The effects of sample handling on proteomics assessed by reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA):Functional proteomic profiling in leukemia

Reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) can assess protein expression and activation states in large numbers of samples (n > 1000) and evidence suggests feasibility in the setting of multi-institution clinical trials. Despite evidence in solid tumors, little is known about protein stability in leukemia. Proteins collected from leukemia cells in blood and bone marrow biopsies must be sufficiently stable for analysis. Using 58 leukemia samples, we initially assessed protein/phospho-protein integrity for the following preanalytical variables: 1) shipping vs local processing, 2) temperature (4 degrees C vs ambient temperature), 3) collection tube type (heparin vs Cell Save (CS) preservation tubes), 4) treatment effect (prevs post-chemotherapy) and 5) transit time. Next, we assessed 1515 samples from the Children's Oncology Group Phase 3 AML clinical trial (AAML1031, NCT01371981) for the effects of transit time and tube type. Protein expression from shipped blood samples was stable if processed in Significance: RPPA can assess protein abundance and activation states in large numbers of samples using small amounts of material, making this method ideal for use in multi-institution clinical trials. However, there is little known about the effect of preanalytical handling variables on protein stability and the integrity of protein concentrations after sample collection and shipping. In this study, we used RPPA to assess preanalytical variables that could potentially affect protein concentrations. We found that the preanalytical variables of shipping, transit time, and temperature had minimal effects on RPPA protein concentration distributions in peripheral blood and bone marrow, demonstrating that these preanalytical variables could be successfully managed in a multi-site clinical trial setting

Wnt inhibition leads to improved chemosensitivity in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

While childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is now highly curable, the dismal prognosis for children who relapse warrants novel therapeutic approaches. Previously, using an integrated genomic analysis of matched diagnosis-relapse paired samples, we identified overactivation of the Wnt pathway as a possible mechanism of recurrence. To validate these findings and document whether Wnt inhibition may sensitize cells to chemotherapy, we analysed the expression of activated β-catenin (and its downstream target BIRC5) using multiparameter phosphoflow cytometry and tested the efficacy of a recently developed Wnt inhibitor, iCRT14, in ALL cell lines and patient samples. We observed increased activation of β-catenin at relapse in 6/10 patients. Furthermore, treatment of leukaemic cell lines with iCRT14 led to significant downregulation of Wnt target genes and combination with traditional chemotherapeutic drugs resulted in a synergistic decrease in viability as well as a significant increase in apoptotic cell death. Finally, pre-treatment of purified blasts from patients with relapsed leukaemia with the Wnt inhibitor followed by exposure to prednisolone, restored chemosensitivity in these cells. Our results demonstrate that overactivation of the Wnt pathway may contribute to chemoresistance in relapsed childhood ALL and that Wnt-inhibition may be a promising therapeutic approach

Characterization of COVID-19 Disease in Pediatric Oncology Patients: The New York-New Jersey Regional Experience

PURPOSE: Pediatric oncology patients undergoing active chemotherapy are suspected to be at a high risk for severe disease secondary to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; however, data to support this are lacking. We aim to describe the characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in this population and also its impact on pediatric cancer care in the New York region during the peak of the pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included 13 institutions. Clinical and laboratory information on 98 patients ≤21 years of age receiving active anticancer therapy, who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by nasopharyngeal swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR), was collected. RESULTS: Of the 578 pediatric oncology patients tested for COVID-19, 98 were positive, of whom 73 were symptomatic. Most experienced mild disease, 28 required inpatient management, 25 needed oxygen support, and seven required mechanical ventilation. There is a slightly higher risk of severe disease in males and obese patients, though not statistically significant. Persistent lymphopenia was noted in severe cases. Delays in cancer therapy occurred in 67% of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. Of four deaths, none were solely attributable to COVID-19. The impact of the pandemic on pediatric oncology care was significant, with 54% of institutions reporting delays in chemotherapy, 46% delays in surgery, and 30% delays in transplant. CONCLUSION: In this large multi-institutional cohort, we observed that mortality and morbidity from COVID-19 amongst pediatric oncology patients were low overall, but higher than reported in general pediatrics. Certain subgroups might be at higher risk of severe disease. Delays in cancer care due to SARS-CoV-2 remain a concern