Predicting the ecological status of rivers and streams under different climatic and socioeconomic scenarios using Bayesian Belief Networks

Freshwater systems have increasingly been subjected to a multitude of human pressures and the re-establishment of their ecological integrity is currently a major worldwide challenge. Expected future climate and socioeconomic changes will most probably further exacerbate such challenges. Modelling techniques may provide useful tools to help facing these demands, but their use is still limited within ecological quality assessment of water resources due to its technical complexity. We developed a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) framework for modelling the ecological quality of rivers and streams in two European river basins located in two distinct European climatic regions: the Odense Fjord basin (Denmark) and the Sorraia basin (Portugal). This method enabled us to integrate different data sources into a single framework to model the effect of multiple stressors on several biological indicators of river water quality and, subsequently, on their ecological status. The BBN provided a simple interactive user interface with which we simulated combined climate and socioeconomic changes scenarios to assess their impacts on river ecological status. According to the resulting BBNs the scenarios demonstrated small impacts of climate and socioeconomic changes on the biological quality elements analysed. This yield a final ecological status similar to the baseline in the Odense case, and slightly worse in Sorraia. Since the present situation already depicts a high percentage of rivers and streams with moderate or worse ecological status in both basins, this means that many of them would not fulfil the Water Framework Directive target in the future. Results also showed that macrophytes and fish indices were mainly responsible for a non-desirable overall ecological status in Odense and Sorraia, respectively. The approach followed in this study is novel, since BBN modelling is used for the first time for assessing the ecological status of rivers and streams under future scenarios, using an ensemble of biological quality elements. An important advantage of this tool is that it may easily be updated with new knowledge on the nature of relationships already established in the BBN or even by introducing new causal links. By encompassing two case studies of very different characteristics, these BBN may be more easily adapted as decision-making tools for water management of other river basinsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

TWINLATIN: Twinning European and Latin-American river basins for research enabling sustainable water resources management. Combined Report D3.1 Hydrological modelling report and D3.2 Evaluation report

Water use has almost tripled over the past 50 years and in some regions the water demand already exceeds supply (Vorosmarty et al., 2000). The world is facing a “global water crisis”; in many countries, current levels of water use are unsustainable, with systems vulnerable to collapse from even small changes in water availability. The need for a scientifically-based assessment of the potential impacts on water resources of future changes, as a basis for society to adapt to such changes, is strong for most parts of the world. Although the focus of such assessments has tended to be climate change, socio-economic changes can have as significant an impact on water availability across the four main use sectors i.e. domestic, agricultural, industrial (including energy) and environmental. Withdrawal and consumption of water is expected to continue to grow substantially over the next 20-50 years (Cosgrove & Rijsberman, 2002), and consequent changes in availability may drastically affect society and economies. One of the most needed improvements in Latin American river basin management is a higher level of detail in hydrological modelling and erosion risk assessment, as a basis for identification and analysis of mitigation actions, as well as for analysis of global change scenarios. Flow measurements are too costly to be realised at more than a few locations, which means that modelled data are required for the rest of the basin. Hence, TWINLATIN Work Package 3 “Hydrological modelling and extremes” was formulated to provide methods and tools to be used by other WPs, in particular WP6 on “Pollution pressure and impact analysis” and WP8 on “Change effects and vulnerability assessment”. With an emphasis on high and low flows and their impacts, WP3 was originally called “Hydrological modelling, flooding, erosion, water scarcity and water abstraction”. However, at the TWINLATIN kick-off meeting it was agreed that some of these issues resided more appropriately in WP6 and WP8, and so WP3 was renamed to focus on hydrological modelling and hydrological extremes. The specific objectives of WP3 as set out in the Description of Work are

Ecological models at fish community and species level to support effective river restoration

RESUMEN Los peces nativos son indicadores de la salud de los ecosistemas acuáticos, y se han convertido en un elemento de calidad clave para evaluar el estado ecológico de los ríos. La comprensión de los factores que afectan a las especies nativas de peces es importante para la gestión y conservación de los ecosistemas acuáticos. El objetivo general de esta tesis es analizar las relaciones entre variables biológicas y de hábitat (incluyendo la conectividad) a través de una variedad de escalas espaciales en los ríos Mediterráneos, con el desarrollo de herramientas de modelación para apoyar la toma de decisiones en la restauración de ríos. Esta tesis se compone de cuatro artículos. El primero tiene como objetivos modelar la relación entre un conjunto de variables ambientales y la riqueza de especies nativas (NFSR), y evaluar la eficacia de potenciales acciones de restauración para mejorar la NFSR en la cuenca del río Júcar. Para ello se aplicó un enfoque de modelación de red neuronal artificial (ANN), utilizando en la fase de entrenamiento el algoritmo Levenberg-Marquardt. Se aplicó el método de las derivadas parciales para determinar la importancia relativa de las variables ambientales. Según los resultados, el modelo de ANN combina variables que describen la calidad de ribera, la calidad del agua y el hábitat físico, y ayudó a identificar los principales factores que condicionan el patrón de distribución de la NFSR en los ríos Mediterráneos. En la segunda parte del estudio, el modelo fue utilizado para evaluar la eficacia de dos acciones de restauración en el río Júcar: la eliminación de dos azudes abandonados, con el consiguiente incremento de la proporción de corrientes. Estas simulaciones indican que la riqueza aumenta con el incremento de la longitud libre de barreras artificiales y la proporción del mesohabitat de corriente, y demostró la utilidad de las ANN como una poderosa herramienta para apoyar la toma de decisiones en el manejo y restauración ecológica de los ríos Mediterráneos. El segundo artículo tiene como objetivo determinar la importancia relativa de los dos principales factores que controlan la reducción de la riqueza de peces (NFSR), es decir, las interacciones entre las especies acuáticas, variables del hábitat (incluyendo la conectividad fluvial) y biológicas (incluidas las especies invasoras) en los ríos Júcar, Cabriel y Turia. Con este fin, tres modelos de ANN fueron analizados: el primero fue construido solamente con variables biológicas, el segundo se construyó únicamente con variables de hábitat y el tercero con la combinación de estos dos grupos de variables. Los resultados muestran que las variables de hábitat son los ¿drivers¿ más importantes para la distribución de NFSR, y demuestran la importancia ecológica de los modelos desarrollados. Los resultados de este estudio destacan la necesidad de proponer medidas de mitigación relacionadas con la mejora del hábitat (incluyendo la variabilidad de caudales en el río) como medida para conservar y restaurar los ríos Mediterráneos. El tercer artículo busca comparar la fiabilidad y relevancia ecológica de dos modelos predictivos de NFSR, basados en redes neuronales artificiales (ANN) y random forests (RF). La relevancia de las variables seleccionadas por cada modelo se evaluó a partir del conocimiento ecológico y apoyado por otras investigaciones. Los dos modelos fueron desarrollados utilizando validación cruzada k-fold y su desempeño fue evaluado a través de tres índices: el coeficiente de determinación (R2 ), el error cuadrático medio (MSE) y el coeficiente de determinación ajustado (R2 adj). Según los resultados, RF obtuvo el mejor desempeño en entrenamiento. Pero, el procedimiento de validación cruzada reveló que ambas técnicas generaron resultados similares (R2 = 68% para RF y R2 = 66% para ANN). La comparación de diferentes métodos de machine learning es muy útil para el análisis crítico de los resultados obtenidos a través de los modelos. El cuarto artículo tiene como objetivo evaluar la capacidad de las ANN para identificar los factores que afectan a la densidad y la presencia/ausencia de Luciobarbus guiraonis en la demarcación hidrográfica del Júcar. Se utilizó una red neuronal artificial multicapa de tipo feedforward (ANN) para representar relaciones no lineales entre descriptores de L. guiraonis con variables biológicas y de hábitat. El poder predictivo de los modelos se evaluó con base en el índice Kappa (k), la proporción de casos correctamente clasificados (CCI) y el área bajo la curva (AUC) característica operativa del receptor (ROC). La presencia/ausencia de L. guiraonis fue bien predicha por el modelo ANN (CCI = 87%, AUC = 0.85 y k = 0.66). La predicción de la densidad fue moderada (CCI = 62%, AUC = 0.71 y k = 0.43). Las variables más importantes que describen la presencia/ausencia fueron: radiación solar, área de drenaje y la proporción de especies exóticas de peces con un peso relativo del 27.8%, 24.53% y 13.60% respectivamente. En el modelo de densidad, las variables más importantes fueron el coeficiente de variación de los caudales medios anuales con una importancia relativa del 50.5% y la proporción de especies exóticas de peces con el 24.4%. Los modelos proporcionan información importante acerca de la relación de L. guiraonis con variables bióticas y de hábitat, este nuevo conocimiento podría utilizarse para apoyar futuros estudios y para contribuir en la toma de decisiones para la conservación y manejo de especies en los en los ríos Júcar, Cabriel y Turia.Olaya Marín, EJ. (2013). Ecological models at fish community and species level to support effective river restoration [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/28853TESI

Coupled daily streamflow and water temperature modelling in large river basins

Realistic estimates of daily streamflow and water temperature are required for effective management of water resources (e.g. for electricity and drinking water production) and freshwater ecosystems. Although hydrological and process-based water temperature modelling approaches have been successfully applied to small catchments and short time periods, much less work has been done at large spatial and temporal scales. We present a physically based modelling framework for daily river discharge and water temperature simulations applicable to large river systems on a global scale. Model performance was tested globally at 1/2 × 1/2° spatial resolution and a daily time step for the period 1971–2000. We made specific evaluations on large river basins situated in different hydro-climatic zones and characterized by different anthropogenic impacts. Effects of anthropogenic heat discharges on simulated water temperatures were incorporated by using global gridded thermoelectric water use datasets and representing thermal discharges as point sources into the heat advection equation. This resulted in a significant increase in the quality of the water temperature simulations for thermally polluted basins (Rhine, Meuse, Danube and Mississippi). Due to large reservoirs in the Columbia which affect streamflow and thermal regimes, a reservoir routing model was used. This resulted in a significant improvement in the performance of the river discharge and water temperature modelling. Overall, realistic estimates were obtained at daily time step for both river discharge (median normalized BIAS = 0.3; normalized RMSE = 1.2; r = 0.76) and water temperature (median BIAS = -0.3 °C; RMSE = 2.8 °C; r = 0.91) for the entire validation period, with similar performance during warm, dry periods. Simulated water temperatures are sensitive to headwater temperature, depending on resolution and flow velocity. A high sensitivity of water temperature to river discharge (thermal capacity) was found during warm, dry conditions. The modelling approach has potential to be used for risk analyses and studying impacts of climate change and other anthropogenic effects (e.g. thermal pollution, dams and reservoir regulation) on large rivers

Water Framework Directive and Modelling Using PEGOPERA Simulation Software

peer reviewedaudience: researcher, professional, studentThe Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (WFD) established a framework for community action in the field of water policy. To implement the WFD, the competent authorities for watershed management should use modelling techniques to establish, for example, the pressure/impacts relationship. The PEGOPERA modelling tool (composed of the water quality model PEGASE and a friendly Graphical User Interface), has been developed in order to be compliant with the requirements of the WFD. PEGASE is a physicochemical model describing the behaviour of whole river systems, at various scales, from tens to tens of thousands km². The specificity of the model is its ability to work at a high spatial resolution not only for small river basins (water body level), but also for large drainage networks. Already used by several basin management competent authorities, the PEGOPERA modelling tool proved to be an efficient tool for helping in surface water management from local up to the international district level and is therefore an operational numerical tool for WFD implementatio

Assessment of hydrology, sediment and particulate organic carbon yield in a large agricultural catchment using the SWAT model

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT, 2005) was used to simulate discharge and sediment transport at daily time steps within the intensively farmed Save catchment in south-west France (1110 km2). The SWAT model was applied to evaluate catchment hydrology and sediment and associated particulate organic carbon yield using historical flow and meteorological data for a 10-years (January 1999–March 2009). Daily data on sediment (27 months, January 2007–March 2009) and particular organic carbon (15 months, January 2008–March 2009) were used to calibrate the model. Data on management practices (crop rotation, planting date, fertiliser quantity and irrigation) were included in the model during the simulation period of 10 years. Simulated daily discharge, sediment and particulate carbon values matched the observed values satisfactorily. The model predicted that mean annual catchment precipitation for the total study period (726 mm) was partitioned into evapotranspiration (78.3%), percolation/groundwater recharge (14.1%) and abstraction losses (0.5%), yielding 7.1% surface runoff. Simulated mean total water yield for the whole simulation period amounted to 138 mm, comparable to the observed value of 136 mm. Simulated annual sediment yield ranged from 4.3 t km−2 y−1 to 110 t km−2 y−1 (annual mean of 48 t km−2 y−1). Annual yield of particulate organic carbon ranged from 0.1 t km−2 y−1 to 2.8 t km−2 y−1 (annual mean of 1.2 t km−2 y−1). Thus, the highest annual sediment and particulate carbon yield represented 25 times the minimum annual yield. However, the highest annual water yield represented five times the minimum (222 mm and 51 mm, respectively). An empirical correlation between annual water yield and annual sediment and organic carbon yield was developed for this agricultural catchment. Potential source areas of erosion were also identified with the model. The range of the annual contributing erosive zones varied spatially from 0.1 to 6 t ha−1 according to the slope and agricultural practices at the catchment scale