Sustainable Industrial Engineering along Product-Service Life Cycle/Supply Chain

Sustainable industrial engineering addresses the sustainability issue from economic, environmental, and social points of view. Its application fields are the whole value chain and lifecycle of products/services, from the development to the end-of-life stages. This book aims to address many of the challenges faced by industrial organizations and supply chains to become more sustainable through reinventing their processes and practices, by continuously incorporating sustainability guidelines and practices in their decisions, such as circular economy, collaboration with suppliers and customers, using information technologies and systems, tracking their products’ life-cycle, using optimization methods to reduce resource use, and to apply new management paradigms to help mitigate many of the wastes that exist across organizations and supply chains. This book will be of interest to the fast-growing body of academics studying and researching sustainability, as well as to industry managers involved in sustainability management

Review of mathematical models for production planning under uncertainty due to lack of homogeneity: proposal of a conceptual model

[EN] Lack of homogeneity in the product (LHP) appears in some production processes that confer heterogeneity in the characteristics of the products obtained. Supply chains with this issue have to classify the product in different homogeneous subsets, whose quantity is uncertain during the production planning process. This paper proposes a generic framework for reviewing in a unified way the literature about production planning models dealing with LHP uncertainty. This analysis allows the identification of similarities among sectors to transfer solutions between them and gaps existing in the literature for further research. The results of the review show: (1) sectors affected by LHP inherent uncertainty, (2) the inherent LHP uncertainty types modelled, and (3) the approaches for modelling LHP uncertainty most widely employed. Finally, we suggest a conceptual model reflecting the aspects to be considered when modelling the production planning in sectors with LHP in an uncertain environment.This research was initiated within the framework of the project funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad [Ref. DPI2011-23597] entitled ‘Methods and models for operations planning and order management in supply chains characterised by uncertainty in production due to the lack of product uniformity’ (PLANGES-FHP) already finished. After, the project leading to this application has received funding from the European Union’s research and innovation programme under the H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions with the grant agreement No 691249, Project entitled ’Enhancing and implementing Knowledge based ICT solutions within high Riskand Uncertain Conditions for Agriculture Production Systems’ (RUC-APS).Mundi, I.; Alemany Díaz, MDM.; Poler, R.; Fuertes-Miquel, VS. (2019). Review of mathematical models for production planning under uncertainty due to lack of homogeneity: proposal of a conceptual model. International Journal of Production Research. 57(15-16):5239-5283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1566665S523952835715-16Ahumada, O., Rene Villalobos, J., & Nicholas Mason, A. (2012). Tactical planning of the production and distribution of fresh agricultural products under uncertainty. Agricultural Systems, 112, 17-26. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.06.002Ahumada, O., & Villalobos, J. R. (2009). Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(1), 1-20. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.014Alarcón, F., Alemany, M. M. E., Lario, F. C., & Oltra, R. F. (2011). La falta de homogeneidad del producto (FHP) en las empresas cerámicas y su impacto en la reasignación del inventario. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio, 50(1), 49-58. doi:10.3989/cyv.072011Albornoz, V. M., M. González-Araya, M. C. Gripe, and S. V. Rodrıguez. 2014. “A Mixed Integer Linear Program for Operational Planning in a Meat Packing Plant.” Accessed January 15, 2015. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Victor_Albornoz/publication/268687089_A_Mixed_Integer_Linear_Program_for_Operational_Planning_in_a_Meat_Packing_Plant/links/547382bf0cf29afed60f55c7.pdf.José Alem, D., & Morabito, R. (2012). Production planning in furniture settings via robust optimization. Computers & Operations Research, 39(2), 139-150. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2011.02.022Alemany, M. M. E., Lario, F.-C., Ortiz, A., & Gómez, F. (2013). Available-To-Promise modeling for multi-plant manufacturing characterized by lack of homogeneity in the product: An illustration of a ceramic case. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(5), 3380-3398. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.022Alemany, M., Ortiz, A., & Fuertes-Miquel, V. S. (2018). A decision support tool for the order promising process with product homogeneity requirements in hybrid Make-To-Stock and Make-To-Order environments. Application to a ceramic tile company. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 122, 219-234. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.05.040Alfalla-Luque, R., Medina-Lopez, C., & Dey, P. K. (2012). Supply chain integration framework using literature review. Production Planning & Control, 24(8-9), 800-817. doi:10.1080/09537287.2012.666870Al-Othman, W. B. E., Lababidi, H. M. S., Alatiqi, I. M., & Al-Shayji, K. (2008). Supply chain optimization of petroleum organization under uncertainty in market demands and prices. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(3), 822-840. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.081Al-Shammari, A., & Ba-Shammakh, M. S. (2011). Uncertainty Analysis for Refinery Production Planning. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 50(11), 7065-7072. doi:10.1021/ie200313rAmaro, A. C. S., & Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P. F. D. (2009). The effect of uncertainty on the optimal closed-loop supply chain planning under different partnerships structure. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 33(12), 2144-2158. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.06.003ARAS, N., BOYACI, T., & VERTER, V. (2004). The effect of categorizing returned products in remanufacturing. IIE Transactions, 36(4), 319-331. doi:10.1080/07408170490279561Aydin, R., Kwong, C. K., Geda, M. W., & Okudan Kremer, G. E. (2017). Determining the optimal quantity and quality levels of used product returns for remanufacturing under multi-period and uncertain quality of returns. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(9-12), 4401-4414. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-1141-0Bakhrankova, K., Midthun, K. T., & Uggen, K. T. (2014). Stochastic optimization of operational production planning for fisheries. Fisheries Research, 157, 147-153. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2014.03.018Banasik, A., Kanellopoulos, A., Claassen, G. D. H., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., & van der Vorst, J. G. A. J. (2017). Closing loops in agricultural supply chains using multi-objective optimization: A case study of an industrial mushroom supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 409-420. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.012Beaudoin, D., LeBel, L., & Frayret, J.-M. (2007). Tactical supply chain planning in the forest products industry through optimization and scenario-based analysis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37(1), 128-140. doi:10.1139/x06-223Begen, M. A., & Puterman, M. L. (2003). Development Of A Catch Allocation Tool Design For Production Planning At Js Mcmillan Fisheries. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 41(3), 235-244. doi:10.1080/03155986.2003.11732678Benedito, E., & Corominas, A. (2010). Optimal manufacturing and remanufacturing capacities of systems with reverse logistics and deterministic uniform demand. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 3(1). doi:10.3926/jiem.2010.v3n1.p33-53Bertrand, J. W. ., & Rutten, W. G. M. . (1999). Evaluation of three production planning procedures for the use of recipe flexibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 115(1), 179-194. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00166-0Björheden, R., & Helstad, K. (2005). Raw Material Procurement in Sawmills’ Business Level Strategy-A Contingency Perspective. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 16(2), 47-56. doi:10.1080/14942119.2005.10702513Bohle, C., Maturana, S., & Vera, J. (2010). A robust optimization approach to wine grape harvesting scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 245-252. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.12.003Cai, X., Lai, M., Li, X., Li, Y., & Wu, X. (2014). Optimal acquisition and production policy in a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system with core acquisition at different quality levels. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 374-382. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.017Carneiro, M. C., Ribas, G. P., & Hamacher, S. (2010). Risk Management in the Oil Supply Chain: A CVaR Approach. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49(7), 3286-3294. doi:10.1021/ie901265nChakraborty, M., & Chandra, M. K. (2005). Multicriteria decision making for optimal blending for beneficiation of coal: a fuzzy programming approach. Omega, 33(5), 413-418. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.005LUO, C., & RONG, G. (2009). A Strategy for the Integration of Production Planning and Scheduling in Refineries under Uncertainty. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 17(1), 113-127. doi:10.1016/s1004-9541(09)60042-2Davoli, G., Gallo, S., Collins, M., & Melloni, R. (2011). A stochastic simulation approach for production scheduling and investment planning in the tile industry. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 2(9). doi:10.4314/ijest.v2i9.64006Denizel, M., Ferguson, M., & Souza, G. (2010). Multiperiod Remanufacturing Planning With Uncertain Quality of Inputs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(3), 394-404. doi:10.1109/tem.2009.2024506Dong, M., Lu, S., & Han, S. (2011). Production Planning for Hybrid Remanufacturing and Manufacturing System with Component Recovery. Advances in Electrical Engineering and Electrical Machines, 511-518. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25905-0_66Dubois, D., Fargier, H., & Fortemps, P. (2003). Fuzzy scheduling: Modelling flexible constraints vs. coping with incomplete knowledge. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(2), 231-252. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00558-1DUENYAS, I., & TSAI, C.-Y. (2000). Control of a manufacturing system with random product yield and downward substitutability. IIE Transactions, 32(9), 785-795. doi:10.1080/07408170008967438Esteso, A., Alemany, M. M. E., & Ortiz, A. (2018). Conceptual framework for designing agri-food supply chains under uncertainty by mathematical programming models. International Journal of Production Research, 56(13), 4418-4446. doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1447706French, M. L., & LaForge, R. L. (2005). Closed-loop supply chains in process industries: An empirical study of producer re-use issues. Journal of Operations Management, 24(3), 271-286. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.012Gallo, M., R. Grisi, G. Guizzi, and E. Romano. 2009. “A Comparison of Production Policies in Remanufacturing Systems,” Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS International Conference on System Science and Simulation in Engineering, ICOSSSE ‘09, pp. 334.Goodfellow, R., & Dimitrakopoulos, R. (2017). Simultaneous Stochastic Optimization of Mining Complexes and Mineral Value Chains. Mathematical Geosciences, 49(3), 341-360. doi:10.1007/s11004-017-9680-3Graves, S. C. (2010). Uncertainty and Production Planning. Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise, 83-101. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6485-4_5Grillo, H., Alemany, M. M. E., Ortiz, A., & Fuertes-Miquel, V. S. (2017). Mathematical modelling of the order-promising process for fruit supply chains considering the perishability and subtypes of products. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 49, 255-278. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2017.04.037Guan, Z., & Philpott, A. B. (2011). A multistage stochastic programming model for the New Zealand dairy industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(2), 289-299. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.003Guide, V. D. R. (2000). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management, 18(4), 467-483. doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(00)00034-6Gupta, V., & Grossmann, I. E. (2011). Solution strategies for multistage stochastic programming with endogenous uncertainties. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 35(11), 2235-2247. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.11.013Gupta, S., and Z. Nan. 2006. “‘Multiperiod Planning of Refinery Operations Under Market Uncertainty,’ AIChE Annual Meeting.” Conference Proceedings.Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S. (2015). A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling. Omega, 52, 119-132. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004Heydari, J., & Ghasemi, M. (2018). A revenue sharing contract for reverse supply chain coordination under stochastic quality of returned products and uncertain remanufacturing capacity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 607-615. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.206Hovelaque, V., Duvaleix-Tréguer, S., & Cordier, J. (2009). Effects of constrained supply and price contracts on agricultural cooperatives. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(3), 769-780. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.08.005Hsieh, S., & Chiang, C.-C. (2001). Manufacturing-to-Sale Planning Model for Fuel Oil Production. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 18(4), 303-311. doi:10.1007/s001700170070Igarashi, M., de Boer, L., & Fet, A. M. (2013). What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(4), 247-263. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2013.06.001Jamshidi, M., & Osanloo, M. (2019). Reliability analysis of production schedule in multi-element deposits under grade-tonnage uncertainty with multi-destinations for the run of mine material. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 29(3), 483-489. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.04.016Jin, X., Hu, S. J., Ni, J., & Xiao, G. (2013). Assembly Strategies for Remanufacturing Systems With Variable Quality Returns. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 10(1), 76-85. doi:10.1109/tase.2012.2217741Jindal, A., & Sangwan, K. S. (2016). Multi-objective fuzzy mathematical modelling of closed-loop supply chain considering economical and environmental factors. Annals of Operations Research, 257(1-2), 95-120. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2219-zJohnson, P., G. Evatt, P. Duck, and S. Howell. 2010. “The Derivation and Impact of an Optimal Cut-off Grade Regime Upon Mine Valuations,” Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2010 Vol I.Junior, M. L., & Filho, M. G. (2011). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: literature review and analysis. Production Planning & Control, 23(6), 419-435. doi:10.1080/09537287.2011.561815Kamrad, B., & Ernst, R. (2001). An Economic Model for Evaluating Mining and Manufacturing Ventures with Output Yield Uncertainty. Operations Research, 49(5), 690-699. doi:10.1287/opre.49.5.690.10610Kannegiesser, M., Günther, H.-O., van Beek, P., Grunow, M., & Habla, C. (2008). Value chain management for commodities: a case study from the chemical industry. OR Spectrum, 31(1), 63-93. doi:10.1007/s00291-008-0124-9Karabuk, S. (2008). Production planning under uncertainty in textile manufacturing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(4), 510-520. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602370Khor, C. S., Elkamel, A., & Douglas, P. L. (2008). Stochastic Refinery Planning with Risk Management. Petroleum Science and Technology, 26(14), 1726-1740. doi:10.1080/10916460701287813Kumral, M. (2004). Genetic algorithms for optimization of a mine system under uncertainty. Production Planning & Control, 15(1), 34-41. doi:10.1080/09537280310001654844Lalmazloumian, M., and K. Y. Wong. 2012. “A Review of Modelling Approaches for Supply Chain Planning Under Uncertainty,” Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), 2012 9th International Conference on, pp. 197.Leiras, A., Ribas, G., Hamacher, S., & Elkamel, A. (2013). Tactical and Operational Planning of Multirefinery Networks under Uncertainty: An Iterative Integration Approach. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(25), 8507-8517. doi:10.1021/ie302835nLiao, H., Deng, Q., & Wang, Y. (2017). Optimal Acquisition and Production Policy for End-of-Life Engineering Machinery Recovering in a Joint Manufacturing/Remanufacturing System under Uncertainties in Procurement and Demand. Sustainability, 9(3), 338. doi:10.3390/su9030338Loomba, A. P. S., & Nakashima, K. (2011). Enhancing value in reverse supply chains by sorting before product recovery. Production Planning & Control, 23(2-3), 205-215. doi:10.1080/09537287.2011.591652Macedo, P. B., Alem, D., Santos, M., Junior, M. L., & Moreno, A. (2015). Hybrid manufacturing and remanufacturing lot-sizing problem with stochastic demand, return, and setup costs. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 82(5-8), 1241-1257. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7445-zMartinez, L. 2009. “Why Accounting for Uncertainty and Risk Can Improve Final Decision-Making in Strategic Open Pit Mine Evaluation.” Project Evaluation Conference, Melbourne, pp. 1.Matamoros, M. E. V., & Dimitrakopoulos, R. (2016). Stochastic short-term mine production schedule accounting for fleet allocation, operational considerations and blending restrictions. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(3), 911-921. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.050Meredith, J. (1993). Theory Building through Conceptual Methods. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(5), 3-11. doi:10.1108/01443579310028120Miller, W. A., Leung, L. C., Azhar, T. M., & Sargent, S. (1997). Fuzzy production planning model for fresh tomato packing. International Journal of Production Economics, 53(3), 227-238. doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(97)00110-2Mitra, K. (2009). Multiobjective optimization of an industrial grinding operation under uncertainty. Chemical Engineering Science, 64(23), 5043-5056. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2009.08.012Moghaddam, K. S. (2015). Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation in reverse logistics systems under supply and demand uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(15-16), 6237-6254. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.010Mula, J., Peidro, D., Díaz-Madroñero, M., & Vicens, E. (2010). Mathematical programming models for supply chain production and transport planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 204(3), 377-390. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.008Mula, J., Peidro, D., & Poler, R. (2010). The effectiveness of a fuzzy mathematical programming approach for supply chain production planning with fuzzy demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 136-143. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.007MUNDI, I., ALEMANY, M. M. E., BOZA, A., & POLER, R. (2013). A Model-Driven Decision Support System for the Master Planning of Ceramic Supply Chains with Non-uniformity of Finished Goods. Studies in Informatics and Control, 22(2). doi:10.24846/v22i2y201305Mundi, M. I., Alemany, M. M. E., Poler, R., & Fuertes-Miquel, V. S. (2016). Fuzzy sets to model master production effectively in Make to Stock companies with Lack of Homogeneity in the Product. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 293, 95-112. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2015.06.009Munhoz, J. R., & Morabito, R. (2014). Optimization approaches to support decision making in the production planning of a citrus company: A Brazilian case study. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 107, 45-57. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2014.05.016Olivetti, E. A., Gaustad, G. G., Field, F. R., & Kirchain, R. E. (2011). Increasing Secondary and Renewable Material Use: A Chance Constrained Modeling Approach To Manage Feedstock Quality Variation. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(9), 4118-4126. doi:10.1021/es103486sOsmani, A., & Zhang, J. (2013). Stochastic optimization of a multi-feedstock lignocellulosic-based bioethanol supply chain under multiple uncertainties. Energy, 59, 157-172. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.043Paksoy, T., Pehlivan, N. Y., & Özceylan, E. (2012). Application of fuzzy optimization to a supply chain network design: A case study of an edible vegetable oils manufacturer. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(6), 2762-2776. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.060Pauls-Worm, K. G. J., Hendrix, E. M. T., Haijema, R., & van der Vorst, J. G. A. J. (2014). An MILP approximation for ordering perishable products with non-stationary demand and service level constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, 157, 133-146. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.020Peidro, D., Mula, J., Alemany, M. M. E., & Lario, F.-C. (2012). Fuzzy multi-objective optimisation for master planning in a ceramic supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 3011-3020. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.588267Peidro, D., Mula, J., Jiménez, M., & del Mar Botella, M. (2010). A fuzzy linear programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(1), 65-80. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.11.031Peidro, D., Mula, J., Poler, R., & Lario, F.-C. (2008). Quantitative models for supply chain planning under uncertainty: a review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 43(3-4), 400-420. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1715-yPendharkar, P. C. (1997). A fuzzy linear programming model for production planning in coal mines. Computers & Operations Research, 24(12), 1141-1149. doi:10.1016/s0305-0548(97)00024-5Pendharkar, P. C. (2013). Scatter search based interactive multi-criteria optimization of fuzzy objectives for coal production planning. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(5-6), 1503-1511. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2013.01.001Pieter van Donk, D. (2000). Customer‐driven manufacturing in the food processing industry. British Food Journal, 102(10), 739-747. doi:10.1108/00070700010362176Pitty, S. S., Li, W., Adhitya, A., Srinivasan, R., & Karimi, I. A. (2008). Decision support for integrated refinery supply chains. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32(11), 2767-2786. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.11.006Poles, R., and F. Cheong. 2009. “A System Dynamics Model for Reducing Uncertainty in Remanufacturing Systems,” PACIS 2009–13th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: IT Services in a Global Environment.Pongsakdi, A., Rangsunvigit, P., Siemanond, K., & Bagajewicz, M. J. (2006). Financial risk management in the planning of refinery operations. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(1), 64-86. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.04.007Radulescu, M., G. Zbaganu, and C. Z. Radulescu. 2008. “Crop Planning in the Presence of Production Quotas (Invited Paper),” Computer Modeling and Simulation, 2008.UKSIM 2008. Tenth International Conference on, pp. 549.Rajaram, K., & Karmarkar, U. S. (2002). Product Cycling With Uncertain Yields: Analysis and Application to the Process Industry. Operations Research, 50(4), 680-691. doi:10.1287/opre.50.4.680.2867Ramasesh, R. V., &

Green Technologies for Production Processes

This book focuses on original research works about Green Technologies for Production Processes, including discrete production processes and process production processes, from various aspects that tackle product, process, and system issues in production. The aim is to report the state-of-the-art on relevant research topics and highlight the barriers, challenges, and opportunities we are facing. This book includes 22 research papers and involves energy-saving and waste reduction in production processes, design and manufacturing of green products, low carbon manufacturing and remanufacturing, management and policy for sustainable production, technologies of mitigating CO2 emissions, and other green technologies

Sustainability Analysis and Environmental Decision-Making Using Simulation, Optimization, and Computational Analytics

Effective environmental decision-making is often challenging and complex, where final solutions frequently possess inherently subjective political and socio-economic components. Consequently, complex sustainability applications in the “real world” frequently employ computational decision-making approaches to construct solutions to problems containing numerous quantitative dimensions and considerable sources of uncertainty. This volume includes a number of such applied computational analytics papers that either create new decision-making methods or provide innovative implementations of existing methods for addressing a wide spectrum of sustainability applications, broadly defined. The disparate contributions all emphasize novel approaches of computational analytics as applied to environmental decision-making and sustainability analysis – be this on the side of optimization, simulation, modelling, computational solution procedures, visual analytics, and/or information technologies

Uncertain Multi-Criteria Optimization Problems

Most real-world search and optimization problems naturally involve multiple criteria as objectives. Generally, symmetry, asymmetry, and anti-symmetry are basic characteristics of binary relationships used when modeling optimization problems. Moreover, the notion of symmetry has appeared in many articles about uncertainty theories that are employed in multi-criteria problems. Different solutions may produce trade-offs (conflicting scenarios) among different objectives. A better solution with respect to one objective may compromise other objectives. There are various factors that need to be considered to address the problems in multidisciplinary research, which is critical for the overall sustainability of human development and activity. In this regard, in recent decades, decision-making theory has been the subject of intense research activities due to its wide applications in different areas. The decision-making theory approach has become an important means to provide real-time solutions to uncertainty problems. Theories such as probability theory, fuzzy set theory, type-2 fuzzy set theory, rough set, and uncertainty theory, available in the existing literature, deal with such uncertainties. Nevertheless, the uncertain multi-criteria characteristics in such problems have not yet been explored in depth, and there is much left to be achieved in this direction. Hence, different mathematical models of real-life multi-criteria optimization problems can be developed in various uncertain frameworks with special emphasis on optimization problems

A review of discrete-time optimization models for tactical production planning

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published in International Journal of Production Research on 27 Mar 2014, available online: http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.899721[EN] This study presents a review of optimization models for tactical production planning. The objective of this research is to identify streams and future research directions in this field based on the different classification criteria proposed. The major findings indicate that: (1) the most popular production-planning area is master production scheduling with a big-bucket time-type period; (2) most of the considered limited resources correspond to productive resources and, to a lesser extent, to inventory capacities; (3) the consideration of backlogs, set-up times, parallel machines, overtime capacities and network-type multisite configuration stand out in terms of extensions; (4) the most widely used modelling approach is linear/integer/mixed integer linear programming solved with exact algorithms, such as branch-and-bound, in commercial MIP solvers; (5) CPLEX, C and its variants and Lindo/Lingo are the most popular development tools among solvers, programming languages and modelling languages, respectively; (6) most works perform numerical experiments with random created instances, while a small number of works were validated by real-world data from industrial firms, of which the most popular are sawmills, wood and furniture, automobile and semiconductors and electronic devices.This study has been funded by the Universitat Politècnica de València projects: ‘Material Requirement Planning Fourth Generation (MRPIV)’ (Ref. PAID-05-12) and ‘Quantitative Models for the Design of Socially Responsible Supply Chains under Uncertainty Conditions. Application of Solution Strategies based on Hybrid Metaheuristics’ (PAID-06-12).Díaz-Madroñero Boluda, FM.; Mula, J.; Peidro Payá, D. (2014). A review of discrete-time optimization models for tactical production planning. International Journal of Production Research. 52(17):5171-5205. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.899721S51715205521

Technology 2001: The Second National Technology Transfer Conference and Exposition, volume 2

Proceedings of the workshop are presented. The mission of the conference was to transfer advanced technologies developed by the Federal government, its contractors, and other high-tech organizations to U.S. industries for their use in developing new or improved products and processes. Volume two presents papers on the following topics: materials science, robotics, test and measurement, advanced manufacturing, artificial intelligence, biotechnology, electronics, and software engineering

Decision Support System for Managing Reverse Supply Chain

Reverse logistics are becoming more and more important in the overall Industry area because of the environment and business factors. Planning and implementing a suitable reverse logistics network could bring more profit, customer satisfaction, and an excellent social picture for companies. But, most of the logistics networks are not equipped to handle the return products in reverse channels. Reverse logistics processes and plans rely heavily on reversing the supply chain so that companies can correctly identify and categorize returned products for disposition, an area that offers many opportunities for additional revenue. The science of reverse logistics includes return policy administration, product recall protocols, repairs processing, product repackaging, parts management, recycling, product disposition management, maximizing liquidation values and much more. The focus of this project is to develop a reverse logistics management system/ tools (RLMS). The proposed tools are demonstrated in the following order. First, we identify the risks involved in the reverse supply chain. Survey tool is used to collect data and information required for analysis. The methodologies that are used to identify key risks are the six sigma tools, namely Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve and Control (DMAIC), SWOT analysis, cause and effect, and Risk Mapping. An improved decision-making method using fuzzy set theory for converting linguistic data into numeric risk ratings has been attempted. In this study, the concept of ‘Left and Right dominance approach’(Chen and Liu, 2001) and Method of ‘In center of centroids’ (Thoran et al., 2012a,b) for generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers has been used to quantify the ‘degree of risk’ in terms of crisp ratings. After the analysis, the key risks are identified are categorized, and an action requirement plan suggested for providing guidelines for the managers to manage the risk successfully in the context of reverse logistics. Next, from risk assessment findings, information technology risk presents the highest risk impact on the performance of the reverse logistics, especially lack of use of a decision support system (DSS). We propose a novel multi-attribute decision (MADM) support tool that can categorizes return products and make the best alternative selection of recovery and disposal option using carefully considered criteria using MADM decision making methodologies such as fuzzy MOORA and VIKOR. The project can be applied to all types of industries. Once the returned products are collected and categorized at the retailers/ Points of return (PoR), an optimized network is required to determine the number of reprocessing centres to be opened and the optimized optimum material flow between retailers, reprocessing, recycling and disposal centers at minimum costs. The research develops a mixed integer linear programming model for two scenarios, namely considering direct shipping from retailer/ PoR to the respective reprocessing centers and considering the use of centralized return centers (CRC). The models are solved using LINGO 15 software and excel solver tools respectively. The advantage of the implementation of our solution is that it will help improve performance and reduce time. This benefits the company by having a reduction in their cost due to uncertainties and also contributes to better customer satisfaction. Implementation of these tools at ABZ computer distributing company demonstrates how the reverse logistics management tools can used in order to be beneficial to the organization. The tool is designed to be easily implemented at minimal cost and serves as a valuable tool for personnel faced with significant and costly decisions regarding risk assessment, decision making and network optimization in the reverse supply chain practices

A Decision Tool for Supplier Selection That Takes into Account Power and Performance

Companies select their suppliers to provide required performance while being successful partners. An important aspect of collaboration is the power relationship between the company and its suppliers. Although the significance of power in supplier selection is acknowledged, published work rarely includes assessment of power. An empirical study on selecting suppliers for new product developments in a major European diesel engine manufacturing company, supported by three smaller studies with electronic engineering companies, frames overall questions regarding the importance of incorporating power into supplier selection and how this might be achieved. This research proposes an approach that assesses both performance and power and integrates the assessment results by modelling the relative effects of power and performance. It positions the suppliers into six scenarios (ideal, satisfying, tolerable, unfavourable, risky and tough) which depict to what extent a supplier is ‘suitable’ to work with. A reverse analysis reviews the relationship when several suppliers appear suitable. An assessment method is developed incorporating both subjective and objective data for qualitative and quantitative criteria. It combines two decision making methods, AHP and TOPSIS, with triangular fuzzy numbers. Multiple judgements from several decision makers are synthesised. This method is adapted for performance assessment of single, group and cross-group suppliers. Weights are calculated for the criteria, and combined with calculations of supplier performance against each criterion to provide an overall assessment and supplier profile. Power is quantified against a set of power determinants and power relations (supplier dominance, buyer dominance and balanced) are determined. The effects of supplier perceptions (objective, optimistic and pessimistic) are estimated in the calculation. The proposed approach involves complex calculations and a prototype software tool is developed with graphical interfaces. The tool includes performance criteria and power determinants collected from literature and allows users to define new ones. Application to an agriculture case enables the sustainable performance of suppliers (farmers) to be evaluated and compared