An Integrated FAHP-PROMETHEE Approach For Selecting The Best Flexible Manufacturing System

This paper proposes an integrated approach to the decision-making problem that combines the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) with the purpose of Evaluation of Flexible Manufacturing Systems with a Group Decision Support System (GDSS). The FAHP is used to determine the weights for each criterion and PROMETHEE is applied to get the final ranking and GAIA plane is used to highlight the conflicts, the similarities and independences among the criteria and the DMs. Finally, a numerical example proposed in this paper determines the most appropriate FMS alternative

An Integrated FAHP-PROMETHEE Approach For Selecting The Best Flexible Manufacturing System

This paper proposes an integrated approach to the decision-making problem that combines the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) with the purpose of Evaluation of Flexible Manufacturing Systems with a Group Decision Support System (GDSS). The FAHP is used to determine the weights for each criterion and PROMETHEE is applied to get the final ranking and GAIA plane is used to highlight the conflicts, the similarities and independences among the criteria and the DMs. Finally, a numerical example proposed in this paper determines the most appropriate FMS alternative

Decision support system for project monitoring portfolio

Vallejo Antich, RA. (2010). Decision support system for project monitoring portfolio. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/8632.Archivo delegad

An intelligent group decision-support system and its application for project performance evaluation

Purpose: In any organization there are main goals, with lots of projects designed to achieve these goals. It is important for any organization to determine how much these projects affect the achievement of these goals. The purpose of this paper is to develop a fuzzy multiple attribute-based group decision-support system (FMAGDSS) to evaluate projects' performance in promoting the organization's goals utilizing simple additive weighting (SAW) algorithm and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) algorithm. The proposed FMAGDSS deals with choosing the most appropriate fuzzy ranking algorithm for solving a given fuzzy multi attribute decision making (FMADM) problem with both qualitative and quantitative criteria (attributes), and uncertain judgments of decision makers. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, a FMAGDSS model is designed to determine scores and ranks of every project in promoting the organization's goals. In the first step of FMAGDSS model, all projects are assessed by experts based on evaluation criteria and the organization's goals. The proposed FMAGDSS model will then choose the most appropriate fuzzy ranking method to solve the given FMADM problem. Finally, a sensitivity analysis system is developed to assess the reliability of the decision-making process and provide an opportunity to analyze the impacts of "criteria weights" and "projects" performance' on evaluating projects in achieving the organizations' goals, and to assess the reliability of the decision-making process. In addition, a software prototype has been developed on the basis of FMAGDSS model that can be applied to solve every FMADM problem that needs to rank alternatives according to certain attributes. Findings: The result of this study simplifies and accelerates the evaluation process. The proposed system not only helps organizations to choose the most efficient projects for sustainable development, but also helps them to assess the reliability of the decision-making process, and decrease the uncertainty in final decision caused by uncertain judgment of decision makers. Research limitations/implications: Future studies are suggested to expand this system to evaluate and rank the project proposals. To achieve this goal, the efficiency of the projects in line with organization's goals, should be predicted.Originality/value: This study contributes to the relevant literature by proposing a FMAGDSS model to evaluate projects in promoting organization's goals. The proposed FMAGDSS has ability to choose the most appropriate fuzzy ranking algorithm to solve a given FMADM problem based on the type and the number of attributes and alternatives, considering the least computation and time consumption for ranking alternatives. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Ranking and aggregation-based multiple attributes decision making method for sustainable energy planning

In sustainable energy planning, the selection of a suitable Renewable Energy Sources (RES) for energy supply and evaluation of different RES technologies is a complex decision-making process. This is because there are many conflicting criteria that need to be considered. It becomes more complicated when qualitative data is involved in addition to quantitative data. Previous studies use Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) methods for decision making, which work well with quantitative data but not with qualitative data. There are some MADM methods that can handle with both qualitative and quantitative data but suffer from complex computation burden. It becomes more difficult when more than one MADM method or more than one Decision Maker (DM) need to be considered. Different results will be obtained since different MADM methods or different DMs provide different results. This thesis proposes a new MADM method to overcome the limitations of previous methods. It consists of two parts which are ranking and aggregation techniques. The proposed ranking technique able to deal with quantitative and qualitative data through sorting process according to beneficial and non-beneficial criteria without normalizing the data. Then the proposed aggregation technique able to overcome the problem of different rankings due to different MADM methods or different DMs. The idea is to modify the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations, where a preference index is assigned when comparing two alternatives at one time with respect to their ranking position instead of the criteria. Four case studies are examined to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed ranking method while three case studies are evaluated to demonstrate the applications of the proposed aggregation method. For verification, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient is utilized to determine an agreement of the proposed method with the existing MADM methods. The results show the strength of the proposed method as it yields a correlation coefficient of more than 0.87 in all case studies. The results show an excellent correlation with those obtained by past researchers, which specifically prove the applicability of the proposed method for solving sustainable energy planning decision problem

Finding the most sustainable wind farm sites with a hierarchical outranking decision aiding method

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2590-4This paper considers the problem of finding suitable sites for wind farms in a region of Catalonia (Spain). The evaluation criteria are structured into a hierarchy that identifies several intermediate sub-goals dealing with different points of view. Therefore, the recent ELECTRE-III-H hierarchical multi-criteria analysis method is proposed as a good solution to help decision-makers. This method establishes an order among the set of possible sites for the wind farms for each sub-goal. ELECTRE-III-H aggregates these orders into an overall order using different parameters. The procedure is based on the construction and exploitation of a pairwise outranking relation, following the principles of concordance (i.e. majority rule) and discordance (i.e. respect for the minority opinions). This paper makes two main contributions. First, it contributes to the ELECTRE-III-H method by studying its mathematical properties for the construction of outranking relations. Second, the case study is solved and its results show that we can effectively represent and manage the overall influence of the various criteria on the global result at different levels of the hierarchy. The paper compares different scenarios with strict, normal, and optimistic preference, indifference and veto thresholds. Results show that the best site differs for technical, economic, environmental, and social intermediate criteria. Therefore, the best overall solution changes depending on the preference and veto thresholds fixed at the intermediate level of the hierarchy.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

A contribution to multi-criteria decision making in sustainable energy management based on fuzzy and qualitative reasoning

Energy problems are serious problems caused by limited resources and by human activity such as deforestation, water pollution and various other long-term practices that have environmental impact which produces global warming and climate change. These complex problems usually involve multiple conflicting criteria and multiple decision makers. They require the use of multi-criteria decision-making methods to evaluate different types of variables with respect to sustainability factors addressing conflicting economic, technological, social and environmental aspects. These factors, especially social ones, are not always precise, as imprecision and uncertainty are features of the real world. Therefore, in order to provide useful data from experts' assessments, in this thesis a new multi-criteria decision-making method, as a useful tool in energy planning, is presented. This method supports decision makers in all stages of the decision-making process with uncertain values. An exhaustive literature review on multi-criteria decision analysis and energy planning has been conducted in this thesis. First, the in-depth study of criteria and indicators in the energy planning area is presented. Some well-known multi-criteria decision-making methods and their applications are introduced. In these problems, it is often difficult to obtain exact numerical values for some criteria and indicators. In order to overcome this shortcoming, qualitative reasoning techniques integrated with multi-criteria decision-making methods are capable of representing uncertainty, emulating skilled humans, and handling vague situations. This study proposes a Qualitative TOPSIS (Q-TOPSIS) method, which is a new method for ranking multi-criteria alternatives in group decision making. This new method, in its first step, takes into account qualitative data provided by the decision makers' individual linguistic judgments on the performance of alternatives with respect to each criterion, without any previous aggregation or normalization. Then, in its second step, it incorporates the judgments of decision makers into the modified TOPSIS method to generate a complete ranking of alternatives. Three applications of the proposed method in energy planning are presented. In the first case, the application of the Q-TOPSIS method in a case study of renewable energy alternatives selection is presented. These alternatives are ranked and the proposed method is compared with the modified fuzzy TOPSIS method. A simulation of thirty scenarios using different weights demonstrates that the simplicity and interpretability of Q-TOPSIS provides a general improvement over classic TOPSIS in the case of ordinal assessments. Second, a real case study in a social framework to find an appropriate place for wind farm location in Catalonia is presented. In this case different alternatives were proposed based on social actors' preferences for the location of the desired wind farms in a region between the counties of Urgell and Conca de Barbera. Ranking alternatives concludes that an alternative combining two different initial projects is the best option. Using the proposed method to handle a high degree of conflict in group decision making involving multi-dimensional concepts simplified the experts' measurements. Finally, an application to energy efficiency in buildings using the SEMANCO (Semantic tools for carbon reduction in urban planning) platform is presented in order to assess the energy performance and CO2 emissions of projected urban plans at the city level in Manresa. In this case study, an application of Q-TOPSIS helps decision makers to rank different projects with respect to multi-granular quantitative and qualitative criteria and offers outputs which are very easy for decision makers to understand.Los problemas de la energía son problemas graves causados por los recursos limitados y las actividades humanas como la deforestación, contaminación del agua y otras prácticas con efectos a largo plazo. Estas prácticas tienen un gran impacto ambiental y dan lugar al efecto invernadero, que ocasiona el calentamiento global y cambio climático. Los problemas complejos implican generalmente múltiples criterios contradictorios y múltiples decisores. Requieren el uso de métodos toma de decisiones multicriterio para evaluar diferentes tipos de variables con respecto a factores de sostenibilidad, incluyendo aspectos conflictivos económicos, tecnológicos, sociales y ambientales. Estos factores, especialmente los sociales, no siempre son precisos, dado que la imprecisión y la incertidumbre son características del mundo real. Por lo tanto, con el fin de proporcionar datos útiles a partir de evaluaciones de expertos, en esta tesis se presenta un nuevo método de toma de decisiones multicriterio, como una herramienta útil en la planificación de la energía. Este método permite a los decisores utilizar valores con imprecisión en todas las etapas de la toma de decisiones. En esta tesis se ha realizado una revisión exhaustiva de la literatura sobre el análisis de la decisión multicriterio y la planificación de la energía. En primer lugar, se presenta el estudio a fondo de los criterios e indicadores en el área de planificación de la energía. Se introducen algunos de los métodos más conocidos de toma de decisiones multicriterio y sus aplicaciones. En estos problemas, a menudo es difícil obtener valores numéricos exactos para algunos criterios e indicadores. Para superar esta deficiencia, la integración de técnicas de razonamiento cualitativo en métodos de decisión multicriterio permite representar la incertidumbre, emular el trabajo de seres humanos cualificados y manejar situaciones vagas. Este estudio propone un método TOPSIS cualitativo (Q-TOPSIS), que es un nuevo método de ranking de alternativas para la toma de decisiones multicriterio en grupo. Este nuevo método, toma en cuenta los datos cualitativos proporcionados por los juicios lingüísticos individuales de los decisores sin necesidad de previa agregación o normalización. Se presentan tres aplicaciones del método propuesto en la planificación de la energía. En el primer caso, se presenta la aplicación del método Q-TOPSIS en un caso práctico de selección de alternativas de energías renovables. Una simulación de treinta escenarios utilizando diferentes pesos demuestra que la simplicidad y la interpretabilidad de Q-TOPSIS proporcionan una mejora general del TOPSIS clásico en el caso de evaluaciones ordinales. En segundo lugar, se presenta un estudio de un caso real para decidir el lugar apropiado para ubicación de parques eólicos en una zona de Cataluña. En este caso, las distintas alternativas fueron propuestas en base a las preferencias de los actores sociales sobre la ubicación de los parques eólicos deseados en una región entre los condados del Urgell y la Conca de Barberà. El ranking obtenido de las alternativas concluye que la mejor opción es una alternativa que combina dos proyectos iniciales diferentes. La utilización del método propuesto para la decisión en grupo permite manejar un alto grado de conflicto entre conceptos multidimensionales y simplifica las mediciones de los expertos. Por último, se presenta una aplicación a la eficiencia de la energía en edificios mediante la plataforma SEMANCO (Herramientas semánticas para la reducción de carbono en la planificación urbana) para evaluar la eficiencia de la energía y las emisiones de CO2 de planes urbanísticos proyectados en la ciudad de Manresa. En este caso estudio, la aplicación de Q-TOPSIS ayuda a los decisores a realizar el ranking de los diferentes proyectos con respecto a criterios cuantitativos y cualitativos multi-granulares y ofrece resultados fácilmente inteligibles para los decisores

Multiple Criteria Analysis of the Life Cycle of the Built Environment

To design and achieve effective the life cycle of the built environment a complex analysis of its stages as well as stakeholders, their aims and potentialities is needed. The effect of micro, meso and macro environmental factors should also be taken into account. A thorough built environment’s life cycle (brief; design; raw material extraction, transport and processing; construction materials production and distribution; construction; use, repair and maintenance; demolition; disposal, reuse, or recycling) analysis is quite difficult to undertake, because a buildings and its environment are a complex system (technical, technological, economical, social, cultural, ecological, etc.), where all sub-systems influence the total efficiency performance and where the interdependence between sub-systems play a significant role. Various stakeholders (clients, users, architects, designers, utilities engineers, economists, contractors, maintenance engineers, built environment material manufacturers, suppliers, contractors, finansing institutions, local government, state and state institutions) are involved in the life cycle of the built environment, trying to satisfy their needs and affecting its efficiency. The level of the efficiency of the life cycle of the built environment depends on a number of variables, at three levels: micro, meso and macro level. The problem is how to define an efficient built environment life cycle when a lot of various parties are involved, the alternative project versions come to hundreds thousand and the efficiency changes with the alterations in the environment conditions and the constituent parts of the process in question. Moreover, the realization of some objectives seems more rational from the economic perspective thought from the other perspectives they have various significance. Therefore, it is considered that the efficiency of a built environment life cycle depends on the rationality of its stages as well as on the ability to satisfy the needs of the stakeholders and the rational character of environment conditions. Formalized presentation of the research shows how changes in the environment and the extent to which the goals pursued by various stakeholders are satisfied cause corresponding changes in the value and utility degree of a built environment life cycle. With this in mind, it is possible to solve the problem of optimization concerning satisfaction of the needs at reasonable expenditures. This requires the analysis of the built environment life cycle versions allowing to find an optimal combination of goals pursued and finances available. References to the most modern world scientific literature sources are presented in the monograph. The monograph is prepared for the researchers, MSc and PhD students of civil engineering, construction management and real estate development. The book may be useful for other researchers, MSc and PhD students of economics, management and other specialities. The edition was recommended by the Committe of Studies of VGTU Faculty of Civil Engineering. The publication of monograph was funded by European Social Fund according to project No. VP1-2.2-ŠMM-07-K-02-060 Development and Implementation of Joint Master’s Study Programme “Sustainable Development of the Built Environment”.The edition was recommended by the Committe of Studies of VGTU Faculty of Civil Engineering. The publication of monograph was funded by European Social Fund according to project No. VP1-2.2-ŠMM-07-K-02-060 Development and Implementation of Joint Master’s Study Programme “Sustainable Development of the Built Environment”