1,870 research outputs found

    ALEKS Constructs as Predictors of High School Mathematics Achievement for Struggling Students

    Get PDF
    Educators in the United States (U.S.) are increasingly turning to intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) to provide differentiated math instruction to high school students. However, many struggling high school learners do not perform well on these platforms, which reinforces the need for more awareness about effective supports that influence the achievement of learners in these milieus. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors of the Assessment and Learning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS), an ITS, are predictive of struggling learners\u27 performance in a blended-learning Algebra 1 course at an inner city technical high school located in the northeastern U.S. The theoretical framework consisted of knowledge base theory, the zone of proximal development, and cognitive learning theory. Three variables (student retention, engagement time, and the ratio of topics mastered to topics practiced) were used to predict the degree of association on the criterion variable (mathematics competencies), as measured by final course progress grades in algebra, and the Preliminary Scholastic Assessment Test (PSATm) math scores. A correlational predictive design was applied to assess the data of a purposive sample of 265 struggling students at the study site; multiple regression analysis was also used to investigate the predictability of these variables. Findings suggest that engagement time and the ratio of mastered to practiced topics were significant predictors of final course progress grades. Nevertheless, these factors were not significant contributors in predicting PSATm score. Retention was identified as the only statistically significant predictor of PSATm score. The results offer educators with additional insights that can facilitate improvements in mathematical content knowledge and promote higher graduation rates for struggling learners in high school mathematics

    Relationships Between High School Students\u27 Performance in ALEKS Placement, Preparation, and Learning (PPL) Modules and Performance on the ALEKS College Mathematics Placement Exam

    Get PDF
    The misalignment between the mathematics taught in high school and the mathematics expected at colleges and universities has created a difficult transition for high school students in the U.S. from high school to college level mathematics. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) have been used to help high school students transition from the mathematics taught in high school to the mathematics expected at colleges and universities across the country. The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between high school studentsโ€™ performance in Assessment and LEarning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS) Placement, Preparation, and Learning (PPL) Modules and performance on the ALEKS College Mathematics Placement Exam. This study used a quasi-experimental nonequivalent research design. The participants in this study were 100 students from five high schools in a single school district. Students were in two groups: the ALEKS Group, who completed the ALEKS PreCalculus Learning Modules, and the Non-ALEKS Group, who did not complete the modules. The analysis included a 2x2 mixed ANOVA to measure how assignment of the modules affected exam scores. A logistic regression was used to assess differences between the two groups in placing into college algebra. A multiple linear regression was used to identify factors that influenced growth on the ALEKS Mathematics Placement Exam. There was a statistically significant difference in exam scores between the ALEKS Group and the Non-ALEKS Group which indicated that assignment to the ALEKS PPL PreCalculus Learning Modules did increase performance on the ALEKS College Mathematics Placement Exam. Conversely, assignment to the ALEKS PPL PreCalculus Modules did not increase studentsโ€™ likelihood of placing into College Algebra. The factors that influenced student outcomes on the ALEKS Mathematics Placement exam for those students assigned to the ALEKS Group included the amount of time spent taking the exam in May and the number of modules mastered. These results show that schools could implement ITS into their current mathematics classrooms and help students increase their scores on the ALEKS Mathematics Placement Exam, which has the potential to decrease the number of remedial courses students need to take in college

    Cognitive tutoring and assessment systems and mathematics achievement: a quantitative study of the Summit Learning Platform

    Get PDF
    Title from PDF of title page viewed June 16, 2021Dissertation advisor: Loyce CaruthersVitaIncludes bibliographical references (pages 151-191)Thesis (Ed.D.)--School of Education. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2021The purpose of this study was to determine if the Summit Learning Platform, a type of Intelligent Tutoring System, has a positive association with mathematics achievement of high school students in grades nine through eleven. The study was conducted in a Midwest suburban school district among three high schools within the same district. Further, a quasi-experimental research design was used with a sample size of 2000 students in the control group and 450 students in the treatment group. Data were compiled from the 2018-2019 school year and applied a combination of t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the mean scores of the two groups. As comparison points, the Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA), pre-ACT, and ACT were used in this Midwest district as measures among all students. The results demonstrated that students using the Summit Learning Platform showed significant gains when using their pre-test and post-test scores, but there was not statistical significance when analyzing the measures between the control and treatment groups. As more school districts utilize technological tools in far-reaching efforts to raise achievement levels in math, the intent of the study was to demonstrate potential benefits of the Summit Learning Platform for districts across the nation.Introduction -- Review of literature -- Methodology -- Results of analyses and conclusions -- Discussio

    Can Portable EEG Headsets be Used to Determine if Students are Learning?

    Get PDF
    This study examined EEGs recorded from a single-channel, portable EEG headset (NeuroSky MindWave) during the study period of a paired-associate word paradigm which used Swahili words and their English meanings. It was hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in gamma, theta, and beta band powers for when students recalled words correctly vs. when they did not recall correctly on a subsequent test. There were 35 participants who consisted of students that volunteered at the University of Memphis (20 females and 15 males, 31 of which were right-handed and 4 which were left-handed). A paired-samples t-test suggested that there was a higher mean z-score for brainwave activity during the study period in the high gamma range (41-49.75Hz) for when participants did not recall words correctly on a test, which was opposite of what previous research has found regarding encoding. Based on the results of this study, the MindWave seems to capture muscle activity and/or saccadic behavior that is suggested by higher gamma maximums on average in the study period for word-pairs which resulted in failed recall. Exploratory results may lend insight to future work using portable EEG devices. This study\u27s main objective was to determine if portable EEG devices could be used to determine when students learn new information. Further testing, especially using other portable EEG devices is necessary to answer this question

    ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์ธ์‹

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์‚ฌ๋ฒ”๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ต์œกํ•™๊ณผ, 2021. 2. ์กฐ์˜ํ™˜.์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ(AI)์˜ ๋„์ž…์ด ํฐ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๋Œ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ AI ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ํ•™์Šต ๋ถ„์„์ด ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์€ ์ง€๊ธˆ๊ป ์‹คํ˜„๋˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์› ๋˜ ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ํ•™์Šต(personalized learning)๊ณผ ์ ์‘์  ํ•™์Šต(adaptive learning)์— ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋ฐœ์ „ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ(AI-based education platform)์€ ํ•™์Šต์ž์˜ ํ–‰๋™ ์ถ”์  ๋“ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด๋“ค์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ง„๋‹จ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ ๋’ค ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ํ•™์Šต์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ธ์ง€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๋งž๋Š” ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ํ•™์Šต์ž์›๊ณผ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์€ ๊ต์‚ฌ์™€ ํ•™์ƒ์—๊ฒŒ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ํ•™์Šต์— ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์„ ํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋„ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์˜ ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ๋‚˜ ์—„๋ฐ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•ด์™”์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์ธ์‹๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋“œ๋ฌผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ต์‚ฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๊ต์œก ๋„์ž…์— ์žˆ์–ด ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์˜ ์ธ์‹๊ณผ ์˜๊ฒฌ์€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์˜ ์ธ์‹์„ ํƒ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•„๋ž˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์งˆ์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์œก์— ํ™œ์šฉ ์žˆ์–ด ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์žฅ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฐ€? ๋‘˜์งธ, ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ๊ณผ ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์ˆ˜ ํ™œ๋™ ์š”์†Œ ๊ฐ„ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ๋ชจ์ˆœ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฐ€? ์…‹์งธ, ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์œก์— ๋„์ž…ํ•  ๋•Œ ๋ฌด์—‡์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฐ€? ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์‹ฌ์ธต ๋ฉด๋‹ด์„ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฉด๋‹ด ์งˆ๋ฌธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋˜ ๋ˆˆ๋ฉ์ดํ‘œ์ง‘๋ฒ• (snowball sampling)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ค‘๊ตญ ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์‚ฌ 14๋ช…์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋กœ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ ์ •๋œ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•ฝ 1์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ •๋„ ๋ฉด๋‹ด์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋…น์Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฉด๋‹ด์ด ๋๋‚œ ํ›„ ๋…น์Œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ „์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฃผ์ œ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฉด๋‹ด ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์ฝ”๋“œ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฉด๋‹ด ์ž๋ฃŒ ์†์—์„œ ์ฃผ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ 2๋ฒˆ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ํ™œ์šฉ๊ณผ ๊ต์ˆ˜ ํ•™์Šตํ™œ๋™ ๋‚ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์š”์†Œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ชจ์ˆœ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™œ๋™์ด๋ก ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ‹€๋กœ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์ œ 1์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฃผ์ œ 4๊ฐœ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์ œ 2์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฃผ์ œ 6๊ฐœ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์ œ 3์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฃผ์ œ 4๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ์žฅ์ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ฆ‰๊ฐ์ ์ธ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ ์ œ๊ณต, ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต ์ง€์›, ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์—…๋ฌด๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ์†Œ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต ์ž์›์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•„์šธ๋Ÿฌ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ์žˆ์–ด ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต ํ™œ๋™๊ณผ ์ƒ์ถฉ๋œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ์ถ”์ฒœ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์ฐจ๋ณ„ํ™”๋œ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ์ž˜ ์ ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์กด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ•™์Šต ์ž์›์„ ์ž˜ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋ถˆํŽธํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์ง€์ ์žฌ์‚ฐ๊ถŒ์„ ๋ณดํ˜ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ทœ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํ•™๋ถ€๋ชจ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ•™์Šต์ž์˜ ์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท ๋‚จ์šฉ๊ณผ ์‹œ๋ ฅ ์ €ํ•˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์šฐ๋ คํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ ์ค‘๊ตญ์˜ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๊ต์œก ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์˜ ๊ธ€์”จ ์“ฐ๊ธฐ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•™๊ต ๋‚ด ์ „์ž๊ธฐ๊ธฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ œํ•œ๋„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘์˜ ์ง€์†์„ฑ๊ณผ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์œ„์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ทœ์น™ ๋งˆ๋ จ๊ณผ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์™„ํ™”๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์‹ค์ œ ์š”๊ตฌ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๊ณผ์ •์— ๊ต์œก ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์™€ ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ธ์‹์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต์—์„œ์˜ ์žฅ์ ๊ณผ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ์•„์šธ๋Ÿฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ๋กœ ๋„์ž…๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ทœ์น™, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ์ˆ , ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ต์œก ๊ณตํ•™์˜ ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ทœ๋ฒ”๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๊ฐœ์„ ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด ํ–ฅํ›„ ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ๋„์ž…์— ํ™œ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์—๋„ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.In recent years, the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has attracted widespread attention. In particular, the AI-based education platform based on the combination of AI technology and learning analysis brings new light to the long-standing difficulties in personalized learning and adaptive learning. The AI-based education platform analyzes learners' characteristics by collecting their data and tracking their learning behavior. It then generates cognitive diagnosis for learners and provides them with personalized learning resources and adaptive feedback that match their cognitive level based on systematic analysis. With the help of the AI-based education platform, teachers and students can get real-time educational data and analysis result๏ผŒas well as the feedback and treatment corresponding to the results. Previous studies have already demonstrated and proved its positive significance to personalized learning. However, these studies mostly start from a model development perspective or in a rigorous laboratory environment. There has been little research on teachers' perceptions of AI-based education platform. As a direct user of AI educational technologies, teachers' perceptions and suggestions are vital for introducing AIEd in education. In this study, the researcher explored teachers' perceptions of using AI-based education platform in teaching. The study conducted qualitative research to address the following research questions: 1) How do Chinese teachers perceive the advantages of AI-based education platforms for teaching and learning in secondary school? 2) How do Chinese teachers perceive the contradictions between AI-based education platforms and the secondary school system? 3๏ผ‰How do Chinese teachers suggest applying AI-based education platforms in secondary school? And it referred to the in-depth online interview with Chinese teachers who had experience with AI-based education platform. Interview questions were constructed through the literature review, and 14 secondary school teachers were selected by the snowball sampling method. The interviews lasted for an average of one hour per teacher and were transcribed from the audio recordings to text documents when finished. Afterward, the data were analyzed using thematic analysis, including generating initial codes, searching and reviewing the categories, and deriving the themes finally. Notably, for research question two, the researcher used the activity theory framework to analyze the contradictions among the use of the AI-based education platform and the various elements of the teaching and learning activities. Finally, four themes for research question 1, six themes for research question 2, and four themes for research question 3 were derived. As for the advantages, teachers believe that AI-based education platforms can provide instant feedback, targeted and systematic teaching support, and reduce teachers' workload. At the same time, AI-based education platforms can also integrate teaching resources in different areas. Teachers also recognized that the AI-based education platforms might trigger contradictions in existing teaching activities. They are aware of the situation that the recommended model of the AI-based education platform is not suitable for all levels of students; that a large number of learning resources are not classified properly enough to meet the needs of teachers, and that there lack clear rules and regulations to protect teachers' intellectual property rights when using the platform. Besides, parents are also concerned about the potential risk of internet addiction and vision problems using AI-based education platforms. Moreover, the use of the AI-based education platform may also affect students' ability to write Chinese characters due to the socio-historical background and educational characteristics in China. Furthermore, the restricted use of electronic devices on campus may also impact the consistent and effective education data collection. Teachers believe that these problems can be solved by improving rules and AI technology. Moreover, to make the platform more in line with the actual teaching requirements, teachers and education experts can also be involved in the development process of AI-based education platform. This study explored how Chinese teachers perceive the AI-based education platform and found that the AI-based education platform was conducive to personalized teaching and learning. At the same time, this study put forward some suggestions from the perspective of rules, AI technology, and educational technology, hoping to provide a good value for the future large-scale introduction of AI-based education platforms in education.CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Problem Statement 1 1.2. Purpose of Research 7 1.3. Definition of Terms 8 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 10 2.1. AI in Education 10 2.1.1 AI for Learning and Teaching 10 2.1.2 AI-based Education Platform 14 2.1.3 Teachers' Perception on AI-based Education Platform 18 2.2. Activity Theory 20 CHAPTER 3. RESEARCH METHOD 23 3.1. Research Design 23 3.2. Participants 25 3.3. Instrumentation 26 3.3.1 Potential Value of AI System in Education 26 3.4. Data Collection 33 3.5. Data Analysis 34 CHAPTER 4. FINDINGS 36 4.1. Advantages of Using AI-based Education Platform 36 4.1.1 Instant Feedback 37 4.1.2 Targeted and Systematic Teaching Support 42 4.1.3 Educational Resources Sharing 46 4.1.4 Reducing Workload 49 4.2. Tensions of Using AI-based Education Platform 51 4.2.1 Inadequately Meet the Needs of Teachers 52 4.2.2 Failure to Satisfy Low and High Achievers 54 4.2.3 Intellectual Property Violation 56 4.2.4 Guardian's Concern 57 4.2.5 School Rules about the Use of Electronic Devices 58 4.2.6 Implication for Chinese Character Education 59 4.3. Suggestion of Using AI-based Education Platform 61 4.3.1 Improving Rules of Using the AI-based Education Platform 61 4.3.2 Improving Rules of Protecting Teachers Right 62 4.3.3 Improving AI Technology 64 4.3.4 Participatory Design 66 CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 68 5.1. Discussion 68 5.2. Conclusion 72 REFERENCE 75 APPENDIX 1 98 APPENDIX 2 100 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 112Maste

    Instructors as Orchestrators: A Qualitative Case Study that Explores the role of Instructors in an Adaptive Learning Classroom Environment

    Get PDF
    This qualitative case study highlights the vital role of the instructor and the importance of learning analytics (LA) in an adaptive learning (AL) classroom environment. Existing research does not consistently support a particular outcome for the use of the AL platform, ALEKS, as an instructional approach. An examination of the AL landscape has been characterized by inconsistent and inconclusive results. The persistent emphasis on studentsโ€™ attitudes and performance in relation to ALEKS, along with the comparative approach to traditionally taught classes, have prevented us from understanding the complex and multifaceted ALEKS classroom environment. This study is novel because it distinguishes itself from previous research by providing the AL landscape with a supplementary lens โ€“ that of the instructors. By exploring how the instructors in this study used the LA from ALEKS to enrich the studentsโ€™ learning experiences, we intended to gain a renewed understanding and a reconceptualization of the instructorโ€™s role from a parameter that can be overlooked to an orchestrator whose presence is vital. This study draws on Laurillardโ€™s Conversational Framework (CF) as a theoretical foundation, which promotes an education-driven approach where technology serves pedagogy, not the other way around. This allows for an evaluation that challenges ALEKS to deliver on what education requires of it, and makes visible the vital role that educators play in the classroom. In sharp contrast with the quantitative orientation that has dominated previous research studies, this study espouses a qualitative stance to inquiry using open-ended research questions. Therefore, this dissertation employs semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and documentary evidence as data collection methods to paint a vibrant image of the case study under investigation. The findings demonstrate the multi-layered and intricate nature of an AL classroom environment. Evidence suggests that an AL approach to instruction depends on the active and engaged presence of instructors. Using the LA from the AL platform to cater to the individual needs of every student became an integral part of the instructorโ€™s role in the ALEKS classes studied. Further evidence indicates that the LA in ALEKS contributes towards a positive classroom dynamic and enhanced learner-instructor interaction. The CF adds another dimension to the findings and leads to an improved articulation of how the different aspects of learning are enacted in an AL environment. The study concludes with an array of recommendations for implementers and decision-makers with regard to leading a successful AL experience

    Did It Change How We Teach? A Qualitative Exploration Into Teacher Perceptions of How Technology Changed in the Classroom as a Result of the Pandemic

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this case study was to understand the perceived change in educator attitudes from the pandemic concerning technology at Cornerstone School. The problem addressed in this study was the lack of motivation of educators to try new ways to use technology in their classrooms. The theory guiding this study was J. Brunerโ€™s constructivist theory which focuses on obtaining knowledge through discovery. The connection between Brunerโ€™s theory and the perceived change in teachersโ€™ attitudes was that teachers learned technology through their use and discovery. A qualitative case study design was used to carry out this investigation. Ten educators were recruited using a typical purposeful sampling strategy; all were from a small private school. These included educators from the kindergarten through 11th-grade levels. The data were collected through a questionnaire followed by semi-structured individual interviews, an analysis of reflective journal prompts, and an analysis of artifacts. Findings revealed themes pertaining to the studyโ€™s purpose, including pre-pandemic attitudes toward technology, successful practices using technology during the pandemic, and post-pandemic attitudes toward technology. Confidence developed by the participants through the discovery of technology used confirmed Brunerโ€™s theory that learning through discovery gave the participants a more positive attitude towards technology and influenced how the participants taught

    The Impact of Human Resource Capital on Ethnic Minority Middle School Students' Engagement in a Mathematics Community of Practice and their Mathematics Identities

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this instrumental case study (Stake, 1995) was to understand (a) the impact of human resource capital on ethnic minority middle school students' engagement in a mathematics community of practice and (b) the impact of this engagement on their mathematics identities. Case study methodology was used to collect data from nine participants. Qualitative data collection methods were used, including observations, audio taped individual and focus group interviews of participants, participants' responses to mathematics scenarios and a thorough examination of weekly journal logs kept by the participants. Data were analyzed using Creswell's (2003) content analysis coding procedures. The two themes that emerged from analysis of the data were sociocultural capital and personal capital. Sociocultural capital of the participants was demonstrated through their interactions as a mathematics community of learners including collaboration with peers, communication with peers, and the sense of community the participants perceived within the mathematics classroom [community of practice]. Other indicators of sociocultural capital in this study were participants' social networks with their peers and family members as well as their views of the relevance of mathematics in extracurricular activities and mathematics-related careers. Participants' personal capital was demonstrated by their intrinsic motivation, including factors of self motivation and self regulation; and by participants' extrinsic motivation, which includes the expectations of participants' families, participants' individual career goals and their prior knowledge and experiences. Implications for relevant classroom practices and further research are recommended
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore