28 research outputs found

    Do's and Don'ts in Primary Aneurysmal Bone Cysts of the Proximal Femur in Children and Adolescents : Retrospective Multicenter EPOS Study of 79 Patients

    Get PDF
    Background:Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABC) are rare benign cystic bone tumors, generally diagnosed in children and adolescents. Proximal femoral ABCs may require specific treatment strategies because of an increased pathologic fracture risk. As few reports are published on ABCs, specifically for this localization, consensus regarding optimal treatment is lacking. We present a large retrospective study on the treatment of pediatric proximal femoral ABCs. Methods:All eligible pediatric patients with proximal femoral ABC were included, from 11 tertiary referral centers for musculo-skeletal oncology (2000-2021). Patient demographics, diagnostics, treatments, and complications were evaluated. Index procedures were categorized as percutaneous/open procedures and osteosynthesis alone. Primary outcomes were: time until full weight-bearing and failure-free survival. Failure was defined as open procedure after primary surgery, >3 percutaneous procedures, recurrence, and/or fracture. Risk factors for failure were evaluated. Results:Seventy-nine patients with ABC were included [mean age, 10.2 (+/- SD4.0) y, n=56 male]. The median follow-up was 5.1 years (interquartile ranges=2.5 to 8.8).Index procedure was percutaneous procedure (n=22), open procedure (n=35), or osteosynthesis alone (n=22). The median time until full weight-bearing was 13 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI)=7.9-18.1] for open procedures, 9 weeks (95% CI=1.4-16.6) for percutaneous, and 6 weeks (95% CI=4.3-7.7) for osteosynthesis alone (P=0.1). Failure rates were 41%, 43%, and 36%, respectively. Overall, 2 and 5-year failure-free survival was 69.6% (95% CI=59.2-80.0) and 54.5% (95% CI=41.6-67.4), respectively. Risk factors associated with failure were age younger than 10 years [hazard ratios (HR)=2.9, 95% CI=1.4-5.8], cyst volume >55 cm(3) (HR=1.7, 95% CI=0.8-2.5), and fracture at diagnosis (HR=1.4, 95% CI=0.7-3.3). Conclusions:As both open and percutaneous procedures along with osteosynthesis alone seem viable treatment options in this weight-bearing location, optimal treatment for proximal femoral ABCs remains unclear. The aim of the treatment was to achieve local cyst control while minimizing complications and ensuring that children can continue their normal activities as soon as possible. A personalized balance should be maintained between undertreatment, with potentially higher risks of pathologic fractures, prolonged periods of partial weight-bearing, or recurrences, versus overtreatment with large surgical procedures, and associated risks.Peer reviewe

    The treatment of metastases in the appendicular skeleton

    No full text
    A new protocol for surgical treatment of metastases of appendicular skeleton is described

    A new protocol of surgical treatment of long bone metastases

    No full text
    Background. The choice of proper treatment way is one of the most important things in surgically treated long bones metastases. The aim of this research was evaluation of the treatment way according to neoplasm's type and metastasis localisation and spreading. Material and methods. The evaluation underwent 158 patients who were divided in 4 groups. The first one consists of 13 patients with single metastasis of cancer with good prognosis. In the second group were 69 patients with bone fracture. The third group included 36 patients with such bone destruction that fracture was expected. The last fourth one had 40 patients with osteoblastic metastases or osteolitic in unloaded bones. Results and Discussion. In group I long lasting reconstructive implants are required and postoperative irradiation is recommended, in groups II and III the aggressiveness of treatment should be related to three parameters: survival expectancy, mechanical properties of the affected bone, predictive response to adjuvants. Based on the above parameters the quidelines of the protocol allow to identify the most appropriate reconstructive indication for every single case ranging from simple osteosynthesis (bad prognosis, low fracture risk, goodresponse to adjuvants) to prosthetic replacement (good prognosis, high fracture risk, bad response to adjuvants). Patients from group IV were admitted to oncology treatment ward after biopsy

    Malignant primary chest wall tumours: techniques of reconstruction and survival

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: We analysed our experience in primary malignant chest-wall tumours (PMCWTs) with an emphasis on a new reconstruction technique and on survival. METHODS: From 1998 to 2008, 41 patients (23 (56%) male, mean age 48 years) with PMCWT were operated in our unit: chondrosarcoma n=25; osteosarcoma n=8; Ewing's sarcoma n=2; other n=6. We performed nine sternectomies and 32 lateral chest-wall resections (median number of ribs resected=3.5). Resections were extended to the lung (n=2), diaphragm (n=3), vertebral body (n=3), scapula (n=1) and upper limb (n=1). Stability was obtained by a prosthetic material, rigid and non-rigid and a muscular flap. As non-rigid material, we mostly used a polytetrafluoroethylene patch (n=24). In the past 2 years, two patients (one total sternectomy and one wide anterior chest-wall resection) were reconstructed with a rigid system composed of mouldable titanium connecting bars and rib clips (Strasbourg Thoracic Osteosyntheses System--STRATOS, MedXpert GMbH, Heitersheim, Germany). A muscular flap was added in 12 patients (29.3%). RESULTS: There was no perioperative mortality or significant morbidity and all patients were extubated within first 24h. At a mean follow-up of 60.5 months (range 4-130 months), the overall 5- and 10-year survival was 61% and 47%, respectively. In the chondrosarcoma group, 5- and 10-year survival was 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Wide resection with tumour-free margins is necessary in PMCWT to minimise local recurrence and to contribute to long-term survival. The STRATOS system, developed for chest-wall replacement, allows a firm reconstruction, simple to handle and to fix, avoiding instability or paradoxical movement also in wide chest-wall resections

    Treatment of calcaneal tumors by calcanectomy and reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest structural graft

    No full text
    Goals: Different techniques have been described for treatment of tumors of the calcaneus, when a complete excision of the calcaneus is necessary. Due to the rarity of this condition, reports in Literature mostly concerned single case reports. The Authors describe their experience in reconstruction of the calcaneus with a vascularized structural iliac graft in three patients. Methods: The vascularized graft was shaped to adequately fit the gap left by calcaneal excision and to present an adequate inferior side for weight-bearing heel function, rotating the graft to place the superior iliac crest on the plantar side. A groove was created on the lower surface of the talus for graft setting; fixation was achieved by screws from the crest to the talus and the cuboid in two cases and with a plate from the crest to the cuboid and screws to the talus in one case. Patients were affected by osteoblastoma (1 case), benign fibrous istiocitoma (1 case) and giant cell tumor (1 case). Age at surgery ranged from 18 to 29 (average 24). Results: In all cases fusion of the graft occurred without complications and no secondary surgical procedure was needed. Complete weight-bearing was allowed at about 6 months from surgery. All patients were continuously disease free at an average follow-up of 60.3 months (ranging from 20 to 89). At follow-up MSTS/ISOLS functional score was respectively 93,3%, 93,3% and 53,3.% in the three patients. In two patients there was no pain and an unlimited walking ability; the third patient (the one with the shortest follow-up) presented a complete radiographic fusion of the graft but he complained of persistent heel pain on weight-bearing. A gait analysis and baropodometric evaluation was performed at follow-up.and results are presented and discussed. Conclusion: Reconstruction of a functional heel after calcaneal excision is a challenging procedure. In Authors’ experience, the use of a vascularized structural iliac crest graft showed to be a mechanical effective procedure, durable in time and with satisfactory functional results

    Different reconstructive techniques for tumours of the distal tibia

    No full text
    AIMS: The aim of this study was to report the results of three forms of reconstruction for patients with a ditsl tibial bone tumour: an intercalary resection and reconstruction, an osteoarticular reconstruction, and arthrodesis of the ankle.METHODS: A total of 73 patients with a median age of 19 years (interquartile range (IQR) 14 to 36) were included in this retrospective, multicentre study.RESULTS: Reconstructions included intercalary resection in 17 patients, osteoarticular reconstruction in 11, and ankle arthrodesis in 45. The median follow-up was 77 months (IQR 35 to 130). Local recurrence occurred in eight patients after a median of 14 months (IQR 9 to 36), without a correlation with adequacy of margins or reconstructive technique. Major complications included fracture of the graft in ten patients, nonunion of the proximal osteotomy in seven, and infection in five. In the osteoarticular group, three of 11 patients developed radiological evidence of severe osteoarthritis, but only one was symptomatic and required conversion to ankle arthrodesis. Functional evaluation showed higher values of the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores in the intercalary group compared with the others.CONCLUSION: Preservation of the epiphysis in patients with a distal tibial bone tumour is a safe and effective form of limb-sparing treatment. It requires rigorous preoperative planning after accurate analysis of the imaging. When joint-sparing resection is not indicated, ankle arthrodesis, either isolated tibiotalar or combined tibiotalar and subtalar arthrodesis, should be preferred over osteoarticular reconstruction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1567-1573
    corecore