143 research outputs found
The effect of induction therapy with infliximab or vedolizumab on hepcidin and iron status in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Background Differentiating absolute iron deficiency from functional iron restriction is challenging in active Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Hepcidin, the systemic iron regulator, could be the key in the diagnosis and management of absolute iron deficiency. In this study, we assessed hepcidin as a diagnostic iron deficiency marker and we explored the relationship between hepcidin, inflammation, hypoxia, and iron deficiency in patients receiving induction therapy with infliximab (IFX) or vedolizumab (VEDO). Methods 130 patients with IBD, who received induction therapy with IFX or VEDO for active disease, were included in this study. Clinical and biochemical data were extracted from medical records. Serum samples at baseline and week 6 of induction therapy were retrieved from the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) biobank and analysed for: hepcidin, inflammation (e.g., interleukins [IL] 6, 10, and Tumour Necrosis Factor-α [TNFα]), oxidative stress (free thiols), and hypoxia (e.g., erythropoietin [EPO], Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-3α [MIP3α]). For comparison, serum samples from 50 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were obtained from pre-donation biobank at the UMCG. Response to therapy was defined by either General Physicianâs Assessment at week 14 of induction therapy, normalisation or at least a three-point decrease in clinical scores: Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) for Crohnâs Disease, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) for ulcerative colitis. Results Hepcidin correlated with ferritin and sTfR/log ferritin index [Ï = 0.74 and Ï = -0.79, respectively; P<0.001 for both markers], while inflammation- and hypoxia-associated markers showed only marginal correlations. Hepcidin accurately identified absolute iron deficiency: AUC(hepcidin) = 0.89 [95% CI: 0.82â0.95; P<0.001]. Induction with either IFX or VEDO decreased hepcidin [13.5 ng/mL vs. 9.5 ng/mL; P<0.001], ferritin [45.5 ug/L vs. 37.0 ug/L, P<0.05], and inflammatory markers at week 6, while transferrin increased [2.4 g/L vs. 2.5 g/L, P<0.001]. In total, 75.4% of patients responded to the induction therapy. Hepcidin and ferritin decreased, while transferrin increased (P<0.001 for all changes) in patients who responded to the therapy. In addition, hypoxia (EPO and MIP3α) and inflammatory markers such as faecal calprotectin, IL-6, IL-22, and TNFα improved significantly. In contrast, none of these improvements were observed in patients who did not respond to the therapy. Conclusion Hepcidin reflects iron deficiency in active IBD, but inflammation masks the severity of the deficiency. Induction therapy with either IFX or VEDO modulates hepcidin and iron indices, especially in patients who respond to the therapy
Vedolizumab for Inflammatory Bowel Disease:Two-Year Results of the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) Registry, A Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study: ICC Registry - Vedolizumab
Contains fulltext :
220028.pdf (Publisherâs version ) (Open Access)Prospective data of vedolizumab treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) beyond 1 year of treatment is scarce but needed for clinical decision making. We prospectively enrolled 310 patients with IBD (191 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 119 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC)) with a follow-up period of 104 weeks (interquartile range: 103-104) in a nationwide registry. The corticosteroid-free clinical remission rate (Harvey Bradshaw Index â€Â 4, Short Clinical Colitis Activity index â€Â 2) at weeks 52 and 104 were 28% and 19% for CD and 27% and 28% for UC, respectively. Fifty-nine percent maintained corticosteroid-free clinical remission between weeks 52 and 104. Vedolizumab with concomitant immunosuppression showed comparable effectiveness outcomes compared with vedolizumab monotherapy (week 104: 21% vs. 23%; P = 0.77), whereas 8 of 13 severe infections occurred in patients treated with concomitant immunosuppression. To conclude, the clinical effect was 19% for CD and 28% for UC after 2 years of follow-up regardless of concomitant immunosuppression
Instructions for Authors
Nonadherence to medical therapy is frequently encountered in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to identify predictors for future (non)adherence in IBD
Prognostic Value of the Modified Rutgeerts Score for Long-Term Outcomes After Primary Ileocecal Resection in Crohnâs Disease
IntroductionThe prognostic value of the modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) needs to be further elucidated. This study assessed the prognostic value of the mRS for long-term outcomes after primary ileocecal resection in patients with CD.METHODS: Patients with CD after primary ileocecal resection with an available mRS at first postoperative ileocolonoscopy (index mRS) were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was surgical recurrence. Secondary outcomes were clinical recurrence and progression to severe endoscopic recurrence (âĄi3). Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between index mRS and outcomes. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-two patients were included (mean follow-up: 6.4 years, SD: 4.6). Surgical recurrence rates were 7.7%, 5.3%, 12.9%, 19.1%, 28.8%, 47.8% for index mRS i0, i1, i2a, i2b, i3, and i4, respectively. Clinical recurrence occurred in 42.2% (i0), 53.7% (i1), 58.5% (i2a), 80.2% (i2b), 79.4% (i3), and 95.3% (i4) of patients. Progression to severe endoscopic recurrence occurred in 21.1% (i0), 33.9% (i1), 26.8% (i2a), and 33.3% (i2b) of patients. An index mRS of i2b (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.0; 1.5â5.6), i3 (aHR 4.0; 2.0â7.9) and i4 (aHR 8.0; 4.0â16.0) were associated with surgical recurrence. An index mRS of i1 (aHR 1.7; 1.2â2.4), i2a (aHR 1.7; 1.2â2.4), i2b (aHR 4.4; 3.2â6.0), i3 (aHR 3.6; 2.5â5.2), and i4 (aHR 7.3; 4.8â10.9) were associated with clinical recurrence. An index mRS of i1 (aHR 2.0; 1.1â3.7) or i2b (aHR 2.5; 1.4â4.6) was associated with progression to severe endoscopic recurrence.DISCUSSION: The increasing mRS corresponds closely with the risk of surgical and clinical recurrence. An index mRS ⥠i2b is associated with surgical recurrence, an index mRS ⥠i1 is associated with clinical recurrence, and i1 or i2b with progression to severe endoscopic recurrence. These results support tight monitoring of disease activity and treatment optimization in patients with ileal lesions and a more conservative management in patients with anastomotic lesions.</p
Prognostic Value of the Modified Rutgeerts Score for Long-Term Outcomes After Primary Ileocecal Resection in Crohnâs Disease
IntroductionThe prognostic value of the modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) needs to be further elucidated. This study assessed the prognostic value of the mRS for long-term outcomes after primary ileocecal resection in patients with CD.METHODS: Patients with CD after primary ileocecal resection with an available mRS at first postoperative ileocolonoscopy (index mRS) were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was surgical recurrence. Secondary outcomes were clinical recurrence and progression to severe endoscopic recurrence (âĄi3). Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between index mRS and outcomes. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-two patients were included (mean follow-up: 6.4 years, SD: 4.6). Surgical recurrence rates were 7.7%, 5.3%, 12.9%, 19.1%, 28.8%, 47.8% for index mRS i0, i1, i2a, i2b, i3, and i4, respectively. Clinical recurrence occurred in 42.2% (i0), 53.7% (i1), 58.5% (i2a), 80.2% (i2b), 79.4% (i3), and 95.3% (i4) of patients. Progression to severe endoscopic recurrence occurred in 21.1% (i0), 33.9% (i1), 26.8% (i2a), and 33.3% (i2b) of patients. An index mRS of i2b (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.0; 1.5â5.6), i3 (aHR 4.0; 2.0â7.9) and i4 (aHR 8.0; 4.0â16.0) were associated with surgical recurrence. An index mRS of i1 (aHR 1.7; 1.2â2.4), i2a (aHR 1.7; 1.2â2.4), i2b (aHR 4.4; 3.2â6.0), i3 (aHR 3.6; 2.5â5.2), and i4 (aHR 7.3; 4.8â10.9) were associated with clinical recurrence. An index mRS of i1 (aHR 2.0; 1.1â3.7) or i2b (aHR 2.5; 1.4â4.6) was associated with progression to severe endoscopic recurrence.DISCUSSION: The increasing mRS corresponds closely with the risk of surgical and clinical recurrence. An index mRS ⥠i2b is associated with surgical recurrence, an index mRS ⥠i1 is associated with clinical recurrence, and i1 or i2b with progression to severe endoscopic recurrence. These results support tight monitoring of disease activity and treatment optimization in patients with ileal lesions and a more conservative management in patients with anastomotic lesions.</p
Hereditary cancer registries improve the care of patients with a genetic predisposition to cancer:contributions from the Dutch Lynch syndrome registry
The Dutch Hereditary Cancer Registry was established in 1985 with the support of the Ministry of Health (VWS). The aims of the registry are: (1) to promote the identification of families with hereditary cancer, (2) to encourage the participation in surveillance programs of individuals at high risk, (3) to ensure the continuity of lifelong surveillance examinations, and (4) to promote research, in particular the improvement of surveillance protocols. During its early days the registry provided assistance with family investigations and the collection of medical data, and recommended surveillance when a family fulfilled specific diagnostic criteria. Since 2000 the registry has focused on family follow-up, and ensuring the quality of surveillance programs and appropriate clinical management. Since its founding, the registry has identified over 10,000 high-risk individuals with a diverse array of hereditary cancer syndromes. All were encouraged to participate in prevention programmes. The registry has published a number of studies that evaluated the outcome of surveillance protocols for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome, as well as in familial colorectal cancer. In 2006, evaluation of the effect of registration and colonoscopic surveillance on the mortality rate associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) showed that the policy led to a substantial decrease in the mortality rate associated with CRC. Following discovery of MMR gene defects, the first predictive model that could select families for genetic testing was published by the Leiden group. In addition, over the years the registry has produced many cancer risk studies that have helped to develop appropriate surveillance protocols. Hereditary cancer registries in general, and the Lynch syndrome registry in particular, play an important role in improving the clinical management of affected families.</p
Pooled Resequencing of 122 Ulcerative Colitis Genes in a Large Dutch Cohort Suggests Population-Specific Associations of Rare Variants in MUC2
Genome-wide association studies have revealed several common genetic risk variants for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, little is known about the contribution of rare, large effect genetic variants to UC susceptibility. In this study, we performed a deep targeted re-sequencing of 122 genes in Dutch UC patients in order to investigate the contribution of rare variants to the genetic susceptibility to UC. The selection of genes consists of 111 established human UC susceptibility genes and 11 genes that lead to spontaneous colitis when knocked-out in mice. In addition, we sequenced the promoter regions of 45 genes where known variants exert cis-eQTL-effects. Targeted pooled re-sequencing was performed on DNA of 790 Dutch UC cases. The Genome of the Netherlands project provided sequence data of 500 healthy controls. After quality control and prioritization based on allele frequency and pathogenicity probability, follow-up genotyping of 171 rare variants was performed on 1021 Dutch UC cases and 1166 Dutch controls. Single-variant association and gene-based analyses identified an association of rare variants in the MUC2 gene with UC. The associated variants in the Dutch population could not be replicated in a German replication cohort (1026 UC cases, 3532 controls). In conclusion, this study has identified a putative role for MUC2 on UC susceptibility in the Dutch population and suggests a population-specific contribution of rare variants to UC
Lymphoproliferative disease in the rectum 4 years after local mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for refractory perianal Crohn's fistulas:a case report
OV
Outcome of Reverse Switching From CT-P13 to Originator Infliximab in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and treated with originator infliximab are increasingly being switched to biosimilars. Some patients, however, are "reverse switched" to treatment with the originator. Here we assess the prevalence of reverse switching, including its indication and outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, data on patients with IBD from 9 hospitals in the Netherlands were collected. All adult patients with IBD were included if they previously had been switched from originator infliximab to the biosimilar CT-P13 and had a follow-up time of at least 52 weeks after the initial switch. The reasons for reverse switching were categorized into worsening gastrointestinal symptoms, adverse effects, or loss of response to CT-P13. Drug persistence was analyzed through survival analyses. RESULTS: A total of 758 patients with IBD were identified. Reverse switching was observed in 75 patients (9.9%). Patients with reverse switching were predominantly female (70.7%). Gastrointestinal symptoms (25.5%) and dermatological symptoms (21.8%) were the most commonly reported reasons for reverse switching. In 9 patients (12.0%), loss of response to CT-P13 was the reason for reverse switching. Improvement of reported symptoms was seen in 73.3% of patients after reverse switching and 7 out of 9 patients (77.8%) with loss of response regained response. Infliximab persistence was equal between patients who were reverse-switched and those who were maintained on CT-P13. CONCLUSIONS: Reverse switching occurred in 9.9% of patients, predominantly for biosimilar-attributed adverse effects. Switching back to originator infliximab seems effective in patients who experience adverse effects, worsening gastrointestinal symptoms, or loss of response after switching from originator infliximab to CT-P13
Tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis:results of the prospective Dutch Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) registry
Background: Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Aim: To evaluate effectiveness, safety and use of tofacitinib in daily practice. Methods: UC patients initiating tofacitinib were prospectively enrolled in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission (short clinical colitis activity index [SCCAI] â€2), biochemical remission (faecal calprotectin level â€250 ”g/g), combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission, predictors of remission, safety outcomes, treatment dose and effect on lipids were determined at weeks 12 and 24. Endoscopic outcomes were evaluated in centres with routine endoscopic evaluation. Results: In total, 123 UC patients (95% anti-TNF, 62% vedolizumab and 3% ustekinumab experienced) were followed for a median duration of 24 weeks (interquartile range 12-26). The proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free clinical, biochemical, and combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission rate at week 24 was 29% (n: 22/77), 25% (n: 14/57), and 19% (n: 11/57) respectively. Endoscopic remission (Mayo = 0) was achieved in 21% of patients at week 12 (n: 7/33). Prior vedolizumab exposure was associated with reduced clinical remission (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.94). At week 24, 33% (n: 14/42) of patients still on tofacitinib treatment used 10 mg twice daily. In total, 33 tofacitinib-related adverse events (89 per 100 patient years) occurred, 7 (6% of total cohort) resulted in discontinuation. Cholesterol, HDL and LDL levels increased during induction treatment by 18% (95% CI 9-26), 18% (95% CI 8-28) and 21% (95% CI 14-39) respectively. Conclusion: Tofacitinib is an effective treatment for UC after anti-TNF and vedolizumab failure. However, a relatively high rate of adverse events was observed resulting in discontinuation in 6% of patients
- âŠ