80 research outputs found

    Biológiai hálózatok reakciókinetikai vizsgálata = Reaction kinetic analysis of biological networks

    Get PDF
    Az ifjúsági OTKA támogatás lehetőséget nyújtott ahhoz, hogy a biokémiai reakciókinetika módszereit használva több biológiai kérdésen is dolgozzak. A biológiai napi ritmus és a sejtosztódási ciklus biokémiai oszcillációinak kapcsoltságát vizsgáltam matematikai modellekkel. Megállapítottam, hogy kvantált sejtciklusidő eloszláshoz vezethet ha a két oszcillátor eltérő saját periódussal rendelkezik és a modell alapján azt a feltételezést tettük, hogy ez a kapcsoltság fontos szerepet játszhat az emlős sejtek homeosztázisát reguláló méretkontrolljában. Egy másik kapcsolódó munkában azt a meglapítást tettük, hogy a napi ritmus szabályozó reakcióhálózat kísérletesen megfigyelt tulajdonságainak pontos modellezéséhez elengedhetetlen egy pozitív visszacsatolási hurok jelenléte a rendszerben. Más biológiai kérdéseket vizsgáltam élesztők sejtciklusának szabályozásával kapcsolatban: a sarjadzó élesztő sejtciklusának kritikus lépéseinek szabályzó mechanizmusában fontos szerepet játszó előre és visszacsatolási hurkokat találtam a rendszer matematikai modelljeivel, valamint vizsgáltam ezen sejtciklus átmenetek érzékenységét, sztochasztikáját és dinamikáját. Más cikkekben a hasadó élesztő sejtosztódását és növekedésének regulálását és szignalizációs utak egyszerű modelleit is vizsgáltam. A modellezéssel kapott predikciók közül néhányat már kísérletesen igazoltak is, mások jelenleg állnak tesztelés alatt. | The OTKA youth grant allowed me to work on various biology-oriented projects with the tools of biochemical reaction kinetics. I investigated by mathematical modeling the coupling of the biochemical oscillators of the daily rhythm and the cell division cycle. I found that the cell cycle time could show quantized distributions in case the two oscillators run with dissimilar basal periods. Furthermore the model suggests that this coupling might have an important role in homeostasis regulatory size control of mammalian cells. In another related work we showed that the presence of a positive feedback loop in the network of circadian clock regulation is inevitable to properly model some experimental observations on the daily rhythm. Additionally I investigated other biological questions related to the cell cycle regulation of yeast cells: with mathematical modeling of the network of the regulation in budding yeast I identified important feed-forward and feedback loops that control the critical cell cycle transitions, furthermore I investigated the sensitivity, stochasticity and dynamics of these transitions. In other articles I investigated the regulation of cell division and cell growth in fission yeast cells as well as studied simplified models of signaling pathways. Some of the predictions of the models have been already experimentally verified, some are still under experimental tests

    Growth Rate as a Direct Regulator of the Start Network to Set Cell Size

    Get PDF
    Cells are able to adjust their growth and size to external inputs to comply with specific fates and developmental programs. Molecular pathways controlling growth also have an enormous impact in cell size, and bacteria, yeast, or epithelial cells modify their size as a function of growth rate. This universal feature suggests that growth (mass) and proliferation (cell number) rates are subject to general coordinating mechanisms. However, the underlying molecular connections are still a matter of debate. Here we review the current ideas on growth and cell size control, and focus on the possible mechanisms that could link the biosynthetic machinery to the Start network in budding yeast. In particular, we discuss the role of molecular chaperones in a competition framework to explain cell size control by growth at the individual cell level

    Response dynamics of phosphorelays suggest their potential utility in cell signalling

    Get PDF
    Phosphorelays are extended two-component signalling systems found in diverse bacteria, lower eukaryotes and plants. Only few of these systems are characterized, and we still lack a full understanding of their signalling abilities. Here, we aim to achieve a global understanding of phosphorelay signalling and its dynamical properties. We develop a generic model, allowing us to systematically analyse response dynamics under different assumptions. Using this model, we find that the steady-state concentration of phosphorylated protein at the final layer of a phosphorelay is a linearly increasing, but eventually saturating function of the input. In contrast, the intermediate layers can display ultrasensitivity. We find that such ultrasensitivity is a direct result of the phosphorelay biochemistry; shuttling of a single phosphate group from the first to the last layer. The response dynamics of the phosphorelay results in tolerance of cross-talk, especially when it occurs as cross-deactivation. Further, it leads to a high signal-to-noise ratio for the final layer. We find that a relay length of four, which is most commonly observed, acts as a saturating point for these dynamic properties. These findings suggest that phosphorelays could act as a mechanism to reduce noise and effects of cross-talk on the final layer of the relay and enforce its input–response relation to be linear. In addition, our analysis suggests that middle layers of phosphorelays could embed thresholds. We discuss the consequence of these findings in relation to why cells might use phosphorelays along with enzymatic kinase cascades

    Time scale and dimension analysis of a budding yeast cell cycle model

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The progress through the eukaryotic cell division cycle is driven by an underlying molecular regulatory network. Cell cycle progression can be considered as a series of irreversible transitions from one steady state to another in the correct order. Although this view has been put forward some time ago, it has not been quantitatively proven yet. Bifurcation analysis of a model for the budding yeast cell cycle has identified only two different steady states (one for G1 and one for mitosis) using cell mass as a bifurcation parameter. By analyzing the same model, using different methods of dynamical systems theory, we provide evidence for transitions among several different steady states during the budding yeast cell cycle. RESULTS: By calculating the eigenvalues of the Jacobian of kinetic differential equations we have determined the stability of the cell cycle trajectories of the Chen model. Based on the sign of the real part of the eigenvalues, the cell cycle can be divided into excitation and relaxation periods. During an excitation period, the cell cycle control system leaves a formerly stable steady state and, accordingly, excitation periods can be associated with irreversible cell cycle transitions like START, entry into mitosis and exit from mitosis. During relaxation periods, the control system asymptotically approaches the new steady state. We also show that the dynamical dimension of the Chen's model fluctuates by increasing during excitation periods followed by decrease during relaxation periods. In each relaxation period the dynamical dimension of the model drops to one, indicating a period where kinetic processes are in steady state and all concentration changes are driven by the increase of cytoplasmic growth. CONCLUSION: We apply two numerical methods, which have not been used to analyze biological control systems. These methods are more sensitive than the bifurcation analysis used before because they identify those transitions between steady states that are not controlled by a bifurcation parameter (e.g. cell mass). Therefore by applying these tools for a cell cycle control model, we provide a deeper understanding of the dynamical transitions in the underlying molecular network

    Evolution of Opposing Regulatory Interactions Underlies the Emergence of Eukaryotic Cell Cycle Checkpoints

    Get PDF
    In eukaryotes the entry into mitosis is initiated by activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which in turn activate a large number of protein kinases to induce all mitotic processes. The general view is that kinases are active in mitosis and phosphatases turn them off in interphase. Kinases activate each other by cross- and self-phosphorylation, while phosphatases remove these phosphate groups to inactivate kinases. Crucial exceptions to this general rule are the interphase kinase Wee1 and the mitotic phosphatase Cdc25. Together they directly control CDK in an opposite way of the general rule of mitotic phosphorylation and interphase dephosphorylation. Here we investigate why this opposite system emerged and got fixed in almost all eukaryotes. Our results show that this reversed action of a kinase-phosphatase pair, Wee1 and Cdc25, on CDK is particularly suited to establish a stable G2 phase and to add checkpoints to the cell cycle. We show that all these regulators appeared together in LECA (Last Eukaryote Common Ancestor) and co-evolved in eukaryotes, suggesting that this twist in kinase-phosphatase regulation was a crucial step happening at the emergence of eukaryotes

    Transcriptional Regulation Is a Major Controller of Cell Cycle Transition Dynamics

    Get PDF
    DNA replication, mitosis and mitotic exit are critical transitions of the cell cycle which normally occur only once per cycle. A universal control mechanism was proposed for the regulation of mitotic entry in which Cdk helps its own activation through two positive feedback loops. Recent discoveries in various organisms showed the importance of positive feedbacks in other transitions as well. Here we investigate if a universal control system with transcriptional regulation(s) and post-translational positive feedback(s) can be proposed for the regulation of all cell cycle transitions. Through computational modeling, we analyze the transition dynamics in all possible combinations of transcriptional and post-translational regulations. We find that some combinations lead to ‘sloppy’ transitions, while others give very precise control. The periodic transcriptional regulation through the activator or the inhibitor leads to radically different dynamics. Experimental evidence shows that in cell cycle transitions of organisms investigated for cell cycle dependent periodic transcription, only the inhibitor OR the activator is under cyclic control and never both of them. Based on these observations, we propose two transcriptional control modes of cell cycle regulation that either STOP or let the cycle GO in case of a transcriptional failure. We discuss the biological relevance of such differences

    Cooperation and competition in the dynamics of tissue architecture during homeostasis and tumorigenesis

    Get PDF
    The construction of a network of cell-to-cell contacts makes it possible to characterize the patterns and spatial organisation of tissues. Such networks are highly dynamic, depending on the changes of the tissue architecture caused by cell division, death and migration. Local competitive and cooperative cell-to-cell interactions influence the choices cells make. We review the literature on quantitative data of epithelial tissue topology and present a dynamical network model that can be used to explore the evolutionary dynamics of a two dimensional tissue architecture with arbitrary cell-to-cell interactions. In particular, we show that various forms of experimentally observed types of interactions can be modelled using game theory. We discuss a model of cooperative and non-cooperative cell-to-cell communication that can capture the interplay between cellular competition and tissue dynamics. We conclude with an outlook on the possible uses of this approach in modelling tumorigenesis and tissue homeostasis.Comment: 11 pages, 5 figures; Seminars in Cancer Biology (2013

    Minimum Criteria for DNA Damage-Induced Phase Advances in Circadian Rhythms

    Get PDF
    Robust oscillatory behaviors are common features of circadian and cell cycle rhythms. These cyclic processes, however, behave distinctively in terms of their periods and phases in response to external influences such as light, temperature, nutrients, etc. Nevertheless, several links have been found between these two oscillators. Cell division cycles gated by the circadian clock have been observed since the late 1950s. On the other hand, ionizing radiation (IR) treatments cause cells to undergo a DNA damage response, which leads to phase shifts (mostly advances) in circadian rhythms. Circadian gating of the cell cycle can be attributed to the cell cycle inhibitor kinase Wee1 (which is regulated by the heterodimeric circadian clock transcription factor, BMAL1/CLK), and possibly in conjunction with other cell cycle components that are known to be regulated by the circadian clock (i.e., c-Myc and cyclin D1). It has also been shown that DNA damage-induced activation of the cell cycle regulator, Chk2, leads to phosphorylation and destruction of a circadian clock component (i.e., PER1 in Mus or FRQ in Neurospora crassa). However, the molecular mechanism underlying how DNA damage causes predominantly phase advances in the circadian clock remains unknown. In order to address this question, we employ mathematical modeling to simulate different phase response curves (PRCs) from either dexamethasone (Dex) or IR treatment experiments. Dex is known to synchronize circadian rhythms in cell culture and may generate both phase advances and delays. We observe unique phase responses with minimum delays of the circadian clock upon DNA damage when two criteria are met: (1) existence of an autocatalytic positive feedback mechanism in addition to the time-delayed negative feedback loop in the clock system and (2) Chk2-dependent phosphorylation and degradation of PERs that are not bound to BMAL1/CLK
    corecore