195 research outputs found

    Whole-ecosystem experimental manipulations of tropical forests.

    Get PDF
    Tropical forests are highly diverse systems involving extraordinary numbers of interactions between species, with each species responding in a different way to the abiotic environment. Understanding how these systems function and predicting how they respond to anthropogenic global change is extremely challenging. We argue for the necessity of 'whole-ecosystem' experimental manipulations, in which the entire ecosystem is targeted, either to reveal the functioning of the system in its natural state or to understand responses to anthropogenic impacts. We survey the current range of whole-ecosystem manipulations, which include those targeting weather and climate, nutrients, biotic interactions, human impacts, and habitat restoration. Finally we describe the unique challenges and opportunities presented by such projects and suggest directions for future experiments.This review was initiated during a symposium on ‘The effects of large scale manipulations of tropical forests on arthropod assemblages’ at the INTECOL 2013 congress, London 18–23 August 2013. T.M.F. is funded by the Australian Research Council (DP140101541), T.M.F. and R.M.E. by Yayasan Sime Darby, TMF and Y.B. by the project Biodiversity of Forest Ecosystems (CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0064) co-financed by the European Social Fund and the state budget of the Czech Republic, and T.M.F. Y.B. and V.N. by the Czech Science Foundation (GACR 14-32302S, 14-36098G, 14-04258S respectively). Y.B. is also supported by the Sistema Nacional de Investigacio´n of Panama. E.C.T. is supported by funds from PT SMART Research Institute and the Isaac Newton Trust, Cambridge. R.M.E. is supported by European Research Council Project number 281986. We are grateful to Maureen Fayle, Andrew Hector, Jan Leps, Scott Miller, Kalsum M. Yusah, Paul Craze, and two anonymous reviewers for advice during the drafting of the manuscript, and Jennifer Balch for additional information regarding her burning experiments.This is the final published version. It first appeared at http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/abstract/S0169-5347%2815%2900069-5

    Scientists' warning on climate change and insects

    Get PDF
    Climate warming is considered to be among the most serious of anthropogenic stresses to the environment, because it not only has direct effects on biodiversity, but it also exacerbates the harmful effects of other human-mediated threats. The associated consequences are potentially severe, particularly in terms of threats to species preservation, as well as in the preservation of an array of ecosystem services provided by biodiversity. Among the most affected groups of animals are insects—central components of many ecosystems—for which climate change has pervasive effects from individuals to communities. In this contribution to the scientists' warning series, we summarize the effect of the gradual global surface temperature increase on insects, in terms of physiology, behavior, phenology, distribution, and species interactions, as well as the effect of increased frequency and duration of extreme events such as hot and cold spells, fires, droughts, and floods on these parameters. We warn that, if no action is taken to better understand and reduce the action of climate change on insects, we will drastically reduce our ability to build a sustainable future based on healthy, functional ecosystems. We discuss perspectives on relevant ways to conserve insects in the face of climate change, and we offer several key recommendations on management approaches that can be adopted, on policies that should be pursued, and on the involvement of the general public in the protection effort.</p

    Arthropod Distribution In A Tropical Rainforest: Tackling A Four Dimensional Puzzle

    Get PDF
    Quantifying the spatio-temporal distribution of arthropods in tropical rainforests represents a first step towards scrutinizing the global distribution of biodiversity on Earth. To date most studies have focused on narrow taxonomic groups or lack a design that allows partitioning of the components of diversity. Here, we consider an exceptionally large dataset (113,952 individuals representing 5,858 species), obtained from the San Lorenzo forest in Panama, where the phylogenetic breadth of arthropod taxa was surveyed using 14 protocols targeting the soil, litter, understory, lower and upper canopy habitats, replicated across seasons in 2003 and 2004. This dataset is used to explore the relative influence of horizontal, vertical and seasonal drivers of arthropod distribution in this forest. We considered arthropod abundance, observed and estimated species richness, additive decomposition of species richness, multiplicative partitioning of species diversity, variation in species composition, species turnover and guild structure as components of diversity. At the scale of our study (2km of distance, 40m in height and 400 days), the effects related to the vertical and seasonal dimensions were most important. Most adult arthropods were collected from the soil/litter or the upper canopy and species richness was highest in the canopy. We compared the distribution of arthropods and trees within our study system. Effects related to the seasonal dimension were stronger for arthropods than for trees. We conclude that: (1) models of beta diversity developed for tropical trees are unlikely to be applicable to tropical arthropods; (2) it is imperative that estimates of global biodiversity derived from mass collecting of arthropods in tropical rainforests embrace the strong vertical and seasonal partitioning observed here; and (3) given the high species turnover observed between seasons, global climate change may have severe consequences for rainforest arthropods.1012SolVin-Solvay SASTRIUnited Nations Environment ProgrammeSmithsonian Institution (Walcott Fund)European Science FoundationGlobal Canopy ProgrammeCzech Science foundation GACR grant [14-36098G]European Social FundCzech Ministry of Education [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0064]U.S. National Science Fundation [DEB-0841885]Australian Research Council [FT100100040]Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)"Investissement d'Avenir'' grant [ANR-10-LABX-25-01]Norwegian Research CouncilGrant Agency of the Czech Republic [14-36098G

    Thermoregulatory ability and mechanism do not differ consistently between neotropical and temperate butterflies

    Get PDF
    Climate change is a major threat to species worldwide, yet it remains uncertain whether tropical or temperate species are more vulnerable to changing temperatures. To further our understanding of this, we used a standardised field protocol to (1) study the buffering ability (ability to regulate body temperature relative to surrounding air temperature) of neotropical (Panama) and temperate (the United Kingdom, Czech Republic and Austria) butterflies at the assemblage and family level, (2) determine if any differences in buffering ability were driven by morphological characteristics and (3) used ecologically relevant temperature measurements to investigate how butterflies use microclimates and behaviour to thermoregulate. We hypothesised that temperate butterflies would be better at buffering than neotropical butterflies as temperate species naturally experience a wider range of temperatures than their tropical counterparts. Contrary to our hypothesis, at the assemblage level, neotropical species (especially Nymphalidae) were better at buffering than temperate species, driven primarily by neotropical individuals cooling themselves more at higher air temperatures. Morphology was the main driver of differences in buffering ability between neotropical and temperate species as opposed to the thermal environment butterflies experienced. Temperate butterflies used postural thermoregulation to raise their body temperature more than neotropical butterflies, probably as an adaptation to temperate climates, but the selection of microclimates did not differ between regions. Our findings demonstrate that butterfly species have unique thermoregulatory strategies driven by behaviour and morphology, and that neotropical species are not likely to be more inherently vulnerable to warming than temperate species
    • …
    corecore