13 research outputs found

    When Hypereosinophilia Leads to Stroke

    Get PDF
    AFIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion can only be confirmed through molecular and cytogenetic investigations causing a delay in the diagnosis. However, patients with this mutation need urgent treatment because they present hypereosinophilia which may be associated with short-term tissue damage. Thromboembolism is a known cause of death in hypereosinophilic syndrome. A case of Loeffler endocarditis due to FIP1L1-PDGFRA-associated chronic eosinophilic leukemia presenting hemiparesis with fever, which also mislead the initial diagnosis, is reported

    Multiple myeloma and venous thromboembolic disease : epidemiological, economic, pathophysiological and pharmacological aspects

    No full text
    Comme dans tout cancer, l'association entre myélome multiple et maladie thrombo-embolique veineuse est bien établie. Son incidence au cours du myélome est en moyenne de 10 à 20%. Elle semble plus élevée en cas de myélome de novo et lors de l’utilisation de traitements immunomodulateurs comme le thalidomide. Pourtant, la part de surcroît du risque de thrombose dû à ce traitement n’est pas encore très bien définie. Tout d’abord, nous avons réalisé un bilan de ces pathologies afin de délimiter le champ d’étude grâce à une revue de la littérature. Nous avons ensuite évalué l’incidence de la maladie thrombo-embolique veineuse, identifié les facteurs de risque thrombotique et évalué le classement en groupe de risque des patients présentant un myélome et traités par immunomodulateur grâce à une étude observationnelle, multicentrique, prospective, de la prise en charge des myélomes par les hématologues en France. Par la suite, nous avons réalisé l’analyse médico-économique du seul essai randomisé réalisé à ce jour sur la thrombophylaxie chez les malades présentant un myélome multiple traités par thalidomide en première ligne. Cette étude montre un gain de qualité de vie associé à des économies majeures lors de la prévention de la thrombose par aspirine plutôt que par héparine. Enfin nous avons réalisé 2 études médicales utilisant la génération de thrombine, test biologique de recherche. La première a été effectuée afin d’essayer de prédire les patients qui vont présenter une thrombose. La deuxième a pour but de rechercher l’existence d’une résistance à l’héparine aux doses habituelles utilisées dans cette pathologieThe association between multiple myeloma and venous thromboembolic disease is well established. This incidence in myeloma is on average from 10 to 20%. It appears to be higher in newly diagnosed myeloma and immunomodulatory drugs such as thalidomide might significantly increase the risk. However, the risk of thrombosis due to these treatments is not yet well defined. First, we performed a review of these diseases in order to delimit the field of this study through a literature review. Then, we evaluated the incidence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with myeloma and treated with immunomodulatory, identified the thrombotic risk factors and evaluated the thrombotic risk assessment based on the physicians choice, through an observational, multicenter, prospective French study. Moreover, we performed the medico-economic analysis of the only randomized trial conducted to date on the thrombophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide in the first line of chemotherapy. This analysis showed a gain in quality of life associated with significant cost savings in the prevention of thrombosis by aspirin rather than heparin. Finally we performed two medical studies using thrombin generation test, a global assay that measures the overall tendency of a plasma sample to form thrombin. The first study was conducted to predict patients who will have thrombosis. The second is performed to know if a heparin resistance with the usual doses in this pathology, exist

    External validation of the MidiCAT variant of thrombography: Comparison with calibrated automated thrombography and study of the centrifugation scheme

    No full text
    International audienceIntroduction To perform Calibrated Automated Thrombography (CAT), the use of reduced plasma volumes (referred to as “MidiCAT”) makes it possible to more efficiently use limited volumes of valuable biobanked plasma samples and decreases expenses for reagents. It is, however, unclear whether the MidiCAT procedure is suitable when thrombin generation (TG) is studied in the presence of added thrombomodulin (TG-TM). Moreover, a simplified centrifugation scheme would facilitate biobanking, if appropriate, for more sensitive coagulation studies. We aimed to compare the results of “MidiCAT” (halved plasma and reagent volumes) with those from regular CAT, in the absence or presence of TM, as well as to study the impact of a single-centrifugation scheme for plasma preparation before freezing. Materials and methods Plasma samples were prepared from the citrated blood from 20 Geneva hospital diverse patients without gross coagulation abnormalities with a single- or double-centrifugation scheme. Samples were kept frozen at −80°C and thawed just before the TG assay in duplicate under two conditions: 1 pM tissue factor (TF) or 5 pM TF + TM. Results and discussion (1) We externally validated “MidiCAT” and also extended the validation to TG-TM. Whatever the method (CAT or MidiCAT), intra-assay (assessed with duplicates) CV was below 6% (1 pM TF) or below 10% (5 pM TF + TM) for ETP. Agreement between the MidiCAT and CAT results was satisfactory; the p coefficients were above 0.95 for ETP and above 0.90 for most other parameters; biases for ETP were +10.0% (1 pM FT) and +13.5% (5 pM + TM). (2) The centrifugation scheme markedly affected the results obtained in the presence of TM, whereas the bias and limit of agreement (difference plots) were low for the no TM condition. The bias in the presence of TM was obvious, more marked with plasma samples sensitive to TM when double centrifuged: the lower the ETP-TM, the greater the relative difference between the ETP-TM of plasma samples prepared with just single centrifugation and the reference plasma samples. Thus, a single-centrifugation procedure, as is often used for plasma biobanking, is suitable for TG study only if it is not performed in the presence of TM

    Fulminant hepatitis due to very severe sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS/VOD) after autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation: a case report

    No full text
    Abstract Background Hepatic veno-occlusive disease, also called sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS/VOD), is a potentially fatal complication of allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A plethora of transplant and patient-related risk factors predispose to SOS/VOD and should be taken into account for prognosis assessment as well as for adequate therapeutic intervention. Case presentation We describe the case of a mantle cell lymphoma patient who developed a fulminant hepatitis following oxaliplatin-containing intensive chemotherapy and autologous transplantation. This clinical manifestation was secondary to a very severe SOS/VOD. The patient did not exhibit the usual risk factors and presented a non-classical form with major cytolysis, thus puzzling SOS/VOD diagnosis in this context. Conclusion SOS has been previously reported after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancers, in particular in patients with colorectal liver metastases. We therefore suspected a potential relationship with oxaliplatin-based regimen as a driver of SOS/VOD in a non-susceptible lymphoma patient. With regards to this case, clinicians and especially intensivists should be aware of this atypical presentation

    Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and multiple myeloma patients in real-life: Results of a large survey and clinical guidance recommendations from the IFM group

    No full text
    International audienceVenous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a critical issue in the management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), particularly when immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) combined with dexamethasone therapy are being prescribed as first-line and relapse therapy. One possible explanation for the persistent high rates of VTE, is the use of inappropriate thromboprophylaxis strategies for patients starting antimyeloma treatment. To tackle the issue, the Intergroupe francophone du myélome (IFM) offered convenient guidance for VTE thromboprophylaxis in MM patients initiating systemic therapy. This guidance is mainly supported by the results of a large survey on the clinical habits regarding VTE of physicians who are substantially involved in daily care of MM patients. VTE prophylaxis should be considered for all patients treated with IMiDs in combination with dexamethasone, in the absence of significant comorbidities, such as renal failure or bleeding risk. Anticoagulant should be preferred to antiplatelet agents for thromboprophylaxis. Despite the absence of large randomized controlled trials comparing those attitudes/options, available data on direct oral anticoagulants, which are already used in daily management of MM patients, are consistent with their potential usefulness for VTE prophylaxis in such patients. However, in order to implement a personalized continuous improvement strategy, clinicians must to be organized to collect all the data regarding this management. In other situations, thromboprophylaxis should be evaluated by using risk models and after careful evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio
    corecore