Characterization of a chromatin complex involved in the post-transcriptional gene silencing

Le PTGS (post-transcriptional gene silencing) est un mécanisme de défense qui cible les acides nucléiques invasifs d’origines endogènes (transposons) ou exogènes (pathogènes, transgènes). Des mutations dans les gènes JMJ14 et NAC52 ont été isolées lors d’un crible génétique visant à identifier des mutants déficients en PTGS. JMJ14 code une histone déméthylase ciblant la lysine 4 bi- ou tri-méthylée de l’histone H3, tandis que NAC52 code un facteur de transcription. Ces deux protéines forment un complexe qui régule la transcription de centaines de gènes endogènes. Toutefois, le rôle de ce complexe chromatinien dans l’expression des transgènes et surtout dans le PTGS reste incompris. JMJ14 interagit avec NAC52 mais aussi avec une protéine de type guanine exchange factor de la famille RCC1. Des mutations dans l’un ou l’autre des membres du complexe RCC1-JMJ14-NAC52 réduisent la transcription des transgènes. JMJ14 se fixe au promoteur de façon indépendante de NAC52, tandis que NAC52 a besoin de JMJ14 pour se fixer à la région transcrite. Toutefois, JMJ14 et NAC52 ne semblent pas requis pour la transcription proprement dite. En effet, un niveau normal de transcription est restauré chez le double mutant jmj14 drm2, indiquant que le rôle du complexe RCC1-JMJ14-NAC52 semble être d’empêcher la méthylation de novo du promoteur par DRM2.L’effet des mutations jmj14 et nac52 sur la transcription des transgènes ne peut expliquer leur effet sur certaines formes de PTGS. En effet, les mutations jmj14 et nac52 n’affectent pas le PTGS induit constitutivement. Par contre, elles empêchent la systémie du PTGS induit localement. Des mutations dans le gène SPCL45 codant une Serine Carboxy Peptidase-Like qui interagit avec NAC52, mais pas JMJ14, ont le même effet. En revanche, la mutation rcc1 n’affecte pas la systémie du PTGS, suggérant que c’est au sein d’un complexe JMJ14-NAC2-SPCL45 que JMJ14 et NAC52 contrôlent le PTGS systémique. Ce complexe pourrait agir directement sur la chromatine du transgène pour permettre d’enclencher le PTGS en réponse à la perception du signal systémique, ou indirectement en contrôlant l’expression d’un gène endogène codant une protéine régulant la systémie du PTGS. Afin de mieux comprendre le rôle de JMJ14 dans la systémie du PTGS, un crible génétique visant à isoler des suppresseurs de la mutation jmj14 a été réalisé. Seize mutants correspondants à sept gènes codant des protéines ayant un rapport avec la chromatine et une action antagoniste à JMJ14 ont été caractérisés. Les mutations dans ces sept gènes pourraient supprimer l’effet de jmj14 en augmentant la transcription du transgène cible et donc la quantité du signal systémique de PTGS. Un 17ème mutant pourrait quant à lui affecter qualitativement le signal systémique de PTGS ou la perception du signal dans les cellules qui le reçoivent. Le gène correspondant reste à identifier.Post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) is a defense mechanism that targets invading nucleic acids from endogenous (transposons) or exogenous (pathogens, transgenes) origins. Mutations in JMJ14 and NAC52 have been retrieved from a genetic screen aiming to identify PTGS deficient mutants. JMJ14 encodes an histone demethylase targeting the bi- or tri-methylated lysine 4 of histone H3, while NAC52 encodes a transcription factor. Both act in a complex that regulates the transcription of hundreds endogenous genes. However, the function of this chromatin complex in transgene expression and in PTGS is not known. JMJ14 interacts with NAC52 but also with a guanine exchange factor of the RCC1 family. Mutations in any member of the RCC1-JMJ14-NAC52 complex reduce transgene transcription. JMJ14 binds to the transgene promoter independently of NAC52, whereas NAC52 requires JMJ14 to bind on the transcribed region. However, JMJ14 and NAC52 do not seem to be required for transcription itself. Indeed, a wild-type level of transcription is restored in the jmj14 drm2 double mutant, suggesting that the complex RCC1-JMJ14-NAC52 prevents de novo DNA methylation of the promoter by DRM2. The effects of jmj14 and nac52 mutations on transgene transcription cannot explain their specific effect on some forms of PTGS. Indeed, jmj14 and nac52 do not affect constitutively-induced PTGS, but prevent the systemic spreading of locally-induced PTGS. Mutations in SCPL45, encoding a Serine-Carboxy Peptidase-Like that interacts with NAC52, but not JMJ14, have the same effect. In contrast, rcc1 does not affect the systemic PTGS, suggesting that a JMJ14-NAC52-SCPL45 complex is involved in the control of systemic PTGS. This complex could act directly on transgene chromatin to trigger PTGS in response to the PTGS signal, or indirectly by controlling the expression of an endogenous gene encoding a protein regulating systemic PTGS. To better understand the function of JMJ14 in systemic PTGS, a genetic screen aiming to identify suppressors of jmj14 have been performed. Sixteen mutants corresponding to seven genes encoding proteins related to chromatin and having an antagonist function to JMJ14, have been characterized. Mutations in theses seven genes could suppress jmj14 by increasing transgene transcription and consequently the quantity of the PTGS systemic signal. A seventeenth mutant could have a qualitative effect on the PTGS systemic signal or could affect the perception of this signal in recipient cells. The corresponding gene remains to identify

Caractérisation d'un complexe chromatinien impliqué dans l'inactivation post-transcriptionnelle des ARNs

Post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) is a defense mechanism that targets invading nucleic acids from endogenous (transposons) or exogenous (pathogens, transgenes) origins. Mutations in JMJ14 and NAC52 have been retrieved from a genetic screen aiming to identify PTGS deficient mutants. JMJ14 encodes an histone demethylase targeting the bi- or tri-methylated lysine 4 of histone H3, while NAC52 encodes a transcription factor. Both act in a complex that regulates the transcription of hundreds endogenous genes. However, the function of this chromatin complex in transgene expression and in PTGS is not known. JMJ14 interacts with NAC52 but also with a guanine exchange factor of the RCC1 family. Mutations in any member of the RCC1-JMJ14-NAC52 complex reduce transgene transcription. JMJ14 binds to the transgene promoter independently of NAC52, whereas NAC52 requires JMJ14 to bind on the transcribed region. However, JMJ14 and NAC52 do not seem to be required for transcription itself. Indeed, a wild-type level of transcription is restored in the jmj14 drm2 double mutant, suggesting that the complex RCC1-JMJ14-NAC52 prevents de novo DNA methylation of the promoter by DRM2. The effects of jmj14 and nac52 mutations on transgene transcription cannot explain their specific effect on some forms of PTGS. Indeed, jmj14 and nac52 do not affect constitutively-induced PTGS, but prevent the systemic spreading of locally-induced PTGS. Mutations in SCPL45, encoding a Serine-Carboxy Peptidase-Like that interacts with NAC52, but not JMJ14, have the same effect. In contrast, rcc1 does not affect the systemic PTGS, suggesting that a JMJ14-NAC52-SCPL45 complex is involved in the control of systemic PTGS. This complex could act directly on transgene chromatin to trigger PTGS in response to the PTGS signal, or indirectly by controlling the expression of an endogenous gene encoding a protein regulating systemic PTGS. To better understand the function of JMJ14 in systemic PTGS, a genetic screen aiming to identify suppressors of jmj14 have been performed. Sixteen mutants corresponding to seven genes encoding proteins related to chromatin and having an antagonist function to JMJ14, have been characterized. Mutations in theses seven genes could suppress jmj14 by increasing transgene transcription and consequently the quantity of the PTGS systemic signal. A seventeenth mutant could have a qualitative effect on the PTGS systemic signal or could affect the perception of this signal in recipient cells. The corresponding gene remains to identify.Le PTGS (post-transcriptional gene silencing) est un mécanisme de défense qui cible les acides nucléiques invasifs d’origines endogènes (transposons) ou exogènes (pathogènes, transgènes). Des mutations dans les gènes JMJ14 et NAC52 ont été isolées lors d’un crible génétique visant à identifier des mutants déficients en PTGS. JMJ14 code une histone déméthylase ciblant la lysine 4 bi- ou tri-méthylée de l’histone H3, tandis que NAC52 code un facteur de transcription. Ces deux protéines forment un complexe qui régule la transcription de centaines de gènes endogènes. Toutefois, le rôle de ce complexe chromatinien dans l’expression des transgènes et surtout dans le PTGS reste incompris. JMJ14 interagit avec NAC52 mais aussi avec une protéine de type guanine exchange factor de la famille RCC1. Des mutations dans l’un ou l’autre des membres du complexe RCC1-JMJ14-NAC52 réduisent la transcription des transgènes. JMJ14 se fixe au promoteur de façon indépendante de NAC52, tandis que NAC52 a besoin de JMJ14 pour se fixer à la région transcrite. Toutefois, JMJ14 et NAC52 ne semblent pas requis pour la transcription proprement dite. En effet, un niveau normal de transcription est restauré chez le double mutant jmj14 drm2, indiquant que le rôle du complexe RCC1-JMJ14-NAC52 semble être d’empêcher la méthylation de novo du promoteur par DRM2.L’effet des mutations jmj14 et nac52 sur la transcription des transgènes ne peut expliquer leur effet sur certaines formes de PTGS. En effet, les mutations jmj14 et nac52 n’affectent pas le PTGS induit constitutivement. Par contre, elles empêchent la systémie du PTGS induit localement. Des mutations dans le gène SPCL45 codant une Serine Carboxy Peptidase-Like qui interagit avec NAC52, mais pas JMJ14, ont le même effet. En revanche, la mutation rcc1 n’affecte pas la systémie du PTGS, suggérant que c’est au sein d’un complexe JMJ14-NAC2-SPCL45 que JMJ14 et NAC52 contrôlent le PTGS systémique. Ce complexe pourrait agir directement sur la chromatine du transgène pour permettre d’enclencher le PTGS en réponse à la perception du signal systémique, ou indirectement en contrôlant l’expression d’un gène endogène codant une protéine régulant la systémie du PTGS. Afin de mieux comprendre le rôle de JMJ14 dans la systémie du PTGS, un crible génétique visant à isoler des suppresseurs de la mutation jmj14 a été réalisé. Seize mutants correspondants à sept gènes codant des protéines ayant un rapport avec la chromatine et une action antagoniste à JMJ14 ont été caractérisés. Les mutations dans ces sept gènes pourraient supprimer l’effet de jmj14 en augmentant la transcription du transgène cible et donc la quantité du signal systémique de PTGS. Un 17ème mutant pourrait quant à lui affecter qualitativement le signal systémique de PTGS ou la perception du signal dans les cellules qui le reçoivent. Le gène correspondant reste à identifier

Mikrobiologi Kedokteran

XV.753 hal.; ill.; 27 c

sgs1: a neomorphic nac52 allele impairing post-transcriptional gene silencing through SGS3 downregulation

Post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) is a defense mechanism that targets invading nucleic acids from endogenous (transposons) or exogenous (pathogens, transgenes) sources. Genetic screens based on the reactivation of silenced transgenes have long been used to identify cellular components and regulators of PTGS. Here we show that the first isolated PTGS-deficient mutant, sgs1, is impaired in the transcription factor NAC52. This mutant exhibits striking similarities to a mutant impaired in the H3K4me3 demethylase JMJ14 isolated from the same genetic screen. These similarities include increased transgene promoter DNA methylation, reduced H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 levels, reduced PolII occupancy and reduced transgene mRNA accumulation. It is likely that increased DNA methylation is the cause of reduced transcription because the effect of jmj14 and sgs1 on transgene transcription is suppressed by drm2, a mutation that compromises de novo DNA methylation, suggesting that the JMJ14-NAC52 module promotes transgene transcription by preventing DNA methylation. Remarkably, sgs1 has a stronger effect than jmj14 and nac52 null alleles on PTGS systems requiring siRNA amplification, and this is due to reduced SGS3 mRNA levels in sgs1. Given that the sgs1 mutation changes a conserved amino acid of the NAC proteins involved in homodimerization, we propose that sgs1 corresponds to a neomorphic nac52 allele encoding a mutant protein that lacks wild-type NAC52 activity but promotes SGS3 downregulation. Together, these results indicate that impairment of PTGS in sgs1 is due to its dual effect on transgene transcription and SGS3 transcription, thus compromising siRNA amplification

Transgenerational effect of mutants in the RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway on the triploid block in Arabidopsis

International audienceAbstract Background Hybridization of plants that differ in number of chromosome sets (ploidy) frequently causes endosperm failure and seed arrest, a phenomenon referred to as triploid block. In Arabidopsis , loss of function of NRPD1 , encoding the largest subunit of the plant-specific RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV), can suppress the triploid block. Pol IV generates short RNAs required to guide de novo methylation in the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway. Recent work suggests that suppression of the triploid block by mutants in RdDM components differs, depending on whether the diploid pollen is derived from tetraploid plants or from the omission in second division 1 ( osd1 ) mutant. This study aims to understand this difference. Results In this study, we find that the ability of mutants in the RdDM pathway to suppress the triploid block depends on their degree of inbreeding. While first homozygous generation mutants in RdDM components NRPD1 , RDR2 , NRPE1 , and DRM2 have weak or no ability to rescue the triploid block, they are able to suppress the triploid block with successive generations of inbreeding. Inbreeding of nrpd1 was connected with a transgenerational loss of non-CG DNA methylation on sites jointly regulated by CHROMOMETHYLASES 2 and 3. Conclusions Our data reveal that loss of RdDM function differs in its effect in early and late generations, which has important implications when interpreting the effect of RdDM mutants

Allergic delayed drug hypersensitivity is more frequently diagnosed in drug reaction, eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome than in exanthema induced by beta-lactam antibiotics

International audienc

Polymerase IV Plays a Crucial Role in Pollen Development in Capsella.

In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), DNA-dependent RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) is required for the formation of transposable element (TE)-derived small RNA transcripts. These transcripts are processed by DICER-LIKE3 into 24-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that guide RNA-directed DNA methylation. In the pollen grain, Pol IV is also required for the accumulation of 21/22-nucleotide epigenetically activated siRNAs, which likely silence TEs via post-transcriptional mechanisms. Despite this proposed role of Pol IV, its loss of function in Arabidopsis does not cause a discernible pollen defect. Here, we show that the knockout of NRPD1, encoding the largest subunit of Pol IV, in the Brassicaceae species Capsella (Capsella rubella), caused postmeiotic arrest of pollen development at the microspore stage. As in Arabidopsis, all TE-derived siRNAs were depleted in Capsella nrpd1 microspores. In the wild-type background, the same TEs produced 21/22-nucleotide and 24-nucleotide siRNAs; these processes required Pol IV activity. Arrest of Capsella nrpd1 microspores was accompanied by the deregulation of genes targeted by Pol IV-dependent siRNAs. TEs were much closer to genes in Capsella compared with Arabidopsis, perhaps explaining the essential role of Pol IV in pollen development in Capsella. Our discovery that Pol IV is functionally required in Capsella microspores emphasizes the relevance of investigating different plant models

Conditions of bifidobacterial colonization in preterm infants: A prospective analysis

Background: Premature birth results in a delayed and abnormal qualitative pattern of gut colonization. This abnormal pattern is thought to affect intestinal development and contribute to a higher risk of gastrointestinal infectious diseases such as neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). In particular, bifidobacteria are thought to play a major role. We therefore studied bifidobacterial colonization in preterm infants during the first month of life. Patients and Methods: Fecal samples were prospectively analyzed in 52 infants born at a gestational age ranging from 30 to 35 weeks fed with a preterm formula alone and, in 18, with their mother's milk. Fecal samples were collected twice per week during the hospital stay. Bifidobacterial colonization was analyzed with culture and a molecular method. Results: Bifidobacterial colonization occurred in 18 infants at a median age of 11 days, always greater than the corrected mean gestational age of 35.4 weeks (SD, 0.9) and greater than 34 weeks for 16 of 18. Colonization by bifidobacteria was affected by neither birthweight nor mode of delivery nor antibiotics given to the mother or infant. In contrast, birth gestational age had a significant impact on colonization by bifidobacteria (P < 0.05), which always occurred in children born at a birth gestational age greater than 32.9 weeks (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Birth gestational age seems to act as a major determinant of bifidobacterial colonization in the premature infant, suggesting the role of gut maturation, a finding that should probably be taken into account in manipulations of the gut flora aimed at reducing NEC