Order-Sorted Unification with Regular Expression Sorts

We extend first-order order-sorted unification by permitting regular expression sorts for variables and in the domains of function symbols. The set of basic sorts is finite. The obtained signature corresponds to a finite bottom-up hedge automaton. The unification problem in such a theory generalizes some known unification problems. Its unification type is infinitary. We give a complete unification procedure and prove decidability

Towards Correctness of Program Transformations Through Unification and Critical Pair Computation

Correctness of program transformations in extended lambda calculi with a contextual semantics is usually based on reasoning about the operational semantics which is a rewrite semantics. A successful approach to proving correctness is the combination of a context lemma with the computation of overlaps between program transformations and the reduction rules, and then of so-called complete sets of diagrams. The method is similar to the computation of critical pairs for the completion of term rewriting systems. We explore cases where the computation of these overlaps can be done in a first order way by variants of critical pair computation that use unification algorithms. As a case study we apply the method to a lambda calculus with recursive let-expressions and describe an effective unification algorithm to determine all overlaps of a set of transformations with all reduction rules. The unification algorithm employs many-sorted terms, the equational theory of left-commutativity modelling multi-sets, context variables of different kinds and a mechanism for compactly representing binding chains in recursive let-expressions.Comment: In Proceedings UNIF 2010, arXiv:1012.455

A mechanization of sorted higher-order logic based on the resolution principle

The usage of sorts in first-order automated deduction has brought greater conciseness of representation and a considerable gain in efficiency by reducing the search spaces involved. This suggests that sort information can be employed in higher-order theorem proving with similar results. This thesis develops a sorted higher-order logic SUM HOL suitable for automatic theorem proving applications. SUM HOL is based on a sorted Lambda-calculus SUM A->, which is obtained by extending Church\u27;s simply typed Lambda-calculus by a higher-order sort concept including term declarations and functional base sorts. The term declaration mechanism studied here is powerful enough to allow convenient formalization of a large body of mathematics, since it offers natural primitives for domains and codomains of functions, and allows to treat function restriction. Furthermore, it subsumes most other mechanisms for the declaration of sort information known from the literature, and can thus serve as a general framework for the study of sorted higher-order logics. For instance, the term declaration mechanism of SUM HOL subsumes the subsorting mechanism as a derived notion, and hence justifies our special form of subsort inference. We present sets of transformations for sorted higher-order unification and pre-unification, and prove the nondeterministic completeness of the algorithm induced by these transformations. The main technical difficulty of unification in ! is that the analysis of general bindings is much more involved than in the unsorted case, since in the presence of term declarations well-sortedness is not a structural property. This difficulty is overcome by a structure theorem that links the structure of a formula to the structure of its sorting derivation. We develop two notions of set-theoretic semantics for SUM HOL. General SUM-models are a direct generalization of Henkin\u27;s general models to the sorted setting. Since no known machine-oriented calculus can adequately mechanize full extensionality, we generalize general SUM-models further to SUM-model structures, which allow full extensionality to fail. The notions of SUM-model structures and general SUM-models allow us to prove model existence theorems for them. These model-theoretic variants of Andrews unifying principle for type theory\u27; can be used as a powerful tool in completeness proofs of higher-order calculi. Finally, we use our pre-unification algorithms as a central inference procedure for a sorted higherorder resolution calculus in the spirit of Huet\u27;s Constrained Resolution. This calculus is proven sound and complete with respect to our semantics. It differs from Huet\u27;s calculus by allowing early unification strategies and using variable dependencies. For the completeness proof we make use of our model existence theorem, and prove a strong lifting lemma

Unification modulo a 2-sorted Equational theory for Cipher-Decipher Block Chaining

We investigate unification problems related to the Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode of encryption. We first model chaining in terms of a simple, convergent, rewrite system over a signature with two disjoint sorts: list and element. By interpreting a particular symbol of this signature suitably, the rewrite system can model several practical situations of interest. An inference procedure is presented for deciding the unification problem modulo this rewrite system. The procedure is modular in the following sense: any given problem is handled by a system of `list-inferences', and the set of equations thus derived between the element-terms of the problem is then handed over to any (`black-box') procedure which is complete for solving these element-equations. An example of application of this unification procedure is given, as attack detection on a Needham-Schroeder like protocol, employing the CBC encryption mode based on the associative-commutative (AC) operator XOR. The 2-sorted convergent rewrite system is then extended into one that fully captures a block chaining encryption-decryption mode at an abstract level, using no AC-symbols; and unification modulo this extended system is also shown to be decidable.Comment: 26 page

A mechanization of sorted higher-order logic based on the resolution principle

The usage of sorts in first-order automated deduction has brought greater conciseness of representation and a considerable gain in efficiency by reducing the search spaces involved. This suggests that sort information can be employed in higher-order theorem proving with similar results. This thesis develops a sorted higher-order logic SUM HOL suitable for automatic theorem proving applications. SUM HOL is based on a sorted Lambda-calculus SUM A->, which is obtained by extending Church';s simply typed Lambda-calculus by a higher-order sort concept including term declarations and functional base sorts. The term declaration mechanism studied here is powerful enough to allow convenient formalization of a large body of mathematics, since it offers natural primitives for domains and codomains of functions, and allows to treat function restriction. Furthermore, it subsumes most other mechanisms for the declaration of sort information known from the literature, and can thus serve as a general framework for the study of sorted higher-order logics. For instance, the term declaration mechanism of SUM HOL subsumes the subsorting mechanism as a derived notion, and hence justifies our special form of subsort inference. We present sets of transformations for sorted higher-order unification and pre-unification, and prove the nondeterministic completeness of the algorithm induced by these transformations. The main technical difficulty of unification in ! is that the analysis of general bindings is much more involved than in the unsorted case, since in the presence of term declarations well-sortedness is not a structural property. This difficulty is overcome by a structure theorem that links the structure of a formula to the structure of its sorting derivation. We develop two notions of set-theoretic semantics for SUM HOL. General SUM-models are a direct generalization of Henkin';s general models to the sorted setting. Since no known machine-oriented calculus can adequately mechanize full extensionality, we generalize general SUM-models further to SUM-model structures, which allow full extensionality to fail. The notions of SUM-model structures and general SUM-models allow us to prove model existence theorems for them. These model-theoretic variants of Andrews unifying principle for type theory'; can be used as a powerful tool in completeness proofs of higher-order calculi. Finally, we use our pre-unification algorithms as a central inference procedure for a sorted higherorder resolution calculus in the spirit of Huet';s Constrained Resolution. This calculus is proven sound and complete with respect to our semantics. It differs from Huet';s calculus by allowing early unification strategies and using variable dependencies. For the completeness proof we make use of our model existence theorem, and prove a strong lifting lemma

Constraining Montague Grammar for computational applications

This work develops efficient methods for the implementation of Montague Grammar on a computer. It covers both the syntactic and the semantic aspects of that task. Using a simplified but adequate version of Montague Grammar it is shown how to translate from an English fragment to a purely extensional first-order language which can then be made amenable to standard automatic theorem-proving techniques. Translating a sentence of Montague English into the first-order predicate calculus usually proceeds via an intermediate translation in the typed lambda calculus which is then simplified by lambda-reduction to obtain a first-order equivalent. If sufficient sortal structure underlies the type theory for the reduced translation to always be a first-order one then perhaps it should be directly constructed during the syntactic analysis of the sentence so that the lambda-expressions never come into existence and no further processing is necessary. A method is proposed to achieve this involving the unification of meta-logical expressions which flesh out the type symbols of Montague's type theory with first-order schemas. It is then shown how to implement Montague Semantics without using a theorem prover for type theory. Nothing more than a theorem prover for the first-order predicate calculus is required. The first-order system can be used directly without encoding the whole of type theory. It is only necessary to encode a part of second-order logic and this can be done in an efficient, succinct, and readable manner. Furthermore the pseudo-second-order terms need never appear in any translations provided by the parser. They are vital just when higher-order reasoning must be simulated. The foundation of this approach is its five-sorted theory of Montague Semantics. The objects in this theory are entities, indices, propositions, properties, and quantities. It is a theory which can be expressed in the language of first-order logic by means of axiom schemas and there is a finite second-order axiomatisation which is the basis for the theorem-proving arrangement. It can be viewed as a very constrained set theory

A Focused Sequent Calculus Framework for Proof Search in Pure Type Systems

Basic proof-search tactics in logic and type theory can be seen as the root-first applications of rules in an appropriate sequent calculus, preferably without the redundancies generated by permutation of rules. This paper addresses the issues of defining such sequent calculi for Pure Type Systems (PTS, which were originally presented in natural deduction style) and then organizing their rules for effective proof-search. We introduce the idea of Pure Type Sequent Calculus with meta-variables (PTSCalpha), by enriching the syntax of a permutation-free sequent calculus for propositional logic due to Herbelin, which is strongly related to natural deduction and already well adapted to proof-search. The operational semantics is adapted from Herbelin's and is defined by a system of local rewrite rules as in cut-elimination, using explicit substitutions. We prove confluence for this system. Restricting our attention to PTSC, a type system for the ground terms of this system, we obtain the Subject Reduction property and show that each PTSC is logically equivalent to its corresponding PTS, and the former is strongly normalising iff the latter is. We show how to make the logical rules of PTSC into a syntax-directed system PS for proof-search, by incorporating the conversion rules as in syntax-directed presentations of the PTS rules for type-checking. Finally, we consider how to use the explicitly scoped meta-variables of PTSCalpha to represent partial proof-terms, and use them to analyse interactive proof construction. This sets up a framework PE in which we are able to study proof-search strategies, type inhabitant enumeration and (higher-order) unification

Multi-level Contextual Type Theory

Contextual type theory distinguishes between bound variables and meta-variables to write potentially incomplete terms in the presence of binders. It has found good use as a framework for concise explanations of higher-order unification, characterize holes in proofs, and in developing a foundation for programming with higher-order abstract syntax, as embodied by the programming and reasoning environment Beluga. However, to reason about these applications, we need to introduce meta^2-variables to characterize the dependency on meta-variables and bound variables. In other words, we must go beyond a two-level system granting only bound variables and meta-variables. In this paper we generalize contextual type theory to n levels for arbitrary n, so as to obtain a formal system offering bound variables, meta-variables and so on all the way to meta^n-variables. We obtain a uniform account by collapsing all these different kinds of variables into a single notion of variabe indexed by some level k. We give a decidable bi-directional type system which characterizes beta-eta-normal forms together with a generalized substitution operation.Comment: In Proceedings LFMTP 2011, arXiv:1110.668