DYLAN\u27S JUDGMENT ON JUDGES: POWER AND GREED AND CORRUPTIBLE SEED SEEM TO BE ALL THAT THERE IS

This Article is presented in the form of an Indictment against judges brought by Bob Dylan, in the role of prosecutor. Indictment Part A contains a summary of Dylan\u27s allegations against judges. Part B is background information. Part C alleges Abuse of Power as indictment count one. Part D alleges Greed as indictment count two. Part E alleges Corruptible Seed as indictment count three. Part F contains the indictments conclusion. Finally, the article concludes with a Brady letter

Meet Mr. Brady

Published Nov. 7, 2012."Read a book excerpt about Tom Brady, BA '24, for whom Brady Commons was named."By Norm Benedict

Perceptions, 1986

49 pages. Editor: Chris McMichael. Associate Editor: Kevin Heumaneus. Faculty Advisor: Sally Russell. Staff: Marilyn Bedsworth, Tammy Buchanan, and Shirly Miller Jones. Cover: Barby Shaw. Contributors - Prose: Nagib Andros, Ilse Charamond, Kevin Heumaneus, Shirley Miller jones, Chris McMichael, and Robby Soriggs. Contributors- Poetry: Marilyn Bedsworth, Rober Brady, Janet Braswell, T.K. Buchanan, Christa Chandler, Emily Clements, Don Cockrel, Dot Danchetz, J. Miller Gilbert, Thelma Hall, Kevin Heumaneus, Shirley Jones, Kimberly Kitchens, Jim Kline, Robbie Lathem, Mary MacWade, Barbara McMichaels, Chris McMichael, Steven McNeilly, Betty Maine, Mary Nichelson, Wade Niles, Donna Pinson, Sally Russell, Robby Spriggs, Barbara T., Bob Terrell, Ed Waller. Contributors- Art: Ann Bowen, Lisa Daughtry, Michelle McKenzie, Chris McMichael, Denise Murphy, Suzan Pardue, Tracey Phillips, Barby Shaw, James Stanley, Bob Terrell, and Rhonda Traylor.https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/perceptions/1004/thumbnail.jp

Triangle Journal News, volume 5, number 5

Co-Editors: Allen Cook, John Stilwell. Staff Writers: Vincent Astor. National News Editor: Mike Morgan. Contributors: Chuck Saylor, Steve Wesson, Jim Norcross, David Jeffers. Production: Vincent Astor, Allen Cook, Bob Dumais, Jennifer Johnson, John Stilwell. Advertising: Vincent Astor, Bob Dumais. Special thanks to Rhodes College and the Paul Barret Jr. Library for providing initial scanning of this collection.https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/speccoll-mss-outmemphis4/1052/thumbnail.jp

Accurate Feature Extraction and Control Point Correction for Camera Calibration with a Mono-Plane Target

The paper addresses two problems related to 3D camera calibration using a single mono-plane calibration target with circular control marks. The first problem is how to compute accurately the locations of the features (ellipses) in images of the target. Since the structure of the control marks is known beforehand, we propose to use a shape-specific searching technique to find the optimal locations of the features. Our experiments have shown this technique generates more accurate feature locations than the state-of-the-art ellipse extraction methods. The second problem is how to refine the control mark locations with unknown manufacturing errors. We demonstrate in a case study, where the control marks are laser printed on a A4 paper, that the manufacturing errors of the control marks can be compensated to a good extent so that the remaining calibration errors are reduced significantly. 1

Local transient rheological behavior of concentrated suspensions

This paper reports experiments on the shear transient response of concentrated non-Brownian suspensions. The shear viscosity of the suspensions is measured using a wide-gap Couette rheometer equipped with a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) device that allows measuring the velocity field. The suspensions made of PMMA particles (31$\mu$m in diameter) suspended in a Newtonian index- and density-matched liquid are transparent enough to allow an accurate measurement of the local velocity for particle concentrations as high as 50%. In the wide-gap Couette cell, the shear induced particle migration is evidenced by the measurement of the time evolution of the flow profile. A peculiar radial zone in the gap is identified where the viscosity remains constant. At this special location, the local particle volume fraction is taken to be the mean particle concentration. The local shear transient response of the suspensions when the shear flow is reversed is measured at this point where the particle volume fraction is well defined. The local rheological measurements presented here confirm the macroscopic measurements of Gadala-Maria and Acrivos (1980). After shear reversal, the viscosity undergoes a step-like reduction, decreases slower and passes through a minimum before increasing again to reach a plateau. Upon varying the particle concentration, we have been able to show that the minimum and the plateau viscosities do not obey the same scaling law with respect to the particle volume fraction. These experimental results are consistent with the scaling predicted by Mills and Snabre (2009) and with the results of numerical simulation performed on random suspensions [Sierou and Brady (2001)]. The minimum seems to be associated with the viscosity of an isotropic suspension, or at least of a suspension whose particles do not interact through non-hydrodynamic forces, while the plateau value would correspond to the viscosity of a suspension structured by the shear where the non-hydrodynamic forces play a crucial role

The Story of \u3ci\u3eBrady v. Maryland\u3c/i\u3e: From Adversarial Gamesmanship Toward the Search for Innocence?

This book chapter, forthcoming in Criminal Procedure Stories (Carol Steiker ed. forthcoming 2005), explains the story behind Brady v. Maryland and its broader significance in the field of criminal procedure. Brady is unusual among the great landmark criminal procedure decisions of the Warren Court. Brady requires prosecutors to give criminal defendants evidence that tends to negate their guilt or reduce their punishment. In other words, Brady mandates limited discovery instead of trial by ambush. Brady\u27s test turns not on whether the prosecutor misled a jury or acted in good faith, but on whether the evidence is favorable and material to guilt or punishment. Thus, Brady marked a potentially revolutionary shift from traditionally unfettered adversarial combat toward a more inquisitorial, innocence-focused system. Yet, unlike Mapp v. Ohio and Miranda v. Arizona, Brady has sparked little public controversy or commentary. This may be because innocence is an appealing touchstone for criminal procedure, one with enormous potential to transform the adversarial criminal trial into a collaborative search for the truth. Brady, however, has meant much less in practice than it could have. Few potential Brady claims come to light, and fewer defendants walk free, because our system remains an adversarial contest rather than a neutral inquiry into innocence. First, Brady requires prosecutors to look out for defendants\u27 interests, and adversarial-minded prosecutors are poorly suited to do that job. Second, Brady is hard to implement and enforce. Favorable evidence is often spread across many agencies\u27 files; defendants cannot learn of evidence hidden in these files; and judges are loath to reverse convictions long after trial. Empirical evidence shows that few Brady claims succeed and that most Brady material is ambiguous enough that prosecutors can easily overlook it. Third, Brady requires relatively little discovery, though statutes and rules have broadened discovery beyond the constitutional minimum. Much broader discovery would alleviate many of the adversary system\u27s problems, at the cost of more witness intimidation, fabricated alibis, and revelation of undercover and confidential informants. Fourth, Bradyapplies only at the trial stage, but hardly any defendants go to trial any more. About 95% plead guilty, and Brady may not even apply to the plea bargaining process, when defendants need this information most. Finally, though Brady ignores the prosecutor\u27s good faith (mens rea), its test continues to require some prosecutorial misdeed (actus reus). It does not focus exclusively on the defendant\u27s guilt or innocence of the crime or punishment. Brady\u27s ringing rhetoric of innocence, then, is in some ways a hollow promise. Far from transforming the adversarial system into a quest for truth, it has merely tinkered at its margins

Extending Metacompleteness to Systems with Classical Formulae

In honour of Bob Meyer, the paper extends the use of his concept of metacompleteness to include various classical systems, as much as we are able. To do this for the classical sentential calculus, we add extra axioms so as to treat the variables like constants. Further, we use a one-sorted and a two-sorted approach to add classical sentential constants to the logic DJ of my book, Universal Logic. It is appropriate to use rejection to represent classicality in the one-sorted case. We then extend these methods to the quantified logics, but we use a finite domain of individual constants to do this