Deep abscess of nasal tip

[ES] Los abscesos profundos nasales constituyen una patología infrecuente en la práctica clínica. Su localización más habitual es el tabique nasal y suelen ser de origen traumático. Se comenta un caso de una paciente sin inmunosupresión subyacente, que presentó un absceso profundo de punta nasal secundario a un forúnculo de vestíbulo nasal. [EN] Nasal deep abscess are an uncommon entity in clinical practice. Its most frequent location is the nasal septum and are usually of traumatic origin. We describe the clinical case of a patient without underlying immunopression, who presented a deep nasal tip abscess secondary to vestibule boil

Post-traumatic Endophthalmitis Caused by Nocardia nova

Introduction: Nocardia nova complex has been associated with infections in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Infection can be localized or disseminated, affecting skin and soft tissues, the respiratory system, bones and joints, the circulatory system and especially the central nervous system. Ocular infections such as keratitis, scleritis, conjunctivitis, dacryocystitis, orbital cellulitis and endophthalmitis due to Nocardia spp. are infrequently reported, and usually described after penetrating corneal trauma or ocular contact with plants and soils. Case presentation: An immunocompetent male presented with a history of penetrating ocular trauma that had evolved to infectious endophthalmitis, which was refractory to different antibiotic treatments. No micro-organisms were isolated from repeated conjunctival smear and corneal scraping cultures between the ocular trauma (August 2014) and the endophthalmitis diagnosis (November 2015). After this period, N. nova sensu stricto was isolated in aqueous humour aspirate. Treatment was adjusted and clinical improvement was obtained after an adequate microbiological procedure, including an optimal sampling and an antimicrobial-susceptibility testing report. Conclusion: Nocardia identification to the species level and performance of antimicrobial-susceptibility tests are both essential tools for treatment adjustment and clinical improvement

Evaluation of endothelial function and subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with HIV infection

The aim of this study was to analyse the association between human immunodefciency virus (HIV) related clinical and analytical parameters and the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis as well as endothelial dysfunction. This was a prospective cohort study of HIV-positive patients who underwent intima media thickness (IMT) determination and coronary artery calcium scoring to determine subclinical atherosclerosis. To detect endothelial dysfunction, the breath holding index, fow-mediated dilation and the concentration of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were measured. Patients with an IMT? 0.9 mm had an average of 559.3 ± 283.34 CD4/?l, and those with an IMT< 0.9 mm had an average of 715.4 ± 389.92 CD4/?l (p= 0.04). Patients with a low calcium score had a signifcantly higher average CD4 cell value and lower zenith viral load (VL) than those with a higher score (707.7 ± 377.5 CD4/?l vs 477.23 ± 235.7 CD4/?l (p= 0.01) and 7 ×?¬104 ± 5 ×?¬104 copies/ml vs 23.4 × 104 ± 19 × 104 copies/ml (p= 0.02)). The number of early EPCs in patients with a CD4 nadir< 350/ µl was lower than that in those with a CD4 nadir? 350 (p= 0.03). In HIV-positive patients, low CD4 cell levels and high VL were associated with risk of developing subclinical atherosclerosis. HIV patients with CD4 cell nadir < 350/µl may have fewer early EPCs

Catheter-related bloodstream infections: predictive factors for Gram-negative bacteria aetiology and 30 day mortality in a multicentre prospective cohort

PROBAC REIPI/GEIH-SEIMC/SAEI.[Background] Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) increase morbidity and mortality, prolong hospitalization and generate considerable medical costs. Recent guidelines for CRBSI recommend empirical therapy against Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) and restrict coverage for Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) only to specific circumstances.[Objectives]To investigate predictors of GNB aetiology in CRBSI and to assess the predictors of outcome in patients with CRBSI.[Methods] Patients with CRBSI were selected from the PROBAC cohort, a prospective, observational, multicentre national cohort study including patients with bloodstream infections consecutively admitted to 26 Spanish hospitals in a 6 month period (October 2016–March 2017). Outcome variables were GNB aetiology and 30 day mortality. Adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression.[Results] Six hundred and thirty-one episodes of CRBSI were included in the study. Risk factors independently related to GNB aetiology were central venous catheter (CVC) [OR 1.60 (95% CI: 1.05–2.44), P = 0.028], sepsis/septic shock [OR: 1.76 (95% CI: 1.11–2.80), P = 0.016], antibiotic therapy in the previous 30 days [OR: 1.56 (95% CI: 1.02–2.36), P = 0.037], neutropenia <500/μL [OR: 2.01 (95% CI: 1.04–3.87), P = 0.037] and peripheral vascular disease [OR: 2.04 (95% CI: 1.13–3.68), P = 0.018]. GNB were not associated with increased mortality in adjusted analysis, while removal of catheter [OR: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09–0.61), P = 0.002] and adequate empirical treatment [OR: 0.37 (95% CI: 0.18–0.77), P = 0.008] were strong protective factors.[Conclusions] Our study reinforces the recommendation that empirical coverage should cover GNB in patients presenting with sepsis/septic shock and in neutropenic patients. Catheter removal and adequate empirical treatment were both protective factors against mortality in patients with CRBSI.This study was funded by Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013–2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, through the following grants: Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001; RD16/0016/0007; RD16/0016/0008; RD16/0016/0012), co-financed by European Development Regional Fund ‘A way to achieve Europe’, Operative Program Intelligent Growth 2014–2020, and PI16/01432. F. Caló enjoyed an ESCMID Observership grant at Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena to develop this research

Aproximación terapéutica a las infecciones por microorganismos multirresistentes.

RESUMEN: La infección nosocomial por microorganismos multirresistentes se asocia en la mayoría de los casos a un retraso en el inicio de un tratamiento adecuado y a un fracaso terapéutico, prolongando la estancia hospitalaria, los costes y la mortalidad. Los microorganismos multirresistentes de mayor importancia clínica son: Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina, Enterococcus resistente a vancomicina, enterobacterias multirresistentes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa y Acinetobacter multirresistente. Entre los factores de riesgo para presentar infecciones por microorganismos multirresistentes destacan el tener una estancia hospitalaria prolongada, el ingreso en unidades de cuidados intensivos, el empleo de antibióticos de amplio espectro y la presencia de dispositivos invasivos. Es de gran importancia la correcta elección de la antibioterapia para el tratamiento de infecciones por microorganismos multirresistentes, pero no son menos importantes algunas actitudes básicas descritas en esta revisión, que pueden evitar que estas infecciones lleguen a producirse, con lo que ahorraremos al paciente riesgo, tiempo de hospitalización y toxicidad farmacológica.ABSTRACT: Nosocomial infection by multiresistant microorganisms is associated with delayed initiation of adequate therapy and therapeutic failure, prolonging hospital stay, cost and mortality. Multiresistant microorganisms with a higher clinically relevance are: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, multiresistant enterobacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and multiresistant Acinetobacter. The risk factors for infection due to multiresistant microorganisms are mainly: to have a prolonged hospital stay, stay in a intensive care unit, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and the presence of invasive devices. It is really important the correct choice of antibiotherapy to treat infections by multiresistant microorganisms. However, there are not less important some basic attitudes described in this review, which could prevent that these infections happen, decreasing the patient risk, time of hospitalization and drug toxicity

Uso racional de los antibióticos y multirresistencia. Nuevos antimicrobianos.

RESUMEN: El uso inadecuado de antibióticos es actualmente un problema mundial que requiere la revisión de las políticas sanitarias, dada la repercusión que tiene tanto a nivel individual como social. Es de gran importancia detectar la infección l oantes posible, identificar el foco y el patógeno causal, así como su susceptibilidad antibiótica para establecer un tratamiento antibiótico apropiado. Las resistencias a antibióticos son un problema que va aumentando tanto a nivel comunitario como hospitalario, generando una mayor morbilidad, mortalidad y gastos hospitalarios. Debido a esto en los últimos años se han creado en distintos centros hospitalarios programas de optimización de tratamientos antimicrobianos (PROA). Por otro lado, el aumento de las resistencias ha favorecido un incremento en el desarrollo y posterior comercialización de nuevas moléculas antibióticas frente a los principales microorganismos hospitalarios multirresistentes.ABSTRACT: The bad use of antibiotics is a growing problem in global public health that requires action by all government sectors and society in general. It is very important to detect the infection as soon as possible, identify the source of infection, causative pathogen and its antibiotic susceptibility to establish an appropriate antibiotic treatment. The antibiotic resistance is a problem that is increasing over time at Community and in hospitals, generating an increase in morbidity and mortality. Because of this, years ago, antimicrobial stewardships programs began to be created in different hospitals (called PROA in this document). On the other hand, increased resistance has favored the development and commercialization of new molecules of antibiotics against most of the multiresistant microorganisms

Association of microbiological factors with mortality in Escherichia coli bacteraemia presenting with sepsis/septic shock: a prospective cohort study

[EN] Objectives: This study aimed to determine the association of Escherichia coli microbiological factors with 30-day mortality in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) presenting with a dysregulated response to infection (i.e. sepsis or septic shock). Methods: Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 224 E coli isolates of patients with sepsis/septic shock, from 22 Spanish hospitals. Phylogroup, sequence type, virulence, antibiotic resistance, and pathogenicity islands were assessed. A multivariable model for 30-day mortality including clinical and epidemiological variables was built, to which microbiological variables were hierarchically added. The predictive capacity of the models was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Mortality at day 30 was 31% (69 patients). The clinical model for mortality included (adjusted OR; 95% CI) age (1.04; 1.02-1.07), Charlson index >= 3 (1.78; 0.95-3.32), urinary BSI source (0.30; 0.16-0.57), and active empirical treatment (0.36; 0.11-1.14) with an AUROC of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67-0.80). Addition of microbiological factors selected clone ST95 (3.64; 0.94-14.04), eilA gene (2.62; 1.14-6.02), and astA gene (2.39; 0.87-6.59) as associated with mortality, with an AUROC of 0.76 (0.69-0.82). Discussion: Despite having a modest overall contribution, some microbiological factors were associated with increased odds of death and deserve to be studied as potential therapeutic or preventive targets. Natalia Maldonado, Clin Microbiol Infect 2024;30:1035 (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).This study was funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III through grant PI16/01432 and co-funded by the European Union (Development Regional Fund 'A Way to Achieve Europe').Maldonado, N.; López-Hernández, I.; López-Cortés, LE.; Pérez-Crespo, PM.; Retamar-Gentil, P.; García-Montaner, A.; Riestra, S.... (2024). Association of microbiological factors with mortality in Escherichia coli bacteraemia presenting with sepsis/septic shock: a prospective cohort study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 30(8):1035-1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.04.0011035104130

Inflammasome-related genetic polymorphisms as severity biomarkers of COVID-19

The most critical forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are associated with excessive activation of the inflammasome. Despite the COVID-19 impact on public health, we still do not fully understand the mechanisms by which the inflammatory response influences disease prognosis. Accordingly, we aimed to elucidate the role of polymorphisms in the key genes of the formation and signaling of the inflammasome as biomarkers of COVID-19 severity. For this purpose, a large and well-defined cohort of 377 COVID-19 patients with mild (n = 72), moderate (n = 84), severe (n = 100), and critical (n = 121) infections were included. A total of 24 polymorphisms located in inflammasome-related genes (NLRP3, NLRC4, NLRP1, CARD8, CASP1, IL1B, IL18, NFKB1, ATG16L1, and MIF) were genotyped in all of the patients and in the 192 healthy controls (HCs) (who were without COVID-19 at the time of and before the study) by RT-qPCR. Our results showed that patients with mild, moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19 presented similar allelic and genotypic distribution in all the variants studied. No statistically significant differences in the haplotypic distribution of NLRP3, NLRC4, NLRP1, CARD8, CASP1, IL1B, and ATG16L1 were observed between COVID-19 patients, who were stratified by disease severity. Each stratified group of patients presented a similar genetic distribution to the HCs. In conclusion, our results suggest that the inflammasome polymorphisms studied are not associated with the worsening of COVID-19.Funding: V.P.-C. was supported by the funds of NVAL23/02 from Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL); M.S.M.-G. was financed by the funds of PI21/00042 from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), which was co-funded by the European Social Fund (ESF); JCBL was a recipient of a PFIS program fellowship from the ISCIII, which was co-funded by the ESF (‘Investing in your future’) with the grant number of FI22/00020. RL-M was a recipient of a Miguel Servet type II program fellowship from the ISCIII, which was co-funded by ESF (“Investing in your future”) with a grant number of CPII21/00004. Acknowledgments: We thank all the subjects that participated in this study

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Fosfomycin for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results from a Spanish Multicenter Cohort

Current guidelines recommend against systematic screening for or treating asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) among kidney transplant (KT) recipients, although the evidence regarding episodes occurring early after transplantation or in the presence of anatomical abnormalities is inconclusive. Oral fosfomycin may constitute a good option for the treatment of posttransplant AB, particularly due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) uropathogens. Available clinical evidence supporting its use in this specific setting, however, remains scarce. We performed a retrospective study in 14 Spanish institutions from January 2005 to December 2017. Overall, 137 episodes of AB diagnosed in 133 KT recipients treated with oral fosfomycin (calcium and trometamol salts) with a test-of-cure urine culture within the first 30 days were included. Median time from transplantation to diagnosis was 3.1 months (interquartile range [IQR], 1.1 to 10.5). Most episodes (96.4% [132/137]) were caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), and 56.9% (78/137) were categorized as MDR (extended?spectrum ??lactamase?producing Enterobacterales [20.4%] and carbapenem?resistant GNB [2.9%]). Rate of microbiological failure at month 1 was 40.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.9% to 48.9%) for the whole cohort and 42.3% (95% CI, 31.2% to 54.0%) for episodes due to MDR pathogens. Previous urinary tract infection (odds ratio [OR], 2.42; 95% CI, 1.11 to 5.29; P value = 0.027) and use of fosfomycin as salvage therapy (OR, 8.31; 95% CI, 1.67 to 41.35; P value = 0.010) were predictors of microbiological failure. No severe treatment-related adverse events were detected. Oral fosfomycin appears to be a suitable and safe alternative for the treatment (if indicated) of AB after KT, including those episodes due to MDR uropathogens.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was supported by Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013‐2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016), and Spanish Network for Research in Renal Diseases (REDInREN RD16/0009) and cofinanced by the European Development Regional Fund entitled A way to achieve Europe. M.F.-R. holds a research contract (Miguel Servet, CP18/00073), from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, ISCIII. Funding sources were not involved in the study design and conduction, data analysis, or manuscript preparation

Real-world experience with bezlotoxumab for prevention of recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection

Bezlotoxumab is marketed for the prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). Its high cost could be determining its prescription to a different population than that represented in clinical trials. The objective of the study was to verify the effectiveness and safety of bezlotoxumab in preventing rCDI and to investigate factors related to bezlotoxumab failure in the real world. A retrospective, multicentre cohort study of patients treated with bezlotoxumab in Spain was conducted. We compared the characteristics of cohort patients with those of patients treated with bezlotoxumab in the pivotal MODIFY trials. We assessed recurrence rates 12 weeks after completion of treatment against C. difficile, and we analysed the factors associated with bezlotoxumab failure. Ninety-one patients were included in the study. The cohort presented with more risk factors for rCDI than the patients included in the MODIFY trials. Thirteen (14.2%) developed rCDI at 12 weeks of follow-up, and rCDI rates were numerically higher in patients with two or more previous episodes (25%) than in those who had fewer than two previous episodes of C. difficile infection (CDI) (10.4%); p = 0.09. There were no adverse effects attributable to bezlotoxumab. Despite being used in a more compromised population than that represented in clinical trials, we confirm the effectiveness of bezlotoxumab for the prevention of rCDI