Restoring Rangelands for Nutrition and Health for Humans and Livestock

Drylands cover 40% of the global land area and host 2 billion people, of which 90% live in low- or middleincome countries. Drylands often face severe land degradation, low agricultural productivity, rapid population growth, widespread poverty, and poor health. Governance structures and institutions are often eroded. Livestock-based livelihoods, largely depending on seasonal migration are common. Pastoralist communities and their land are highly vulnerable to climate shocks, while there are also changes in land tenure, insecurity/conflicts and rapid infrastructure development. Drylands Transform is an interdisciplinary research project revolving around the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The project aim is to contribute new knowledge to a transformative change and sustainable development of drylands in East Africa to help escape the ongoing negative spiral of land, livestock and livelihood degradation. We investigate the links between land health, livelihoods, human well-being, and land management and governance with several study sites along the Kenya-Uganda border. Through strong stakeholder engagement we will explore challenges and pathways towards a social-ecological transformation in these drylands. The entry point is the urgent need to identify and enhance synergies between food and nutrition security (SDG2), land and ecosystem health (SDG15) and governance and justice (SDG16) for sustainable dryland development, aiming to improve health and equity (SDGs 3 and 5), while minimizing trade-offs between agricultural productivity, natural resources management and climate change. We are using innovative field research approaches focusing on livelihood improvement through rangeland (grazing areas) restoration and governance interventions. We will present results from the initial work to assess land health using the Land Degradation Surveillance Framework and explore the links with human health and well-being through household survey data. We will also show how we will co-develop sustainable dryland management options (e.g., field experiments with fodder grasses and shrubs) with local communities and set-up knowledge sharing hubs

Grain legumes and dryland cereals for enhancing carbon sequestration in semi-arid and sub-humid agro-ecologies of Africa and South Asia

Sorghum, millets (pearl and finger millet) and grain legumes (chickpea, common bean, cowpea, lentils, pigeon pea and soybean), collectively referred to as GLDC under the CGIAR research program on Grain Legumes and Dryland Cereals, are commonly grown, eaten and traded by small holder farmers in Africa and South Asia. These crops contribute to food and nutritional security, environmental sustainability, and economic growth in the region. However, their possible contribution to carbon sequestration through biomass production and accumulation of soil organic carbon (SOC) is not known. To find out more about their contribution, and how to increase SOC, this study reviewed the evidence of carbon sequestration in farming systems that integrate GLDC in Africa and South Asia. A total of 437 publications reporting SOC and its proxies across 32 countries in Africa (N=250 studies) and South Asia (N=187) were identified as sources of evidence for carbon sequestration. Among these, 179 publications provided appropriate control groups for evaluating changes in aboveground carbon when GLDC were integrated under intercrop (n=38), crop rotation (n=8) or agroforestry (n=13), or when improved varieties of GLDC were compared with local varieties (n=14). A further 81 publications compared SOC content at the start and the end of the experiment while 43 publications compared SOC between farms growing GLDC and those which did not. Aboveground carbon of GLDC was found to be 1.51±0.05 Mg/ha in Africa and 2.29±0.10 Mg/ha in South Asia. Absolute SOC concentration in the topsoil (0-30 cm) was 0.96±0.06% in Africa and 0.58±0.04 in South Asia. It was observed that GLDC produced more aboveground carbon and significantly increased SOC when grown as intercrops and in crop rotations. The increase, however, depended on the species and whether the crop was a legume or a cereal. The largest amount of aboveground carbon (>2 Mg/ha) was found in cereals (and pigeon pea) while the largest increase in SOC was found in farming systems that included legumes. Aboveground carbon of improved varieties of GLDC was lower compared to local varieties. Soils which had low initial (32%) showed the greatest potential for carbon sequestration when GLDC were grown. Among the GLDC crops, pigeon pea which is a perennial grain legume showed the highest biomass production and carbon sequestration in the soil when integrated into farming systems in Africa and South Asia. Findings from this study underscore the importance of aboveground residues in regulating the addition of carbon to the soil, and the role of legumes in the enhancement of SOC

The N-P-K soil nutrient balance of portuguese cropland in the 1950s: the transition from organic to chemical fertilization

Agricultural nutrient balances have been receiving increasing attention in both historical and nutrient management research. The main objectives of this study were to further develop balance methodologies and to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the functioning and nutrient cycling of 1950s agroecosystems in Portugal. Additionally, the main implications for the history of agriculture in Portugal were discussed from the standpoint of soil fertility. We used a mass balance approach that comprises virtually all nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) inputs and outputs from cropland topsoil for average conditions in the period 1951–56. We found a consistent deficit in N, both for nationwide (−2.1 kg.ha−1.yr−1) and arable crops (−1.6 kg.ha−1.yr−1) estimates, that was rectified in the turn to the 1960 decade. P and K were, in contrast, accumulating in the soil (4.2–4.6 kg.ha−1.yr−1 and 1.0–3.0 kg.ha−1.yr−1, respectively). We observed that the 1950s is the very moment of inflection from an agriculture fertilized predominantly through reused N in biomass (livestock excretions plus marine, plant and human waste sources) to one where chemical fertilizers prevailed. It is suggested that N deficiency played an important role in this transitioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Suprimento de potássio em função da adubação potássica residual em um Latossolo Vermelho do Cerrado

Em alguns solos com baixos teores de potássio trocável, formas não trocáveis participam do suprimento às plantas. Há evidências de que a disponibilização do K não trocável depende mais da demanda das plantas pelo nutriente do que das propriedades do solo. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o suprimento e a exaustão de formas de K em um Latossolo Vermelho do Cerrado em decorrência da adubação potássica residual e do cultivo de Brachiaria ruziziensis (Syn. Urochloa ruziziensis). Amostras de solos foram coletadas na camada de 0-20 cm, em parcelas de um experimento de campo em que a soja vinha sendo adubada anualmente, por 10 anos, com 0, 60, 120 e 180 kg ha-1 de K2O. Em casa de vegetação, as amostras de solo receberam a aplicação de 0, 150 e 300 mg dm-3 de K e foram cultivadas com B. ruziziensis, com cinco cortes sucessivos. O suprimento de K às plantas dependeu mais do fertilizante recém-adicionado do que do efeito residual de adubações anteriores. O K não trocável foi responsável, ao longo do tempo, pela manutenção dos teores de K trocáveis e, na ausência de adubação potássica, constituiu a principal fonte de K para as plantas de B. ruziziensis. As plantas de B. ruziziensis possuem capacidade de extrair quantidade considerável de K do solo, confirmando sua importância como cultura de cobertura, na ciclagem do nutriente no solo

Considering Soil Potassium Pools with Dissimilar Plant Availability

Soil potassium (K) has traditionally been portrayed as residing in four functional pools: solution K, exchangeable K, interlayer (sometimes referred to as “fixed” or “nonexchangeable”) K, and structural K in primary minerals. However, this four-pool model and associated terminology have created confusion in understanding the dynamics of K supply to plants and the fate of K returned to the soil in fertilizers, residues, or waste products. This chapter presents an alternative framework to depict soil K pools. The framework distinguishes between micas and feldspars as K-bearing primary minerals, based on the presence of K in interlayer positions or three-dimensional framework structures, respectively; identifies a pool of K in neoformed secondary minerals that can include fertilizer reaction products; and replaces the “exchangeable” K pool with a pool defined as “surface-adsorbed” K, identifying where the K is located and the mechanism by which it is held rather than identification based on particular soil testing procedures. In this chapter, we discuss these K pools and their behavior in relation to plant K acquisition and soil K dynamics