Previous hospital admissions and disease severity predict the use of antipsychotic combination treatment in patients with schizophrenia

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although not recommended in treatment guidelines, previous studies have shown a frequent use of more than one antipsychotic agent among patients with schizophrenia. The main aims of the present study were to explore the antipsychotic treatment regimen among patients with schizophrenia in a catchment area-based sample and to investigate clinical characteristics associated with antipsychotic combination treatment.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The study included 329 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia using antipsychotic medication. Patients were recruited from all psychiatric hospitals in Oslo. Diagnoses were obtained by use of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I). Additionally, Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and number of hospitalisations and pharmacological treatment were assessed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Multiple hospital admissions, low GAF scores and high PANSS scores, were significantly associated with the prescription of combination treatment with two or more antipsychotics. The use of combination treatment increased significantly from the second hospital admission. Combination therapy was not significantly associated with age or gender. Regression models confirmed that an increasing number of hospital admission was the strongest predictor of the use of two or more antipsychotics.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Previous hospital admissions and disease severity measured by high PANSS scores and low GAF scores, predict the use of antipsychotic combination treatment in patients with schizophrenia. Future studies should further explore the use of antipsychotic drug treatment in clinical practice and partly based on such data establish more robust treatment guidelines for patients with persistently high symptom load.</p

Patterns of childhood adverse events are associated with clinical characteristics of bipolar disorder

Background Previous studies in bipolar disorder investigating childhood trauma and clinical presentations of the illness have mainly focused on physical and sexual abuse. Our aim was to explore further the relationship between childhood trauma and disease characteristics in bipolar disorder to determine which clinical characteristics were most strongly associated with childhood trauma total score, as well as subtypes of adverse childhood events, including physical, sexual, emotional abuse and neglect. Methods 141 Patients with bipolar disorder were consecutively recruited, and disease history and clinical characteristics were assessed. History of childhood abuse was obtained using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Statistical methods used were factor analysis, Poisson and linear regression, and generalized additive modeling (GAM). Results The factor analysis of CTQ identified three factors: emotional abuse/neglect, sexual abuse and physical abuse. There were significant associations between CTQ total score and earlier onset of illness, reduced level of psychosocial functioning (GAF; Global Assessment of Functioning) and decreased number of hospitalization, which mainly were due to the factor emotional abuse/neglect. Physical abuse was significantly associated with lower GAF scores, and increased number of mood episodes, as well as self-harm. Sexual abuse was significantly associated with increased number of mood episodes. For mood episodes and self-harm the associations were characterized by great variance and fluctuations. Conclusions Our results suggest that childhood trauma is associated with a more severe course of bipolar illness. Further, childhood abuse (physical and sexual), as well as emotional abuse and neglect were significantly associated with accelerating staging process of bipolar disorder. By using specific trauma factors (physical abuse, sexual abuse and emotional abuse/neglect) the associations become both more precise, and diverse

Effects of copy number variations on brain structure and risk for psychiatric illness: large-scale studies from the ENIGMA working groups on CNVs

The Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis copy number variant (ENIGMA-CNV) and 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Working Groups (22q-ENIGMA WGs) were created to gain insight into the involvement of genetic factors in human brain development and related cognitive, psychiatric and behavioral manifestations. To that end, the ENIGMA-CNV WG has collated CNV and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from ~49,000 individuals across 38 global research sites, yielding one of the largest studies to date on the effects of CNVs on brain structures in the general population. The 22q-ENIGMA WG includes 12 international research centers that assessed over 533 individuals with a confirmed 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, 40 with 22q11.2 duplications, and 333 typically developing controls, creating the largest-ever 22q11.2 CNV neuroimaging data set. In this review, we outline the ENIGMA infrastructure and procedures for multi-site analysis of CNVs and MRI data. So far, ENIGMA has identified effects of the 22q11.2, 16p11.2 distal, 15q11.2, and 1q21.1 distal CNVs on subcortical and cortical brain structures. Each CNV is associated with differences in cognitive, neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric traits, with characteristic patterns of brain structural abnormalities. Evidence of gene-dosage effects on distinct brain regions also emerged, providing further insight into genotype-phenotype relationships. Taken together, these results offer a more comprehensive picture of molecular mechanisms involved in typical and atypical brain development. This "genotype-first" approach also contributes to our understanding of the etiopathogenesis of brain disorders. Finally, we outline future directions to better understand effects of CNVs on brain structure and behavior.Funding information: European Union's Horizon2020 Research and Innovation Programme, Grant/Award Number: CoMorMent project; Grant #847776; KG Jebsen Stiftelsen; National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Number: U54 EB020403; Norges Forskningsråd, Grant/Award Number: #223273; South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Grant/Award Number: #2020060ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The ENIGMA Consortium is supported by the NIH Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) program under consortium grant number U54 EB020403 (PI: Thompson). OAA is supported by the Research Council of Norway, South East Norway Health Authority, KG Jebsen Stiftelsen, EU H2020. C. A. has been funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation; Instituto de Salud Carlos III (SAM16PE07CP1, PI16/02012, PI19/ 024), co-financed by ERDF Funds from the European Commission, “A way of making Europe”, CIBERSAM; Madrid Regional Government (B2017/BMD-3740 AGES-CM-2), European Union Structural Funds; European Union Seventh Framework Program under grant agreements FP7-4-HEALTH-2009-2.2.1-2-241,909 (Project EU-GEI), FP7- HEALTH-2013-2.2.1-2-603,196 (Project PSYSCAN) and FP7- HEALTH-2013- 2.2.1-2-602,478 (Project METSY); and European Union H2020 Program under the Innovative Medicines Initiative two Joint Undertaking (grant agreement No 115916, Project PRISM, and grant agreement No 777394, Project AIMS-2-TRIALS), Fundación Familia Alonso and Fundación Alicia Koplowitz. R. A-A is funded by a Miguel Servet contract from the Carlos III Health Institute (CP18/00003). G. B. is supported by the Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development ZonMw (grants 91112002 & 91712394). A. S. B. is supported by the Dalglish Family Chair in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grants MOP-79518, MOP89066, MOP-97800 and MOP-111238, and NIMH grant number U01 MH101723–01(3/5). C. E. B. is also supported by the National Institute of Mental Health: RO1 MH085953, R01 MH100900 and 1U01MH119736. N. E. B. is granted the KNAW Academy Professor Award (PAH/6635). V. D. C. is supported by NIH R01 MH094524. S. C. is supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under the Specific Grant Agreement No. 945539 (Human Brain Project SGA3); Helmholtz Initiative and Networking Fund. C. R. K. C. is supported by NIA T32AG058507. E. W. C. C. is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ontario Mental Health Foundation grant MOP-74631 and NIMH grant U01MH101723–01(3/5). S. Ci. has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under the Specific Grant Agreement No. 945539 (Human Brain Project SGA3). M. C. C. is supported by the Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. N. A. C. is supported by Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID Chile) PIA ACT192064. GId. Z. is supported by the NHMRC. J. L. D. and D. E. J. L. are supported by the Wellcome Trust. T. B. C. is supported by NICHD grant PO1-HD070454, NIH grant UO1-MH191719, and NIMH grant R01 MH087636-01A1. AMD is supported by U24DA041147. B. D. is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (NCCR Synapsy, project grant numbers 32003B_135679, 32003B_159780, 324730_192755 and CRSK3_190185), the Leenaards Foundation and the Roger De Spoelberch Foundation. SE is supported by the NARSAD-Young Investigator Grant “Epigenetic Regulation of Intermediate Phenotypes in Schizophrenia”. B. E. S. is supported by the NIH (NIMH). D. C. G. is supported by NIH grant numbers MH078143, MH083824, AG058464. W. R. K. is supported by NIH/MH R0106824. R. E. G. is supported by NIH/NIMH grant numbers MH087626, MH119737. DMMcD-McG is supported by National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH), grant numbers MH119737-02; MH191719; and MH087636-01A1. S. E. M. is supported by NHMRC grants APP1103623; APP1158127; APP1172917. TM is supported by Research Council of Norway - grant number 273345. D. G. M. is supported by the National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London and S (European Autism Interventions)/EU AIMS-2-TRIALS, a European Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreements 115300 and 777394. T. N. was supported by Stiftelsen KG Jebsen under grant number SKGJ-MED-021. R. A. O. is supported by NIMH R01 MH090553. S. Y. S. has been funded by the Canadain Institutes of Health Research. M. J. O. is supported by MRC Centre grant MR/L010305/1 and Wellcome Trust grant 100,202/Z/12/Z; Dr. Owen has received research support from Takeda. Z. P. is supported by CIHR, CFI, HSFC. B. G. P. is supported by CIHR FDN 143290 and CAIP Chair. G. M. R. is supported by Fondecyt-Chile #1171014 and ANID-Chile ACT192064. A. Re. was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_182632). DRR is supported by R01 MH120174 (PI: Roalf). This report represents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London (to J. J. R). PSS is supported by NHMRC (Australia) program grant 1093083. J. E. S. is supported by NIH K01-ES026840. S. M. S. is supported by the Epilepsy Society. T. J. S. is supported by NIH grants R01MH107108, R01HD042794, and HDU54079125. I. E. S. is supported by South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (#2020060), European Union's Horizon2020 Research and Innovation Programme (CoMorMent project; grant #847776) and the KG Jebsen Foundation (SKGJ-MED-021). V. M. S. is supported by Research Council of Norway (CoE funding scheme, grant number 223273). D. J. S. is supported by the SA MRC. C. K. T. is supported by Research Council of Norway (#230345, #288083, #223273) and South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (#2019069, #2021070, #500189). D. T.-G. was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI14/00639 and PI14/00918) and Fundación Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (NCT0235832 and NCT02534363). Dvd. M. is supported by Research Council of Norway #276082. F. V. R. is supported by the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award. deCODE genetics has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreements' no. 115008 (NEWMEDS) and no. 115300 (EUAIMS), of which resources are composed of EFPIA in-kind contribution and financial contribution from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (EU-FP7/ 2007–2013). L. T. W. is supported by Research Council of Norway, European Research Council. The IDIVAL neuroimage unit is supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI020499, research funding SCIII-INT13/0014, MICINN research funding SAF2010-20840-C02- 02, SAF2013-46292-R. The TOP/NORMENT study are supported by the Research Council of Norway (#223273). The GOBS study data collection was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants: R01 MH078143, R01 MH078111, and R01 MH083824 with work conducted in part in facilities constructed under the support of NIH grant number C06 RR020547. The Sydney Memory and Ageing Study has been funded by three National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Program Grants (ID No. ID350833, ID568969, and APP1093083). We thank the participants and their informants for their time and generosity in contributing to this research. We also acknowledge the MAS research team: https://cheba.unsw.edu.au/researchprojects/sydney-memory-and-ageing-study. We acknowledge the contribution of the OATS research team (https://cheba.unsw.edu.au/ project/older-australian-twins-study) to this study. The OATS study has been funded by a National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and Australian Research Council (ARC) Strategic Award Grant of the Aging Well, Aging Productively Program (ID No. 401162); NHMRC Project (seed) Grants (ID No. 1024224 and 1025243); NHMRC Project Grants (ID No. 1045325 and 1085606); and NHMRC Program Grants (ID No. 568969 and 1093083). We thank the participants for their time and generosity in contributing to this research. This research was facilitated through access to Twins Research Australia, a national resource supported by a Centre of Research Excellence Grant (ID No. 1079102) from the National Health and Medical Research Council. The NCNG sample collection was supported by grants from the Bergen Research Foundation and the University of Bergen, the Dr Einar Martens Fund, the KG Jebsen Foundation, the Research Council of Norway, to S. L. H., V. M. S., A. J. L., and T. E. The authors thank Dr. Eike Wehling for recruiting participants in Bergen, and Professor Jonn-Terje Geitung and Haraldplass Deaconess Hospital for access to the MRI facility. Additional support by RCN grants 177458/V50 and 231286/F20. The Betula study was supported by a Wallenberg Scholar Grant (KAW). The HUNT Study is a collaboration between HUNT Research Centre (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU—Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Nord-Trøndelag County Council, Central Norway Health Authority, and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. HUNT-MRI was funded by the Liaison Committee between the Central Norway Regional Health Authority and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, and the Norwegian National Advisory Unit for functional MRI. Research for the GAP cohort was supported by the Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Specialist Biomedical Research Center for Mental Health award to South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) and the Institute of Psychiatry at King's College London, London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. S.J. is supported by Calcul Quebec (http:// www.calculquebec.ca), Compute Canada (http://www.computecanada. ca), the Brain Canada Multi investigator research initiative (MIRI), the Institute of Data Valorization (Canada First Research Excellence Fund), CHIR, Canada Research Chairs and the Jeanne et Jean Louis Levesque Foundation. The NTR cohort was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), MW904-61-193 (de Geus & Boomsma), MaGWnr: 400-07-080 (van 't Ent), MagW 480-04-004 (Boomsma), NWO/SPI 56-464-14,192 (Boomsma), the European Research Council, ERC-230374 (Boomsma), and Amsterdam Neuroscience. Funding for genotyping was obtained from the National Institutes of Health (NIMH U24 MH068457-06; Grand Opportunity grants 1RC2 MH089951, and 1RC2 MH089995); the Avera Institute for Human Genetics, Sioux Falls, South Dakota (USA). Part of the genotyping and analyses were funded by the Genetic Association Information Network (GAIN) of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health. The Brainscale study was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research MagW 480-04-004 (Boomsma), 51.02.060 (Hilleke Hulshoff Pol), 668.772 (Boomsma & Hulshoff Pol); NWO/SPI 56-464-14192 (Boomsma), the European Research Council (ERC230374) (Boomsma), High Potential Grant Utrecht University (Hulshoff Pol), NWO Brain and Cognition 433-09-220 (Hulshoff Pol). SHIP is part of the Community Medicine Research net of the University of Greifswald, Germany, which is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grants no. 01ZZ9603, 01ZZ0103, and 01ZZ0403), the Ministry of Cultural Affairs and the Social Ministry of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania. Genome-wide SNP typing in SHIP and MRI scans in SHIP and SHIP-TREND have been supported by a joint grant from Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany and the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania. The ENIGMA-22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Working Group wishes to acknowledge our dear colleague Dr. Clodagh Murphy, who sadly passed away in April 2020. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL

Morphological correlates to cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia as studied with Bayesian regression

BACKGROUND: Relationships between cognitive deficits and brain morphological changes observed in schizophrenia are alternately explained by less gray matter in the brain cerebral cortex, by alterations in neural circuitry involving the basal ganglia, and by alteration in cerebellar structures and related neural circuitry. This work explored a model encompassing all of these possibilities to identify the strongest morphological relationships to cognitive skill in schizophrenia. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with schizophrenia and sixty-five healthy control subjects were characterized by neuropsychological tests covering six functional domains. Measures of sixteen brain morphological structures were taken using semi-automatic and fully manual tracing of MRI images, with the full set of measures completed on thirty of the patients and twenty controls. Group differences were calculated. A Bayesian decision-theoretic method identified those morphological features, which best explained neuropsychological test scores in the context of a multivariate response linear model with interactions. RESULTS: Patients performed significantly worse on all neuropsychological tests except some regarding executive function. The most prominent morphological observations were enlarged ventricles, reduced posterior superior vermis gray matter volumes, and increased putamen gray matter volumes in the patients. The Bayesian method associated putamen volumes with verbal learning, vigilance, and (to a lesser extent) executive function, while caudate volumes were associated with working memory. Vermis regions were associated with vigilance, executive function, and, less strongly, visuo-motor speed. Ventricular volume was strongly associated with visuo-motor speed, vocabulary, and executive function. Those neuropsychological tests, which were strongly associated to ventricular volume, showed only weak association to diagnosis, possibly because ventricular volume was regarded a proxy for diagnosis. Diagnosis was strongly associated with the other neuropsychological tests, implying that the morphological associations for these tasks reflected morphological effects and not merely group volumetric differences. Interaction effects were rarely associated, indicating that volumetric relationships to neuropsychological performance were similar for both patients and controls. CONCLUSION: The association of subcortical and cerebellar structures to verbal learning, vigilance, and working memory supports the importance of neural connectivity to these functions. The finding that a morphological indicator of diagnosis (ventricular volume) provided more explanatory power than diagnosis itself for visuo-motor speed, vocabulary, and executive function suggests that volumetric abnormalities in the disease are more important for cognition than non-morphological features

Reply to: New Meta- and Mega-analyses of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Schizophrenia: Do They Really Increase Our Knowledge About the Nature of the Disease Process?

This work was supported by National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Grant No. U54EB020403 (to the ENIGMA consortium)

ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries.

This review summarizes the last decade of work by the ENIGMA (Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta Analysis) Consortium, a global alliance of over 1400 scientists across 43 countries, studying the human brain in health and disease. Building on large-scale genetic studies that discovered the first robustly replicated genetic loci associated with brain metrics, ENIGMA has diversified into over 50 working groups (WGs), pooling worldwide data and expertise to answer fundamental questions in neuroscience, psychiatry, neurology, and genetics. Most ENIGMA WGs focus on specific psychiatric and neurological conditions, other WGs study normal variation due to sex and gender differences, or development and aging; still other WGs develop methodological pipelines and tools to facilitate harmonized analyses of "big data" (i.e., genetic and epigenetic data, multimodal MRI, and electroencephalography data). These international efforts have yielded the largest neuroimaging studies to date in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, substance use disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorders, epilepsy, and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. More recent ENIGMA WGs have formed to study anxiety disorders, suicidal thoughts and behavior, sleep and insomnia, eating disorders, irritability, brain injury, antisocial personality and conduct disorder, and dissociative identity disorder. Here, we summarize the first decade of ENIGMA's activities and ongoing projects, and describe the successes and challenges encountered along the way. We highlight the advantages of collaborative large-scale coordinated data analyses for testing reproducibility and robustness of findings, offering the opportunity to identify brain systems involved in clinical syndromes across diverse samples and associated genetic, environmental, demographic, cognitive, and psychosocial factors

Normative modeling of brain morphometry in Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis

Importance: The lack of robust neuroanatomical markers of psychosis risk has been traditionally attributed to heterogeneity. A complementary hypothesis is that variation in neuroanatomical measures in the majority of individuals at psychosis risk may be nested within the range observed in healthy individuals. Objective: To quantify deviations from the normative range of neuroanatomical variation in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P) and evaluate their overlap with healthy variation and their association with positive symptoms, cognition, and conversion to a psychotic disorder. Design setting and participants: Clinical, IQ and FreeSurfer-derived regional measures of cortical thickness (CT), cortical surface area (SA), and subcortical volume (SV) from 1,340 CHR-P individuals [47.09% female; mean age: 20.75 (4.74) years] and 1,237 healthy individuals [44.70% female; mean age: 22.32 (4.95) years] from 29 international sites participating in the ENIGMA Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Working Group. Main outcomes and measures: For each regional morphometric measure, z-scores were computed that index the degree of deviation from the normative means of that measure in a healthy reference population (N=37,407). Average deviation scores (ADS) for CT, SA, SV, and globally across all measures (G) were generated by averaging the respective regional z-scores. Regression analyses were used to quantify the association of deviation scores with clinical severity and cognition and two-proportion z-tests to identify case-control differences in the proportion of individuals with infranormal (z1.96) scores. Results: CHR-P and healthy individuals overlapped in the distributions of the observed values, regional z-scores, and all ADS vales. The proportion of CHR-P individuals with infranormal or supranormal values in any metric was low (<12%) and similar to that of healthy individuals. CHR-P individuals who converted to psychosis compared to those who did not convert had a higher percentage of infranormal values in temporal regions (5-7% vs 0.9-1.4%). In the CHR-P group, only the ADS SA showed significant but weak associations (|β|<0.09; P FDR <0.05) with positive symptoms and IQ. Conclusions and relevance: The study findings challenge the usefulness of macroscale neuromorphometric measures as diagnostic biomarkers of psychosis risk and suggest that such measures do not provide an adequate explanation for psychosis risk. Key points: Question: Is the risk of psychosis associated with brain morphometric changes that deviate significantly from healthy variation?Findings: In this study of 1340 individuals high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P) and 1237 healthy participants, individual-level variation in macroscale neuromorphometric measures of the CHR-P group was largely nested within healthy variation and was not associated with the severity of positive psychotic symptoms or conversion to a psychotic disorder.Meaning: The findings suggest the macroscale neuromorphometric measures have limited utility as diagnostic biomarkers of psychosis risk

What we learn about bipolar disorder from large-scale neuroimaging:Findings and future directions from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group

MRI-derived brain measures offer a link between genes, the environment and behavior and have been widely studied in bipolar disorder (BD). However, many neuroimaging studies of BD have been underpowered, leading to varied results and uncertainty regarding effects. The Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) Bipolar Disorder Working Group was formed in 2012 to empower discoveries, generate consensus findings and inform future hypothesis-driven studies of BD. Through this effort, over 150 researchers from 20 countries and 55 institutions pool data and resources to produce the largest neuroimaging studies of BD ever conducted. The ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group applies standardized processing and analysis techniques to empower large-scale meta- and mega-analyses of multimodal brain MRI and improve the replicability of studies relating brain variation to clinical and genetic data. Initial BD Working Group studies reveal widespread patterns of lower cortical thickness, subcortical volume and disrupted white matter integrity associated with BD. Findings also include mapping brain alterations of common medications like lithium, symptom patterns and clinical risk profiles and have provided further insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of BD. Here we discuss key findings from the BD working group, its ongoing projects and future directions for large-scale, collaborative studies of mental illness

Using brain structural neuroimaging measures to predict psychosis onset for individuals at clinical high-risk

Machine learning approaches using structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) can be informative for disease classification, although their ability to predict psychosis is largely unknown. We created a model with individuals at CHR who developed psychosis later (CHR-PS+) from healthy controls (HCs) that can differentiate each other. We also evaluated whether we could distinguish CHR-PS+ individuals from those who did not develop psychosis later (CHR-PS-) and those with uncertain follow-up status (CHR-UNK). T1-weighted structural brain MRI scans from 1165 individuals at CHR (CHR-PS+, n = 144; CHR-PS-, n = 793; and CHR-UNK, n = 228), and 1029 HCs, were obtained from 21 sites. We used ComBat to harmonize measures of subcortical volume, cortical thickness and surface area data and corrected for non-linear effects of age and sex using a general additive model. CHR-PS+ (n = 120) and HC (n = 799) data from 20 sites served as a training dataset, which we used to build a classifier. The remaining samples were used external validation datasets to evaluate classifier performance (test, independent confirmatory, and independent group [CHR-PS- and CHR-UNK] datasets). The accuracy of the classifier on the training and independent confirmatory datasets was 85% and 73% respectively. Regional cortical surface area measures-including those from the right superior frontal, right superior temporal, and bilateral insular cortices strongly contributed to classifying CHR-PS+ from HC. CHR-PS- and CHR-UNK individuals were more likely to be classified as HC compared to CHR-PS+ (classification rate to HC: CHR-PS+, 30%; CHR-PS-, 73%; CHR-UNK, 80%). We used multisite sMRI to train a classifier to predict psychosis onset in CHR individuals, and it showed promise predicting CHR-PS+ in an independent sample. The results suggest that when considering adolescent brain development, baseline MRI scans for CHR individuals may be helpful to identify their prognosis. Future prospective studies are required about whether the classifier could be actually helpful in the clinical settings.</p

Excessive substance use in bipolar disorder is associated with impaired functioning rather than clinical characteristics, a descriptive study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is a strong association between bipolar disorder (BD) and substance use disorder (SUD). The clinical and functional correlates of SUD in BD are still unclear and little is known about the role of excessive substance use that does not meet SUD criteria. Thus, the aims of the current study were to investigate lifetime rates of illicit substance use in BD relative to the normal population and if there are differences in clinical and functional features between BD patients with and without excessive substance use.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>125 consecutively recruited BD in- and outpatients from the Oslo University Hospitals and 327 persons randomly drawn from the population in Oslo, Norway participated. Clinical and functional variables were assessed. Excessive substance use was defined as DSM-IV SUD and/or excessive use according to predefined criteria.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The rate of lifetime illicit substance use was significantly higher among patients compared to the reference population (OR = 3.03, CI = 1.9-4.8, p < .001). Patients with excessive substance use (45% of total) had poorer educational level, occupational status, GAF-scores and medication compliance, with a trend towards higher suicidality rates, compared to patients without. There were no significant group differences in current symptom levels or disease course between groups.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The percentage of patients with BD that had tried illicit substances was significantly higher than in the normal population. BD patients with excessive substance use clearly had impaired functioning, but not a worse course of illness compared to patients without excessive substance use. An assessment of substance use beyond SUD criteria in BD is clinically relevant.</p