671 research outputs found
On the algorithmic complexity of twelve covering and independence parameters of graphs
The definitions of four previously studied parameters related to total coverings and total matchings of graphs can be restricted, thereby obtaining eight parameters related to covering and independence, each of which has been studied previously in some form. Here we survey briefly results concerning total coverings and total matchings of graphs, and consider the aforementioned 12 covering and independence parameters with regard to algorithmic complexity. We survey briefly known results for several graph classes, and obtain new NP-completeness results for the minimum total cover and maximum minimal total cover problems in planar graphs, the minimum maximal total matching problem in bipartite and chordal graphs, and the minimum independent dominating set problem in planar cubic graphs
Higher order matching polynomials and d-orthogonality
We show combinatorially that the higher-order matching polynomials of several
families of graphs are d-orthogonal polynomials. The matching polynomial of a
graph is a generating function for coverings of a graph by disjoint edges; the
higher-order matching polynomial corresponds to coverings by paths. Several
families of classical orthogonal polynomials -- the Chebyshev, Hermite, and
Laguerre polynomials -- can be interpreted as matching polynomials of paths,
cycles, complete graphs, and complete bipartite graphs. The notion of
d-orthogonality is a generalization of the usual idea of orthogonality for
polynomials and we use sign-reversing involutions to show that the higher-order
Chebyshev (first and second kinds), Hermite, and Laguerre polynomials are
d-orthogonal. We also investigate the moments and find generating functions of
those polynomials.Comment: 21 pages, many TikZ figures; v2: minor clarifications and addition
Trees and Matchings
In this article, Temperley's bijection between spanning trees of the square
grid on the one hand, and perfect matchings (also known as dimer coverings) of
the square grid on the other, is extended to the setting of general planar
directed (and undirected) graphs, where edges carry nonnegative weights that
induce a weighting on the set of spanning trees. We show that the weighted,
directed spanning trees (often called arborescences) of any planar graph G can
be put into a one-to-one weight-preserving correspondence with the perfect
matchings of a related planar graph H.
One special case of this result is a bijection between perfect matchings of
the hexagonal honeycomb lattice and directed spanning trees of a triangular
lattice. Another special case gives a correspondence between perfect matchings
of the ``square-octagon'' lattice and directed weighted spanning trees on a
directed weighted version of the cartesian lattice.
In conjunction with results of Kenyon, our main theorem allows us to compute
the measures of all cylinder events for random spanning trees on any (directed,
weighted) planar graph. Conversely, in cases where the perfect matching model
arises from a tree model, Wilson's algorithm allows us to quickly generate
random samples of perfect matchings.Comment: 32 pages, 19 figures (minor revisions from version 1
Local colourings and monochromatic partitions in complete bipartite graphs
We show that for any -local colouring of the edges of the balanced
complete bipartite graph , its vertices can be covered with at
most~ disjoint monochromatic paths. And, we can cover almost all vertices of
any complete or balanced complete bipartite -locally coloured graph with
disjoint monochromatic cycles.\\ We also determine the -local
bipartite Ramsey number of a path almost exactly: Every -local colouring of
the edges of contains a monochromatic path on vertices.Comment: 18 page
Ramanujan Coverings of Graphs
Let be a finite connected graph, and let be the spectral radius of
its universal cover. For example, if is -regular then
. We show that for every , there is an -covering
(a.k.a. an -lift) of where all the new eigenvalues are bounded from
above by . It follows that a bipartite Ramanujan graph has a Ramanujan
-covering for every . This generalizes the case due to Marcus,
Spielman and Srivastava (2013).
Every -covering of corresponds to a labeling of the edges of by
elements of the symmetric group . We generalize this notion to labeling
the edges by elements of various groups and present a broader scenario where
Ramanujan coverings are guaranteed to exist.
In particular, this shows the existence of richer families of bipartite
Ramanujan graphs than was known before. Inspired by Marcus-Spielman-Srivastava,
a crucial component of our proof is the existence of interlacing families of
polynomials for complex reflection groups. The core argument of this component
is taken from a recent paper of them (2015).
Another important ingredient of our proof is a new generalization of the
matching polynomial of a graph. We define the -th matching polynomial of
to be the average matching polynomial of all -coverings of . We show this
polynomial shares many properties with the original matching polynomial. For
example, it is real rooted with all its roots inside .Comment: 38 pages, 4 figures, journal version (minor changes from previous
arXiv version). Shortened version appeared in STOC 201
- …