Identification and Functional Characterization of G6PC2 Coding Variants Influencing Glycemic Traits Define an Effector Transcript at the G6PC2-ABCB11 Locus

This is the final version. Available on open access from the Public Library of Science via the DOI in this recordData Availability: This is a meta-analysis that was conducted on summary level results. Individual level data was not shared amongst the authors of the manuscript, and the corresponding authors are not in a position to make the individual level data available. For most of the samples included, individual level data deposition is precluded by existing consents, and other issues related to individual privacy. Summary level data from the meta-analysis are available from the DIAGRAM (http://www.diagram-consortium.org/Mahajan_2014_ExomeChip/) and LocusZoom (http://csg.sph.umich.edu/locuszoom/) website.Genome wide association studies (GWAS) for fasting glucose (FG) and insulin (FI) have identified common variant signals which explain 4.8% and 1.2% of trait variance, respectively. It is hypothesized that low-frequency and rare variants could contribute substantially to unexplained genetic variance. To test this, we analyzed exome-array data from up to 33,231 non-diabetic individuals of European ancestry. We found exome-wide significant (P<5×10-7) evidence for two loci not previously highlighted by common variant GWAS: GLP1R (p.Ala316Thr, minor allele frequency (MAF)=1.5%) influencing FG levels, and URB2 (p.Glu594Val, MAF = 0.1%) influencing FI levels. Coding variant associations can highlight potential effector genes at (non-coding) GWAS signals. At the G6PC2/ABCB11 locus, we identified multiple coding variants in G6PC2 (p.Val219Leu, p.His177Tyr, and p.Tyr207Ser) influencing FG levels, conditionally independent of each other and the non-coding GWAS signal. In vitro assays demonstrate that these associated coding alleles result in reduced protein abundance via proteasomal degradation, establishing G6PC2 as an effector gene at this locus. Reconciliation of single-variant associations and functional effects was only possible when haplotype phase was considered. In contrast to earlier reports suggesting that, paradoxically, glucose-raising alleles at this locus are protective against type 2 diabetes (T2D), the p.Val219Leu G6PC2 variant displayed a modest but directionally consistent association with T2D risk. Coding variant associations for glycemic traits in GWAS signals highlight PCSK1, RREB1, and ZHX3 as likely effector transcripts. These coding variant association signals do not have a major impact on the trait variance explained, but they do provide valuable biological insights

A Low-Frequency Inactivating Akt2 Variant Enriched in the Finnish Population is Associated With Fasting Insulin Levels and Type 2 Diabetes Risk

To identify novel coding association signals and facilitate characterization of mechanisms influencing glycemic traits and type 2 diabetes risk, we analyzed 109,215 variants derived from exome array genotyping together with an additional 390,225 variants from exome sequence in up to 39,339 normoglycemic individuals from five ancestry groups. We identified a novel association between the coding variant (p.Pro50Thr) in AKT2 and fasting insulin, a gene in which rare fully penetrant mutations are causal for monogenic glycemic disorders. The low-frequency allele is associated with a 12% increase in fasting plasma insulin (FI) levels. This variant is present at 1.1% frequency in Finns but virtually absent in individuals from other ancestries. Carriers of the FI-increasing allele had increased 2-hour insulin values, decreased insulin sensitivity, and increased risk of type 2 diabetes (odds ratio=1.05). In cellular studies, the AKT2-Thr50 protein exhibited a partial loss of function. We extend the allelic spectrum for coding variants in AKT2 associated with disorders of glucose homeostasis and demonstrate bidirectional effects of variants within the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT2.Academy of Finland (129293, 128315, 129330, 131593, 139635, 139635, 121584, 126925, 124282, 129378, 258753); Action on Hearing Loss (G51); Ahokas Foundation; American Diabetes Association (#7-12-MN-02); Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency; Augustinus foundation; Becket foundation; Benzon Foundation; Biomedical Research Council; British Heart Foundation (SP/04/002); Canada Foundation for Innovation; Commission of the European Communities, Directorate C-Public Health (2004310); Copenhagen County; Danish Centre for Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment; Danish Council for Independent Research; Danish Heart Foundation (07-10-R61-A1754-B838-22392F); Danish Medical Research Council; Danish Pharmaceutical Association; Emil Aaltonen Foundation; European Research Council Advanced Research Grant; European Union FP7 (EpiMigrant, 279143; FP7/2007-2013; 259749); Finland's Slottery Machine Association; Finnish Cultural Foundation; Finnish Diabetes Research Foundation; Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research; Finnish Foundation of Cardiovascular Research; Finnish Medical Society; Finnish National Public Health Institute; Finska Läkaresällskapet; Folkhälsan Research Foundation; Foundation for Life and Health in Finland; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD) ; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Health Care Centers in Vasa, Närpes and Korsholm; Health Insurance Foundation (2012B233) ; Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Foundation; Hospital districts of Pirkanmaa, Southern Ostrobothnia, North Ostrobothnia, Central Finland, and Northern Savo; Ib Henriksen foundation; Juho Vainio Foundation; Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (4845–301); Korea National Institute of Health (2012-N73002-00); Li Ka Shing Foundation; Liv och Hälsa; Lundbeck Foundation; Marie-Curie Fellowship (PIEF-GA-2012-329156); Medical Research Council (G0601261, G0900747-91070, G0601966, G0700931); Ministry of Education in Finland; Ministry of Social Affairs and Health in Finland; MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health;Municipal Heath Care Center and Hospital in Jakobstad; Närpes Health Care Foundation; National Institute for Health Research (RP-PG-0407-10371); National Institutes of Health (U01 DK085526, U01 DK085501, U01 DK085524, U01 DK085545, U01 DK085584, U01 DK088389, RC2-DK088389, DK085545, DK098032, HHSN268201300046C, HHSN268201300047C, HHSN268201300048C, HHSN268201300049C, HHSN, R01MH107666 and K12CA139160268201300050C, U01 DK062370, R01 DK066358, U01DK085501, R01HL102830, R01DK073541, PO1AG027734, R01AG046949, 1R01AG042188, P30AG038072, R01 MH101820, R01MH090937, P30DK020595, R01 DK078616, NIDDK K24 DK080140, 1RC2DK088389, T32GM007753); National Medical Research Council; National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2012R1A2A1A03006155); Nordic Center of Excellence in Disease Genetics; Novo Nordisk; Ollqvist Foundation; OrionFarmos Research Foundation; Paavo Nurmi Foundation; Perklén Foundation; Samfundet Folkhälsan; Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation; Sigrid Juselius Foundation; Social Insurance Institution of Finland; South East Norway Health Authority (2011060); Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland; Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation; Swedish Research Council; Swedish Research Council (Linné and Strategic Research Grant); The American Federation for Aging Research; The Einstein Glenn Center; The European Commission (HEALTH-F4-2007-201413); The Finnish Diabetes Association; The Folkhälsan Research Foundation; The Påhlssons Foundation; The provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick; The Sigrid Juselius Foundation; The Skåne Regional Health Authority; The Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation; Timber Merchant Vilhelm Bang’s Foundation; Turku University Foundation; Uppsala University; Wellcome Trust (064890, 083948, 085475, 086596, 090367, 090532, 092447, 095101/Z/10/Z, 200837/Z/16/Z, 095552, 098017, 098381, 098051, 084723, 072960/2/ 03/2, 086113/Z/08/Z, WT098017, WT064890, WT090532, WT098017, 098051, WT086596/Z/08/A and 086596/Z/08/Z). Detailed acknowledgment of funding sources is provided in the Additional Acknowledgements section of the Supplementary Materials

Diltiazem infusion for renal protection in cardiac surgical patients with preexisting renal dysfunction

Objective: To evaluate if the calcium channel blocker diltiazem protects postoperatively renal function in cardiac surgical patients with preexisting mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction. Design: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical study. Setting: Cardiothoracic anesthesia department at a university hospital. Participants: Adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass, with a preoperatively elevated serum creatinine level (n = 24). Interventions: Randomized infusions of diltiazem (bolus 0.25 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 1.7 pg/kg/min) (DTZ, n = 12) or placebo (C, n = 12) were started 30 minutes before induction of anesthesia and continued for 24 hours. Measurements and Main Results: Median plasma concentrations of diltiazem (DTZ group) were 79 mug/L before cardiopulmonary bypass, 67 mug/L at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 164 mug/L at 24 hours postoperatively. Serum creatinine levels; on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5; and 3 weeks postoperatively were similar between groups. lohexol clearance did not differ between the groups on day 5 but was higher in the DTZ group than in the placebo group 3 weeks after surgery (median, 51 v 40 mL/min/1.73 m(2); p < 0.05). Urinary N-acetyl-β-glucosamidase concentrations were similar between the groups during the study but were increased from baseline on days 2 and 4 and 3 weeks postoperatively. Conclusion: Diltiazem can be safely used in patients who have mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction and undergo cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. Within the limits of this study, the data suggest that addition of prophylactic diltiazem may prevent further glomerular damage resulting from cardiopulmonary bypass and may improve glomerular function 3 weeks after cardiac surgery

Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data and large-scale replication identifies additional susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes.

Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have identified multiple loci at which common variants modestly but reproducibly influence risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Established associations to common and rare variants explain only a small proportion of the heritability of T2D. As previously published analyses had limited power to identify variants with modest effects, we carried out meta-analysis of three T2D GWA scans comprising 10,128 individuals of European descent and approximately 2.2 million SNPs (directly genotyped and imputed), followed by replication testing in an independent sample with an effective sample size of up to 53,975. We detected at least six previously unknown loci with robust evidence for association, including the JAZF1 (P = 5.0 x 10(-14)), CDC123-CAMK1D (P = 1.2 x 10(-10)), TSPAN8-LGR5 (P = 1.1 x 10(-9)), THADA (P = 1.1 x 10(-9)), ADAMTS9 (P = 1.2 x 10(-8)) and NOTCH2 (P = 4.1 x 10(-8)) gene regions. Our results illustrate the value of large discovery and follow-up samples for gaining further insights into the inherited basis of T2D