7 research outputs found

    Assessing Coastal Plain Risk Indices for Subsurface Phosphorus Loss

    Get PDF
    Phosphorus (P) Index evaluations are critical to advancing nutrient management planning in the United States. However, most assessments until now have focused on the risks of P losses in surface runoff. In artificially drained agroecosystems of the Atlantic Coastal Plain, subsurface flow is the predominant mode of P transport, but its representation in most P Indices is often inadequate. We explored methods to evaluate the subsurface P risk routines of five P Indices from Delaware, Maryland (two), Virginia, and North Carolina using available water quality and soils datasets. Relationships between subsurface P risk scores and published dissolved P loads in leachate (Delaware, Maryland, and North Carolina) and ditch drainage (Maryland) were directionally correct and often statistically significant, yet the brevity of the observation periods (weeks to several years) and the limited number of sampling locations precluded a more robust assessment of each P Index. Given the paucity of measured P loss data, we then showed that soil water extractable P concentrations at depths corresponding with the seasonal high water table (WEPWT) could serve as a realistic proxy for subsurface P losses in ditch drainage. The associations between WEPWT and subsurface P risk ratings reasonably mirrored those obtained with sparser water quality data. As such, WEPWT is seen as a valuable metric that offers interim insight into the directionality of subsurface P risk scores when water quality data are inaccessible. In the long term, improved monitoring and modeling of subsurface P losses clearly should enhance the rigor of future P Index appraisals

    Fertilization strategy can affect the estimation of soil nitrogen mineralization potential with chemical methods

    No full text
    Aims: Our objective was to evaluate if the relationship between quick indices of mineralizable N and soil N mineralization potential (No) is affected by long-term fertilization with inorganic fertilizers (IF) and/or poultry litter (PL). Methods: Samples from four long-term research sites that were fertilized with IF, IF+PL, or PL (>10 years) were aerobically incubated for 24 weeks to determine No. Soil No was then related to the results from the Illinois soil test analysis (ISNT), extractions with hot KCl, NaOH, or phosphate-borate (PB), and an anaerobic incubation (Nan). Results: All evaluated chemical methods were correlated with No (R2 > 0.59). However, the models to describe the association between the chemical methods and No differed depending on the fertilizer treatment, due to the inability of chemical indices to estimate the No increase observed in some PL-amended soils. In contrast, the relationship between Nan and No was not affected by fertilization strategy. Conclusions: Chemical indices can lead to the underestimation of soil N mineralization potential in PL-treated soils when the indices are calibrated in IF-amended soils, whereas the biological method Nan predicted No independently from the field’s fertilization history.Fil: Wyngaard, Nicolás. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Cabrera, Miguel L.. University of Georgia; Estados UnidosFil: Shober, Amy. University of Delaware. Plant and Soil Sciences Department; Estados UnidosFil: Kanwar, R.. Iowa State University. Department of Agricultural and Bio-systems Engineering; Estados Unido

    Evaluation of phosphorus indices after twenty years of science and development

    Get PDF
    Citation: Nelson, N.O. and Shober, A.L. (2012), Evaluation of Phosphorus Indices after Twenty Years of Science and Development. J. Environ. Qual., 41: 1703-1710. doi:10.2134/jeq2012.0342The P Index was proposed as a nutrient management tool in 1992 and has been implemented as such for the past decade. However, lack of water quality improvement in agricultural watersheds and discrepancies in P loss ratings between P indices have raised questions about continued use of the P Index. In response to these concerns, a symposium was held as part of the 2011 ASA, CSSA, SSSA annual meetings. This symposium produced a special collection of seven papers describing the role of P indices in P management, evaluation of P indices, new models for assessing P loss, methods to improve P indices, and changes in producer behavior resulting from P Index use. The objectives of this introductory paper are to provide background on the P Index concept, overviews of the special collection papers, and recommendations for future P Index evaluation and development research. The papers in this special collection conclude that P indices can provide accurate assessments of P loss but must be evaluated appropriately. Evaluation will require compiling large regional P loss datasets at field and small watershed scales. Simulation models may be used to generate P loss estimates; however, models must be calibrated and validated to ensure their accuracy. Further development of P indices will require coordinated regional efforts to identify common P Index frameworks and standardized interpretations. Stringent P Index evaluations will expand the utility of P indices for critical source area identification and strategic best management practice implementation by regulatory, education, and scientific communities alike
    corecore