Recommendations for coronavirus infection in rheumatic diseases treated with biologic therapy.

The Coronavirus-associated disease, that was first identified in 2019 in China (CoViD-19), is a pandemic caused by a bat-derived beta-coronavirus, named SARS-CoV2. It shares homology with SARS and MERS-CoV, responsible for past outbreaks in China and in Middle East. SARS-CoV2 spread from China where the first infections were described in December 2019 and is responsible for the respiratory symptoms that can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome. A cytokine storm has been shown in patients who develop fatal complications, as observed in past coronavirus infections. The management includes ventilatory support and broad-spectrum antiviral drugs, empirically utilized, as a targeted therapy and vaccines have not been developed. Based upon our limited knowledge on the pathogenesis of CoViD-19, a potential role of some anti-rheumatic drugs may be hypothesized, acting as direct antivirals or targeting host immune response. Antimalarial drugs, commonly used in rheumatology, may alter the lysosomal proteases that mediates the viral entry into the cell and have demonstrated efficacy in improving the infection. Anti-IL-1 and anti-IL-6 may interfere with the cytokine storm in severe cases and use of tocilizumab has shown good outcomes in a small cohort. Baricitinib has both antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. Checkpoints inhibitors such as anti-CD200 and anti-PD1 could have a role in the treatment of CoViD-19. Rheumatic disease patients taking immunosuppressive drugs should be recommended to maintain the chronic therapy, prevent infection by avoiding social contacts and pausing immunosuppressants in case of infection. National and international registries are being created to collect data on rheumatic patients with CoViD-19

biosimilars new guns for the treatment of rheumatological patients

The advent of biological therapies in 2000s has represented a real revolution in the treatment of patients affected by rheumatic diseases, but biosimilars represent nowadays a further revolution both from an economic point of view and for the accessibility to treatment for rheumatic patients. The main scientific rheumatologic societies have clearly expressed themselves on the biosimilars topic, by highlighting how they represent a great opportunity to contain costs and treat more patients, and these advantages should be accepted by rheumatologists. The use of biosimilars in different European countries varies widely; in fact, in some of them their use is mandatory (at least in naïve patients), while in other countries it is only recommended. The knowledge and consequently the acceptance of biosimilars are different among patients, and this also depends on the correct medical information on this topic. As more and more biosimilars receive regulatory approval and reach the market, it is essential for healthcare professionals to have the right knowledge about them, so that they are properly transferred to their patients. Biosimilars are not identical to the reference product, and clinicians are particularly interested in the safety and effectiveness of switching from the biooriginator to the bio-similar in experienced patients. We will develop these aspects on biosimilars in the present manuscript, for an update on current guidelines in their use in rheumatic patients

Autoantibodies as biomarkers for interstitial lung disease in idiopathic inflammatory myositis and systemic sclerosis: The case of anti-eIF2B antibodies

Objectives: Serum autoantibodies are pivotal for the early detection of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases such as Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) and Poly/Dermatomyositis (PM/DM), and in some cases are associated with organ complications such as interstitial lung disease (ILD). A paradigmatic example is provided by the autoantibody against the Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2B (eIF2B) that has been recently detected in SSc. Methods: Sera from 118 patients with SSc, 8 Poly/Dermatomyositis, 2 overlap SSc/Polymyositis, 4 undifferentiated connective tissue disease-UCTD and 3 healthy controls were tested first by indirect immunofluorescence for anti-nuclear antibodies-ANA pattern. Further, we employed prot ein-radioimmunoprecipitation (IP) and IP- Western Blot for the detection and confirmation of anti-eIF2B antibodies. Serum findings were further correlated with the clinical features of patients. Results: We identified 3 SSc cases (2.5%) positive for anti-eIF2B antibodies while this autoantibody was not detected in control sera. Using protein-IP all three patients manifested the 38kD protein which is the antigenic target of anti-eIF2B antibodies, and this was associated with a cytoplasmic pattern at indirect immunofluorescence. The presence of anti-eIF2B was associated with ILD and a diffuse SSc variant, in one case in association with anti-Scl70/topoI. Conclusions: Our data confirm that a small subgroup (2.5%) of patients with SSc have detectable anti-eIF2B with cytoplasmic-positive staining at immunofluorescence and this reactivity is associated with ILD.Fil: Ceribelli, Angela. Humanitas Research Hospital; ItaliaFil: Isailovic, Natasa. Humanitas Research Hospital; ItaliaFil: De Santis, Maria. Humanitas Research Hospital; ItaliaFil: Gorlino, Carolina Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Biológicas de San Luis. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Biológicas de San Luis; ArgentinaFil: Satoh, Minoru. University Of Occupational And Environmental Health; JapónFil: Selmi, Carlo. Humanitas Research Hospital; Itali

MicroRNAs in systemic rheumatic diseases

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous, non-coding, single-stranded RNAs about 21 nucleotides in length. miRNAs have been shown to regulate gene expression and thus influence a wide range of physiological and pathological processes. Moreover, they are detected in a variety of sources, including tissues, serum, and other body fluids, such as saliva. The role of miRNAs is evident in various malignant and nonmalignant diseases, and there is accumulating evidence also for an important role of miRNAs in systemic rheumatic diseases. Abnormal expression of miRNAs has been reported in autoimmune diseases, mainly in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. miRNAs can be aberrantly expressed even in the different stages of disease progression, allowing miRNAs to be important biomarkers, to help understand the pathogenesis of the disease, and to monitor disease activity and effects of treatment. Different groups have demonstrated a link between miRNA expression and disease activity, as in the case of renal flares in lupus patients. Moreover, miRNAs are emerging as potential targets for new therapeutic strategies of autoimmune disorders. Taken together, recent data demonstrate that miRNAs can influence mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis, relapse, and specific organ involvement of autoimmune diseases. The ultimate goal is the identification of a miRNA target or targets that could be manipulated through specific therapies, aiming at activation or inhibition of specific miRNAs responsible for the development of disease

Clinical significance of rare serum autoantibodies in rheumatic diseases: a systematic literature review

The identification of serum autoantibodies is central in the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD), and an increasing number of specificities have been detected in the past years. This allows an early diagnosis in the active phases of diseases, with the identification of specific disease subsets that may ultimately improve the disease outcomes. Thanks to the use of old and new laboratory techniques that are becoming increasingly available worldwide, the number of rheumatic patients with a specific autoantibody is increasing and this is improving also our knowledge of disease trigger mechanisms. The paradigmatic example is the plethora of serum autoantibodies described in polymyositis and dermatomyositis, coined myositis-specific antibodies (MSA) which include antibodies directed against tRNA synthetases, anti-SRP, anti-Mi-2, and anti-TIF-1γ and can discriminate disease subtypes, particularly when associated with the risk of cancer. As a further example, anti-HMGCR antibodies have been reported in several studies in association with necrotizing autoimmune myositis that may follow statin use. To clarify the current knowledge on these rare specificities, we performed a systematic literature review. We focused on the main features associated to specific autoantibodies that are rarely identified in rheumatic disease, to increase the awareness and scientific knowledge on these autoantibodies in different ethnic groups worldwide.Fil: Ceribelli, Angela. Humanitas Research Hospital; Italia. Università degli Studi di Milano; ItaliaFil: Isailovic, Natasa. Humanitas Research Hospital; ItaliaFil: De Santis, Maria. Humanitas Research Hospital; ItaliaFil: Generali, Elena. Humanitas Research Hospital; ItaliaFil: Gorlino, Carolina Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Biológicas de San Luis. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Biológicas de San Luis; Argentina. Humanitas Research Hospital; ItaliaFil: Palermo, Bianca. Humanitas Research Hospital; ItaliaFil: Selmi, Carlo. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia. Humanitas Research Hospital; Itali

Anti-MJ/NXP-2 antibodies are the most common specifcity in a cohort of adult caucasian patients with dermatomyositis

n/

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with articular involvement: a predictive marker for erosive disease?

summary A small number of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients develops an erosive disease. Some studies have suggested an association between anti-cyclic citrullinated (anti-CCP) antibodies and this pattern of arthritis, but their exact significance in SLE patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of anti-CCP antibodies in SLE patients with different subsets of articular disease. Among 521 SLE patients followed in this center from 1976 to 2011, those with articular involvement (n=298) were selected to take part in the study. We searched for anti-CCP2 IgG antibodies in 198 patients using a commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Immunoscan RA, Eurodiagnostica). In 174 patients the results for rheumatoid factor (RF) by nephelometry were retrospectively collected. C reactive protein (CRP) was obtained from clinical records. Patients were classified into 3 groups: erosive, non-erosive deforming, non-erosive non-deforming arthritis. Results of the different tests were compared among the groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Anti-CCP antibodies were significantly associated with erosive disease. We also found that RF positivity and increased CRP were more frequent in erosive arthritis and erosive or non-deforming arthritis, respectively, than in non-erosive non-deforming arthritis. This study supports the evidence that anti-CCP antibodies could be a useful marker of erosive disease in SLE patients. Increase in RF and CRP could be an additional means of identifying lupus patients with arthritis at risk of a worse prognosis

The role of WNT and IL-1 signaling in osteoarthritis: therapeutic implications for platelet-rich plasma therapy

Different from inflammatory arthritis, where biologicals and targeted synthetic molecules have revolutionized the disease course, no drug has demonstrated a disease modifying activity in osteoarthritis, which remains one of the most common causes of disability and chronic pain worldwide. The pharmacological therapy of osteoarthritis is mainly directed towards symptom and pain relief, and joint replacement is still the only curative strategy. Elucidating the disease pathophysiology is essential to understand which mechanisms can be targeted by innovative therapies. It has extensively been demonstrated that aberrant WNT and IL-1 signaling pathways are responsible for cartilage degeneration, impaired chondrocyte metabolism and differentiation, increased extracellular matrix degradation, and altered subchondral bone homeostasis. Platelet-rich plasma is an autologous blood derivative containing a concentration of platelets that is much higher than the whole blood counterpart and has shown promising results in the treatment of early knee osteoarthritis. Among the proposed mechanisms, the modulation of WNT and IL-1 pathways is of paramount importance and is herein reviewed in light of the proposed regenerative approaches

Frequent coexistence of anti-topoisomerase I and anti-U1RNP autoantibodies in African American patients associated with mild skin involvement: a retrospective clinical study

Introduction: The presence of anti-topoisomerase I (topo I) antibodies is a classic scleroderma (SSc) marker presumably associated with a unique clinical subset. Here the clinical association of anti-topo I was reevaluated in unselected patients seen in a rheumatology clinic setting.Methods: Sera from the initial visit in a cohort of unselected rheumatology clinic patients (n = 1,966, including 434 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 119 SSc, 85 polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM)) were screened by radioimmunoprecipitation. Anti-topo I-positive sera were also tested with immunofluorescence and RNA immunoprecipitation.Results: Twenty-five (15 Caucasian, eight African American, two Latin) anti-topo I positive patients were identified, and all except one met the ACR SSc criteria. Coexistence of other SSc autoantibodies was not observed, except for anti-U1RNP in six cases. When anti-topo I alone versus anti-topo I + U1RNP groups were compared, African American (21% vs. 67%), overlap with SLE (0 vs. 50%; P = 0.009) or PM/DM (0 vs. 33%; P = 0.05) or elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK) (P = 0.07) were more common in the latter group. In comparison of anti-topo I-positive Caucasians versus African Americans, the latter more frequently had anti-U1RNP (13% vs. 50%), mild/no skin changes (14% vs. 63%; P = 0.03) and overlap with SLE (0 vs. 38%; P = 0.03) and PM/DM (0 vs. 25%; P = 0.05).Conclusions: Anti-topo I detected by immunoprecipitation in unselected rheumatology patients is highly specific for SSc. Anti-topo I coexisting with anti-U1RNP in African American patients is associated with a subset of SLE overlapping with SSc and PM/DM but without apparent sclerodermatous changes. \ua9 2011 Satoh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd