Project scheduling under undertainty – survey and research potentials.

The vast majority of the research efforts in project scheduling assume complete information about the scheduling problem to be solved and a static deterministic environment within which the pre-computed baseline schedule will be executed. However, in the real world, project activities are subject to considerable uncertainty, that is gradually resolved during project execution. In this survey we review the fundamental approaches for scheduling under uncertainty: reactive scheduling, stochastic project scheduling, stochastic GERT network scheduling, fuzzy project scheduling, robust (proactive) scheduling and sensitivity analysis. We discuss the potentials of these approaches for scheduling projects under uncertainty.Management; Project management; Robustness; Scheduling; Stability;

Project scheduling under uncertainty using fuzzy modelling and solving techniques

In the real world, projects are subject to numerous uncertainties at different levels of planning. Fuzzy project scheduling is one of the approaches that deal with uncertainties in project scheduling problem. In this paper, we provide a new technique that keeps uncertainty at all steps of the modelling and solving procedure by considering a fuzzy modelling of the workload inspired from the fuzzy/possibilistic approach. Based on this modelling, two project scheduling techniques, Resource Constrained Scheduling and Resource Leveling, are considered and generalized to handle fuzzy parameters. We refer to these problems as the Fuzzy Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (FRCPSP) and the Fuzzy Resource Leveling Problem (FRLP). A Greedy Algorithm and a Genetic Algorithm are provided to solve FRCPSP and FRLP respectively, and are applied to civil helicopter maintenance within the framework of a French industrial project called Helimaintenance

When greediness fails: Examples from stochastic scheduling

The purpose of this paper is to present examples which show that deterministic and stochastic scheduling problems often have a surprisingly different behavior. In particular, it demonstrates some seemingly counterintuitive properties of optimal scheduling policies for stochastic machine scheduling problems.Economics ;

Solution and quality robust project scheduling: a methodological framework.

The vast majority of the research efforts in project scheduling over the past several years has concentrated on the development of exact and suboptimal procedures for the generation of a baseline schedule assuming complete information and a deterministic environment. During execution, however, projects may be the subject of considerable uncertainty, which may lead to numerous schedule disruptions. Predictive-reactive scheduling refers to the process where a baseline schedule is developed prior to the start of the project and updated if necessary during project execution. It is the objective of this paper to review possible procedures for the generation of proactive (robust) schedules, which are as well as possible protected against schedule disruptions, and for the deployment of reactive scheduling procedures that may be used to revise or re-optimize the baseline schedule when unexpected events occur. We also offer a methodological framework that should allow project management to identify the proper scheduling methodology for different project scheduling environments. Finally, we survey the basics of Critical Chain scheduling and indicate in which environments it is useful.Framework; Information; Management; Processes; Project management; Project scheduling; Project scheduling under uncertainty; Stability; Robust scheduling; Quality; Scheduling; Stability; Uncertainty;

The complexity of generating robust resource-constrained baseline schedules.

Robust scheduling aims at the construction of a schedule that is protected against uncertain events. A stable schedule is a robust schedule that will change little when variations in the input parameters arise. Robustness can also be achieved by making the schedule makespan insensitive to variability. In this paper, we describe models for the generation of stable and insensitive baseline schedules for resource-constrained scheduling problems and present results on their complexity status. We start from a project scheduling viewpoint and derive results on machine scheduling sub-problems.Complexity; Information; Product scheduling; Robustness; sensitivity; stability;

A tabu search procedure for generating robust project baseline schedules under stochastic resource availabilities.

The majority of research efforts in project scheduling assume a static and deterministic environment with complete information. In practice, however, these assumptions will hardly, if ever, be satisfied. Proactive scheduling aims at the generation of robust baseline schedules that are as much as possible protected against anticipated disruptions that may occur during project execution. In this paper, we focus on disruptions that may be caused by stochastic resource availabilities and aim at generating stable baseline schedules, where the solution robustness (stability) of the baseline schedule is measured by the weighted deviation between the planned and the actually realized activity starting times during project execution. We present a tabu search procedure that operates on a surrogate free slack based objective function. The effectiveness of the procedure is demonstrated by extensive computational results obtained on a set of randomly generated test instances.

An Approximately Optimal Algorithm for Scheduling Phasor Data Transmissions in Smart Grid Networks

In this paper, we devise a scheduling algorithm for ordering transmission of synchrophasor data from the substation to the control center in as short a time frame as possible, within the realtime hierarchical communications infrastructure in the electric grid. The problem is cast in the framework of the classic job scheduling with precedence constraints. The optimization setup comprises the number of phasor measurement units (PMUs) to be installed on the grid, a weight associated with each PMU, processing time at the control center for the PMUs, and precedence constraints between the PMUs. The solution to the PMU placement problem yields the optimum number of PMUs to be installed on the grid, while the processing times are picked uniformly at random from a predefined set. The weight associated with each PMU and the precedence constraints are both assumed known. The scheduling problem is provably NP-hard, so we resort to approximation algorithms which provide solutions that are suboptimal yet possessing polynomial time complexity. A lower bound on the optimal schedule is derived using branch and bound techniques, and its performance evaluated using standard IEEE test bus systems. The scheduling policy is power grid-centric, since it takes into account the electrical properties of the network under consideration.Comment: 8 pages, published in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, October 201