11 research outputs found
IRE1α–XBP1 controls T cell function in ovarian cancer by regulating mitochondrial activity
Tumours evade immune control by creating hostile microenvironments that perturb T cell metabolism and effector function 1?4 . However, it remains unclear how intra-tumoral T cells integrate and interpret metabolic stress signals. Here we report that ovarian cancer?an aggressive malignancy that is refractory to standard treatments and current immunotherapies 5?8 ?induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and activates the IRE1α?XBP1 arm of the unfolded protein response 9,10 in T cells to control their mitochondrial respiration and anti-tumour function. In T cells isolated from specimens collected from patients with ovarian cancer, upregulation of XBP1 was associated with decreased infiltration of T cells into tumours and with reduced IFNG mRNA expression. Malignant ascites fluid obtained from patients with ovarian cancer inhibited glucose uptake and caused N-linked protein glycosylation defects in T cells, which triggered IRE1α?XBP1 activation that suppressed mitochondrial activity and IFNÎł production. Mechanistically, induction of XBP1 regulated the abundance of glutamine carriers and thus limited the influx of glutamine that is necessary to sustain mitochondrial respiration in T cells under glucose-deprived conditions. Restoring N-linked protein glycosylation, abrogating IRE1α?XBP1 activation or enforcing expression of glutamine transporters enhanced mitochondrial respiration in human T cells exposed to ovarian cancer ascites. XBP1-deficient T cells in the metastatic ovarian cancer milieu exhibited global transcriptional reprogramming and improved effector capacity. Accordingly, mice that bear ovarian cancer and lack XBP1 selectively in T cells demonstrate superior anti-tumour immunity, delayed malignant progression and increased overall survival. Controlling endoplasmic reticulum stress or targeting IRE1α?XBP1 signalling may help to restore the metabolic fitness and anti-tumour capacity of T cells in cancer hosts.Fil: Song, Minkyung. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Sandoval, Tito A.. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Chae, Chang-Suk. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Chopra, Sahil. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Tan, Chen. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Rutkowski, Melanie R.. University of Virginia; Estados UnidosFil: Raundhal, Mahesh. Dana Farber Cancer Institute; Estados Unidos. Harvard Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Chaurio, Ricardo A.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Payne, Kyle K.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Konrad, Csaba. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Bettigole, Sarah E.. Quentis Therapeutics Inc.; Estados UnidosFil: Shin, Hee Rae. Quentis Therapeutics Inc.; Estados UnidosFil: Crowley, Michael J. P.. Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Cerliani, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂficas y TĂ©cnicas. Instituto de BiologĂa y Medicina Experimental. FundaciĂłn de Instituto de BiologĂa y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de BiologĂa y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Kossenkov, Andrew V.. The Wistar Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Motorykin, Ievgen. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Zhang, Sheng. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Manfredi, Giovanni. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Zamarin, Dmitriy. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Estados UnidosFil: Holcomb, Kevin. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Rodriguez, Paulo C.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Rabinovich, Gabriel Adrián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂficas y TĂ©cnicas. Instituto de BiologĂa y Medicina Experimental. FundaciĂłn de Instituto de BiologĂa y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de BiologĂa y Medicina Experimental; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de QuĂmica BiolĂłgica; ArgentinaFil: Conejo Garcia, Jose R.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Glimcher, Laurie H.. Dana Farber Cancer Institute; Estados Unidos. Harvard Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Cubillos-Ruiz, Juan R.. Weill Graduate School Of Medical Sciences; Estados Unidos. Weill Graduate School Of Medical Sciences; Estados Unido
Recommended from our members
Novel Functions for XBP1 and IRE1α in Hematopoiesis
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a critical regulator of cellular homeostasis, primarily responsible for handling calcium storage and signaling, lipid synthesis, and the proper glycosylation and folding of nascent transmembrane and secreted proteins. Numerous stimuli such as dysregulated oxidative stress, depletion of calcium stores, hypo- and hyperglycemia, hypoxia, inefficient cellular degradation pathways, and inflammation can disrupt the protein folding capacity of the ER, leading to a condition known as ER stress. The canonical unfolded protein response (UPR) is a three-pronged signaling axis charged with ameliorating ER stress, and is particularly important for the development of highly secretory tissues such as plasma cells, pancreatic acinar cells, and Paneth cells. Here we examine the requirement for the ER stress response transcription factor XBP1 in hematopoiesis, focusing specifically on granulocyte development.
In this study we found that XBP1 is selectively required for the development of the eosinophil lineage, but not for other granulocyte lineages. Targeted hematopoietic ablation of XBP1 or its upstream activator IRE1α using Vav1-Cre conditional knockout mice resulted in complete loss of mature eosinophils and dramatic decrease in Lin-, Sca1-, CD34+, c-Kitlo, IL-5Rα+ eosinophil progenitors without altering neighboring hematopoietic lineages such as basophils and neutrophils. Myeloid and eosinophil progenitors selectively activated XBP1 without induction of parallel canonical ER stress signaling pathways. Through the use of mixed bone marrow chimeras, in vitro bone marrow-derived eosinophil cultures, and eosinophil-selective Cre mouse models, we demonstrated that XBP1 is required after eosinophil lineage commitment in a cell-intrinsic manner to sustain cell viability. RNA-sequencing and bioinformatic analyses of hematopoietic progenitors at different stages of eosinophil differentiation revealed that Xbp1 deficiency reduced the adaptive protein folding capacity of the ER. Upon eosinophil commitment, this vulnerability led to massive defects in post-translational maturation of key granule proteins required for survival, and these unresolvable structural defects fed back to suppress critical aspects of the transcriptional developmental program.
Taken together, we present the first evidence that granulocyte subsets can be distinguished by their differential sensitivities to perturbations in XBP1-mediated secretory pathway functions. Furthermore, this work implicates the IRE1α/XBP1 signaling axis as a potential therapeutic target for eosinophil-mediated diseases.Medical Science
Metastasis and Immune Evasion from Extracellular cGAMP Hydrolysis
Cytosolic DNA is characteristic of chromosomally unstable metastatic cancer cells, resulting in constitutive activation of the cGAS-STING innate immune pathway. How tumors co-opt inflammatory signaling while evading immune surveillance remains unknown. Here, we show that the ectonucleotidase ENPP1 promotes metastasis by selectively degrading extracellular cGAMP, an immune-stimulatory metabolite whose breakdown products include the immune suppressor adenosine. ENPP1 loss suppresses metastasis, restores tumor immune infiltration, and potentiates response to immune checkpoint blockade in a manner dependent on tumor cGAS and host STING. Conversely, overexpression of wild-type ENPP1, but not an enzymatically weakened mutant, promotes migration and metastasis, in part through the generation of extracellular adenosine, and renders otherwise sensitive tumors completely resistant to immunotherapy. In human cancers, ENPP1 expression correlates with reduced immune cell infiltration, increased metastasis, and resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Thus, cGAMP hydrolysis by ENPP1 enables chromosomally unstable tumors to transmute cGAS activation into an immune-suppressive pathway. SIGNIFICANCE: Chromosomal instability promotes metastasis by generating chronic tumor inflammation. ENPP1 facilitates metastasis and enables tumor cells to tolerate inflammation by hydrolyzing the immunotransmitter cGAMP, preventing its transfer from cancer cells to immune cells.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 995
Recommended from our members
Non-cell-autonomous cancer progression from chromosomal instability.
Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a driver of cancer metastasis1-4, yet the extent to which this effect depends on the immune system remains unknown. Using ContactTracing-a newly developed, validated and benchmarked tool to infer the nature and conditional dependence of cell-cell interactions from single-cell transcriptomic data-we show that CIN-induced chronic activation of the cGAS-STING pathway promotes downstream signal re-wiring in cancer cells, leading to a pro-metastatic tumour microenvironment. This re-wiring is manifested by type I interferon tachyphylaxis selectively downstream of STING and a corresponding increase in cancer cell-derived endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response. Reversal of CIN, depletion of cancer cell STING or inhibition of ER stress response signalling abrogates CIN-dependent effects on the tumour microenvironment and suppresses metastasis in immune competent, but not severely immune compromised, settings. Treatment with STING inhibitors reduces CIN-driven metastasis in melanoma, breast and colorectal cancers in a manner dependent on tumour cell-intrinsic STING. Finally, we show that CIN and pervasive cGAS activation in micronuclei are associated with ER stress signalling, immune suppression and metastasis in human triple-negative breast cancer, highlighting a viable strategy to identify and therapeutically intervene in tumours spurred by CIN-induced inflammation
Metastasis and immune evasion from extracellular cGAMP hydrolysis
Cytosolic DNA is characteristic of chromosomally unstable metastatic cancer cells, resulting in constitutive activation of the cGAS-STING innate immune pathway. How tumors co-opt inflammatory signaling while evading immune surveillance remains unknown. Here we show that the ectonucleotidase ENPP1 promotes metastasis by selectively degrading extracellular cGAMP, an immune stimulatory metabolite whose breakdown products include the immune suppressor, adenosine. ENPP1 loss suppresses metastasis, restores tumor immune infiltration, and potentiates response to immune checkpoint blockade in a manner dependent on tumor cGAS and host STING. Conversely, overexpression of wildtype ENPP1, but not an enzymatically weakened mutant, promotes migration and metastasis, in part, through the generation of extracellular adenosine, and renders otherwise sensitive tumors completely resistant to immunotherapy. In human cancers, ENPP1 expression correlates with reduced immune cell infiltration, increased metastasis, and resistance to anti-PD1/PD-L1 treatment. Thus, cGAMP hydrolysis by ENPP1 enables chromosomally unstable tumors to transmute cGAS activation into an immune suppressive pathway