A Tight Karp-Lipton Collapse Result in Bounded Arithmetic

Cook and Krajíček [9] have obtained the following Karp-Lipton result in bounded arithmetic: if the theory proves , then collapses to , and this collapse is provable in . Here we show the converse implication, thus answering an open question from [9]. We obtain this result by formalizing in a hard/easy argument of Buhrman, Chang, and Fortnow [3]. In addition, we continue the investigation of propositional proof systems using advice, initiated by Cook and Krajíček [9]. In particular, we obtain several optimal and even p-optimal proof systems using advice. We further show that these p-optimal systems are equivalent to natural extensions of Frege systems

Nondeterministic Instance Complexity and Proof Systems with Advice

Motivated by strong Karp-Lipton collapse results in bounded arithmetic, Cook and Krajíček [1] have recently introduced the notion of propositional proof systems with advice. In this paper we investigate the following question: Given a language L , do there exist polynomially bounded proof systems with advice for L ? Depending on the complexity of the underlying language L and the amount and type of the advice used by the proof system, we obtain different characterizations for this problem. In particular, we show that the above question is tightly linked with the question whether L has small nondeterministic instance complexity

One-Way Reversible and Quantum Finite Automata with Advice

We examine the characteristic features of reversible and quantum computations in the presence of supplementary external information, known as advice. In particular, we present a simple, algebraic characterization of languages recognized by one-way reversible finite automata augmented with deterministic advice. With a further elaborate argument, we prove a similar but slightly weaker result for bounded-error one-way quantum finite automata with advice. Immediate applications of those properties lead to containments and separations among various language families when they are assisted by appropriately chosen advice. We further demonstrate the power and limitation of randomized advice and quantum advice when they are given to one-way quantum finite automata.Comment: A4, 10pt, 1 figure, 31 pages. This is a complete version of an extended abstract appeared in the Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language and Automata Theory and Applications (LATA 2012), March 5-9, 2012, A Coruna, Spain, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Vol.7183, pp.526-537, 201

Deterministic Graph Exploration with Advice

We consider the task of graph exploration. An $n$-node graph has unlabeled nodes, and all ports at any node of degree $d$ are arbitrarily numbered $0,\dots, d-1$. A mobile agent has to visit all nodes and stop. The exploration time is the number of edge traversals. We consider the problem of how much knowledge the agent has to have a priori, in order to explore the graph in a given time, using a deterministic algorithm. This a priori information (advice) is provided to the agent by an oracle, in the form of a binary string, whose length is called the size of advice. We consider two types of oracles. The instance oracle knows the entire instance of the exploration problem, i.e., the port-numbered map of the graph and the starting node of the agent in this map. The map oracle knows the port-numbered map of the graph but does not know the starting node of the agent. We first consider exploration in polynomial time, and determine the exact minimum size of advice to achieve it. This size is $\log\log\log n -\Theta(1)$, for both types of oracles. When advice is large, there are two natural time thresholds: $\Theta(n^2)$ for a map oracle, and $\Theta(n)$ for an instance oracle, that can be achieved with sufficiently large advice. We show that, with a map oracle, time $\Theta(n^2)$ cannot be improved in general, regardless of the size of advice. We also show that the smallest size of advice to achieve this time is larger than $n^\delta$, for any $\delta <1/3$. For an instance oracle, advice of size $O(n\log n)$ is enough to achieve time $O(n)$. We show that, with any advice of size $o(n\log n)$, the time of exploration must be at least $n^\epsilon$, for any $\epsilon <2$, and with any advice of size $O(n)$, the time must be $\Omega(n^2)$. We also investigate minimum advice sufficient for fast exploration of hamiltonian graphs