Customer application protocol for data transfer between embedded processor and microcontroller systems

This paper develops a new customer application protocol (CAP) to improve the efficiency of transferring data between embedded processor and microcontroller systems. The established protocol is characterized by its fidelity and simplicity for using a small header to control and monitor the data flow between the two systems. This is achieved by constructing an embedded processor system with an Ethernet intellectual property (IP) core featured by lightweight IP (lwIP) to settle a connection with a microcontroller device. The embedded system is configured on spartan6E FPGAs slice. The system performance is tested by transferring audio samples and displaying them on chipscope media. The performance test of the designed embedded system with the developed customer application protocol showed fast, efficient and high precision data exchange between the processor and microcontroller systems

Virtual enterprise collaborative processes monitoring through a project business approach

In order to design a system for managing performance in collaborative project-based enterprises, it is necessary to undertake real-time monitoring of its business processes and activities. This paper presents a systematic approach to project business process monitoring (BPM) and identifies the key aspects of virtual enterprise (VE) process evaluation. A framework for VE BPM is presented with special emphasis in linking interest groups to the development of their targets, information and knowledge sharing. The proposed model defines the exclusive performance metrics, which are needed during BPM. This interdisciplinary study examines BPM through peer-to-peer information exchange in the VE domain, which is currently a research gap. The fundamental metrics to define business process performance monitoring are elaborated in the research reported in this paper. The identified performance metrics can be used to measure the overall performances for both a project business and VE. A reference architecture is also highlighted with a case example with the objective to measure the performance in a project business VE. An overall definition of collaborative BPM and performance management systems is also presented accordingly. Future research directions are identified regarding the nature of collaboration in a project business VE and the characteristics of performance indicators to support it.fi=vertaisarvioitu|en=peerReviewed

Data Normalization in Decision Making Processes

With the fast-growing of data-rich systems, dealing with complex decision problems is unavoidable. Normalization is a crucial step in most multi criteria decision making (MCDM) models, to produce comparable and dimensionless data from heterogeneous data. Further, MCDM requires data to be numerical and comparable to be aggregated into a single score per alternative, thus providing their ranking. Several normalization techniques are available, but their performance depends on a number of characteristics of the problem at hand i.e., different normalization techniques may provide different rankings for alternatives. Therefore, it is a challenge to select a suitable normalization technique to represent an appropriate mapping from source data to a common scale. There are some attempts in the literature to address the subject of normalization in MCDM, but there is still a lack of assessment frameworks for evaluating normalization techniques. Hence, the main contribution and objective of this study is to develop an assessment framework for analysing the effects of normalization techniques on ranking of alternatives in MCDM methods and recommend the most appropriate technique for specific decision problems. The proposed assessment framework consists of four steps: (i) determining data types; (ii) chose potential candidate normalization techniques; (iii) analysis and evaluation of techniques; and (iv) selection of the best normalization technique. To validate the efficiency and robustness of the proposed framework, six normalization techniques (Max, Max-Min, Sum, Vector, Logarithmic, and Fuzzification) are selected from linear, semi-linear, and non-linear categories, and tested with four well known MCDM methods (TOPSIS, SAW, AHP, and ELECTRE), from scoring, comparative, and ranking methods. Designing the proposed assessment framework led to a conceptual model allowing an automatic decision-making process, besides recommending the most appropriate normalization technique for MCDM problems. Furthermore, the role of normalization techniques for dynamic multi criteria decision making (DMCDM) in collaborative networks is explored, specifically related to problems of selection of suppliers, business partners, resources, etc. To validate and test the utility and applicability of the assessment framework, a number of case studies are discussed and benchmarking and testimonies from experts are used. Also, an evaluation by the research community of the work developed is presented. The validation process demonstrated that the proposed assessment framework increases the accuracy of results in MCDM decision problems.Com o rápido crescimento dos sistemas ricos em dados, lidar com problemas de decisão complexos é inevitável. A normalização é uma etapa crucial na maioria dos modelos de tomada de decisão multicritério (MCDM), para produzir dados comparáveis e adimensionais a partir de dados heterogéneos, porque os dados precisam ser numéricos e comparáveis para serem agregados em uma única pontuação por alternativa. Como tal, várias técnicas de normalização estão disponíveis, mas o seu desempenho depende de uma série de características do problema em questão, ou seja, diferentes técnicas de normalização podem resultar em diferentes classificações para as alternativas. Portanto, é um desafio selecionar uma técnica de normalização adequada para representar o mapeamento dos dados de origem para uma escala comum. Existem algumas tentativas na literatura de abordar o assunto da normalização, mas ainda há uma falta de estrutura de avaliação para avaliar as técnicas de normalização sobre qual técnica é mais apropriada para os métodos MCDM.Assim, a principal contribuição e objetivo deste estudo são desenvolver uma ferramenta de avaliação para analisar os efeitos das técnicas de normalização na seriação de alternativas em métodos MCDM e recomendar a técnica mais adequada para problemas de decisão específicos. A estrutura de avaliação da ferramenta proposta consiste em quatro etapas: (i) determinar os tipos de dados, (ii) selecionar potenciais técnicas de normalização, (iii) análise e avaliação de técnicas em problemas de MCDM, e (iv) recomendação da melhor técnica para o problema de decisão. Para validar a eficácia e robustez da ferramenta proposta, seis técnicas de normalização (Max, Max-Min, Sum, Vector, Logarithmic e Fuzzification) foram selecionadas - das categorias lineares, semilineares e não lineares- e quatro conhecidos métodos de MCDM foram escolhidos (TOPSIS, SAW, AHP e ELECTRE). O desenho da ferramenta de avaliação proposta levou ao modelo conceptual que forneceu um processo automático de tomada de decisão, além de recomendar a técnica de normalização mais adequada para problemas de decisão. Além disso, é explorado o papel das técnicas de normalização para tomada de decisão multicritério dinâmica (DMCDM) em redes colaborativas, especificamente relacionadas com problemas de seleção de fornecedores, parceiros de negócios, recursos, etc. Para validar e testar a utilidade e aplicabilidade da ferramenta de avaliação, uma série de casos de estudo são discutidos e benchmarking e testemunhos de especialistas são usados. Além disso, uma avaliação do trabalho desenvolvido pela comunidade de investigação também é apresentada. Esta validação demonstrou que a ferramenta proposta aumenta a precisão dos resultados em problemas de decisão multicritério