Data for functional MRI connectivity in transgender people with gender incongruence and cisgender individuals

We provide T2 *-weighted and T1-weighted images acquired on a 3T MRI scanner obtained from 17 transwomen and 29 transmen with gender incongruence; and 22 ciswomen and 19 cismen that identified themselves to the sex assigned at birth. Data from three different techniques that describe global and regional connectivity differences within functional resting-state networks in transwomen and trans men with early-in-life onset gender incongruence are provided: (1) we obtained spatial maps from data-driven independent component analysis using the melodic tool from FSL software; (2) we provide the functional networks interactions of two functional atlases' seeds from a seed to-seed approach; (3) and global graph-theoretical metrics such as the smallworld organization, and the segregation and integration properties of the networks. Interpretations of the present dataset can be found in the original article, doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116613 [1] . The original and pro cessed nifti images are available in Mendeley datasets. In addition, correlation matrices for the seed-to-seed and graph theory analyses as well as the graph-theoretical measures were made available in Matlab files. Finally, we present supplementary information for the original article. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc

Brain network interactions in transgender individuals with gender incongruence

Functional brain organization in transgender persons remains unclear. Our aims were to investigate global and regional connectivity differences within functional networks in transwomen and transmen with early-in-life onset gender incongruence; and to test the consistency of two available hypotheses that attempted to explain gender variants: (i) a neurodevelopmental cortical hypothesis that suggests the existence of different brain phenotypes based on structural MRI data and genes polymorphisms of sex hormone receptors; (ii) a functional-based hypothesis in relation to regions involved in the own body perception. T2*-weighted images in a 3-T MRI were obtained from 29 transmen and 17 transwomen as well as 22 cisgender women and 19 cisgender men. Restingstate independent component analysis, seed-to-seed functional network and graph theory analyses were performed. Transmen, transwomen, and cisgender women had decreased connectivity compared with cisgender men in superior parietal regions, as part of the salience (SN) and the executive control (ECN) networks. Transmen also had weaker connectivity compared with cisgender men between intra-SN regions and weaker inter-network connectivity between regions of the SN, the default mode network (DMN), the ECN and the sensorimotor network. Transwomen had lower small-worldness, modularity and clustering coefficient than cisgender men. There were no differences among transmen, transwomen, and ciswomen. Together these results underline the importance of the SN interacting with DMN, ECN, and sensorimotor networks in transmen, involving regions of the entire brain with a frontal predominance. Reduced global connectivity graph-theoretical measures were a characteristic of transwomen. It is proposed that the interaction between networks is a keystone in building a gendered self. Finally, our findings suggest that both proposed hypotheses are complementary in explaining brain differences between gender variants

Application of machine learning in combination with mechanistic modeling to predict plasma exposure of small molecules

Prediction of a new molecule’s exposure in plasma is a critical first step toward understanding its efficacy/toxicity profile and concluding whether it is a possible first-in-class, best-in-class candidate. For this prediction, traditional pharmacometrics use a variety of scaling methods that are heavily based on pre-clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data. We here propose a novel framework based on which preclinical exposure prediction is performed by applying machine learning (ML) in tandem with mechanism-based modeling. In our proposed method, a relationship is initially established between molecular structure and physicochemical (PC)/PK properties using ML, and then the ML-driven PC/PK parameters are used as input to mechanistic models that ultimately predict the plasma exposure of new candidates. To understand the feasibility of our proposed framework, we evaluated a number of mechanistic models (1-compartment, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK)), PBPK distribution models (Berezhkovskiy, PK-Sim standard, Poulin and Theil, Rodgers and Rowland, and Schmidt), and PBPK parameterizations (using in vivo, or in vitro clearance). For most of the scenarios tested, our results demonstrate that PK profiles can be adequately predicted based on the proposed framework. Our analysis further indicates some limitations when liver microsomal intrinsic clearance (CLint) is used as the only clearance pathway and underscores the necessity of investigating the variability emanating from the different distribution models when providing PK predictions. The suggested approach aims at earlier exposure prediction in the drug development process so that critical decisions on molecule screening, chemistry design, or dose selection can be made as early as possible

Neuroanatomical and Functional Correlates of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Young Healthy Adults

Neural substrates of empathy are mainly investigated through task-related functional MRI. However, the functional neural mechanisms at rest underlying the empathic response have been poorly studied. We aimed to investigate neuroanatomical and functional substrates of cognitive and affective empathy. The self-reported empathy questionnaire Cognitive and Affective Empathy Test (TECA), T1 and T2∗-weighted 3-Tesla MRI were obtained from 22 healthy young females (mean age: 19.6 ± 2.4) and 20 males (mean age: 22.5 ± 4.4). Groups of low and high empathy were established for each scale. FreeSurfer v6.0 was used to estimate cortical thickness and to automatically segment the subcortical structures. FSL v5.0.10 was used to compare resting-state connectivity differences between empathy groups in six defined regions: the orbitofrontal, cingulate, and insular cortices, and the amygdala, hippocampus, and thalamus using a non-parametric permutation approach. The high empathy group in the Perspective Taking subscale (cognitive empathy) had greater thickness in the left orbitofrontal and ventrolateral frontal cortices, bilateral anterior cingulate, superior frontal, and occipital regions. Within the affective empathy scales, subjects with high Empathic Distress had higher thalamic volumes than the low-empathy group. Regarding resting-state connectivity analyses, low-empathy individuals in the Empathic Happiness scale had increased connectivity between the orbitofrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate when compared with the high-empathy group. In conclusion, from a structural point of view, there is a clear dissociation between the brain correlates of affective and cognitive factors of empathy. Neocortical correlates were found for the cognitive empathy dimension, whereas affective empathy is related to lower volumes in subcortical structures. Functionally, affective empathy is linked to connectivity between the orbital and cingulate cortices

Impaired Structural Connectivity In Parkinson's Disease Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Study Based On Probabilistic Tractography

Background: Probabilistic tractography, in combination with graph theory, has been used to reconstruct the structural whole-brain connectome. Threshold-free network-based statistics (TFNBS) is a useful technique to study structural connectivity in neurodegenerative disorders; however, there are no previous studies using TFNBS in Parkinson's disease (PD) with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: Sixty-two PD patients, 27 of whom classified as PD-MCI, and 51 healthy controls (HC) underwent diffusion-weighted 3T MRI. Probabilistic tractography, using FSL, was used to compute the number of streamlines (NOS) between regions. NOS matrices were used to find group differences with TFNBS, and to calculate global and local measures of network integrity using graph theory. A binominal logistic regression was then used to assess the discrimination between PD with and without MCI using non-overlapping significant tracts. Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) were also performed with FSL to study changes in fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD). Results: PD-MCI showed 37 white matter (WM) connections with reduced connectivity strength compared to HC, mainly involving temporo-occipital regions. These were able to differentiate PD-MCI from PD without MCI with an area under the curve of 83-85%. PD without MCI showed disrupted connectivity in 18 connections involving fronto-temporal regions. No significant differences were found in graph measures. Only PD-MCI showed reduced FA compared with HC. Discussion: TFNBS based on whole-brain probabilistic tractography can detect structural connectivity alterations in PD with and without MCI. Reduced structural connectivity in fronto-striatal and posterior corticocortical connections is associated with PD-MCI

Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake

Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

Permutation testing for non-imaging data using FSL randomise

The <i>randomise_non_imaging</i> script is designed to take advantage of the functionalities of FSL randomise (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/Randomise/) to perform GLM-based non-parametric permutation testing using non-imaging data. This can be done fairly easily with other programs, but using randomise could be convenient to FSL users, who are accustomed to creating the necessary input files. <div><br></div><div><div><u>How to make it work</u></div><div><br></div><div><b>System requirements:</b></div><div>This scripts requires FSL (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FSL) as well as python (including the numpy (http://www.numpy.org/) and nipy (http://nipy.org/) packages), and is meant to be used in Linux systems. The necessary python packages can be easily obtained by installing Anaconda (https://www.continuum.io/downloads).<br></div></div><div><br></div><div><div><b>Add alias and route to .bashrc:</b></div><div>After unzipping <i>randomise_non_imaging.zip</i>, we recommend adding an alias to the user's .bashrc as an easy way to call the script from any terminal. The path to the folder containing the <i>parameter2nifti.py</i> script should also be specified as <i>route_NIR </i>in the .bashrc:</div><div><br></div><div><i>alias randomise_non_imaging='bash <b>/full/path/to/your/folder/</b>randomise_non_imaging.sh'<br></i></div><div><i>export route_NIR=<b>/full/path/to/your/folder/</b></i></div></div><div><br></div><div><b>Input files:</b></div><div><div>Three basic input files are required:</div><div>1. Dependent variable matrix: text file containing the variables to be tested, consisting of one column per variable and one row for each observation. This is equivalent to the image input in randomise – and will in fact be converted to image format so it can be fed into the program</div><div>2. Design matrix (<i>.mat</i>) </div><div>3. Contrast matrix (<i>.con</i>)</div><div><br></div><div><div>Some options require additional input files:</div><div>1. F tests: requires <i>.fts </i>files (with the same root name as the design and contrast files)</div><div>2. Block permutation: requires exchangeability block labels <i>.grp</i> file (with the same root name as the design and contrast files)</div></div><div><br></div><div><b>Output (text) files:</b><br></div><div><div>1. P value file: named <i>(output)_p_all_contrasts</i></div><div>2. Stats file: named <i>(output)_stat_all_contrasts</i></div><div>3. F test p value file: <i>(output)_p_F_test</i></div><div>4. F test stats file: <i>(output)_Fstat</i></div><div>5. Corrected p value file: <i>(output)_corrp_all_contrasts</i></div><div>6. Corrected F test p value file: <i>(output)_corrp_F_test</i></div></div><div><br></div><div><b>Usage instructions are given here:</b> <i>https://cjneurolab.org/2017/07/21/permutation-testing-for-non-imaging-data-using-fsl-randomise/</i><br></div></div