Covering problems in edge- and node-weighted graphs

This paper discusses the graph covering problem in which a set of edges in an edge- and node-weighted graph is chosen to satisfy some covering constraints while minimizing the sum of the weights. In this problem, because of the large integrality gap of a natural linear programming (LP) relaxation, LP rounding algorithms based on the relaxation yield poor performance. Here we propose a stronger LP relaxation for the graph covering problem. The proposed relaxation is applied to designing primal-dual algorithms for two fundamental graph covering problems: the prize-collecting edge dominating set problem and the multicut problem in trees. Our algorithms are an exact polynomial-time algorithm for the former problem, and a 2-approximation algorithm for the latter problem, respectively. These results match the currently known best results for purely edge-weighted graphs.Comment: To appear in SWAT 201

Online Mixed Packing and Covering

In many problems, the inputs arrive over time, and must be dealt with irrevocably when they arrive. Such problems are online problems. A common method of solving online problems is to first solve the corresponding linear program, and then round the fractional solution online to obtain an integral solution. We give algorithms for solving linear programs with mixed packing and covering constraints online. We first consider mixed packing and covering linear programs, where packing constraints are given offline and covering constraints are received online. The objective is to minimize the maximum multiplicative factor by which any packing constraint is violated, while satisfying the covering constraints. No prior sublinear competitive algorithms are known for this problem. We give the first such --- a polylogarithmic-competitive algorithm for solving mixed packing and covering linear programs online. We also show a nearly tight lower bound. Our techniques for the upper bound use an exponential penalty function in conjunction with multiplicative updates. While exponential penalty functions are used previously to solve linear programs offline approximately, offline algorithms know the constraints beforehand and can optimize greedily. In contrast, when constraints arrive online, updates need to be more complex. We apply our techniques to solve two online fixed-charge problems with congestion. These problems are motivated by applications in machine scheduling and facility location. The linear program for these problems is more complicated than mixed packing and covering, and presents unique challenges. We show that our techniques combined with a randomized rounding procedure give polylogarithmic-competitive integral solutions. These problems generalize online set-cover, for which there is a polylogarithmic lower bound. Hence, our results are close to tight

Nearly-Linear Time LP Solvers and Rounding Algorithms for Scheduling Problems

We study nearly-linear time approximation algorithms for non-preemptive scheduling problems in two settings: the unrelated machine setting, and the identical machine with job precedence constraints setting, under the well-studied objectives such as makespan and weighted completion time. For many problems, we develop nearly-linear time approximation algorithms with approximation ratios matching the current best ones achieved in polynomial time. Our main technique is linear programming relaxation. For the unrelated machine setting, we formulate mixed packing and covering LP relaxations of nearly-linear size, and solve them approximately using the nearly-linear time solver of Young. For the makespan objective, we develop a rounding algorithm with (2+?)-approximation ratio. For the weighted completion time objective, we prove the LP is as strong as the rectangle LP used by Im and Li, leading to a nearly-linear time (1.45 + ?)-approximation for the problem. For problems in the identical machine with precedence constraints setting, the precedence constraints can not be formulated as packing or covering constraints. To achieve the nearly-linear running time, we define a polytope for the constraints, and leverage the multiplicative weight update (MWU) method with an oracle which always returns solutions in the polytope

Approximation Algorithms for Covering/Packing Integer Programs

Given matrices A and B and vectors a, b, c and d, all with non-negative entries, we consider the problem of computing min {c.x: x in Z^n_+, Ax > a, Bx < b, x < d}. We give a bicriteria-approximation algorithm that, given epsilon in (0, 1], finds a solution of cost O(ln(m)/epsilon^2) times optimal, meeting the covering constraints (Ax > a) and multiplicity constraints (x < d), and satisfying Bx < (1 + epsilon)b + beta, where beta is the vector of row sums beta_i = sum_j B_ij. Here m denotes the number of rows of A. This gives an O(ln m)-approximation algorithm for CIP -- minimum-cost covering integer programs with multiplicity constraints, i.e., the special case when there are no packing constraints Bx < b. The previous best approximation ratio has been O(ln(max_j sum_i A_ij)) since 1982. CIP contains the set cover problem as a special case, so O(ln m)-approximation is the best possible unless P=NP.Comment: Preliminary version appeared in IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (2001). To appear in Journal of Computer and System Science

Thresholded Covering Algorithms for Robust and Max-Min Optimization

The general problem of robust optimization is this: one of several possible scenarios will appear tomorrow, but things are more expensive tomorrow than they are today. What should you anticipatorily buy today, so that the worst-case cost (summed over both days) is minimized? Feige et al. and Khandekar et al. considered the k-robust model where the possible outcomes tomorrow are given by all demand-subsets of size k, and gave algorithms for the set cover problem, and the Steiner tree and facility location problems in this model, respectively. In this paper, we give the following simple and intuitive template for k-robust problems: "having built some anticipatory solution, if there exists a single demand whose augmentation cost is larger than some threshold, augment the anticipatory solution to cover this demand as well, and repeat". In this paper we show that this template gives us improved approximation algorithms for k-robust Steiner tree and set cover, and the first approximation algorithms for k-robust Steiner forest, minimum-cut and multicut. All our approximation ratios (except for multicut) are almost best possible. As a by-product of our techniques, we also get algorithms for max-min problems of the form: "given a covering problem instance, which k of the elements are costliest to cover?".Comment: 24 page

Partial resampling to approximate covering integer programs

We consider column-sparse covering integer programs, a generalization of set cover, which have a long line of research of (randomized) approximation algorithms. We develop a new rounding scheme based on the Partial Resampling variant of the Lov\'{a}sz Local Lemma developed by Harris & Srinivasan (2019). This achieves an approximation ratio of $1 + \frac{\ln (\Delta_1+1)}{a_{\min}} + O\Big( \log(1 + \sqrt{ \frac{\log (\Delta_1+1)}{a_{\min}}} \Big)$, where $a_{\min}$ is the minimum covering constraint and $\Delta_1$ is the maximum $\ell_1$-norm of any column of the covering matrix (whose entries are scaled to lie in $[0,1]$). When there are additional constraints on the variable sizes, we show an approximation ratio of $\ln \Delta_0 + O(\log \log \Delta_0)$ (where $\Delta_0$ is the maximum number of non-zero entries in any column of the covering matrix). These results improve asymptotically, in several different ways, over results of Srinivasan (2006) and Kolliopoulos & Young (2005). We show nearly-matching inapproximability and integrality-gap lower bounds. We also show that the rounding process leads to negative correlation among the variables, which allows us to handle multi-criteria programs