Who is to blame? Perspectives of caregivers on barriers to accessing healthcare for the under-fives in Butere District, Western Kenya

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Kenya, like many developing nations, continues to experience high childhood mortality in spite of the many efforts put in place by governments and international bodies to curb it. This study sought to investigate the barriers to accessing healthcare services for children aged less than five years in Butere District, a rural district experiencing high rates of mortality and morbidity despite having relatively better conditions for child survival.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Exit interviews were conducted among caregivers seeking healthcare for their children in mid 2007 in all the 6 public health facilities. Additionally, views from caregivers in the community, health workers and district health managers were sought through focus group discussions (FGDs) and key informant interviews (KIs).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Three hundred and ninety-seven respondents were surveyed in exit interviews while 45 respondents participated in FGDs and KIs. Some practices by caregivers including early onset of child bearing, early supplementation, and utilization of traditional healers were thought to increase the risk of mortality and morbidity, although reported rates of mosquito net utilization and immunization coverage were high. The healthcare system posed barriers to access of healthcare for the under fives, through long waiting time, lack of drugs and poor services, incompetence and perceived poor attitudes of the health workers. FGDs also revealed wide-spread concerns and misconceptions about health care among the caregivers.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Caregivers' actions were thought to influence children's progression to illness or health while the healthcare delivery system posed recurrent barriers to the accessing of healthcare for the under-fives. Actions on both fronts are necessary to reduce childhood mortality.</p

Maternal health in resource-poor urban settings: how does women's autonomy influence the utilization of obstetric care services?

Background: Despite various international efforts initiated to improve maternal health, morethan half a million women worldwide die each year as a result of complications arising frompregnancy and childbirth. This research was guided by the following questions: 1) How doeswomen's autonomy influence the choice of place of delivery in resource-poor urban settings? 2)Does its effect vary by household wealth? and 3) To what extent does women's autonomy mediatethe relationship between women's education and use of health facility for delivery?Methods: The data used is from a maternal health study carried out in the slums of Nairobi, Kenya.A total of 1,927 women (out of 2,482) who had a pregnancy outcome in 2004–2005 were selectedand interviewed. Seventeen variable items on autonomy were used to construct women's decisionmaking,freedom of movement, and overall autonomy. Further, all health facilities serving the studypopulation were assessed with regard to the number, training and competency of obstetric staff;services offered; physical infrastructure; and availability, adequacy and functional status of suppliesand other essential equipment for safe delivery, among others. A total of 25 facilities weresurveyed.Results: While household wealth, education and demographic and health covariates had strongrelationships with place of delivery, the effects of women's overall autonomy, decision-making andfreedom of movement were rather weak. Among middle to least poor households, all threemeasures of women's autonomy were associated with place of delivery, and in the expecteddirection; whereas among the poorest women, they were strong and counter-intuitive. Finally, thestudy showed that autonomy may not be a major mediator of the link between education and useof health services for delivery.Conclusion: The paper argues in favor of broad actions to increase women's autonomy both asan end and as a means to facilitate improved reproductive health outcomes. It also supports thecall for more appropriate data that could further support this line of action. It highlights the needfor efforts to improve households' livelihoods and increase girls' schooling to alter perceptions ofthe value of skilled maternal health care

Child undernutrition in Kenya: trend analyses from 1993 to 2008-09

Background: Research on trends in child undernutrition in Kenya has been hindered by the challenges of changing criteria for classifying undernutrition, and an emphasis in the literature on international comparisons of countries’ situations. There has been little attention to within-country trend analyses. This paper presents child undernutrition trend analyses from 1993 to 2008–09, using the 2006 WHO criteria for undernutrition. The analyses are decomposed by child’s sex and age, and by maternal education level, household Wealth Index, and province, to reveal any departures from the overall national trends. Methods: The study uses the Kenya Demographic and Health Survey data collected from women aged 15–49 years and children aged 0–35 months in 1993, 1998, 2003 and 2008–09. Logistic regression was used to test trends. Results: The prevalence of wasting for boys and girls combined remained stable at the national level but declined significantly among girls aged 0–35 months (p &lt; 0.05). While stunting prevalence remained stagnant generally, the trend for boys aged 0–35 months significantly decreased and that for girls aged 12–23 months significantly increased (p &lt; 0.05). The pattern for underweight in most socio-demographic groups showed a decline. Conclusion: The national trends in childhood undernutrition in Kenya showed significant declines in underweight while trends in wasting and stunting were stagnant. Analyses disaggregated by demographic and socio-economic segments revealed some significant departures from these overall trends, some improving and some worsening. These findings support the importance of conducting trend analyses at detailed levels within countries, to inform the development of better-targeted childcare and feeding interventions