19,049 research outputs found
Gradual session types
Session types are a rich type discipline, based on linear types, that lifts
the sort of safety claims that come with type systems to communications.
However, web-based applications and microservices are often written in a mix of
languages, with type disciplines in a spectrum between static and dynamic
typing. Gradual session types address this mixed setting by providing a
framework which grants seamless transition between statically typed handling of
sessions and any required degree of dynamic typing.
We propose Gradual GV as a gradually typed extension of the functional
session type system GV. Following a standard framework of gradual typing,
Gradual GV consists of an external language, which relaxes the type system of
GV using dynamic types, and an internal language with casts, for which
operational semantics is given, and a cast-insertion translation from the
former to the latter. We demonstrate type and communication safety as well as
blame safety, thus extending previous results to functional languages with
session-based communication. The interplay of linearity and dynamic types
requires a novel approach to specifying the dynamics of the language.Comment: Preprint of an article to appear in Journal of Functional Programmin
Combining behavioural types with security analysis
Today's software systems are highly distributed and interconnected, and they
increasingly rely on communication to achieve their goals; due to their
societal importance, security and trustworthiness are crucial aspects for the
correctness of these systems. Behavioural types, which extend data types by
describing also the structured behaviour of programs, are a widely studied
approach to the enforcement of correctness properties in communicating systems.
This paper offers a unified overview of proposals based on behavioural types
which are aimed at the analysis of security properties
Benefits of Session Types for software Development
Session types are a formalism used to specify and check the correctness of communication based systems. Within their scope, they can guarantee the absence of communication errors such as deadlock, sending an unexpected message or failing to handle an incoming message. Introduced over two decades ago, they have developed into a significant theme in programming languages. In this paper we examine the beliefs that drive research into this area and make it popular. We look at the claims and motivation behind session types throughout the literature. We identify the hypotheses upon which session types have been designed and implemented, and attempt to clarify and formulate them in a more suitable manner for testing
Session Communication and Integration
The scenario-based specification of a large distributed system is usually
naturally decomposed into various modules. The integration of specification
modules contrasts to the parallel composition of program components, and
includes various ways such as scenario concatenation, choice, and nesting. The
recent development of multiparty session types for process calculi provides
useful techniques to accommodate the protocol modularisation, by encoding
fragments of communication protocols in the usage of private channels for a
class of agents. In this paper, we extend forgoing session type theories by
enhancing the session integration mechanism. More specifically, we propose a
novel synchronous multiparty session type theory, in which sessions are
separated into the communicating and integrating levels. Communicating sessions
record the message-based communications between multiple agents, whilst
integrating sessions describe the integration of communicating ones. A
two-level session type system is developed for pi-calculus with syntactic
primitives for session establishment, and several key properties of the type
system are studied. Applying the theory to system description, we show that a
channel safety property and a session conformance property can be analysed.
Also, to improve the utility of the theory, a process slicing method is used to
help identify the violated sessions in the type checking.Comment: A short version of this paper is submitted for revie
Typechecking protocols with Mungo and StMungo: a session type toolchain for Java
Static typechecking is an important feature of many standard programming languages. However, static typing focuses on data rather than communication, and therefore does not help programmers correctly implement communication protocols in distributed systems. The theory of session types provides a basis for tackling this problem; we use it to develop two tools that support static typechecking of communication protocols in Java. The first tool, Mungo, extends Java with typestate definitions, which allow classes to be associated with state machines defining permitted sequences of method calls: for example, communication methods. The second tool, StMungo, takes a session type describing a communication protocol, and generates a typestate specification of the permitted sequences of messages in the protocol. Protocol implementations can be validated by Mungo against their typestate definitions and then compiled with a standard Java compiler. The result is a toolchain for static typechecking of communication protocols in Java. We formalise and prove soundness of the typestate inference system used by Mungo, and show that our toolchain can be used to typecheck a client for the standard Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)
Behavioral types in programming languages
A recent trend in programming language research is to use behav- ioral type theory to ensure various correctness properties of large- scale, communication-intensive systems. Behavioral types encompass concepts such as interfaces, communication protocols, contracts, and choreography. The successful application of behavioral types requires a solid understanding of several practical aspects, from their represen- tation in a concrete programming language, to their integration with other programming constructs such as methods and functions, to de- sign and monitoring methodologies that take behaviors into account. This survey provides an overview of the state of the art of these aspects, which we summarize as the pragmatics of behavioral types
Modular session types for objects
Session types allow communication protocols to be specified
type-theoretically so that protocol implementations can be verified by static
type checking. We extend previous work on session types for distributed
object-oriented languages in three ways. (1) We attach a session type to a
class definition, to specify the possible sequences of method calls. (2) We
allow a session type (protocol) implementation to be modularized, i.e.
partitioned into separately-callable methods. (3) We treat session-typed
communication channels as objects, integrating their session types with the
session types of classes. The result is an elegant unification of communication
channels and their session types, distributed object-oriented programming, and
a form of typestate supporting non-uniform objects, i.e. objects that
dynamically change the set of available methods. We define syntax, operational
se-mantics, a sound type system, and a sound and complete type checking
algorithm for a small distributed class-based object-oriented language with
structural subtyping. Static typing guarantees that both sequences of messages
on channels, and sequences of method calls on objects, conform to
type-theoretic specifications, thus ensuring type-safety. The language includes
expected features of session types, such as delegation, and expected features
of object-oriented programming, such as encapsulation of local state.Comment: Logical Methods in Computer Science (LMCS), International Federation
for Computational Logic, 201
- …