Improved dynamical particle swarm optimization method for structural dynamics

A methodology to the multiobjective structural design of buildings based on an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm is presented, which has proved to be very efficient and robust in nonlinear problems and when the optimization objectives are in conflict. In particular, the behaviour of the particle swarm optimization (PSO) classical algorithm is improved by dynamically adding autoadaptive mechanisms that enhance the exploration/exploitation trade-off and diversity of the proposed algorithm, avoiding getting trapped in local minima. A novel integrated optimization system was developed, called DI-PSO, to solve this problem which is able to control and even improve the structural behaviour under seismic excitations. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, the methodology is tested against some benchmark problems. Then a 3-story-building model is optimized under different objective cases, concluding that the improved multiobjective optimization methodology using DI-PSO is more efficient as compared with those designs obtained using single optimization.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

An adaptation reference-point-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.It is well known that maintaining a good balance between convergence and diversity is crucial to the performance of multiobjective optimization algorithms (MOEAs). However, the Pareto front (PF) of multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) affects the performance of MOEAs, especially reference point-based ones. This paper proposes a reference-point-based adaptive method to study the PF of MOPs according to the candidate solutions of the population. In addition, the proportion and angle function presented selects elites during environmental selection. Compared with five state-of-the-art MOEAs, the proposed algorithm shows highly competitive effectiveness on MOPs with six complex characteristics

A Look at the Generalized Heron Problem through the Lens of Majorization-Minimization

In a recent issue of this journal, Mordukhovich et al.\ pose and solve an interesting non-differentiable generalization of the Heron problem in the framework of modern convex analysis. In the generalized Heron problem one is given $k+1$ closed convex sets in \Real^d equipped with its Euclidean norm and asked to find the point in the last set such that the sum of the distances to the first $k$ sets is minimal. In later work the authors generalize the Heron problem even further, relax its convexity assumptions, study its theoretical properties, and pursue subgradient algorithms for solving the convex case. Here, we revisit the original problem solely from the numerical perspective. By exploiting the majorization-minimization (MM) principle of computational statistics and rudimentary techniques from differential calculus, we are able to construct a very fast algorithm for solving the Euclidean version of the generalized Heron problem.Comment: 21 pages, 3 figure

MONEDA: scalable multi-objective optimization with a neural network-based estimation of distribution algorithm

The Extension Of Estimation Of Distribution Algorithms (Edas) To The Multiobjective Domain Has Led To Multi-Objective Optimization Edas (Moedas). Most Moedas Have Limited Themselves To Porting Single-Objective Edas To The Multi-Objective Domain. Although Moedas Have Proved To Be A Valid Approach, The Last Point Is An Obstacle To The Achievement Of A Significant Improvement Regarding "Standard" Multi-Objective Optimization Evolutionary Algorithms. Adapting The Model-Building Algorithm Is One Way To Achieve A Substantial Advance. Most Model-Building Schemes Used So Far By Edas Employ Off-The-Shelf Machine Learning Methods. However, The Model-Building Problem Has Particular Requirements That Those Methods Do Not Meet And Even Evade. The Focus Of This Paper Is On The Model- Building Issue And How It Has Not Been Properly Understood And Addressed By Most Moedas. We Delve Down Into The Roots Of This Matter And Hypothesize About Its Causes. To Gain A Deeper Understanding Of The Subject We Propose A Novel Algorithm Intended To Overcome The Draw-Backs Of Current Moedas. This New Algorithm Is The Multi-Objective Neural Estimation Of Distribution Algorithm (Moneda). Moneda Uses A Modified Growing Neural Gas Network For Model-Building (Mb-Gng). Mb-Gng Is A Custom-Made Clustering Algorithm That Meets The Above Demands. Thanks To Its Custom-Made Model-Building Algorithm, The Preservation Of Elite Individuals And Its Individual Replacement Scheme, Moneda Is Capable Of Scalably Solving Continuous Multi-Objective Optimization Problems. It Performs Better Than Similar Algorithms In Terms Of A Set Of Quality Indicators And Computational Resource Requirements.This work has been funded in part by projects CNPq BJT 407851/2012-7, FAPERJ APQ1 211.451/2015, MINECO TEC2014-57022-C2-2-R and TEC2012-37832-C02-01

Multiple Criteria Games Theory and Applications

After a review of basic concepts in multiple criteria optimization, the paper presents a characterization of noncooperative equilibria in multiple criteria games in normal form either by weighted sums or by order-consistent achievement scalarizing functions, for convex and nonconvex cases. Possible applications of multiple criteria games and such characterizations of their equilibria are indicated. The analysis of multiple criteria games night be especially useful when studying reasons of possible conflict escalation processes and ways of preventing them

Set optimization - a rather short introduction

Recent developments in set optimization are surveyed and extended including various set relations as well as fundamental constructions of a convex analysis for set- and vector-valued functions, and duality for set optimization problems. Extensive sections with bibliographical comments summarize the state of the art. Applications to vector optimization and financial risk measures are discussed along with algorithmic approaches to set optimization problems

Otimização multiobjetivo com estimação de distribuição guiada por tomada de decisão multicritério

Orientadores: Fernando José Von Zuben, Guilherme Palermo CoelhoDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Engenharia Elétrica e de ComputaçãoResumo: Considerando as meta-heurísticas estado-da-arte para otimização multiobjetivo (MOO, do inglês Multi-Objective Optimization), como NSGA-II, NSGA-III, SPEA2 e SMS-EMOA, apenas um critério de preferência por vez é levado em conta para classificar soluções ao longo do processo de busca. Neste trabalho, alguns dos critérios de seleção adotados por esses algoritmos estado-da-arte, incluindo classe de não-dominância e contribuição para a métrica de hipervolume, são utilizados em conjunto por uma técnica de tomada de decisão multicritério (MCDM, do inglês Multi-Criteria Decision Making), mais especificamente o algoritmo TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), responsável por ordenar todas as soluções candidatas. O algoritmo TOPSIS permite o uso de abordagens baseadas em múltiplas preferências, ao invés de apenas uma como na maioria das técnicas híbridas de MOO e MCDM. Cada preferência é tratada como um critério com uma importância relativa determinada pelo tomador de decisão. Novas soluções candidatas são então amostradas por meio de um modelo de distribuição, neste caso uma mistura de Gaussianas, obtido a partir da lista ordenada de soluções candidatas produzida pelo TOPSIS. Essencialmente, um operador de roleta é utilizado para selecionar um par de soluções candidatas de acordo com o seu mérito relativo, adequadamente determinado pelo TOPSIS, e então uma novo par de soluções candidatas é gerado a partir de perturbações Gaussianas centradas nas correspondentes soluções candidatas escolhidas. O desvio padrão das funções Gaussianas é definido em função da distância das soluções no espaço de decisão. Também foram utilizados operadores para auxiliar a busca a atingir regiões potencialmente promissoras do espaço de busca que ainda não foram mapeadas pelo modelo de distribuição. Embora houvesse outras opções, optou-se por seguir a estrutura do algoritmo NSGA-II, também adotada no algoritmo NSGA-III, como base para o método aqui proposto, denominado MOMCEDA (Multi-Objective Multi-Criteria Estimation of Distribution Algorithm). Assim, os aspectos distintos da proposta, quando comparada com o NSGA-II e o NSGA-III, são a forma como a população de soluções candidatas é ordenada e a estratégia adotada para gerar novos indivíduos. Os resultados nos problemas de teste ZDT mostram claramente que nosso método é superior aos algoritmos NSGA- II e NSGA-III, e é competitivo com outras meta-heurísticas bem estabelecidas na literatura de otimização multiobjetivo, levando em conta as métricas de convergência, hipervolume e a medida IGDAbstract: Considering the state-of-the-art meta-heuristics for multi-objective optimization (MOO), such as NSGA-II, NSGA-III, SPEA2 and SMS-EMOA, only one preference criterion at a time is considered to properly rank candidate solutions along the search process. Here, some of the preference criteria adopted by those state-of-the-art algorithms, including non-dominance level and contribution to the hypervolume, are taken together as inputs to a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) strategy, more specifically the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), responsible for sorting all candidate solutions. The TOPSIS algorithm allows the use of multiple preference based approaches, rather than focusing on a particular one like in most hybrid algorithms composed of MOO and MCDM techniques. Here, each preference is treated as a criterion with a relative relevance to the decision maker (DM). New candidate solutions are then generated using a distribution model, in our case a Gaussian mixture model, derived from the sorted list of candidate solutions produced by TOPSIS. Essentially, a roulette wheel is used to choose a pair of the current candidate solutions according to the relative quality, suitably determined by TOPSIS, and after that a new pair of candidate solutions is generated as Gaussian perturbations centered at the corresponding parent solutions. The standard deviation of the Gaussian functions is defined in terms of the parents distance in the decision space. We also adopt refreshing operators, aiming at reaching potentially promising regions of the search space not yet mapped by the distribution model. Though other choices could have been made, we decided to follow the structural conception of the NSGA-II algorithm, also adopted in the NSGA-III algorithm, as basis for our proposal, denoted by MOMCEDA (Multi-Objective Multi-Criteria Estimation of Distribution Algorithm). Therefore, the distinctive aspects, when compared to NSGA-II and NSGA-III, are the way the current population of candidate solutions is ranked and the strategy adopted to generate new individuals. The results on ZDT benchmarks show that our method is clearly superior to NSGA-II and NSGA-III, and is competitive with other wellestablished meta-heuristics for multi-objective optimization from the literature, considering convergence to the Pareto front, hypervolume and IGD as performance metricsMestradoEngenharia de ComputaçãoMestre em Engenharia Elétrica2016/21031-0FAPESPCAPE