1,735 research outputs found
Name Disambiguation from link data in a collaboration graph using temporal and topological features
In a social community, multiple persons may share the same name, phone number
or some other identifying attributes. This, along with other phenomena, such as
name abbreviation, name misspelling, and human error leads to erroneous
aggregation of records of multiple persons under a single reference. Such
mistakes affect the performance of document retrieval, web search, database
integration, and more importantly, improper attribution of credit (or blame).
The task of entity disambiguation partitions the records belonging to multiple
persons with the objective that each decomposed partition is composed of
records of a unique person. Existing solutions to this task use either
biographical attributes, or auxiliary features that are collected from external
sources, such as Wikipedia. However, for many scenarios, such auxiliary
features are not available, or they are costly to obtain. Besides, the attempt
of collecting biographical or external data sustains the risk of privacy
violation. In this work, we propose a method for solving entity disambiguation
task from link information obtained from a collaboration network. Our method is
non-intrusive of privacy as it uses only the time-stamped graph topology of an
anonymized network. Experimental results on two real-life academic
collaboration networks show that the proposed method has satisfactory
performance.Comment: The short version of this paper has been accepted to ASONAM 201
The Extraction of Community Structures from Publication Networks to Support Ethnographic Observations of Field Differences in Scientific Communication
The scientific community of researchers in a research specialty is an
important unit of analysis for understanding the field specific shaping of
scientific communication practices. These scientific communities are, however,
a challenging unit of analysis to capture and compare because they overlap,
have fuzzy boundaries, and evolve over time. We describe a network analytic
approach that reveals the complexities of these communities through examination
of their publication networks in combination with insights from ethnographic
field studies. We suggest that the structures revealed indicate overlapping
sub- communities within a research specialty and we provide evidence that they
differ in disciplinary orientation and research practices. By mapping the
community structures of scientific fields we aim to increase confidence about
the domain of validity of ethnographic observations as well as of collaborative
patterns extracted from publication networks thereby enabling the systematic
study of field differences. The network analytic methods presented include
methods to optimize the delineation of a bibliographic data set in order to
adequately represent a research specialty, and methods to extract community
structures from this data. We demonstrate the application of these methods in a
case study of two research specialties in the physical and chemical sciences.Comment: Accepted for publication in JASIS
Exploiting citation networks for large-scale author name disambiguation
We present a novel algorithm and validation method for disambiguating author
names in very large bibliographic data sets and apply it to the full Web of
Science (WoS) citation index. Our algorithm relies only upon the author and
citation graphs available for the whole period covered by the WoS. A pair-wise
publication similarity metric, which is based on common co-authors,
self-citations, shared references and citations, is established to perform a
two-step agglomerative clustering that first connects individual papers and
then merges similar clusters. This parameterized model is optimized using an
h-index based recall measure, favoring the correct assignment of well-cited
publications, and a name-initials-based precision using WoS metadata and
cross-referenced Google Scholar profiles. Despite the use of limited metadata,
we reach a recall of 87% and a precision of 88% with a preference for
researchers with high h-index values. 47 million articles of WoS can be
disambiguated on a single machine in less than a day. We develop an h-index
distribution model, confirming that the prediction is in excellent agreement
with the empirical data, and yielding insight into the utility of the h-index
in real academic ranking scenarios.Comment: 14 pages, 5 figure
- …