FPGA structures for high speed and low overhead dynamic circuit specialization

A Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) is a programmable digital electronic chip. The FPGA does not come with a predefined function from the manufacturer; instead, the developer has to define its function through implementing a digital circuit on the FPGA resources. The functionality of the FPGA can be reprogrammed as desired and hence the name “field programmable”. FPGAs are useful in small volume digital electronic products as the design of a digital custom chip is expensive. Changing the FPGA (also called configuring it) is done by changing the configuration data (in the form of bitstreams) that defines the FPGA functionality. These bitstreams are stored in a memory of the FPGA called configuration memory. The SRAM cells of LookUp Tables (LUTs), Block Random Access Memories (BRAMs) and DSP blocks together form the configuration memory of an FPGA. The configuration data can be modified according to the user’s needs to implement the user-defined hardware. The simplest way to program the configuration memory is to download the bitstreams using a JTAG interface. However, modern techniques such as Partial Reconfiguration (PR) enable us to configure a part in the configuration memory with partial bitstreams during run-time. The reconfiguration is achieved by swapping in partial bitstreams into the configuration memory via a configuration interface called Internal Configuration Access Port (ICAP). The ICAP is a hardware primitive (macro) present in the FPGA used to access the configuration memory internally by an embedded processor. The reconfiguration technique adds flexibility to use specialized ci rcuits that are more compact and more efficient t han t heir b ulky c ounterparts. An example of such an implementation is the use of specialized multipliers instead of big generic multipliers in an FIR implementation with constant coefficients. To specialize these circuits and reconfigure during the run-time, researchers at the HES group proposed the novel technique called parameterized reconfiguration that can be used to efficiently and automatically implement Dynamic Circuit Specialization (DCS) that is built on top of the Partial Reconfiguration method. It uses the run-time reconfiguration technique that is tailored to implement a parameterized design. An application is said to be parameterized if some of its input values change much less frequently than the rest. These inputs are called parameters. Instead of implementing these parameters as regular inputs, in DCS these inputs are implemented as constants, and the application is optimized for the constants. For every change in parameter values, the design is re-optimized (specialized) during run-time and implemented by reconfiguring the optimized design for a new set of parameters. In DCS, the bitstreams of the parameterized design are expressed as Boolean functions of the parameters. For every infrequent change in parameters, a specialized FPGA configuration is generated by evaluating the corresponding Boolean functions, and the FPGA is reconfigured with the specialized configuration. A detailed study of overheads of DCS and providing suitable solutions with appropriate custom FPGA structures is the primary goal of the dissertation. I also suggest different improvements to the FPGA configuration memory architecture. After offering the custom FPGA structures, I investigated the role of DCS on FPGA overlays and the use of custom FPGA structures that help to reduce the overheads of DCS on FPGA overlays. By doing so, I hope I can convince the developer to use DCS (which now comes with minimal costs) in real-world applications. I start the investigations of overheads of DCS by implementing an adaptive FIR filter (using the DCS technique) on three different Xilinx FPGA platforms: Virtex-II Pro, Virtex-5, and Zynq-SoC. The study of how DCS behaves and what is its overhead in the evolution of the three FPGA platforms is the non-trivial basis to discover the costs of DCS. After that, I propose custom FPGA structures (reconfiguration controllers and reconfiguration drivers) to reduce the main overhead (reconfiguration time) of DCS. These structures not only reduce the reconfiguration time but also help curbing the power hungry part of the DCS system. After these chapters, I study the role of DCS on FPGA overlays. I investigate the effect of the proposed FPGA structures on Virtual-Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Arrays (VCGRAs). I classify the VCGRA implementations into three types: the conventional VCGRA, partially parameterized VCGRA and fully parameterized VCGRA depending upon the level of parameterization. I have designed two variants of VCGRA grids for HPC image processing applications, namely, the MAC grid and Pixie. Finally, I try to tackle the reconfiguration time overhead at the hardware level of the FPGA by customizing the FPGA configuration memory architecture. In this part of my research, I propose to use a parallel memory structure to improve the reconfiguration time of DCS drastically. However, this improvement comes with a significant overhead of hardware resources which will need to be solved in future research on commercial FPGA configuration memory architectures

Study on multi-objective optimization of circuit design by evolutionary computation technologies

制度:新 ; 報告番号:甲3364号 ; 学位の種類:博士(工学) ; 授与年月日:2011/4/25 ; 早大学位記番号:新568

Design Automation and Application for Emerging Reconfigurable Nanotechnologies

In the last few decades, two major phenomena have revolutionized the electronic industry – the ever-increasing dependence on electronic circuits and the Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) downscaling. These two phenomena have been complementing each other in a way that while electronics, in general, have demanded more computations per functional unit, CMOS downscaling has aptly supported such needs. However, while the computational demand is still rising exponentially, CMOS downscaling is reaching its physical limits. Hence, the need to explore viable emerging nanotechnologies is more imperative than ever. This thesis focuses on streamlining the existing design automation techniques for a class of emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies. Transistors based on this technology exhibit duality in conduction, i.e. they can be configured dynamically either as a p-type or an n-type device on the application of an external bias. Owing to this dynamic reconfiguration, these transistors are also referred to as Reconfigurable Field-Effect Transistors (RFETs). Exploring and developing new technologies just like CMOS, require tackling two main challenges – first, design automation flow has to be modified to enable tailor- made circuit designs. Second, possible application opportunities should be explored where such technologies can outsmart the existing CMOS technologies. This thesis targets the above two objectives for emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies by proposing approaches for enabling an Electronic Design Automation (EDA) flow for circuits based on RFETs and exploring hardware security as an application that exploits the transistor-level dynamic reconfiguration offered by this technology. This thesis explains the bottom-up approach adopted to propose a logic synthesis flow by identifying new logic gates and circuit design paradigms that can particularly exploit the dynamic reconfiguration offered by these novel nanotechnologies. This led to the subsequent need of finding natural Boolean logic abstraction for emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies as it is shown that the existing abstraction of negative unate logic for CMOS technologies is sub-optimal for RFETs-based circuits. In this direction, it has been shown that duality in Boolean logic is a natural abstraction for this technology and can truly represent the duality in conduction offered by individual transistors. Finding this abstraction paved the way for defining suitable primitives and proposing various algorithms for logic synthesis and technology mapping. The following step is to explore compatible physical synthesis flow for emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies. Using silicon nanowire-based RFETs, .lef and .lib files have been provided which can provide an end-to-end flow to generate .GDSII file for circuits exclusively based on RFETs. Additionally, new approaches have been explored to improve placement and routing for circuits based on reconfigurable nanotechnologies. It has been demonstrated how these approaches led to superior results as compared to the native flow meant for CMOS. Lastly, the unique property of transistor-level reconfiguration offered by RFETs is utilized to implement efficient Intellectual Property (IP) protection schemes against adversarial attacks. The ability to control the conduction of individual transistors can be argued as one of the impactful features of this technology and suitably fits into the paradigm of security measures. Prior security schemes based on CMOS technology often come with large overheads in terms of area, power, and delay. In contrast, RFETs-based hardware security measures such as logic locking, split manufacturing, etc. proposed in this thesis, demonstrate affordable security solutions with low overheads. Overall, this thesis lays a strong foundation for the two main objectives – design automation, and hardware security as an application, to push emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies for commercial integration. Additionally, contributions done in this thesis are made available under open-source licenses so as to foster new research directions and collaborations.:Abstract List of Figures List of Tables 1 Introduction 1.1 What are emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies? 1.2 Why does this technology look so promising? 1.3 Electronics Design Automation 1.4 The game of see-saw: key challenges vs benefits for emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies 1.4.1 Abstracting ambipolarity in logic gate designs 1.4.2 Enabling electronic design automation for RFETs 1.4.3 Enhanced functionality: a suitable fit for hardware security applications 1.5 Research questions 1.6 Entire RFET-centric EDA Flow 1.7 Key Contributions and Thesis Organization 2 Preliminaries 2.1 Reconfigurable Nanotechnology 2.1.1 1D devices 2.1.2 2D devices 2.1.3 Factors favoring circuit-flexibility 2.2 Feasibility aspects of RFET technology 2.3 Logic Synthesis Preliminaries 2.3.1 Circuit Model 2.3.2 Boolean Algebra 2.3.3 Monotone Function and the property of Unateness 2.3.4 Logic Representations 3 Exploring Circuit Design Topologies for RFETs 3.1 Contributions 3.2 Organization 3.3 Related Works 3.4 Exploring design topologies for combinational circuits: functionality-enhanced logic gates 3.4.1 List of Combinational Functionality-Enhanced Logic Gates based on RFETs 3.4.2 Estimation of gate delay using the logical effort theory 3.5 Invariable design of Inverters 3.6 Sequential Circuits 3.6.1 Dual edge-triggered TSPC-based D-flip flop 3.6.2 Exploiting RFET’s ambipolarity for metastability 3.7 Evaluations 3.7.1 Evaluation of combinational logic gates 3.7.2 Novel design of 1-bit ALU 3.7.3 Comparison of the sequential circuit with an equivalent CMOS-based design 3.8 Concluding remarks 4 Standard Cells and Technology Mapping 4.1 Contributions 4.2 Organization 4.3 Related Work 4.4 Standard cells based on RFETs 4.4.1 Interchangeable Pull-Up and Pull-Down Networks 4.4.2 Reconfigurable Truth-Table 4.5 Distilling standard cells 4.6 HOF-based Technology Mapping Flow for RFETs-based circuits 4.6.1 Area adjustments through inverter sharings 4.6.2 Technology Mapping Flow 4.6.3 Realizing Parameters For The Generic Library 4.6.4 Defining RFETs-based Genlib for HOF-based mapping 4.7 Experiments 4.7.1 Experiment 1: Distilling standard-cells from a benchmark suite 4.7.2 Experiment 2A: HOF-based mapping . 4.7.3 Experiment 2B: Using the distilled standard-cells during mapping 4.8 Concluding Remarks 5 Logic Synthesis with XOR-Majority Graphs 5.1 Contributions 5.2 Organization 5.3 Motivation 5.4 Background and Preliminaries 5.4.1 Terminologies 5.4.2 Self-duality in NPN classes 5.4.3 Majority logic synthesis 5.4.4 Earlier work on XMG 5.4.5 Classification of Boolean functions 5.5 Preserving Self-Duality 5.5.1 During logic synthesis 5.5.2 During versatile technology mapping 5.6 Advanced Logic synthesis techniques 5.6.1 XMG resubstitution 5.6.2 Exact XMG rewriting 5.7 Logic representation-agnostic Mapping 5.7.1 Versatile Mapper 5.7.2 Support of supergates 5.8 Creating Self-dual Benchmarks 5.9 Experiments 5.9.1 XMG-based Flow 5.9.2 Experimental Setup 5.9.3 Synthetic self-dual benchmarks 5.9.4 Cryptographic benchmark suite 5.10 Concluding remarks and future research directions 6 Physical synthesis flow and liberty generation 6.1 Contributions 6.2 Organization 6.3 Background and Related Work 6.3.1 Related Works 6.3.2 Motivation 6.4 Silicon Nanowire Reconfigurable Transistors 6.5 Layouts for Logic Gates 6.5.1 Layouts for Static Functional Logic Gates 6.5.2 Layout for Reconfigurable Logic Gate 6.6 Table Model for Silicon Nanowire RFETs 6.7 Exploring Approaches for Physical Synthesis 6.7.1 Using the Standard Place & Route Flow 6.7.2 Open-source Flow 6.7.3 Concept of Driver Cells 6.7.4 Native Approach 6.7.5 Island-based Approach 6.7.6 Utilization Factor 6.7.7 Placement of the Island on the Chip 6.8 Experiments 6.8.1 Preliminary comparison with CMOS technology 6.8.2 Evaluating different physical synthesis approaches 6.9 Results and discussions 6.9.1 Parameters Which Affect The Area 6.9.2 Use of Germanium Nanowires Channels 6.10 Concluding Remarks 7 Polymporphic Primitives for Hardware Security 7.1 Contributions 7.2 Organization 7.3 The Shift To Explore Emerging Technologies For Security 7.4 Background 7.4.1 IP protection schemes 7.4.2 Preliminaries 7.5 Security Promises 7.5.1 RFETs for logic locking (transistor-level locking) 7.5.2 RFETs for split manufacturing 7.6 Security Vulnerabilities 7.6.1 Realization of short-circuit and open-circuit scenarios in an RFET-based inverter 7.6.2 Circuit evaluation on sub-circuits 7.6.3 Reliability concerns: A consequence of short-circuit scenario 7.6.4 Implication of the proposed security vulnerability 7.7 Analytical Evaluation 7.7.1 Investigating the security promises 7.7.2 Investigating the security vulnerabilities 7.8 Concluding remarks and future research directions 8 Conclusion 8.1 Concluding Remarks 8.2 Directions for Future Work Appendices A Distilling standard-cells B RFETs-based Genlib C Layout Extraction File (.lef) for Silicon Nanowire-based RFET D Liberty (.lib) file for Silicon Nanowire-based RFET