Order in space: a general formalism for spatial reasoning

In this paper we propose a general approach for reasoning in space. The approach is composed of a set of two general constraints to govern the spatial relationships between objects in space, and two rules to propagate relationships between those objects. The approach is based on a novel representation of the topology of the space as a connected set of components using a structure called adjacency matrix which can capture the topology of objects of different complexity in any space dimension. The formalism is used to explain spatial compositions resulting in indefinite and definite relations and it is shown to be applicable to reasoning in the temporal domain. The main contribution of the formalism is that it provides means for constructing composition tables for objects with arbitrary complexity in any space dimension. A new composition table between spatial objects of different types is presented. A major advantage of the method is that reasoning between objects of any complexity can be achieved in a defined limited number of steps. Hence, the incorporation of spatial reasoning mechanisms in spatial information systems becomes possible

A qualitive reasoning approach for improving query results for sketch based queries by topological analysis of spatial aggregation

Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geospatial Technologies.Sketch-based spatial query systems provide an intuitive method of user interaction for spatial databases. These systems must be capable of interpreting user sketches in a way that matches the information that the user intended to provide. One challenge that must be overcome is that humans always simplify the environments they have experienced and this is reflected in the sketches they draw. One such simplification is manifested as aggregation or combination of spatial objects into conceptually or spatially related groups. In this thesis I develop a system that uses reasoning tools of the RCC-8 to evaluate sketchbased queries and provide a method for minimizing the effects of aggregation by determining whether a solution to a query can be expanded if some groups of regions are assumed to be parts of a larger aggregate region. If such a group of regions is found, then this group must be included in the solution. The solution is approximate because the approach taken only verifies that assumed parts of an aggregate are not inconsistent with the configuration of the whole solution. Only cases where the size of the solution equals the size of the query minus one are analysed. It is observed that correctly identifying aggregated regions leads to solutions that are more similar to the original query sketch when the size of every other solution is smaller than the size of the query or when a lower limit is placed on the acceptable size of a solution because the new, expanded or refined solution becomes more complete with respect to the sketch of the query

Qualitative Spatial Reasoning with Holed Regions

The intricacies of real-world and constructed spatial entities call for versatile spatial data types to model complex spatial objects, often characterized by the presence of holes. To date, however, relations of simple, hole-free regions have been the prevailing approaches for spatial qualitative reasoning. Even though such relations may be applied to holed regions, they do not take into consideration the consequences of the existence of the holes, limiting the ability to query and compare more complex spatial configurations. To overcome such limitations, this thesis develops a formal framework for spatial reasoning with topological relations over two-dimensional holed regions, called the Holed Regions Model (HRM), and a similarity evaluation method for comparing relations featuring a multi-holed region, called the Frequency Distribution Method (FDM). The HRM comprises a set of 23 relations between a hole-free and a single-holed region, a set of 152 relations between two single-holed regions, as well as the composition inferences enabled from both sets of relations. The inference results reveal that the fine-grained topological relations over holed regions provide more refined composition results in over 50% of the cases when compared with the results of hole-free regions relations. The HRM also accommodates the relations between a hole-free region and a multi-holed region. Each such relation is called a multi-element relation, as it can be deconstructed into a number of elements—relations between a hole-free and a singleholed region—that is equal to the number of holes, regarding each hole as if it were the only one. FDM facilitates the similarity assessment among multi-element relations. The similarity is evaluated by comparing the frequency summaries of the single-holed region relations. The multi-holed regions of the relations under comparison may differ in the number of holes. In order to assess the similarity of such relations, one multi-holed region is considered as the result of dropping from or adding holes to the other region. Therefore, the effect that two concurrent changes have on the similarity of the relations is evaluated. The first is the change in the topological relation between the regions, and the second is the change in a region’s topology brought upon by elimination or addition of holes. The results from the similarity evaluations examined in this thesis show that the topological placement of the holes in relation to the hole-free region influences relation similarity as much as the relation between the hole-free region and the host of the holes. When the relations under comparison have fewer characteristics in common, the placement of the holes is the determining factor for the similarity rankings among relations. The distilled and more correct composition and similarity evaluation results enabled by the relations over holed regions indicate that spatial reasoning over such regions differs from the prevailing reasoning over hole-free regions. Insights from such results are expected to contribute to the design of future geographic information systems that more adequately process complex spatial phenomena, and are better equipped for advanced database query answering

Qualitative Spatial Reasoning with Holed Regions

The intricacies of real-world and constructed spatial entities call for versatile spatial data types to model complex spatial objects, often characterized by the presence of holes. To date, however, relations of simple, hole-free regions have been the prevailing approaches for spatial qualitative reasoning. Even though such relations may be applied to holed regions, they do not take into consideration the consequences of the existence of the holes, limiting the ability to query and compare more complex spatial configurations. To overcome such limitations, this thesis develops a formal framework for spatial reasoning with topological relations over two-dimensional holed regions, called the Holed Regions Model (HRM), and a similarity evaluation method for comparing relations featuring a multi-holed region, called the Frequency Distribution Method (FDM). The HRM comprises a set of 23 relations between a hole-free and a single-holed region, a set of 152 relations between two single-holed regions, as well as the composition inferences enabled from both sets of relations. The inference results reveal that the fine-grained topological relations over holed regions provide more refined composition results in over 50% of the cases when compared with the results of hole-free regions relations. The HRM also accommodates the relations between a hole-free region and a multi-holed region. Each such relation is called a multi-element relation, as it can be deconstructed into a number of elements—relations between a hole-free and a singleholed region—that is equal to the number of holes, regarding each hole as if it were the only one. FDM facilitates the similarity assessment among multi-element relations. The similarity is evaluated by comparing the frequency summaries of the single-holed region relations. The multi-holed regions of the relations under comparison may differ in the number of holes. In order to assess the similarity of such relations, one multi-holed region is considered as the result of dropping from or adding holes to the other region. Therefore, the effect that two concurrent changes have on the similarity of the relations is evaluated. The first is the change in the topological relation between the regions, and the second is the change in a region’s topology brought upon by elimination or addition of holes. The results from the similarity evaluations examined in this thesis show that the topological placement of the holes in relation to the hole-free region influences relation similarity as much as the relation between the hole-free region and the host of the holes. When the relations under comparison have fewer characteristics in common, the placement of the holes is the determining factor for the similarity rankings among relations. The distilled and more correct composition and similarity evaluation results enabled by the relations over holed regions indicate that spatial reasoning over such regions differs from the prevailing reasoning over hole-free regions. Insights from such results are expected to contribute to the design of future geographic information systems that more adequately process complex spatial phenomena, and are better equipped for advanced database query answering

Spatial refinement as collection order relations

An abstract examination of refinement (and conversely, coarsening) with respect to the involved spatial relations gives rise to formulated order relations between spatial coverings, which are defined as complete-coverage representations composed of regional granules. Coverings, which generalize partitions by allowing granules to overlap, enhance hierarchical geocomputations in several ways. Refinement between spatial coverings has underlying patterns with respect to inclusion—formalized as binary topological relations—between their granules. The patterns are captured by collection relations of inclusion, which are obtained by constraining relevant topological relations with cardinality properties such as uniqueness and totality. Conjoining relevant collection relations of equality and proper inclusion with the overlappedness (non-overlapped or overlapped) of the refining and the refined covering yields collection order relations, which serve as specific types of refinement between spatial coverings. The examination results in 75 collection order relations including seven types of equality and 34 pairs of strict or non-strict types of refinement and coarsening, out of which 19 pairs form partial collection orders

Geographies of Production I: Relationality revisited and the ‘practice shift’ in economic geography

This report considers recent developments and ongoing debates around relational economic geography, and a growing body work that has focused on economic practices as a means to better understand production processes and economic development. In particular it examines the critical reaction to relational thinking within the sub-discipline, and the nature of the debate about the degree to which relational work is - and needs to be - regarded as distinct from more traditional approaches to economic geography. It then considers how relational economic geography has become inflected towards an epistemological and methodological focus on practice. It argues that this engagement with economic practices provides the basis to respond to some of the limitations identified with earlier work, and opens up fruitful new potential for theorizing the nature of agency in the space economy