9 research outputs found
What is desirable care in the opinion of formal and informal caregivers in nursing-home care for patients with dementia?
Aim
To examine care characteristics related to desirable care as reported by formal and informal caregivers in Dutch Psycho‐geriatric nursing homes for patients with dementia.
Design
Qualitative exploratory study.
Methods
The sample consisted of four nursing homes. In each home, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with a manager, a quality advisor or head nurse, a daily care supervisor and an informal caregiver. The findings were analysed by labelling and coding the text fragments.
Results
The 16 semi‐structured interviews contained 60 discussion items. The 16 items that were shared by the four interviewee categories were clustered into the following six major themes: good quality of care; poor quality of care; elements of a vision; extra hands; bureaucracy; and formal caregivers
Factors influencing quality of life following lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a systematic review of the literature
Background: The majority of lower limb amputations are undertaken in people with peripheral arterial occlusive disease,\ud
and approximately 50% have diabetes. Quality of life is an important outcome in lower limb amputations; little is known\ud
about what influences it, and therefore how to improve it.\ud
Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to identify the factors that influence quality of life after lower limb\ud
amputation for peripheral arterial occlusive disease.\ud
Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched to identify\ud
articles that quantitatively measured quality of life in those with a lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial occlusive\ud
disease. Articles were quality assessed by two assessors, evidence tables summarised each article and a narrative\ud
synthesis was performed.\ud
Study design: Systematic review.\ud
Results: Twelve articles were included. Study designs and outcome measures used varied. Quality assessment scores\ud
ranged from 36% to 92%. The ability to walk successfully with a prosthesis had the greatest positive impact on quality\ud
of life. A trans-femoral amputation was negatively associated with quality of life due to increased difficulty in walking\ud
with a prosthesis. Other factors such as older age, being male, longer time since amputation, level of social support and\ud
presence of diabetes also negatively affected quality of life.\ud
Conclusion: Being able to walk with a prosthesis is of primary importance to improve quality of life for people with lower\ud
limb amputation due to peripheral arterial occlusive disease. To further understand and improve the quality of life of this\ud
population, there is a need for more prospective longitudinal studies, with a standardised outcome measure
The effects of increased therapy time on cognition and mood in frail patients with a stroke who rehabilitate on rehabilitation units of nursing homes in the Netherlands: a protocol of a comparative study
Is patient-grouping on basis of condition on admission indicative for discharge destination in geriatric stroke patients after rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities? The results of a cluster analysis
Contains fulltext :
108448.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access
Home after a stroke; ‘thatʼs when it really begins’. A qualitative study into the needs for aftercare of stroke patients after being discharged home
Determinants of rehabilitation outcome in geriatric patients admitted to skilled nursing facilities after stroke: a Dutch multi-centre cohort study
Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVE: to identify important demographic, clinical and functional determinants of successful discharge of geriatric patients from skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), particularly the role of multi-morbidity. DESIGN: prospective cohort study with data collection at baseline and at discharge. SETTING: fifteen SNFs in the Netherlands. Participants: of 378 eligible patients, 186 were included. METHODS: multi-disciplinary teams recorded demographic and disease characteristics, as well as functional status, cognitive functioning and multi-morbidity on admission. The study outcomes were discharge to an independent living situation within 1 year of admission and functional status at discharge (Barthel index). RESULTS: of the included 186 patients, 175 were followed up. Of these patients, 123 (70%) were successfully discharged. High Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Star Cancellation test (SCT) scores independently contributed to 48% of the variance of functional status at discharge, while low age, high BBS and SCT scores were independently related to successful discharge, explaining 33% of the variance. Multi-morbidity was not an independent determinant of rehabilitation outcome. CONCLUSION: geriatric patients admitted for 'low intensity' rehabilitation in SNFs after stroke appeared to have a fair prognosis for being successfully discharged. Postural control was an important determinant of both outcome measures
Geriatric rehabilitation of stroke patients in nursing homes: a study protocol.
Contains fulltext :
88482.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Geriatric patients are typically underrepresented in studies on the functional outcome of rehabilitation after stroke. Moreover, most geriatric stroke patients do probably not participate in intensive rehabilitation programs as offered by rehabilitation centers. As a result, very few studies have described the successfulness of geriatric stroke rehabilitation in nursing home patients, although it appears that the majority of these patients are being discharged back to the community, rather than being transferred to residential care. Nevertheless, factors associated with the successfulness of stroke rehabilitation in nursing homes or skilled nursing facilities are largely unknown. The primary goal of this study is, therefore, to assess the factors that uniquely contribute to the successfulness of rehabilitation in geriatric stroke patients that undergo rehabilitation in nursing homes. A secondary goal is to investigate whether these factors are similar to those associated with the outcome of stroke rehabilitation in the literature. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is part of the Geriatric Rehabilitation in AMPutation and Stroke (GRAMPS) study in the Netherlands. It is a longitudinal, observational, multicenter study in 15 nursing homes in the Southern part of the Netherlands that aims to include at least 200 patients. All participating nursing homes are selected based on the existence of a specialized rehabilitation unit and the provision of dedicated multidisciplinary care. Patient characteristics, disease characteristics, functional status, cognition, behavior, and caregiver information, are collected within two weeks after admission to the nursing home. The first follow-up is at discharge from the nursing home or one year after inclusion, and focuses on functional status and behavior. Successful rehabilitation is defined as discharge from the nursing home to an independent living situation within one year after admission. The second follow-up is three months after discharge in patients who rehabilitated successfully, and assesses functional status, behavior, and quality of life. All instruments used in this study have shown to be valid and reliable in rehabilitation research or are recommended by the Netherlands Heart Foundation guidelines for stroke rehabilitation.Data will be analyzed using SPSS 16.0. Besides descriptive analyses, both univariate and multivariate analyses will be performed with the purpose of identifying associated factors as well as their unique contribution to determining successful rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: This study will provide more information about geriatric stroke rehabilitation in Dutch nursing homes. To our knowledge, this is the first large study that focuses on the determinants of success of geriatric stroke rehabilitation in nursing home patients
Comparison of eight prehospital stroke scales to detect intracranial large-vessel occlusion in suspected stroke (PRESTO): a prospective observational study
Background Due to the time-sensitive effect of endovascular treatment, rapid prehospital identification of large-vessel occlusion in individuals with suspected stroke is essential to optimise outcome. Interhospital transfers are an important cause of delay of endovascular treatment. Prehospital stroke scales have been proposed to select patients with large-vessel occlusion for direct transport to an endovascular-capable intervention centre. We aimed to prospectively validate eight prehospital stroke scales in the field.Methods We did a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of adults with suspected stroke (aged >= 18 years) who were transported by ambulance to one of eight hospitals in southwest Netherlands. Suspected stroke was defined by a positive Face-Arm-Speech-Time (FAST) test. We included individuals with blood glucose of at least 2.5 mmol/L. People who presented more than 6 h after symptom onset were excluded from the analysis. After structured training, paramedics used a mobile app to assess items from eight prehospital stroke scales: Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE), Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS), Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool (C-STAT), GazeFace-Arm-Speech-Time (G-FAST), Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity (PASS), Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS), Conveniently-Grasped Field Assessment Stroke Triage (CG-FAST), and the FAST-PLUS (Face-Arm-Speech-Time plus severe arm or leg motor deficit) test. The primary outcome was the clinical diagnosis of ischaemic stroke with a proximal intracranial large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation (aLVO) on CT angiography. Baseline neuroimaging was centrally assessed by neuroradiologists to validate the true occlusion status. Prehospital stroke scale performance was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and was compared with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores assessed by clinicians at the emergency department. This study was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register, NL7387.Findings Between Aug 13,2018, and Sept 2,2019,1039 people (median age 72 years [IQR 61-811]) with suspected stroke were identified by paramedics, of whom 120 (12%) were diagnosed with aLVO. Of all prehospital stroke scales, the AUC for RACE was highest (0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.86), followed by the AUC for G-FAST (0-80,0.76-0-84), CG-FAST (0.80, 0.76-0-84), LAMS (0.79, 0.75-0.83), CPSS (0.79, 0.75-0.83), PASS (0.76, 0.72-0.80), C-STAT (0.75, 0-71-0.80), and FAST-PLUS (0.72, 0.67-0.76). The NIHSS as assessed by a clinician in the emergency department did somewhat better than the prehospital stroke scales with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.89).Interpretation Prehospital stroke scales detect aLVO with acceptable-to-good accuracy. RACE, G-FAST, and CG-FAST are the best performing prehospital stroke scales out of the eight scales tested and approach the performance of the clinician-assessed NIHSS. Further studies are needed to investigate whether use of these scales in regional transportation strategies can optimise outcomes of patients with ischaemic stroke. Copyright (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Neuro Imaging Researc