Microvesicle and tunneling nanotube mediated intercellular transfer of g-protein coupled receptors in cell cultures.

none12Recent evidence shows that cells exchange collections of signals via microvesicles (MVs) and tunneling nano-tubes (TNTs). In this paper we have investigated whether in cell cultures GPCRs can be transferred by means of MVs and TNTs from a source cell to target cells. Western blot, transmission electron microscopy and gene expression analyses demonstrate that A(2A) and D(2) receptors are present in released MVs. In order to further demonstrate the involvement of MVs in cell-to-cell communication we created two populations of cells (HEK293T and COS-7) transiently transfected with D(2)R-CFP or A(2A)R-YFP. These two types of cells were co-cultured, and FRET analysis demonstrated simultaneously positive cells to the D(2)R-CFP and A(2A)R-YFP. Fluorescence microscopy analysis also showed that GPCRs can move from one cell to another also by means of TNTs. Finally, recipient cells pre-incubated for 24 h with A(2A)R positive MVs were treated with the adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS-21680. The significant increase in cAMP accumulation clearly demonstrated that A(2A)Rs were functionally competent in target cells. These findings demonstrate that A(2A) receptors capable of recognizing and decoding extracellular signals can be safely transferred via MVs from source to target cells.openM. Guescini; G. Leo; S. Genedani; C. Carone; F. Pederzoli; F. Ciruela; D. Guidolin; V. Stocchi; M. Mantuano; D.O. Borroto-Escuela; K. Fuxe; L.F. AgnatiGuescini, Michele; G., Leo; S., Genedani; C., Carone; F., Pederzoli; F., Ciruela; D., Guidolin; Stocchi, Vilberto; Mantuano, Michela; D. O., Borroto Escuela; K., Fuxe; L. F., Agnat

Heteroreceptor complexes formed by dopamine D1, histamine H3 and N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors as targets to prevent neuronal death in Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder causing progressive memory loss and cognitive dysfunction. Anti-AD strategies targeting cell receptors consider them as isolated units. However, many cell surface receptors cooperate and physically contact each other forming complexes having different biochemical properties than individual receptors. We here report the discovery of dopamine D , histamine H , and N-methylD-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor heteromers in heterologous systems and in rodent brain cortex. Heteromers were detected by coimmunoprecipitation and in situ proximity ligation assays (PLA) in the rat cortex where H receptor agonists, via negative cross-talk, and H receptor antagonists, via cross-antagonism, decreased D receptor agonist signaling determined by ERK1/2 or Akt phosphorylation and counteracted D receptormediated excitotoxic cell death. Both D and H receptor antagonists also counteracted NMDA toxicity suggesting a complex interaction between NMDA receptors and D -H receptor heteromer function. Likely due to heteromerization, H receptors act as allosteric regulator for D and NMDA receptors. By bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), we demonstrated that D or H receptors form heteromers with NR1A/NR2B NMDA receptor subunits. D -H -NMDA receptor complexes were confirmed by BRET combined with fluorescence complementation. The endogenous expression of complexes in mouse cortex was determined by PLA and similar expression was observed in wild-type and APP/PS1 mice. Consistent with allosteric receptor-receptor interactions within the complex, H receptor antagonists reduced NMDA or D receptor-mediated excitotoxic cell death in cortical organotypic cultures. Moreover, H receptor antagonists reverted the toxicity induced by ß -amyloid peptide. Thus, histamine H receptors in D -H -NMDA heteroreceptor complexes arise as promising targets to prevent neurodegeneration

Multivariate Analysis of Dopaminergic Gene Variants as Risk Factors of Heroin Dependence

BACKGROUND: Heroin dependence is a debilitating psychiatric disorder with complex inheritance. Since the dopaminergic system has a key role in rewarding mechanism of the brain, which is directly or indirectly targeted by most drugs of abuse, we focus on the effects and interactions among dopaminergic gene variants. OBJECTIVE: To study the potential association between allelic variants of dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2), ANKK1 (ankyrin repeat and kinase domain containing 1), dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4), catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) and dopamine transporter (SLC6A3) genes and heroin dependence in Hungarian patients. METHODS: 303 heroin dependent subjects and 555 healthy controls were genotyped for 7 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs4680 of the COMT gene; rs1079597 and rs1800498 of the DRD2 gene; rs1800497 of the ANKK1 gene; rs1800955, rs936462 and rs747302 of the DRD4 gene. Four variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs) were also genotyped: 120 bp duplication and 48 bp VNTR in exon 3 of DRD4 and 40 bp VNTR and intron 8 VNTR of SLC6A3. We also perform a multivariate analysis of associations using Bayesian networks in Bayesian multilevel analysis (BN-BMLA). FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: In single marker analysis the TaqIA (rs1800497) and TaqIB (rs1079597) variants were associated with heroin dependence. Moreover, -521 C/T SNP (rs1800955) of the DRD4 gene showed nominal association with a possible protective effect of the C allele. After applying the Bonferroni correction TaqIB was still significant suggesting that the minor (A) allele of the TaqIB SNP is a risk component in the genetic background of heroin dependence. The findings of the additional multiple marker analysis are consistent with the results of the single marker analysis, but this method was able to reveal an indirect effect of a promoter polymorphism (rs936462) of the DRD4 gene and this effect is mediated through the -521 C/T (rs1800955) polymorphism in the promoter

Studying protein–protein affinity and immobilized ligand–protein affinity interactions using MS-based methods

This review discusses the most important current methods employing mass spectrometry (MS) analysis for the study of protein affinity interactions. The methods are discussed in depth with particular reference to MS-based approaches for analyzing protein–protein and protein–immobilized ligand interactions, analyzed either directly or indirectly. First, we introduce MS methods for the study of intact protein complexes in the gas phase. Next, pull-down methods for affinity-based analysis of protein–protein and protein–immobilized ligand interactions are discussed. Presently, this field of research is often called interactomics or interaction proteomics. A slightly different approach that will be discussed, chemical proteomics, allows one to analyze selectivity profiles of ligands for multiple drug targets and off-targets. Additionally, of particular interest is the use of surface plasmon resonance technologies coupled with MS for the study of protein interactions. The review addresses the principle of each of the methods with a focus on recent developments and the applicability to lead compound generation in drug discovery as well as the elucidation of protein interactions involved in cellular processes. The review focuses on the analysis of bioaffinity interactions of proteins with other proteins and with ligands, where the proteins are considered as the bioactives analyzed by MS

Isolation and Detection of G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Heteroreceptor Complexes in Rat Brain Synaptosomal Preparation Using a Combined Brain Subcellular Fractionation/Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) Procedures

none13sìThe isolation and characterization of GPCR heteroreceptor complexes, specially those present at the central nervous system, are of crucial relevance for the understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind several mental and neurodegenerative disorders. The existence of homo- and heteroreceptor complexes with allosteric receptor-receptor interactions increases the diversity of receptor function including recognition, trafficking, and signaling. This phenomenon increases our understanding of how brain function is altered through molecular integration of receptor signals. An alteration in specific heteroreceptor complexes or their neuronal localization is considered to have a role in the pathogenic mechanisms that lead to mental and neurological diseases, including drug addiction, depression, Parkinson’s disease, and schizophrenia. Therefore, it is fundamental to understand the appropriate localization and synaptic clustering of these GPCR heteroreceptor complexes. This chapter represents a workflow for the analysis of GPCR heteroreceptor complexes by means of combined use of differential centrifugation/coimmunoprecipitation in rat brain tissue. The combination of differential centrifugation/coimmunoprecipitation allows the separation and detection of GPCR heteroreceptor complexes present at synaptic sites from those found in intracellular compartments and vesicular pools. It is a reproducible protocol and produces reliable quantitative data.restrictedDasiel O. Borroto-Escuela, Manuel Narvaez, Martina Zannoni, Chiara Contri, Minerva Crespo-Ramírez, Michael di Palma, Patrizia Ambrogini, Daily Y. Borroto-Escuela, Ismel Brito, Mariana Pita-Rodríguez, Ismael Valladolid-Acebes, Miguel Pérez de la Mora, and Kjell FuxeBorroto-Escuela, Dasiel O.; Narvaez, Manuel; Zannoni, Martina; Contri, Chiara; Crespo-Ramírez, Minerva; DI PALMA, Michael; Ambrogini, Patrizia; Borroto-Escuela, Daily Y.; Brito, Ismel; Pita-Rodríguez, Mariana; Valladolid-Acebes, Ismael; Pérez de la Mora, Miguel; Kjell Fuxe, An

Detection, Analysis, and Quantification of GPCR Homo- and Heteroreceptor Complexes in Specific Neuronal Cell Populations Using the In Situ Proximity Ligation Assay

GPCR’s receptosome operates via coordinated changes between the receptor expression, their modifications and interactions between each other. Perturbation in specific heteroreceptor complexes and/or their balance/equilibrium with other heteroreceptor complexes and corresponding homoreceptor complexes is considered to have a role in pathogenic mechanisms. Such mechanisms lead to mental and neurological diseases, including drug addiction, depression, Parkinson’s disease, and schizophrenia. To understand the associations of GPCRs and to unravel the global picture of their receptor–receptor interactions in the brain, different experimental detection techniques for receptor–receptor interactions have been established (e.g., co-immunoprecipitation based approach). However, they have been criticized for not reflecting the cellular situation or the dynamic nature of receptor–receptor interactions. Therefore, the detection and visualization of GPCR homo- and eteroreceptor complexes in the brain remained largely unknown until recent years, when a well-characterized in situ proximity ligation assay (in situ PLA) was adapted to validate the receptor complexes in their native environment. The in situ PLA protocol presented here can be used to visualize GPCR receptor–receptor interactions in cells and tissues in a highly sensitive and specific manner. We have developed a combined method using immunohistochemistry and PLA, particularly aimed to monitor interactions between GPCRs in specific neuronal cell populations. This allows the analysis of homo- and heteroreceptor complexes at a cellular and subcellular level. The method has the advantage that it can be used in clinical specimens, providing localized, quantifiable homo- and heteroreceptor complexes detected in single cells. We compare the advantages and limitations of the methods, underlining recent progress and the growing importance of these techniques in basic research. We discuss also their potential as tools for drug development and diagnostics

Detection, Analysis, and Quantification of GPCR Homo and Heteroreceptor Complexes in Specific Neuronal Cell Populations Using the In Situ Proximity Ligation Assay

GPCR’s receptosome operates via coordinated changes between the receptor expression, their modifications and interactions between each other. Perturbation in specific heteroreceptor complexes and/or their balance/equilibrium with other heteroreceptor complexes and corresponding homoreceptor complexes is considered to have a role in pathogenic mechanisms. Such mechanisms lead to mental and neurological diseases, including drug addiction, depression, Parkinson’s disease, and schizophrenia. To understand the associations of GPCRs and to unravel the global picture of their receptor–receptor interactions in the brain, different experimental detection techniques for receptor–receptor interactions have been established (e.g., co-immunoprecipitation based approach). However, they have been criticized for not reflecting the cellular situation or the dynamic nature of receptor–receptor interactions. Therefore, the detection and visualization of GPCR homo- and heteroreceptor complexes in the brain remained largely unknown until recent years, when a well-characterized in situ proximity ligation assay (in situ PLA) was adapted to validate the receptor complexes in their native environment. The in situ PLA protocol presented here can be used to visualize GPCR receptor–receptor interactions in cells and tissues in a highly sensitive and specific manner. We have developed a combined method using immunohistochemistry and PLA, particularly aimed to monitor interactions between GPCRs in specific neuronal cell populations. This allows the analysis of homo- and heteroreceptor complexes at a cellular and subcellular level. The method has the advantage that it can be used in clinical specimens, providing localized, quantifiable homo- and heteroreceptor complexes detected in single cells. We compare the advantages and limitations of the methods, underlining recent progress and the growing importance of these techniques in basic research. We discuss also their potential as tools for drug development and diagnostics