Il sistema di imprese della cooperazione sociale. Origini e sviluppo dei consorzi di cooperative sociali

Il saggio si propone di studiare la struttura organizzativa, cioè l’integrazione tra imprese sviluppata dalla cooperazione sociale in Italia nel corso dei suoi trent’anni di storia. Accanto a una rappresentanza politico-sindacale il movimento della cooperazione sociale ha sentito il bisogno di integrarsi in un sistema consortile organizzato su più livelli. Per espletare al meglio i propri compiti, infatti, le cooperative sociali si avvalgono del Consorzio, un soggetto imprenditoriale che quasi mai opera nella parte finale della filiera, raramente si colloca sul mercato dei servizi finiti, preferisce stare nel mezzo: per produrre servizi alle imprese. L’articolo evidenzia infine l’evoluzione del ruolo del sistema consortile: da un compito di tipo promozionale e politico-sindacale si è passati ad uno più mirato. Il consorzio tende a svolgere un numero minore di funzioni, e sempre più specifiche, soprattutto per rafforzare il profilo imprenditoriale delle cooperative sociali e della rete nel suo complesso.Social enterprises, Business history, Italian cooperatives, Networks

"Delirium Day": a nationwide point prevalence study of delirium in older hospitalized patients using an easy standardized diagnostic tool

To date, delirium prevalence in adult acute hospital populations has been estimated generally from pooled findings of single-center studies and/or among specific patient populations. Furthermore, the number of participants in these studies has not exceeded a few hundred. To overcome these limitations, we have determined, in a multicenter study, the prevalence of delirium over a single day among a large population of patients admitted to acute and rehabilitation hospital wards in Italy

"Delirium Day": A nationwide point prevalence study of delirium in older hospitalized patients using an easy standardized diagnostic tool

Background: To date, delirium prevalence in adult acute hospital populations has been estimated generally from pooled findings of single-center studies and/or among specific patient populations. Furthermore, the number of participants in these studies has not exceeded a few hundred. To overcome these limitations, we have determined, in a multicenter study, the prevalence of delirium over a single day among a large population of patients admitted to acute and rehabilitation hospital wards in Italy. Methods: This is a point prevalence study (called "Delirium Day") including 1867 older patients (aged 65 years or more) across 108 acute and 12 rehabilitation wards in Italian hospitals. Delirium was assessed on the same day in all patients using the 4AT, a validated and briefly administered tool which does not require training. We also collected data regarding motoric subtypes of delirium, functional and nutritional status, dementia, comorbidity, medications, feeding tubes, peripheral venous and urinary catheters, and physical restraints. Results: The mean sample age was 82.0 ± 7.5 years (58 % female). Overall, 429 patients (22.9 %) had delirium. Hypoactive was the commonest subtype (132/344 patients, 38.5 %), followed by mixed, hyperactive, and nonmotoric delirium. The prevalence was highest in Neurology (28.5 %) and Geriatrics (24.7 %), lowest in Rehabilitation (14.0 %), and intermediate in Orthopedic (20.6 %) and Internal Medicine wards (21.4 %). In a multivariable logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05), Activities of Daily Living dependence (OR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.12-1.27), dementia (OR 3.25, 95 % CI 2.41-4.38), malnutrition (OR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.29-3.14), and use of antipsychotics (OR 2.03, 95 % CI 1.45-2.82), feeding tubes (OR 2.51, 95 % CI 1.11-5.66), peripheral venous catheters (OR 1.41, 95 % CI 1.06-1.87), urinary catheters (OR 1.73, 95 % CI 1.30-2.29), and physical restraints (OR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.40-2.40) were associated with delirium. Admission to Neurology wards was also associated with delirium (OR 2.00, 95 % CI 1.29-3.14), while admission to other settings was not. Conclusions: Delirium occurred in more than one out of five patients in acute and rehabilitation hospital wards. Prevalence was highest in Neurology and lowest in Rehabilitation divisions. The "Delirium Day" project might become a useful method to assess delirium across hospital settings and a benchmarking platform for future surveys

Clinical Features Associated with Delirium Motor Subtypes in Older Inpatients: Results of a Multicenter Study

Objective To date motor subtypes of delirium have been evaluated in single-center studies with a limited examination of the relationship between predisposing factors and motor profile of delirium. We sought to report the prevalence and clinical profile of subtypes of delirium in a multicenter study. Methods This is a point prevalence study nested in the â\u80\u9cDelirium Day 2015â\u80\u9d, which included 108 acute and 12 rehabilitation wards in Italy. Delirium was detected using the 4-AT and motor subtypes were measured with the Delirium Motor Subtype Scale (DMSS). A multinomial logistic regression was used to determine the factors associated with delirium subtypes. Results Of 429 patients with delirium, the DMSS was completed in 275 (64%), classifying 21.5% of the patients with hyperactive delirium, 38.5% with hypoactive, 27.3% with mixed and 12.7% with the non-motor subtype. The 4-AT score was higher in the hyperactive subtype, similar in the hypoactive, mixed subtypes, while it was lowest in the non-motor subtype. Dementia was associated with all three delirium motor subtypes (hyperactive, OR 3.3, 95% CI: 1.2-8.7; hypoactive, OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.2-6.5; mixed OR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1-6.2). Atypical antipsychotics were associated with hypoactive delirium (OR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.1-0.7), while intravenous lines were associated with mixed delirium (OR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2-6.9). Conclusions The study shows that hypoactive delirium is the most common subtype among hospitalized older patients. Specific clinical features were associated with different delirium subtypes. The use of standardized instruments can help to characterize the phenomenology of different motor subtypes of delirium

"Delirium Day": A nationwide point prevalence study of delirium in older hospitalized patients using an easy standardized diagnostic tool

Background: To date, delirium prevalence in adult acute hospital populations has been estimated generally from pooled findings of single-center studies and/or among specific patient populations. Furthermore, the number of participants in these studies has not exceeded a few hundred. To overcome these limitations, we have determined, in a multicenter study, the prevalence of delirium over a single day among a large population of patients admitted to acute and rehabilitation hospital wards in Italy. Methods: This is a point prevalence study (called "Delirium Day") including 1867 older patients (aged 65 years or more) across 108 acute and 12 rehabilitation wards in Italian hospitals. Delirium was assessed on the same day in all patients using the 4AT, a validated and briefly administered tool which does not require training. We also collected data regarding motoric subtypes of delirium, functional and nutritional status, dementia, comorbidity, medications, feeding tubes, peripheral venous and urinary catheters, and physical restraints. Results: The mean sample age was 82.0 ± 7.5 years (58 % female). Overall, 429 patients (22.9 %) had delirium. Hypoactive was the commonest subtype (132/344 patients, 38.5 %), followed by mixed, hyperactive, and nonmotoric delirium. The prevalence was highest in Neurology (28.5 %) and Geriatrics (24.7 %), lowest in Rehabilitation (14.0 %), and intermediate in Orthopedic (20.6 %) and Internal Medicine wards (21.4 %). In a multivariable logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05), Activities of Daily Living dependence (OR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.12-1.27), dementia (OR 3.25, 95 % CI 2.41-4.38), malnutrition (OR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.29-3.14), and use of antipsychotics (OR 2.03, 95 % CI 1.45-2.82), feeding tubes (OR 2.51, 95 % CI 1.11-5.66), peripheral venous catheters (OR 1.41, 95 % CI 1.06-1.87), urinary catheters (OR 1.73, 95 % CI 1.30-2.29), and physical restraints (OR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.40-2.40) were associated with delirium. Admission to Neurology wards was also associated with delirium (OR 2.00, 95 % CI 1.29-3.14), while admission to other settings was not. Conclusions: Delirium occurred in more than one out of five patients in acute and rehabilitation hospital wards. Prevalence was highest in Neurology and lowest in Rehabilitation divisions. The "Delirium Day" project might become a useful method to assess delirium across hospital settings and a benchmarking platform for future surveys

Visual and Hearing Impairment Are Associated With Delirium in Hospitalized Patients: Results of a Multisite Prevalence Study

426noreservedObjective: Sensory deficits are important risk factors for delirium but have been investigated in single-center studies and single clinical settings. This multicenter study aims to evaluate the association between hearing and visual impairment or bi-sensory impairment (visual and hearing impairment) and delirium. Design: Cross-sectional study nested in the 2017 “Delirium Day” project. Setting and Participants: Patients 65 years and older admitted to acute hospital medical wards, emergency departments, rehabilitation wards, nursing homes, and hospices in Italy. Methods: Delirium was assessed with the 4AT (a short tool for delirium assessment) and sensory deficits with a clinical evaluation. We assessed the association between delirium, hearing and visual impairment in multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for: Model 1, we included predisposing factors for delirium (ie, dementia, weight loss and autonomy in the activities of daily living); Model 2, we added to Model 1 variables, which could be considered precipitating factors for delirium (ie, psychoactive drugs and urinary catheters). Results: A total of 3038 patients were included; delirium prevalence was 25%. Patients with delirium had a higher prevalence of hearing impairment (30.5% vs 18%; P <.001), visual impairment (24.2% vs 15.7%; P <.01) and bi-sensory impairment (16.2% vs 7.5%) compared with those without delirium. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the presence of bi-sensory impairment was associated with delirium in Model 1 [odds ratio (OR) 1.5, confidence interval (CI) 1.2–2.1; P =.00] and in Model 2 (OR 1.4; CI 1.1–1.9; P =.02), whereas the presence of visual and hearing impairment alone was not associated with delirium either in Model 1 (OR 0.8; CI 0.6–1.2, P =.36; OR 1.1; CI 0.8–1.4; P =.42) or in Model 2 (OR 0.8, CI 0.6–1.2, P =.27; OR 1.1, CI 0.8–1.4, P =.63). Conclusions and implications: Our findings support the importance of routine screening and specific interventions by a multidisciplinary team to implement optimal management of sensory impairments and hence prevention and the management of the patients with delirium.mixedMorandi A.; Inzitari M.; Udina C.; Gual N.; Mota M.; Tassistro E.; Andreano A.; Cherubini A.; Gentile S.; Mossello E.; Marengoni A.; Olive A.; Riba F.; Ruiz D.; de Jaime E.; Bellelli G.; Tarasconi A.; Sella M.; Auriemma S.; Paterno G.; Faggian G.; Lucarelli C.; De Grazia N.; Alberto C.; Margola A.; Porcella L.; Nardiello I.; Chimenti E.; Zeni M.; Giani A.; Famularo S.; Romairone E.; Minaglia C.; Ceccotti C.; Guerra G.; Mantovani G.; Monacelli F.; Candiani T.; Ballestrero A.; Santolini F.; Rosso M.; Bono V.; Sibilla S.; Dal Santo P.; Ceci M.; Barone P.; Schirinzi T.; Formenti A.; Nastasi G.; Isaia G.; Gonella D.; Battuello A.; Casson S.; Calvani D.; Boni F.; Ciaccio A.; Rosa R.; Sanna G.; Manfredini S.; Cortese L.; Rizzo M.; Prestano R.; Greco A.; Lauriola M.; Gelosa G.; Piras V.; Arena M.; Cosenza D.; Bellomo A.; LaMontagna M.; Gabbani L.; Lambertucci L.; Perego S.; Parati G.; Basile G.; Gallina V.; Pilone G.; Giudice C.; De F.; Pietrogrande L.; De B.; Mosca M.; Corazzin I.; Rossi P.; Nunziata V.; D'Amico F.; Grippa A.; Giardini S.; Barucci R.; Cossu A.; Fiorin L.; Distefano M.; Lunardelli M.; Brunori M.; Ruffini I.; Abraham E.; Varutti A.; Fabbro E.; Catalano A.; Martino G.; Leotta D.; Marchet A.; Dell'Aquila G.; Scrimieri A.; Davoli M.; Casella M.; Cartei A.; Polidori G.; Brischetto D.; Motta S.; Saponara R.; Perrone P.; Russo G.; Del D.; Car C.; Pirina T.; Franzoni S.; Cotroneo A.; Ghiggia F.; Volpi G.; Menichetti C.; Bo M.; Panico A.; Calogero P.; Corvalli G.; Mauri M.; Lupia E.; Manfredini R.; Fabbian F.; March A.; Pedrotti M.; Veronesi M.; Strocchi E.; Borghi C.; Bianchetti A.; Crucitti A.; DiFrancesco V.; Fontana G.; Bonanni L.; Barbone F.; Serrati C.; Ballardini G.; Simoncelli M.; Ceschia G.; Scarpa C.; Brugiolo R.; Fusco S.; Ciarambino T.; Biagini C.; Tonon E.; Porta M.; Venuti D.; DelSette M.; Poeta M.; Barbagallo G.; Trovato G.; Delitala A.; Arosio P.; Reggiani F.; Zuliani G.; Ortolani B.; Mussio E.; Girardi A.; Coin A.; Ruotolo G.; Castagna A.; Masina M.; Cimino R.; Pinciaroli A.; Tripodi G.; Cannistra U.; Cassadonte F.; Vatrano M.; Scaglione L.; Fogliacco P.; Muzzuilini C.; Romano F.; Padovani A.; Rozzini L.; Cagnin A.; Fragiacomo F.; Desideri G.; Liberatore E.; Bruni A.; Orsitto G.; Franco M.; Bonfrate L.; Bonetto M.; Pizio N.; Magnani G.; Cecchetti G.; Longo A.; Bubba V.; Marinan L.; Cotelli M.; Turla M.; Sessa M.; Abruzzi L.; Castoldi G.; LoVetere D.; Musacchio C.; Novello M.; Cavarape A.; Bini A.; Leonardi A.; Seneci F.; Grimaldi W.; Fimognari F.; Bambara V.; Saitta A.; Corica F.; Braga M.; Ettorre E.; Camellini C.; Bellelli G.; Annoni G.; Crescenzo A.; Noro G.; Turco R.; Ponzetto M.; Giuseppe L.; Mazzei B.; Maiuri G.; Costaggiu D.; Damato R.; Formilan M.; Patrizia G.; Gallucci M.; Paragona M.; Bini P.; Modica D.; Abati C.; Clerici M.; Barbera I.; NigroImperiale F.; Manni A.; Votino C.; Castiglioni C.; Di M.; Degl'Innocenti M.; Moscatelli G.; Guerini S.; Casini C.; Dini D.; D'Imporzano E.; DeNotariis S.; Bonometti F.; Paolillo C.; Riccardi A.; Tiozzo A.; DiBari M.; Vanni S.; Scarpa A.; Zara D.; Ranieri P.; Alessandro M.; Di F.; Pezzoni D.; Platto C.; D'Ambrosio V.; Ivaldi C.; Milia P.; DeSalvo F.; Solaro C.; Strazzacappa M.; Cazzadori M.; Confente S.; Grasso M.; Troisi E.; Guerini V.; Bernardini B.; Corsini C.; Boffelli S.; Filippi A.; Delpin K.; Faraci B.; Bertoletti E.; Vannucci M.; Tesi F.; Crippa P.; Malighetti A.; Bettini D.; Maltese F.; Abruzzese G.; Cosimo D.; Azzini M.; Colombo M.; Procino G.; Fascendini S.; Barocco F.; Del P.; Mazzone A.; Riva E.; Dell'Acqua D.; Cottino M.; Vezzadini G.; Avanzi S.; Brambilla C.; Orini S.; Sgrilli F.; Mello A.; Lombardi L.; Muti E.; Dijk B.; Fenu S.; Pes C.; Gareri P.; Passamonte M.; Rigo R.; Locusta L.; Caser L.; Rosso G.; Cesarini S.; Cozzi R.; Santini C.; Carbone P.; Cazzaniga I.; Lovati R.; Cantoni A.; Ranzani P.; Barra D.; Pompilio G.; Dimori S.; Cernesi S.; Ricco C.; Piazzolla F.; Capittini E.; Rota C.; Gottardi F.; Merla L.; Barelli A.; Millul A.; De G.; Morrone G.; Bigolari M.; Macchi M.; Zambon F.; Pizzorni C.; DiCasaleto G.; Menculini G.; Marcacci M.; Catanese G.; Sprini D.; DiCasalet T.; Bocci M.; Borga S.; Caironi P.; Cat C.; Cingolani E.; Avalli L.; Greco G.; Citerio G.; Gandini L.; Cornara G.; Lerda R.; Brazzi L.; Simeone F.; Caciorgna M.; Alampi D.; Francesconi S.; Beck E.; Antonini B.; Vettoretto K.; Meggiolaro M.; Garofalo E.; Notaro S.; Varutti R.; Bassi F.; Mistraletti G.; Marino A.; Rona R.; Rondelli E.; Riva I.; Scapigliati A.; Cortegiani A.; Vitale F.; Pistidda L.; D'Andrea R.; Querci L.; Gnesin P.; Todeschini M.; Lugano M.; Castelli G.; Ortolani M.; Cotoia A.; Maggiore S.; DiTizio L.; Graziani R.; Testa I.; Ferretti E.; Castioni C.; Lombardi F.; Caserta R.; Pasqua M.; Simoncini S.; Baccarini F.; Rispoli M.; Grossi F.; Cancelliere L.; Carnelli M.; Puccini F.; Biancofiore G.; Siniscalchi A.; Laici C.; Mossello E.; Torrini M.; Pasetti G.; Palmese S.; Oggioni R.; Mangani V.; Pini S.; Martelli M.; Rigo E.; Zuccala F.; Cherri A.; Spina R.; Calamai I.; Petrucci N.; Caicedo A.; Ferri F.; Gritti P.; Brienza N.; Fonnesu R.; Dessena M.; Fullin G.; Saggioro D.Morandi, A.; Inzitari, M.; Udina, C.; Gual, N.; Mota, M.; Tassistro, E.; Andreano, A.; Cherubini, A.; Gentile, S.; Mossello, E.; Marengoni, A.; Olive, A.; Riba, F.; Ruiz, D.; de Jaime, E.; Bellelli, G.; Tarasconi, A.; Sella, M.; Auriemma, S.; Paterno, G.; Faggian, G.; Lucarelli, C.; De Grazia, N.; Alberto, C.; Margola, A.; Porcella, L.; Nardiello, I.; Chimenti, E.; Zeni, M.; Giani, A.; Famularo, S.; Romairone, E.; Minaglia, C.; Ceccotti, C.; Guerra, G.; Mantovani, G.; Monacelli, F.; Candiani, T.; Ballestrero, A.; Santolini, F.; Rosso, M.; Bono, V.; Sibilla, S.; Dal Santo, P.; Ceci, M.; Barone, P.; Schirinzi, T.; Formenti, A.; Nastasi, G.; Isaia, G.; Gonella, D.; Battuello, A.; Casson, S.; Calvani, D.; Boni, F.; Ciaccio, A.; Rosa, R.; Sanna, G.; Manfredini, S.; Cortese, L.; Rizzo, M.; Prestano, R.; Greco, A.; Lauriola, M.; Gelosa, G.; Piras, V.; Arena, M.; Cosenza, D.; Bellomo, A.; Lamontagna, M.; Gabbani, L.; Lambertucci, L.; Perego, S.; Parati, G.; Basile, G.; Gallina, V.; Pilone, G.; Giudice, C.; De, F.; Pietrogrande, L.; De, B.; Mosca, M.; Corazzin, I.; Rossi, P.; Nunziata, V.; D'Amico, F.; Grippa, A.; Giardini, S.; Barucci, R.; Cossu, A.; Fiorin, L.; Distefano, M.; Lunardelli, M.; Brunori, M.; Ruffini, I.; Abraham, E.; Varutti, A.; Fabbro, E.; Catalano, A.; Martino, G.; Leotta, D.; Marchet, A.; Dell'Aquila, G.; Scrimieri, A.; Davoli, M.; Casella, M.; Cartei, A.; Polidori, G.; Brischetto, D.; Motta, S.; Saponara, R.; Perrone, P.; Russo, G.; Del, D.; Car, C.; Pirina, T.; Franzoni, S.; Cotroneo, A.; Ghiggia, F.; Volpi, G.; Menichetti, C.; Bo, M.; Panico, A.; Calogero, P.; Corvalli, G.; Mauri, M.; Lupia, E.; Manfredini, R.; Fabbian, F.; March, A.; Pedrotti, M.; Veronesi, M.; Strocchi, E.; Borghi, C.; Bianchetti, A.; Crucitti, A.; Difrancesco, V.; Fontana, G.; Bonanni, L.; Barbone, F.; Serrati, C.; Ballardini, G.; Simoncelli, M.; Ceschia, G.; Scarpa, C.; Brugiolo, R.; Fusco, S.; Ciarambino, T.; Biagini, C.; Tonon, E.; Porta, M.; Venuti, D.; Delsette, M.; Poeta, M.; Barbagallo, G.; Trovato, G.; Delitala, A.; Arosio, P.; Reggiani, F.; Zuliani, G.; Ortolani, B.; Mussio, E.; Girardi, A.; Coin, A.; Ruotolo, G.; Castagna, A.; Masina, M.; Cimino, R.; Pinciaroli, A.; Tripodi, G.; Cannistra, U.; Cassadonte, F.; Vatrano, M.; Scaglione, L.; Fogliacco, P.; Muzzuilini, C.; Romano, F.; Padovani, A.; Rozzini, L.; Cagnin, A.; Fragiacomo, F.; Desideri, G.; Liberatore, E.; Bruni, A.; Orsitto, G.; Franco, M.; Bonfrate, L.; Bonetto, M.; Pizio, N.; Magnani, G.; Cecchetti, G.; Longo, A.; Bubba, V.; Marinan, L.; Cotelli, M.; Turla, M.; Sessa, M.; Abruzzi, L.; Castoldi, G.; Lovetere, D.; Musacchio, C.; Novello, M.; Cavarape, A.; Bini, A.; Leonardi, A.; Seneci, F.; Grimaldi, W.; Fimognari, F.; Bambara, V.; Saitta, A.; Corica, F.; Braga, M.; Ettorre, E.; Camellini, C.; Bellelli, G.; Annoni, G.; Crescenzo, A.; Noro, G.; Turco, R.; Ponzetto, M.; Giuseppe, L.; Mazzei, B.; Maiuri, G.; Costaggiu, D.; Damato, R.; Formilan, M.; Patrizia, G.; Gallucci, M.; Paragona, M.; Bini, P.; Modica, D.; Abati, C.; Clerici, M.; Barbera, I.; Nigroimperiale, F.; Manni, A.; Votino, C.; Castiglioni, C.; Di, M.; Degl'Innocenti, M.; Moscatelli, G.; Guerini, S.; Casini, C.; Dini, D.; D'Imporzano, E.; Denotariis, S.; Bonometti, F.; Paolillo, C.; Riccardi, A.; Tiozzo, A.; Dibari, M.; Vanni, S.; Scarpa, A.; Zara, D.; Ranieri, P.; Alessandro, M.; Di, F.; Pezzoni, D.; Platto, C.; D'Ambrosio, V.; Ivaldi, C.; Milia, P.; Desalvo, F.; Solaro, C.; Strazzacappa, M.; Cazzadori, M.; Confente, S.; Grasso, M.; Troisi, E.; Guerini, V.; Bernardini, B.; Corsini, C.; Boffelli, S.; Filippi, A.; Delpin, K.; Faraci, B.; Bertoletti, E.; Vannucci, M.; Tesi, F.; Crippa, P.; Malighetti, A.; Bettini, D.; Maltese, F.; Abruzzese, G.; Cosimo, D.; Azzini, M.; Colombo, M.; Procino, G.; Fascendini, S.; Barocco, F.; Del, P.; Mazzone, A.; Riva, E.; Dell'Acqua, D.; Cottino, M.; Vezzadini, G.; Avanzi, S.; Brambilla, C.; Orini, S.; Sgrilli, F.; Mello, A.; Lombardi, L.; Muti, E.; Dijk, B.; Fenu, S.; Pes, C.; Gareri, P.; Passamonte, M.; Rigo, R.; Locusta, L.; Caser, L.; Rosso, G.; Cesarini, S.; Cozzi, R.; Santini, C.; Carbone, P.; Cazzaniga, I.; Lovati, R.; Cantoni, A.; Ranzani, P.; Barra, D.; Pompilio, G.; Dimori, S.; Cernesi, S.; Ricco, C.; Piazzolla, F.; Capittini, E.; Rota, C.; Gottardi, F.; Merla, L.; Barelli, A.; Millul, A.; De, G.; Morrone, G.; Bigolari, M.; Macchi, M.; Zambon, F.; Pizzorni, C.; Dicasaleto, G.; Menculini, G.; Marcacci, M.; Catanese, G.; Sprini, D.; Dicasalet, T.; Bocci, M.; Borga, S.; Caironi, P.; Cat, C.; Cingolani, E.; Avalli, L.; Greco, G.; Citerio, G.; Gandini, L.; Cornara, G.; Lerda, R.; Brazzi, L.; Simeone, F.; Caciorgna, M.; Alampi, D.; Francesconi, S.; Beck, E.; Antonini, B.; Vettoretto, K.; Meggiolaro, M.; Garofalo, E.; Notaro, S.; Varutti, R.; Bassi, F.; Mistraletti, G.; Marino, A.; Rona, R.; Rondelli, E.; Riva, I.; Scapigliati, A.; Cortegiani, A.; Vitale, F.; Pistidda, L.; D'Andrea, R.; Querci, L.; Gnesin, P.; Todeschini, M.; Lugano, M.; Castelli, G.; Ortolani, M.; Cotoia, A.; Maggiore, S.; Ditizio, L.; Graziani, R.; Testa, I.; Ferretti, E.; Castioni, C.; Lombardi, F.; Caserta, R.; Pasqua, M.; Simoncini, S.; Baccarini, F.; Rispoli, M.; Grossi, F.; Cancelliere, L.; Carnelli, M.; Puccini, F.; Biancofiore, G.; Siniscalchi, A.; Laici, C.; Mossello, E.; Torrini, M.; Pasetti, G.; Palmese, S.; Oggioni, R.; Mangani, V.; Pini, S.; Martelli, M.; Rigo, E.; Zuccala, F.; Cherri, A.; Spina, R.; Calamai, I.; Petrucci, N.; Caicedo, A.; Ferri, F.; Gritti, P.; Brienza, N.; Fonnesu, R.; Dessena, M.; Fullin, G.; Saggioro, D

The instruments used by the Italian centres for cognitive disorders and dementia to diagnose mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

Aims: The purpose of this study was to examine the tools used in Italy to diagnose mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: In collaboration with the Luigi Amaducci Research Consortium, the Italian Network of Alzheimer Evaluation Units prepared a questionnaire to describe how MCI is diagnosed in the Italian Centres for cognitive disorders and dementia (CCDD). Results: Most of the ninety-two CCDDs participating in the survey were located in hospitals (54.7%); large percentages were coordinated by neurologists (50.8%) and geriatricians (44.6%). Almost all (98.5%) used the Mini Mental State Examination to diagnose MCI; the Clock Drawing Test was also frequently used (83.9%). Other neuropsychological, imaging and biomarker tests were utilized less frequently and a wide diversity in the instruments used was noted. Conclusions: According to the results, diagnoses of MCI are based on a multitude of instruments, with major differences in the clinical assessment of geriatricians and neurologists. Standardized testing protocols, validated instruments and cut-off points need to be identified and adopted by the CCDDs for assessing MCI

The association of indwelling urinary catheter with delirium in hospitalized patients and nursing home residents: an explorative analysis from the "Delirium Day 2015"

BackroundUse of indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) in older adults has negative consequences, including delirium.AimThis analysis, from the Delirium Day 2015, a nationwide multicenter prevalence study, aim to evaluate the association of IUC with delirium in hospitalized and Nursing Homes (NHs) patients.MethodsPatients underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment, including the presence of IUC; inclusion criteria were age>65 years, being Italian speaker and providing informed consent; exclusion criteria were coma, aphasia, end-of-life status. Delirium was assessed using the 4AT test (score4: possible delirium; scores 1-3: possible cognitive impairment).ResultsAmong 1867 hospitalized patients (mean age 82.07.5 years, 58% female), 539 (28.9%) had IUC, 429 (22.9%) delirium and 675 (36.1%) cognitive impairment. IUC was significantly associated with cognitive impairment (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.19-2.16) and delirium (2.45, 95% CI 1.73-3.47), this latter being significant also in the subset of patients without dementia (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.52-3.43). Inattention and impaired alertness were also independently associated with IUC. Among 1454 NHs residents (mean age 84.47.4 years, 70.% female), 63 (4.3%) had IUC, 535 (36.8%) a 4AT score4, and 653 (44.9%) a 4AT score 1-3. The multivariate logistic regression analysis did not show a significant association between 4AT test or its specific items with IUC, neither in the subset of patients without dementia.DiscussionWe confirmed a significant association between IUC and delirium in hospitalized patients but not in NHs residents.ConclusionEnvironmental and clinical factors of acute setting might contribute to IUC-associated delirium occurrence