18,603 research outputs found
Compact preference representation and Boolean games
International audienceGame theory is a widely used formal model for studying strategical in- teractions between agents. Boolean games[23, 22] yield a compact rep- resentation of 2-player zero-sum static games with binary preferences: an agent's strategy consists of a truth assignment of the propositional variables she controls, and a player's preferences are expressed by a plain propositional formula. These restrictions (2-player, zero-sum, binary preferences) strongly limit the expressivity of the framework. We first generalize the framework to n-player games which are not necessarily zero-sum. We give simple char- acterizations of Nash equilibria and dominated strategies, and investigate the computational complexity of the associated problems. Then, we relax the last restriction by coupling Boolean games with a representation, namely,CP-nets
Pure Nash Equilibria: Hard and Easy Games
We investigate complexity issues related to pure Nash equilibria of strategic
games. We show that, even in very restrictive settings, determining whether a
game has a pure Nash Equilibrium is NP-hard, while deciding whether a game has
a strong Nash equilibrium is SigmaP2-complete. We then study practically
relevant restrictions that lower the complexity. In particular, we are
interested in quantitative and qualitative restrictions of the way each players
payoff depends on moves of other players. We say that a game has small
neighborhood if the utility function for each player depends only on (the
actions of) a logarithmically small number of other players. The dependency
structure of a game G can be expressed by a graph DG(G) or by a hypergraph
H(G). By relating Nash equilibrium problems to constraint satisfaction problems
(CSPs), we show that if G has small neighborhood and if H(G) has bounded
hypertree width (or if DG(G) has bounded treewidth), then finding pure Nash and
Pareto equilibria is feasible in polynomial time. If the game is graphical,
then these problems are LOGCFL-complete and thus in the class NC2 of highly
parallelizable problems
Boolean Hedonic Games
We study hedonic games with dichotomous preferences. Hedonic games are
cooperative games in which players desire to form coalitions, but only care
about the makeup of the coalitions of which they are members; they are
indifferent about the makeup of other coalitions. The assumption of dichotomous
preferences means that, additionally, each player's preference relation
partitions the set of coalitions of which that player is a member into just two
equivalence classes: satisfactory and unsatisfactory. A player is indifferent
between satisfactory coalitions, and is indifferent between unsatisfactory
coalitions, but strictly prefers any satisfactory coalition over any
unsatisfactory coalition. We develop a succinct representation for such games,
in which each player's preference relation is represented by a propositional
formula. We show how solution concepts for hedonic games with dichotomous
preferences are characterised by propositional formulas.Comment: This paper was orally presented at the Eleventh Conference on Logic
and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (LOFT 2014) in Bergen,
Norway, July 27-30, 201
Cooperation through social influence
We consider a simple and altruistic multiagent system in which the agents are eager to perform a collective task but where their real engagement depends on the willingness to perform the task of other influential agents. We model this scenario by an influence game, a cooperative simple game in which a team (or coalition) of players succeeds if it is able to convince enough agents to participate in the task (to vote in favor of a decision). We take the linear threshold model as the influence model. We show first the expressiveness of influence games showing that they capture the class of simple games. Then we characterize the computational complexity of various problems on influence games, including measures (length and width), values (Shapley-Shubik and Banzhaf) and properties (of teams and players). Finally, we analyze those problems for some particular extremal cases, with respect to the propagation of influence, showing tighter complexity characterizations.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author’s final draft
The Complexity of angel-daemons and game isomorphism
The analysis of the computational aspects of strategic situations is a basic field in Computer
Sciences. Two main topics related to strategic games have been developed. First,
introduction and analysis of a class of games (so called angel/daemon games) designed
to asses web applications, have been considered. Second, the problem of isomorphism
between strategic games has been analysed. Both parts have been separately considered.
Angel-Daemon Games
A service is a computational method that is made available for general use through a
wide area network. The performance of web-services may fluctuate; at times of stress the
performance of some services may be degraded (in extreme cases, to the point of failure).
In this thesis uncertainty profiles and Angel-Daemon games are used to analyse servicebased
behaviours in situations where probabilistic reasoning may not be appropriate.
In such a game, an angel player acts on a bounded number of ¿angelic¿ services
in a beneficial way while a daemon player acts on a bounded number of ¿daemonic¿
services in a negative way. Examples are used to illustrate how game theory can be used
to analyse service-based scenarios in a realistic way that lies between over-optimism and
over-pessimism.
The resilience of an orchestration to service failure has been analysed - here angels and
daemons are used to model services which can fail when placed under stress. The Nash
equilibria of a corresponding Angel-Daemon game may be used to assign a ¿robustness¿
value to an orchestration.
Finally, the complexity of equilibria problems for Angel-Daemon games has been
analysed. It turns out that Angel-Daemon games are, at the best of our knowledge, the
first natural example of zero-sum succinct games.
The fact that deciding the existence of a pure Nash equilibrium or a dominant strategy
for a given player is Sp
2-complete has been proven. Furthermore, computing the value of
an Angel-Daemon game is EXP-complete. Thus, matching the already known complexity
results of the corresponding problems for the generic families of succinctly represented
games with exponential number of actions.
Game Isomorphism
The question of whether two multi-player strategic games are equivalent and the computational
complexity of deciding such a property has been addressed. Three notions
of isomorphisms, strong, weak and local have been considered. Each one of these isomorphisms
preserves a different structure of the game. Strong isomorphism is defined to
preserve the utility functions and Nash equilibria. Weak isomorphism preserves only the
player preference relations and thus pure Nash equilibria. Local isomorphism preserves
preferences defined only on ¿close¿ neighbourhood of strategy profiles.
The problem of the computational complexity of game isomorphism, which depends
on the level of succinctness of the description of the input games but it is independent
of the isomorphism to consider, has been shown. Utilities in games can be given succinctly
by Turing machines, boolean circuits or boolean formulas, or explicitly by tables.
Actions can be given also explicitly or succinctly. When the games are given in general
form, an explicit description of actions and a succinct description of utilities have been
assumed. It is has been established that the game isomorphism problem for general form
games is equivalent to the circuit isomorphism when utilities are described by Turing Machines;
and to the boolean formula isomorphism problem when utilities are described by
formulas. When the game is given in explicit form, it is has been proven that the game
isomorphism problem is equivalent to the graph isomorphism problem.
Finally, an equivalence classes of small games and their graphical representation have
been also examined.Postprint (published version
A Logic-Based Representation for Coalitional Games with Externalities
We consider the issue of representing coalitional games in multiagent systems that exhibit externalities from coalition formation, i.e., systems in which the gain from forming a coalition may be affected by the formation of other co-existing coalitions. Although externalities play a key role in many real-life situations, very little attention has been given to this issue in the multi-agent system literature, especially with regard to the computational aspects involved. To this end, we propose a new representation which, in the spirit of Ieong and Shoham [9], is based on Boolean expressions. The idea behind our representation is to construct much richer expressions that allow for capturing externalities induced upon coalitions. We show that the new representation is fully expressive, at least as concise as the conventional partition function game representation and, for many games, exponentially more concise. We evaluate the efficiency of our new representation by considering the problem of computing the Extended and Generalized Shapley value, a powerful extension of the conventional Shapley value to games with externalities. We show that by using our new representation, the Extended and Generalized Shapley value, which has not been studied in the computer science literature to date, can be computed in time linear in the size of the input
- …