Differences in medical students' explicit discourses of professionalism: acting, representing, becoming

Rather than merely acting professionally, medical students are expected to become professionals. Developing an embodied professional persona is not straightforward as there is no single perspective of what medical professionalism comprises. In the context of this confusion, medical educationalists have been charged with developing a professionalism curriculum that emphasises, supports and measures students' professionalism. This paper focuses on medical students' discourses of medical professionalism in order to understand the means through which students conceptualise professionalism. Discourse analysis was undertaken. Two hundred students from three medical schools (in England, Australia and Wales) participated in 32 group and 22 individual interviews. Students' explicit definitions of professionalism were inductively coded according to the dimensions of professionalism they identified (n=19) and the discourses of professionalism they used (individual, collective, interpersonal, complexity). Connections were explored between pre-clinical and clinical students' understandings of professionalism across the schools and the respective policies, documents and teaching opportunities available to them. Understandings of professionalism differed between pre-clinical and clinical students and between schools with different approaches to professionalism education. Students who experienced early patient interaction and opportunities to engage in conversations about professionalism within clinician-led small groups demonstrated complex, embodied understandings of professionalism, drawing on all four discourses. Students who learned predominately through lectures used a restricted range of discourses and focused on dressing or acting like a professional. Providing students with opportunities to engage in active sense-making activities within the formal professional curriculum can encourage an embodied and sophisticated understanding of professionalism

Exploring the relationships among attachment, emotional intelligence and communication

Objectives  Attachment style has been shown to influence both emotional intelligence (EI) and the clinical communication of medical students and doctors. No research has assessed the relationships among attachment, EI and clinical communication in medical students. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of EI on the relationship between medical students’ attachment style and clinical communication. Methods  Medical students were invited to complete measures of attachment (using the Experiences in Close Relationships–Short Form [ECR-SF], a 12-item measure that provides attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety dimensional scores) and EI (using the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test [MSCEIT], a 141-item measure of the perception, use, understanding and management of emotions) at the end of Year 1, prior to a summative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Clinical communication was assessed using OSCE scores. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to analyse a hypothetical model of the relationships among attachment style, EI and clinical communication. Results  A total of 200 of 358 (55.9%) students participated. Attachment avoidance was significantly negatively correlated with total EI scores (r = − 0.28, p < 0.01); total EI was significantly positively correlated with OSCE scores (r = 0.23, p < 0.01). A parsimonious SEM revealed that attachment avoidance accounted for 13% of the variance in students’ total EI scores but did not directly predict OSCE scores, whereas total EI significantly predicted 7% of the variance in OSCE scores. Conclusions  Attachment is perceived to be stable from early adulthood, whereas the literature suggests that EI can be developed through the use of targeted interventions. This has potential implications for the training of medical students in clinical communication