15,773 research outputs found
Two types of well followed users in the followership networks of Twitter
In the Twitter blogosphere, the number of followers is probably the most
basic and succinct quantity for measuring popularity of users. However, the
number of followers can be manipulated in various ways; we can even buy
follows. Therefore, alternative popularity measures for Twitter users on the
basis of, for example, users' tweets and retweets, have been developed. In the
present work, we take a purely network approach to this fundamental question.
First, we find that two relatively distinct types of users possessing a large
number of followers exist, in particular for Japanese, Russian, and Korean
users among the seven language groups that we examined. A first type of user
follows a small number of other users. A second type of user follows
approximately the same number of other users as the number of follows that the
user receives. Then, we compare local (i.e., egocentric) followership networks
around the two types of users with many followers. We show that the second
type, which is presumably uninfluential users despite its large number of
followers, is characterized by high link reciprocity, a large number of friends
(i.e., those whom a user follows) for the followers, followers' high link
reciprocity, large clustering coefficient, large fraction of the second type of
users among the followers, and a small PageRank. Our network-based results
support that the number of followers used alone is a misleading measure of
user's popularity. We propose that the number of friends, which is simple to
measure, also helps us to assess the popularity of Twitter users.Comment: 4 Figures and 8 Table
Teens, Social Media, and Privacy
Teens share a wide range of information about themselves on social media sites; indeed the sites themselves are designed to encourage the sharing of information and the expansion of networks. However, few teens embrace a fully public approach to social media. Instead, they take an array of steps to restrict and prune their profiles, and their patterns of reputation management on social media vary greatly according to their gender and network size
Elite Tweets: Analysing the Twitter Communication Patterns of Labour Party Peers in the House of Lords
The micro-blogging platform Twitter has gained notoriety for its status as both a communication channel between private individuals, and as a public forum monitored by journalists, the public, and the state. Its potential application for political communication has not gone unnoticed; politicians have used Twitter to attract voters, interact with constituencies and advance issue-based campaigns. This article reports on the preliminary results of the research teamâs work with 21 peers sitting on the Labour frontbench. It is based on the monitoring and archival of the peersâ activity on Twitter for a period of 100 days from 16th May to 28th September 2012. Using a sample of more than 4,363 tweets and a mixed methodology combining semantic analysis, social network analysis and quantitative analysis, this paper explores the peersâ patterns of usage and communication on Twitter. Key findings are that as a tweeting community their behavior is consistent with others, however there is evidence that a coherent strategy is lacking. Labour peers tend to work in ego networks of self-interest as opposed to working together to promote party polic
Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated bot accounts on Twitter
This brief communication presents preliminary findings on automated Twitter
accounts distributing links to scientific papers deposited on the preprint
repository arXiv. It discusses the implication of the presence of such bots
from the perspective of social media metrics (altmetrics), where mentions of
scholarly documents on Twitter have been suggested as a means of measuring
impact that is both broader and timelier than citations. We present preliminary
findings that automated Twitter accounts create a considerable amount of tweets
to scientific papers and that they behave differently than common social bots,
which has critical implications for the use of raw tweet counts in research
evaluation and assessment. We discuss some definitions of Twitter cyborgs and
bots in scholarly communication and propose differentiating between different
levels of engagement from tweeting only bibliographic information to discussing
or commenting on the content of a paper.Comment: 9 pages, 4 figures, 1 tabl
Reverse Engineering Socialbot Infiltration Strategies in Twitter
Data extracted from social networks like Twitter are increasingly being used
to build applications and services that mine and summarize public reactions to
events, such as traffic monitoring platforms, identification of epidemic
outbreaks, and public perception about people and brands. However, such
services are vulnerable to attacks from socialbots automated accounts that
mimic real users seeking to tamper statistics by posting messages generated
automatically and interacting with legitimate users. Potentially, if created in
large scale, socialbots could be used to bias or even invalidate many existing
services, by infiltrating the social networks and acquiring trust of other
users with time. This study aims at understanding infiltration strategies of
socialbots in the Twitter microblogging platform. To this end, we create 120
socialbot accounts with different characteristics and strategies (e.g., gender
specified in the profile, how active they are, the method used to generate
their tweets, and the group of users they interact with), and investigate the
extent to which these bots are able to infiltrate the Twitter social network.
Our results show that even socialbots employing simple automated mechanisms are
able to successfully infiltrate the network. Additionally, using a
factorial design, we quantify infiltration effectiveness of different bot
strategies. Our analysis unveils findings that are key for the design of
detection and counter measurements approaches
White, Man, and Highly Followed: Gender and Race Inequalities in Twitter
Social media is considered a democratic space in which people connect and
interact with each other regardless of their gender, race, or any other
demographic factor. Despite numerous efforts that explore demographic factors
in social media, it is still unclear whether social media perpetuates old
inequalities from the offline world. In this paper, we attempt to identify
gender and race of Twitter users located in U.S. using advanced image
processing algorithms from Face++. Then, we investigate how different
demographic groups (i.e. male/female, Asian/Black/White) connect with other. We
quantify to what extent one group follow and interact with each other and the
extent to which these connections and interactions reflect in inequalities in
Twitter. Our analysis shows that users identified as White and male tend to
attain higher positions in Twitter, in terms of the number of followers and
number of times in user's lists. We hope our effort can stimulate the
development of new theories of demographic information in the online space.Comment: In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web
Intelligence (WI'17). Leipzig, Germany. August 201
Recommended from our members
Mapping networks of influence: tracking Twitter conversations through time and space
The increasing use of social media around global news events, such as the London Olympics in 2012, raises questions for international broadcasters about how to engage with users via social media in order to best achieve their individual missions. Twitter is a highly diverse social network whose conversations are multi-directional involving individual users, political and cultural actors, athletes and a range of media professionals. In so doing, users form networks of influence via their interactions affecting the ways that information is shared about specific global events.
This article attempts to understand how networks of influence are formed among Twitter users, and the relative influence of global news media organisations and information providers in the Twittersphere during such global news events. We build an analysis around a set of tweets collected during the 2012 London Olympics. To understand how different users influence the conversations across Twitter, we compare three types of accounts: those belonging to a number of well-known athletes, those belonging to some well-known commentators employed by the BBC, and a number of corporate accounts belonging to the BBC World Service and the official London Twitter account. We look at the data from two perspectives. First, to understand the structure of the social groupings formed among Twitter users, we use a network analysis to model social groupings in the Twittersphere across time and space. Second, to assess the influence of individual tweets, we investigate the ageing factor of tweets, which measures how long users continue to interact with a particular tweet after it is originally posted.
We consider what the profile of particular tweets from corporate and athletesâ accounts can tell us about how networks of influence are forged and maintained. We use these analyses to answer the questions: How do different types of accounts help shape the social networks? and, What determines the level and type of influence of a particular account
Why Do You Spread This Message? Understanding Users Sentiment in Social Media Campaigns
Twitter has been increasingly used for spreading messages about campaigns.
Such campaigns try to gain followers through their Twitter accounts, influence
the followers and spread messages through them. In this paper, we explore the
relationship between followers sentiment towards the campaign topic and their
rate of retweeting of messages generated by the campaign. Our analysis with
followers of multiple social-media campaigns found statistical significant
correlations between such sentiment and retweeting rate. Based on our analysis,
we have conducted an online intervention study among the followers of different
social-media campaigns. Our study shows that targeting followers based on their
sentiment towards the campaign can give higher retweet rate than a number of
other baseline approaches
- âŚ