Residential services as a major cost driver in mental health and substance use services in southern Finland

English abstract.Peer reviewe

Puhelin- ja videovastaanotot psykiatrian potilastyössä: työntekijöiden kokemuksia pandemia-ajalta

Lähtökohdat HUS Psykiatriassa siirryttiin COVID-19-pandemian kiihdyttyä maaliskuussa 2020 laajamittaisesti puhelin- ja videovälitteisiin etävastaanottoihin. Tutkimuksessa selvitettiin työntekijöiden kokemuksia etävastaanottojen soveltuvuudesta psykiatriseen erikoissairaanhoitoon.Menetelmät HUS Psykiatrian avohoidon potilastyöhön osallistuvalta henkilökunnalta kartoitettiin sähköisellä kyselyllä etävastaanottojen kuormittavuutta. Osallistujia pyydettiin arvioimaan niiden soveltuvuutta erilaisten potilasryhmien hoidossa. Anonyymejä vastauksia saatiin 370.Tulokset Potilasryhmittäin kokemukset puhelin- ja videovastaanottojen soveltuvuudesta erosivat jossain määrin toisistaan. Videovastaanotot arvioitiin kauttaaltaan puheluja soveltuvammiksi psykiatrisen hoidon eri osa-alueilla.Päätelmät Psykiatrinen avohoito voi olla tulevaisuudessa laajemmin toteutettavissa etävastaanottojen avulla.</p

Residential services as a major cost driver in mental health and substance use services in southern Finland

publishedVersionPeer reviewe

Identifying Local and Centralized Mental Health ServicesThe Development of a New Categorizing Variable

The challenges of mental health and substance abuse services (MHS) require shifting of the balance of resources from institutional care to community care. In order to track progress, an instrument that can describe these attributes of MHS is needed. We created a coding variable in the European Service Mapping Schedule-Revised (ESMS-R) mapping tool using a modified Delphi panel that classified MHS into centralized, local services with gatekeeping and local services without gatekeeping. For feasibility and validity, we tested the variable on a dataset comprising MHS in Southern Finland, covering a population of 2.3 million people. There were differences in the characteristics of services between our study regions. In our data, 41% were classified as centralized, 37% as local without gatekeeping and 22% as local services with gatekeeping. The proportion of resources allocated to local services varied from 20% to 43%. Reclassifying ESMS-R is an easy way to compare the important local vs. centralized balance of MHS systems globally, where such data exists. Further international studies comparing systems and validating this approach are needed.Peer reviewe

Does Primary Care Mental Health Resourcing Affect the Use and Costs of Secondary Psychiatric Services?

Peer reviewe

How size matters : exploring the association between quality of mental health services and catchment area size

Background: The diversity of mental health and substance abuse services (MHS) available to service users is seen as an indicator of the quality of the service system. In most countries MHS are provided by a mix of public, private and third sector providers. In Finland, officially, the municipalities are responsible for organizing the services needed, but the real extent and roles of private and third sector service providers are not known. Our previous study showed that the catchment area population size was strongly associated with diversity of mental health services. It is not known whether this was due to some types of services or some provider types being more sensitive to the size effect than others. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between area population size and diversity of mental health services, i.e. which types of services and which service providers' contributions are sensitive to population size. Methods: To map and classify services, we used the ESMS-R. The diversity of services was defined as the count of main types of care. Providers were classified as public, private or third sectors. Results: The diversity of outpatient, residential and voluntary services correlated positively with catchment area population size. The strongest positive correlation between the size of population and services available was found in third sector activities followed by public providers, but no correlation was found for diversity of private services. The third sector and public corporations each provided 44 % of the service units. Third sector providers produced all self-help services and most of the day care services. Third sector and private companies provided a significant part (59 %) of the residential care service units. Conclusions: Significant positive correlations were found between size of catchment area population and diversity of residential, outpatient and voluntary services, indicating that these services concentrate on areas with larger population bases. The third sector seems to significantly complement the public sector in providing different services. Thus the third sector be needs to be functionally integrated with other MHS services to achieve a diversified and integrated service system.Peer reviewe

Size Matters - Determinants of Modern, Community-Oriented Mental Health Services

Peer reviewe

Regional Correlates of Psychiatric Inpatient Treatment

Peer reviewe

A Comparison of Mental Health Care Systems in Northern and Southern Europe : A Service Mapping Study

Mental health services (MHS) have gone through vast changes during the last decades, shifting from hospital to community-based care. Developing the optimal balance and use of resources requires standard comparisons of mental health care systems across countries. This study aimed to compare the structure, personnel resource allocation, and the productivity of the MHS in two benchmark health districts in a Nordic welfare state and a southern European, family-centered country. The study is part of the REFINEMENT (Research on Financing Systems' Effect on the Quality of Mental Health Care) project. The study areas were the Helsinki and Uusimaa region in Finland and the Girona region in Spain. The MHS were mapped by using the DESDE-LTC (Description and Evaluation of Services and Directories for Long Term Care) tool. There were 6.7 times more personnel resources in the MHS in Helsinki and Uusimaa than in Girona. The resource allocation was more residential-service-oriented in Helsinki and Uusimaa. The difference in mental health personnel resources is not explained by the respective differences in the need for MHS among the population. It is important to make a standard comparison of the MHS for supporting policymaking and to ensure equal access to care across European countries.Peer reviewe