Thromboprophylaxis in day surgery

AbstractMany patients undergoing day surgery are at low-risk of venous thromboembolic events. However, given that pulmonary embolism is the most common preventable cause of hospital death, the risk-benefit profile of thromboprophylaxis should be accurately balanced. In this narrative review, we will briefly discuss some topics of thromboprohylaxis in ambulatory surgical procedures: venous thromboembolic risk stratification, venous thromboembolic risk during laparoscopic surgery, use of antithrombotic drugs in case of neuraxial anesthesia/analgesia, American College of Chest Physicians recommendations for thromboprophylaxis

Correction to: Reversal agents for oral anticoagulant-associated major or life-threatening bleeding

n/

Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients: some work remains to be done

n/

Commentary

n/

Oral anticoagulant management of patients with mechanical heart valves at the Salam Centre of Khartoum:Observations on quality of anticoagulation and thrombotic risk

IntroductionRheumatic heart disease with mechanical heart valve (MHV) replacement is common in Africa. However, MHV requires long-life anticoagulation and managing this can be challenging.Methods and resultsWe report data of a prospective observational study conducted between August 2018 and September 2019 in MHV patients in the Salam Centre for Cardiac Surgery built in Khartoum, by Emergency, an Italian Non-Governmental Organization, to evaluate the quality of anticoagulation control and the risk of thrombotic complications.ResultsWe studied 3647 patients (median age 25.1 years; 53.9 % female). Median Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) was 53 % (interquartile range 37 % to 67 %) and 70 thrombotic events (rate 1.8 × 100 pt-years [95 % CI 1.38-2.23]) were recorded. Among patients in the first quartile of TTR (≤37 %), we recorded 34/70 (48.6 %) of all thrombotic events (rate 3.7 × 100 pt-years [95 % CI 2.5-5.1]), with a high mortality rate (2.2 × 100 pt-years [95 % CI 1.3-3.3]). In patients with guideline-recommended TTR (≥65 %) the event rate was 0.8 × 100 pt-years for thrombotic events [95 % CI 0.3-1.5] and 0.4 × 100 pt-years for mortality [95 % CI 0.1-0.9]. Multivariable analysis showed that having a TTR in the lowest quartile (≤37 %) and being noncompliant are significantly associated with increased thrombotic risk. Aspirin use or different valve type did not influence the thrombotic risk. Almost 40 % of all thromboembolic complications could have been potentially prevented by further improving VKA management to obtain a TTR > 37 %.ConclusionThe thrombotic risk of MHV patients on VKAs living in a low-income country like Sudan is associated with low quality of anticoagulation control. Efforts should be made to decrease the number of non-compliant patients and to reach a guideline-recommended TTR of ≥65 %

Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer in patients at high-risk for splanchnic vein thrombosis : a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: D-dimer is included in the diagnostic algorithm for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. However, its role in the diagnosis of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer for SVT. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis (PROSPERO protocol registration number: CRD42020184300). The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to March 2021 week 4. Studies which evaluated D-dimer accuracy for SVT in any category of patients were selected. The index test was any D-dimer assay; the reference standard was any radiological imaging. The QUADAS-2 checklist was used for the risk of bias assessment. A bivariate random-effects regression model was used to calculate summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Results: 12 studies (with a total of 1,298 patients) evaluating the accuracy of D-dimer in patients at high risk of SVT (surgical patients, patients with liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma) were included. None of the included studies was at low risk of bias. The weighted mean prevalence of SVT was 33.4% (95% CI, 22.5-45.2%, I2=94.8%). D-dimer accuracy was expressed by sensitivity 96% (95% CI, 72-100%); specificity 25% (95% CI, 5-67%); positive likelihood ratio 1.3 (95% CI, 0.9-1.9); negative likelihood ratio 0.16 (95% CI, 0.03-0.84); area under the ROC curve 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83). Conclusions: D-dimer seems to have high sensitivity in the diagnosis of patients at high-risk for SVT. However, there is a strong need for more robust evidence on this topic.peer-reviewe

The Clinical Impact of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index on the Length of Hospital Stay of Patients with Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) is an extensively validated prognostic score, but impact analyses of the PESI on management strategies, outcomes and health care costs are lacking. Our aim was to assess whether the adoption of the PESI for patients admitted to an internal medicine ward has the potential to safely reduce the length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS We carried out a multicenter randomized controlled trial, enrolling consecutive adult outpatients diagnosed with acute PE and admitted to an internal medicine ward. Within 48 h after diagnosis, the treating physicians were randomized, for every patient, to calculate and report the PESI in the clinical record form on top of the standard of care (experimental arm) or to continue routine clinical practice (standard of care). The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT03002467. RESULTS This study was prematurely stopped due to slow recruitment. A total of 118 patients were enrolled at six internal medicine units from 2016 to 2019. The treating physicians were randomized to the use of the PESI for 59 patients or to the standard of care for 59 patients. No difference in the median LOS was found between the experimental arm (8, IQR 6-12) and the standard-of-care arm (8, IQR 6-12) (p = 0.63). A pre-specified secondary analysis showed that the LOS was significantly shorter among the patients who were treated with DOACs (median of 8 days, IQR 5-11) compared to VKAs or heparin (median of 9 days, IQR 7-12) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The formal calculation of the PESI in the patients already admitted to internal medicine units did not impact the length of hospital stay