A computational model of human trust in supervisory control of robotic swarms

Trust is an important factor in the interaction between humans and automation to mediate the reliance action of human operators. In this work, we study human factors in supervisory control of robotic swarms and develop a computational model of human trust on swarm systems with varied levels of autonomy (LOA). We extend the classic trust theory by adding an intermediate feedback loop to the trust model, which formulates the human trust evolution as a combination of both open-loop trust anticipation and closed-loop trust feedback. A Kalman filter model is implemented to apply the above structure. We conducted a human experiment to collect user data of supervisory control of robotic swarms. Participants were requested to direct the swarm in a simulated environment to finish a foraging task using control systems with varied LOA. We implement three LOAs: manual, mixed-initiative (MI), and fully autonomous LOA. In the manual and autonomous LOA, swarms are controlled by a human or a search algorithm exclusively, while in the MI LOA, the human operator and algorithm collaboratively control the swarm. We train a personalized model for each participant and evaluate the model performance on a separate data set. Evaluation results show that our Kalman model outperforms existing models including inverse reinforcement learning and dynamic Bayesian network methods. In summary, the proposed work is novel in the following aspects: 1) This Kalman estimator is the first to model the complete trust evolution process with both closed-loop feedback and open-loop trust anticipation. 2) The proposed model analyzes time-series data to reveal the influence of events that occur during the course of an interaction; namely, a user’s intervention and report of levels of trust. 3) The proposed model considers the operator’s cognitive time lag between perceiving and processing the system display. 4) The proposed model uses the Kalman filter structure to fuse information from different sources to estimate a human operator's mental states. 5) The proposed model provides a personalized model for each individual

Swarm behavior of self-propelled rods and swimming flagella

Systems of self-propelled particles are known for their tendency to aggregate and to display swarm behavior. We investigate two model systems, self-propelled rods interacting via volume exclusion, and sinusoidally-beating flagella embedded in a fluid with hydrodynamic interactions. In the flagella system, beating frequencies are Gaussian distributed with a non-zero average. These systems are studied by Brownian-dynamics simulations and by mesoscale hydrodynamics simulations, respectively. The clustering behavior is analyzed as the particle density and the environmental or internal noise are varied. By distinguishing three types of cluster-size probability density functions, we obtain a phase diagram of different swarm behaviors. The properties of clusters, such as their configuration, lifetime and average size are analyzed. We find that the swarm behavior of the two systems, characterized by several effective power laws, is very similar. However, a more careful analysis reveals several differences. Clusters of self-propelled rods form due to partially blocked forward motion, and are therefore typically wedge-shaped. At higher rod density and low noise, a giant mobile cluster appears, in which most rods are mostly oriented towards the center. In contrast, flagella become hydrodynamically synchronized and attract each other; their clusters are therefore more elongated. Furthermore, the lifetime of flagella clusters decays more quickly with cluster size than of rod clusters

Industry Led Use-Case Development for Human-Swarm Operations

In the domain of unmanned vehicles, autonomous robotic swarms promise to deliver increased efficiency and collective autonomy. How these swarms will operate in the future, and what communication requirements and operational boundaries will arise are yet to be sufficiently defined. A workshop was conducted with 11 professional unmanned-vehicle operators and designers with the objective of identifying use-cases for developing and testing robotic swarms. Three scenarios were defined by experts and were then compiled to produce a single use case outlining the scenario, objectives, agents, communication requirements and stages of operation when collaborating with highly autonomous swarms. Our compiled use case is intended for researchers, designers, and manufacturers alike to test and tailor their design pipeline to accommodate for some of the key issues in human-swarm ininteraction. Examples of application include informing simulation development, forming the basis of further design workshops, and identifying trust issues that may arise between human operators and the swarm.Comment: Accepted at AAAI 2022 Spring Symposium Series (Putting AI in the Critical Loop: Assured Trust and Autonomy in Human-Machine Teams

Radar, Insect Population Ecology, and Pest Management

Discussions included: (1) the potential role of radar in insect ecology studies and pest management; (2) the potential role of radar in correlating atmospheric phenomena with insect movement; (3) the present and future radar systems; (4) program objectives required to adapt radar to insect ecology studies and pest management; and (5) the specific action items to achieve the objectives

Improving Operator Recognition and Prediction of Emergent Swarm Behaviors

Robot swarms are typically defined as large teams of coordinating robots that interact with each other on a local scale. The control laws that dictate these interactions are often designed to produce emergent global behaviors useful for robot teams, such as aggregating at a single location or moving between locations as a group. These behaviors are called emergent because they arise from the local rules governing each robot as they interact with neighbors and the environment. No single robot is aware of the global behavior yet they all take part in it, which allows for a robustness that is difficult to achieve with explicitly-defined global plans. Now that hardware and algorithms for swarms have progressed enough to allow for their use outside the laboratory, new research is focused on how operators can control them. Recent work has introduced new paradigms for imparting an operator's intent on the swarm, yet little work has focused on how to better visualize the swarm to improve operator prediction and control of swarm states. The goal of this dissertation is to investigate how to present the limited data from a swarm to an operator so as to maximize their understanding of the current behavior and swarm state in general. This dissertation develops--through user studies--new methods of displaying the state of a swarm that improve a user's ability to recognize, predict, and control emergent behaviors. The general conclusion is that how summary information about the swarm is displayed has a significant impact on the ability of users to interact with the swarm, and that future work should focus on the properties unique to swarms when developing visualizations for human-swarm interaction tasks

Using haptic feedback in human swarm interaction

A swarm of robots is a large group of individual agents that autonomously coordinate via local control laws. Their emergent behavior allows simple robots to accomplish complex tasks. Since missions may have complex objectives that change dynamically due to environmental and mission changes, human control and influence over the swarm is needed. The field of Human Swarm Interaction (HSI) is young, with few user studies, and even fewer papers focusing on giving non-visual feedback to the operator. The authors will herein present a background of haptics in robotics and swarms and two studies that explore various conditions under which haptic feedback may be useful in HSI. The overall goal of the studies is to explore the effectiveness of haptic feedback in the presence of other visual stimuli about the swarm system. The findings show that giving feedback about nearby obstacles using a haptic device can improve performance, and that a combination of feedback from obstacle forces via the visual and haptic channels provide the best performance