Rh-POP Pincer Xantphos Complexes for C-S and C-H Activation. Implications for Carbothiolation Catalysis

The neutral Rh­(I)–Xantphos complex [Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos)­Cl]_<i>n</i>, <b>4</b>, and cationic Rh­(III) [Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos)­(H)₂]­[BAr^F₄], <b>2a</b>, and [Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos-3,5-C₆H₃(CF₃)₂)­(H)₂]­[BAr^F₄], <b>2b</b>, are described [Ar^F = 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃; Xantphos = 4,5-bis­(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthene; Xantphos-3,5-C₆H₃(CF₃)₂ = 9,9-dimethylxanthene-4,5-bis­(bis­(3,5-bis­(trifluoromethyl)­phenyl)­phosphine]. A solid-state structure of <b>2b</b> isolated from C₆H₅Cl solution shows a κ¹-chlorobenzene adduct, [Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos-3,5-C₆H₃(CF₃)₂)­(H)₂(κ¹-ClC₆H₅)]­[BAr^F₄], <b>3</b>. Addition of H₂ to <b>4</b> affords, crystallographically characterized, [Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos)­(H)₂Cl], <b>5</b>. Addition of diphenyl acetylene to <b>2a</b> results in the formation of the C–H activated metallacyclopentadiene [Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos)­(ClCH₂Cl)­(σ,σ-(C₆H₄)­C­(H)CPh)]­[BAr^F₄], <b>7</b>, a rare example of a crystallographically characterized Rh–dichloromethane complex, alongside the Rh­(I) complex <i>mer</i>-[Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos)­(η²-PhCCPh)]­[BAr^F₄], <b>6</b>. Halide abstraction from [Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos)­Cl]_<i>n</i> in the presence of diphenylacetylene affords <b>6</b> as the only product, which in the solid state shows that the alkyne binds perpendicular to the κ³-POP Xantphos ligand plane. This complex acts as a latent source of the [Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos)]⁺ fragment and facilitates <i>ortho</i>-directed C–S activation in a number of 2-arylsulfides to give <i>mer</i>-[Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos)­(σ,κ¹-Ar)­(SMe)]­[BAr^F₄] (Ar = C₆H₄COMe, <b>8</b>; C₆H₄(CO)­OMe, <b>9</b>; C₆H₄NO₂, <b>10</b>; C₆H₄CNCH₂CH₂O, <b>11</b>; C₆H₄C₅H₄N, <b>12</b>). Similar C–S bond cleavage is observed with allyl sulfide, to give <i>fac</i>-[Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos)­(η³-C₃H₅)­(SPh)]­[BAr^F₄], <b>13</b>. These products of C–S activation have been crystallographically characterized. For <b>8</b> in situ monitoring of the reaction by NMR spectroscopy reveals the initial formation of <i>fac</i>-κ³-<b>8</b>, which then proceeds to isomerize to the <i>mer</i>-isomer. With the <i>para</i>-ketone aryl sulfide, 4-SMeC ₆H₄COMe, C–H activation <i>ortho</i> to the ketone occurs to give <i>mer</i>-[Rh­(κ³-_P,O,P-Xantphos)­(σ,κ¹-4-(COMe)­C₆H₃SMe)­(H)]­[BAr^F₄], <b>14</b>. The temporal evolution of carbothiolation catalysis using <i>mer</i>-κ³-<b>8</b>, and phenyl acetylene and 2-(methylthio)­acetophenone substrates shows initial fast catalysis and then a considerably slower evolution of the product. We suggest that the initially formed <i>fac</i>-isomer of the C–S activation product is considerably more active than the <i>mer</i>-isomer (i.e., <i>mer</i>-<b>8</b>), the latter of which is formed rapidly by isomerization, and this accounts for the observed difference in rates. A likely mechanism is proposed based upon these data

Whole-genome sequencing reveals host factors underlying critical COVID-19

Critical COVID-19 is caused by immune-mediated inflammatory lung injury. Host genetic variation influences the development of illness requiring critical care1 or hospitalization2–4 after infection with SARS-CoV-2. The GenOMICC (Genetics of Mortality in Critical Care) study enables the comparison of genomes from individuals who are critically ill with those of population controls to find underlying disease mechanisms. Here we use whole-genome sequencing in 7,491 critically ill individuals compared with 48,400 controls to discover and replicate 23 independent variants that significantly predispose to critical COVID-19. We identify 16 new independent associations, including variants within genes that are involved in interferon signalling (IL10RB and PLSCR1), leucocyte differentiation (BCL11A) and blood-type antigen secretor status (FUT2). Using transcriptome-wide association and colocalization to infer the effect of gene expression on disease severity, we find evidence that implicates multiple genes—including reduced expression of a membrane flippase (ATP11A), and increased expression of a mucin (MUC1)—in critical disease. Mendelian randomization provides evidence in support of causal roles for myeloid cell adhesion molecules (SELE, ICAM5 and CD209) and the coagulation factor F8, all of which are potentially druggable targets. Our results are broadly consistent with a multi-component model of COVID-19 pathophysiology, in which at least two distinct mechanisms can predispose to life-threatening disease: failure to control viral replication; or an enhanced tendency towards pulmonary inflammation and intravascular coagulation. We show that comparison between cases of critical illness and population controls is highly efficient for the detection of therapeutically relevant mechanisms of disease

Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in COVID-19.

Host-mediated lung inflammation is present1, and drives mortality2, in the critical illness caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Host genetic variants associated with critical illness may identify mechanistic targets for therapeutic development3. Here we report the results of the GenOMICC (Genetics Of Mortality In Critical Care) genome-wide association study in 2,244 critically ill patients with COVID-19 from 208 UK intensive care units. We have identified and replicated the following new genome-wide significant associations: on chromosome 12q24.13 (rs10735079, P = 1.65 × 10-8) in a gene cluster that encodes antiviral restriction enzyme activators (OAS1, OAS2 and OAS3); on chromosome 19p13.2 (rs74956615, P = 2.3 × 10-8) near the gene that encodes tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2); on chromosome 19p13.3 (rs2109069, P = 3.98 ×  10-12) within the gene that encodes dipeptidyl peptidase 9 (DPP9); and on chromosome 21q22.1 (rs2236757, P = 4.99 × 10-8) in the interferon receptor gene IFNAR2. We identified potential targets for repurposing of licensed medications: using Mendelian randomization, we found evidence that low expression of IFNAR2, or high expression of TYK2, are associated with life-threatening disease; and transcriptome-wide association in lung tissue revealed that high expression of the monocyte-macrophage chemotactic receptor CCR2 is associated with severe COVID-19. Our results identify robust genetic signals relating to key host antiviral defence mechanisms and mediators of inflammatory organ damage in COVID-19. Both mechanisms may be amenable to targeted treatment with existing drugs. However, large-scale randomized clinical trials will be essential before any change to clinical practice

Whole-genome sequencing reveals host factors underlying critical COVID-19

Critical COVID-19 is caused by immune-mediated inflammatory lung injury. Host genetic variation influences the development of illness requiring critical care1 or hospitalization2,3,4 after infection with SARS-CoV-2. The GenOMICC (Genetics of Mortality in Critical Care) study enables the comparison of genomes from individuals who are critically ill with those of population controls to find underlying disease mechanisms. Here we use whole-genome sequencing in 7,491 critically ill individuals compared with 48,400 controls to discover and replicate 23 independent variants that significantly predispose to critical COVID-19. We identify 16 new independent associations, including variants within genes that are involved in interferon signalling (IL10RB and PLSCR1), leucocyte differentiation (BCL11A) and blood-type antigen secretor status (FUT2). Using transcriptome-wide association and colocalization to infer the effect of gene expression on disease severity, we find evidence that implicates multiple genes—including reduced expression of a membrane flippase (ATP11A), and increased expression of a mucin (MUC1)—in critical disease. Mendelian randomization provides evidence in support of causal roles for myeloid cell adhesion molecules (SELE, ICAM5 and CD209) and the coagulation factor F8, all of which are potentially druggable targets. Our results are broadly consistent with a multi-component model of COVID-19 pathophysiology, in which at least two distinct mechanisms can predispose to life-threatening disease: failure to control viral replication; or an enhanced tendency towards pulmonary inflammation and intravascular coagulation. We show that comparison between cases of critical illness and population controls is highly efficient for the detection of therapeutically relevant mechanisms of disease

Controlling selectivity in intermolecular alkene or aldehyde hydroacylation reactions catalyzed by {Rh(L2)}+ fragments

Rhodium(III) dihydrido complexes [Rh(L(2))(H)(2)(acetone)][BAr(4)(F)] (Ark = C(6)H(3)(CF(3))(2)) containing the potentially hemilabile ligands L(2) = 9,9-dimethy1-4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)xanthene (Xantphos) and [Ph(2)P(CH(2))(2)](2)O (POP') have been prepared from their corresponding norbornadiene rhodium(I) precursors. In solution these complexes are fluxional by proposed acetone dissociation, which can be trapped out by addition of MeCN to form [Rh(L(2))(H)(2)(NCMe)][BAr(4)(F)], which have been crystallographically characterized. Addition of alkene (methyl acrylate) to these complexes results in reduction to a rhodium(I) species and when followed by addition of the aldehyde HCOCH(2)CH(2)SMe affords the new acyl hydrido complexes [Rh(L(2))(COCH(2)CH(2)SMe)H][BAr(4)(F)] in good yield. The solid-state and solution structures show a tight binding of the POP' and Xantphos ligands, having a trans-arrangement of the phosphines with the central ether linkage bound. This is similar to the previously reported complex [Rh(DPEphos)(COCH(2)CH(2)SMOHNBAr(4)(F)] (DPEphos = [Ph(2)P(C(6)H(4))](2)O). Unlike the DPEphos complex, the Xantphos and POP' ligated complexes are not effective catalysts for the hydroacylation reaction between methyl acrylate and HCOCH(2)CH(2)SMe. This is traced to their inability to dissociate the central ether link in a hemilabile manner to reveal a vacant site necessary for alkene coordination. Consistent with this lack of availability of the vacant site, these complexes also are stable toward reductive decarbonylation. Complexes [Rh(Ph(2)P(CH(2))PPh(2))(acetone)(2)][BAr(4)(F)] (n = 2-5) have also been studied as catalysts for the hydroacylation reaction between methyl acrylate and HCOCH(2)CH(2)SMe at 22 degrees C. As found previously, for n=2 this affords the product of alkene hydroacylation, but as the chain length is progressively increased to n= 5, the reaction also progressively changes to favor the product of aldehyde hydroacylation. This is suggested to occur by a decrease in the accessibility of the metal site on increasing the bite angle of the chelate ligand, so that alkene coordination to a putative Rh(III)-acyl hydrido intermediate is progressively disfavored and aldehyde coordination (followed by hydride transfer) is progressively favored. These, and previous, results show that the overall conversion in the hydroacylation reaction can be controlled by the hemilabile nature of the chelating phosphine in the catalyst (e.g.. DPEphos versus Xantphos), and the course of the reaction can also be tuned by changing the bite angle of the phosphine, cf. Ph(2)P(CH(2))(2)PPh(2) and Ph(2)P(CH(2))(5)PPh(2))