Cementless total hip replacement: past, present, and future

Cementless total hip replacement (THR) is rapidly being accepted as the surgery for arthritic diseases of the hip joint. The bone-ingrowth rate in porous-type cementless implants was about 90% over 10 years after surgery, showing that biological fixation of cementless THR was well maintained on both the stem and cup sides. As for the stress shielding of the femur operated using a distal fixation-type stem, severe bone resorption was observed. The severe bone resorption group showed continuous progression for more than 10 years after surgery. Stem loosening directly caused by stress shielding has been considered less likely; however, close attention should be paid to bone resorption-associated disorders including femoral fracture. Cementless cups have several specific problems. It is difficult to decide whether a cup should be placed in the physiological position for the case of acetabular dysplasia by bone grafting or at a relatively higher position without bone grafting. The bone-ingrowth rate was lower in the group with en bloc bone grafting, and the reactive line was frequently noted in the bone-grafted region. Although no data indicated that en bloc bone grafting directly led to poor outcomes, such as loosening, cup placement at a higher site without bone grafting is now selected by most operators. The polyethylene liner in a cementless cup is thinned due to the metal cup thickness; however, it has been suggested that the apparent relation between the cup size and the wear rate was absent as long as a cementless cup is used. Comparative study indicated cementless THR was inferior with regard to the yearly polyethylene wear rate and incidence of osteolysis on both the stem and cup sides. Meta-analysis study on the survival rate between cement and cementless THR reported that cemented THR was slightly superior. It should be considered that specific problems for cementless THR, especially with regard to polyethylene wear, do occur

HGF-Transgenic MSCs Can Improve the Effects of Tissue Self-Repair in a Rabbit Model of Traumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is generally characterized as an irreversible disease and tends to cause permanent disability. Therefore, understanding the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms of ONFH and developing effective therapeutic methods is critical for slowing the progress of the disease. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this study, an experimental rabbit model of early stage traumatic ONFH was established, validated, and used for an evaluation of therapy. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging confirmed that this model represents clinical Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) phase I or II ONFH, which was also confirmed by the presence of significant tissue damage in osseous tissue and vasculature. Pathological examination detected obvious self-repair of bone tissue up to 2 weeks after trauma, as indicated by revascularization (marked by CD105) and expression of collagen type I (Col I), osteocalcin, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Transplantation of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-transgenic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) 1 week after trauma promoted recovery from ONFH, as evidenced by a reversed pattern of Col I expression compared with animals receiving no therapeutic treatment, as well as increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that the transplantation of HGF-transgenic MSCs is a promising method for the treatment for ONFH and suggest that appropriate interference therapy during the tissue self-repair stage contributes to the positive outcomes. This study also provides a model for the further study of the ONFH etiology and therapeutic interventions

Periprosthetic osteolysis after total hip replacement: molecular pathology and clinical management

Periprosthetic osteolysis is a serious complication of total hip replacement (THR) in the medium to long term. Although often asymptomatic, osteolysis can lead to prosthesis loosening and periprosthetic fracture. These complications cause significant morbidity and require complex revision surgery. Here, we review advances in our understanding of the cell and tissue response to particles produced by wear of the articular and non-articular surfaces of prostheses. We discuss the molecular and cellular regulators of osteoclast formation and bone resorptive activity, a better understanding of which may lead to pharmacological treatments for periprosthetic osteolysis. We describe the development of imaging techniques for the detection and measurement of osteolysis around THR prostheses, which enable improved clinical management of patients, provide a means of evaluating outcomes of non-surgical treatments for periprosthetic osteolysis, and assist in pre-operative planning for revision surgery. Finally, there have been advances in the materials used for bearing surfaces to minimise wear, and we review the literature regarding the performance of these new materials to date.Donald W. Howie, Susan D. Neale, David R. Haynes, Oksana T. Holubowycz, Margaret A. McGee, Lucian B. Solomon, Stuart A. Callary, Gerald J. Atkins, David M. Findla

Biomechanical comparison of different rod-to-rod connectors to a conventional titanium- and cobalt chromium posterior spinal fixation system

Introduction: Several types of rod-to-rod connectors are available for the extension of spinal fixation systems. However, scientific literature regarding the mechanical performance of different rod-to-rod connector systems is lacking. Research question: The goal of this study was to evaluate the mechanical characteristics of axial and lateral rod connectors in comparison to a conventional pedicle screw rod (titanium and cobalt chromium) construct. Material and method: Six types of instrumentations were investigated in a standardized test model to quantify the mechanical differences: 1: titanium rod; 2: titanium rod with axial connector; 3: titanium rod with lateral connector; 4: cobalt chromium rod; 5: cobalt chromium rod with axial connector; 6: cobalt chromium rod with lateral connector. All groups were tested in static compression, static torsion and dynamic compression and statistically compared regarding failure load and stiffness. Results: In static compression loading, the use of connectors increased the construct stiffness, but unaffected the yield load. The use of a cobalt chromium rod significantly increased by approximately 40% the yield load and stiffness in comparison to the titanium rod configurations. Under dynamic compression, a similar or higher fatigue strength for all tested groups in comparison to the titanium rod configuration was evaluated, with the exception of titanium rod with axial connector. Conclusion: Biomechanically, using rod connectors is a secure way for the extension of a construct and is mechanically equal to a conventional screw rod construct. However, in clinical use, attention should be paid regarding placement of the connectors at high loaded areas