2,254 research outputs found

    ν•˜μ²œ μ˜€μ—Όλ¬Όμ§ˆ ν˜Όν•© 해석을 μœ„ν•œ μ €μž₯λŒ€ λͺ¨ν˜•μ˜ λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜ 산정법 및 κ²½ν—˜μ‹ 개발

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :κ³΅κ³ΌλŒ€ν•™ κ±΄μ„€ν™˜κ²½κ³΅ν•™λΆ€,2019. 8. μ„œμΌμ›.Analyses of solute transport and retention mechanism are essential to manage water quality and river ecosystem. As reported by tracer injection studies that have been conducted to identify solute transport mechanism, concentration curves measured in natural stream have steep rising and long tail parts. This phenomenon is due to solute exchange process between transient storage zones and the main river stream. The transient storage model (TSM) is one of the most widely used models for describing solute transport in natural stream, taking transient storage exchange process into consideration. In order to use this model, calibration of four TSM parameters is necessary. Inverse modelling using measured breakthrough curves (BTCs) from tracer injection test is general method for TSM parameter calibration. However, it is not feasible to carry out performing tracer injection tests, for every parameter calibration. For that reasons, empirical formulae with hydraulic data, which is comparatively easier to obtain, have been proposed for the purpose of parameter estimation. This study presents two methods for TSM parameter estimation. At first, inverse modelling method employing global optimization framework Shuffled Complex-Self Adaptive Hybrid EvoLution (SC-SAHEL), that incorporating famous evolutionary algorithms in water resource management field, was suggested. Second, TSM parameter empirical equations were derived adopting Multigene Genetic Programming (MGGP) based symbolic regression library GPTIPS and using Principal Components Regression (PCR). In terms of general performance, equations of this study were superior to published empirical equations.ν•˜μ²œμ˜ μˆ˜μ§ˆμ„ κ΄€λ¦¬ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” μžμ—°ν•˜μ²œμ—μ„œ μœ μž…λœ 물질이 μ΄μ†‘λ˜κ³  μ§€μ²΄λ˜λŠ” λ©”μΉ΄λ‹ˆμ¦˜μ„ 규λͺ…ν•˜κ³  μ΄ν•΄ν•˜λŠ” 것이 ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€. ν•˜μ²œμ—μ„œμ˜ 물질 ν˜Όν•©μ„ μ΄ν•΄ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ μˆ˜ν–‰λœ μΆ”μ μž μ‹€ν—˜ 연ꡬ듀에 λ”°λ₯΄λ©΄ μžμ—°ν•˜μ²œμ—μ„œ κ³„μΈ‘λ˜λŠ” λ†λ„κ³‘μ„ μ—μ„œλŠ” κ°€νŒŒλ₯Έ μƒμŠΉλΆ€μ™€ κΈ΄ 꼬리기 κ΄€μΈ‘λ˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ μ•Œλ €μ‘Œλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ ν˜„μƒμ€ 주둜 물질이 흐λ₯΄λŠ” λ³Έλ₯˜λŒ€μ™€ μž μ‹œ 물질이 ν¬νšλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€κ°€ μž¬λ°©μΆœλ˜λŠ” λ³Έλ₯˜λŒ€μ™€ μ €μž₯λŒ€ κ°„μ˜ λ¬Όμ§ˆκ΅ν™˜ 효과 λ•Œλ¬Έμ— μΌμ–΄λ‚œλ‹€κ³  μ•Œλ €μ Έ μžˆλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μ €μž₯λŒ€ λ¬Όμ§ˆκ΅ν™˜ 효과λ₯Ό λͺ¨μ‚¬ν•˜λŠ” μ €μž₯λŒ€λͺ¨ν˜• 쀑 Transient Storage zone Model (TSM)은 κ°€μž₯ κ΄‘λ²”μœ„ν•˜κ²Œ μ΄μš©λ˜λŠ” λͺ¨ν˜•μœΌλ‘œ, 이λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„  λ„€ κ°€μ§€μ˜ μ €μž₯λŒ€ λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜λ₯Ό λ³΄μ •ν•˜μ—¬μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€. λ„€ 가지 μ €μž₯λŒ€ λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜λ₯Ό κ²°μ •ν•˜λŠ” λ°©λ²•μœΌλ‘œλŠ” 일반적으둜 ν˜„μž₯μ‹€ν—˜μ—μ„œ μΈ‘μ •λœ 농도곑선을 μ΄μš©ν•œ μ—­μ‚°λͺ¨ν˜•μ΄ μ΄μš©λœλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜κ°€ ν•„μš”ν•  λ•Œλ§ˆλ‹€ μΆ”μ μžμ‹€ν—˜μ„ μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜μ—¬ μ—­μ‚°λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜λŠ” 것은 ν˜„μ‹€μ μœΌλ‘œ λΆˆκ°€λŠ₯ν•œ κ²½μš°κ°€ μžˆμ–΄ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κ²½μš°μ—λŠ” 비ꡐ적 μ·¨λ“ν•˜κΈ° μ‰¬μš΄ μˆ˜λ¦¬μ§€ν˜•ν•™μ  μΈμžλ“€μ„ μ΄μš©ν•΄ λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜λ₯Ό μ‚°μ •ν•˜λŠ” 방법이 이용될 수 μžˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” TSM λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜λ₯Ό κ²°μ •ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ 두 가지 방법을 μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 첫 번째둜, μ „μ—­ μ΅œμ ν™” ν”„λ ˆμž„μ›Œν¬μΈ Shuffled Complex-Self Adaptive Hybrid EvoLution (SC-SAHEL)을 μ΄μš©ν•œ μ—­μ‚°λͺ¨ν˜• 기반 TSM λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜ μ‚°μ • ν”„λ ˆμž„μ›Œν¬λ₯Ό μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έλ‘œλŠ” κΈ°ν˜ΈνšŒκ·€λ²• 라이브러리인 GPTIPSλ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•œ λ‹€μ€‘μœ μ „μž μœ μ „ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž˜λ°(Multigene Genetic Programming, MGGP) κ³Ό μ£Όμ„±λΆ„νšŒκ·€λ²•(Principal Components Regression, PCR)을 톡해 λ„€ 가지 λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜ λ³„λ‘œ 각 두 κ°œμ”©μ˜ κ²½ν—˜μ‹μ΄ κ°œλ°œλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 개발된 κ²½ν—˜μ‹λ“€μ˜ μ„±λŠ₯평가 κ²°κ³Ό, μ„ ν–‰ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ μ œμ‹œλœ μ €μž₯λŒ€ λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜ 식에 λΉ„ν•΄ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ μ œμ‹œλœ 방법이 λŒ€μ²΄μ μœΌλ‘œ μš°μˆ˜ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 결과적으둜 λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 뢄석을 톡해 μ‹€λ¬΄μ μœΌλ‘œ ν™œμš© κ°€λŠ₯ν•œ TSM λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜ μ‚°μ • ν”„λ ˆμž„μ›Œν¬μ™€ κ²½ν—˜μ‹λ“€μ΄ μ œμ‹œλ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 이 방법듀은 μΆ”μ μž μ‹€ν—˜ 자료의 μœ λ¬΄μ— 따라 TSM의 λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜ 결정에 μœ μš©ν•˜κ²Œ μ‚¬μš©λ  κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ κΈ°λŒ€λœλ‹€.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Necessity and Background of Research 1 1.2 Objectives 12 Chapter 2. Theoretical Background 15 2.1 Transient Storage Model 15 2.1.1. Mechanisms of Transient Storage 15 2.1.2. Models Accounting for Transient Storage 21 2.1.2.1 The one Zone Transient Storage Model (1Z-TSM) 24 2.1.2.2 The two Zone Transient Storage Model (2Z-TSM) 25 2.1.2.3 The Continuous Time Random Walk Approach (CTRW) 26 2.1.2.4 The Modified Advection Dispersion Model (MADE) 27 2.1.2.5 The Fractional Advection Dispersion Equation Model (FADE) 28 2.1.2.6 The Multirate Mass Transfer Model (MRMT) 29 2.1.2.7 The Advective Storage Path Model (ASP) 30 2.1.2.8 The Solute Transport in Rivers Model (STIR) 31 2.1.2.9 The Aggregate Dead Zone Model (ADZ) 34 2.2 Empirical Equations for Predicting Transient Storage Model Parameters 39 2.3 Parameter Estimation 47 2.3.1. The SC-SAHEL Framework 50 2.3.1.1 Modified Competitive Complex Evolution (MCCE) 52 2.3.1.2 Modified Frog Leaping (MFL) 52 2.3.1.3 Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) 53 2.3.1.4 Modified Differential Evolution (DE) 53 2.4 Regression Method 54 2.4.1. The Multi-Gene Genetic Programming (MGGP) 56 2.4.1.1 The Simple Genetic Programming 56 2.4.1.2 Scaled Symbolic Regression via Multi-Gene Genetic Programming 57 2.4.2. Evolutionary Polynomial Regression (EPR) 61 2.4.2.1 Main Flow of EPR Procedure 62 Chapter 3. Model Development 66 3.1 Numerical Model 66 3.1.1. Model Validation 69 3.2 Merger of TSM-SC-SAHEL 73 3.3 Further assessments for the parameter estimation framework 76 3.3.1. Tracer Test Description 76 3.3.2. Grid Independency of Estimation 81 3.3.3. Choice of Optimization Setting 85 Chapter 4. Development of Formulae for Predicting TSM Parameter 91 4.1 Dimensional Analysis 91 4.2 Data Collection via Meta Analysis 95 4.3 Formulae Development 106 Chapter 5. Result and Discussion 110 5.1 Model Performances 110 5.2 Sensitivity Analysis 118 5.3 In-stream Application of Empirical Equations 130 Chapter 6. Conclusion 140 References 144 Appendix. I. The mean, minimum, and maximum values of the model fitness value and number of evolution using the SC-SAHEL with single-EA and multi-EA 159 Appendix. II. Used dimensionless datasets for development of empirical equations 161 ꡭ문초둝 165Maste

    A review of artificial intelligence applications in shallow foundations

    Get PDF
    Geotechnical engineering deals with materials (e.g. soil and rock) that, by their very nature, exhibit varied and uncertain behavior because of the imprecise physical processes associated with the formation of these materials. Modeling the behavior of such materials in geotechnical engineering applications is complex and sometimes beyond the ability of most traditional forms of physically based engineering methods. Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more popular and particularly amenable to modeling the complex behavior of most geotechnical engineering applications, including foundations, because it has demonstrated superior predictive ability compared to traditional methods. The main aim of this paper is to review the AI applications in shallow foundations and present the salient features associated with the AI modeling development. The paper also discusses the strengths and limitations of AI techniques compared to other modeling approaches

    OPTIMAL WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR URBAN WATERSHEDS USING MACRO-LEVEL SIMULATION MODELS LINKED WITH EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS

    Get PDF
    Urban watershed management poses a very challenging problem due to the varioussources of pollution and there is a need to develop optimal management models that canfacilitate the process of identifying optimal water quality management strategies. Ascreening level, comprehensive, and integrated computational methodology is developedfor the management of point and non-point sources of pollution in urban watersheds. Themethodology is based on linking macro-level water quality simulation models withefficient nonlinear constrained optimization methods for urban watershed management.The use of macro-level simulation models in lieu of the traditional and complexdeductive simulation models is investigated in the optimal management framework forurban watersheds. Two different types of macro-level simulation models are investigatedfor application to watershed pollution problems namely explicit inductive models andsimplified deductive models. Three different types of inductive modeling techniques areused to develop macro-level simulation models ranging from simple regression methodsto more complex and nonlinear methods such as artificial neural networks and geneticfunctions. A new genetic algorithm (GA) based technique of inductive modelconstruction called Fixed Functional Set Genetic Algorithm (FFSGA) is developed andused in the development of macro-level simulation models. A novel simplified deductivemodel approach is developed for modeling the response of dissolved oxygen in urbanstreams impaired by point and non-point sources of pollution. The utility of this inverseloading model in an optimal management framework for urban watersheds isinvestigated.In the context of the optimization methods, the research investigated the use of parallelmethods of optimization for use in the optimal management formulation. These includedan evolutionary computing method called genetic optimization and a modified version ofthe direct search method of optimization called the Shuffled Box Complex method ofconstrained optimization. The resulting optimal management model obtained by linkingmacro-level simulation models with efficient optimization models is capable ofidentifying optimal management strategies for an urban watershed to satisfy waterquality and economic related objectives. Finally, the optimal management model isapplied to a real world urban watershed to evaluate management strategies for waterquality management leading to the selection of near-optimal strategies

    Development and Applications of Self-learning Simulation in Finite Element Analysis

    Get PDF
    Numerical analysis such as the finite element analysis (FEA) have been widely used to solve many engineering problems. Constitutive modelling is an important component of any numerical analysis and is used to describe the material behaviour. The accuracy and reliability of numerical analysis is greatly reliant on the constitutive model that is integrated in the finite element code. In recent years, data mining techniques such as artificial neural network (ANN), genetic programming (GP) and evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) have been employed as alternative approach to the conventional constitutive modelling. In particular, EPR offers great advantages over other data mining techniques. However, these techniques require a large database to learn and extract the material behaviour. On the other hand, the link between laboratory or field tests and numerical analysis is still weak and more investigation is needed to improve the way that they matched each other. Training a data mining technique within the self-learning simulation framework is currently considered as one of the solutions that can be utilised to accurately represent the actual material behaviour. In this thesis an EPR based machine learning technique is utilised in the heart of the self-learning framework with an automation process which is coded in MATLAB environment. The methodology is applied to simulate different material behaviour in a number of structural and geotechnical applications. Two training strategies are used to train the EPR in the developed framework, total stress-strain and incremental stress-strain strategies. The results show that integrating EPR based models in the framework allows to learn the material response during the self-learning process and provide accurate predictions to the actual behaviour. Moreover, for the first time, the behaviour of a complex material, frozen soil, is modelled based on the EPR approach. The results of the EPR model predictions are compared with the actual data and it is shown that the proposed model can capture and reproduce the behaviour of the frozen soil with a very high accuracy. The developed EPR based self-learning methodology presents a unified approach to material modelling that can also help the user to gain a deeper insight into the behaviour of the materials. The methodology is generic and can be extended to modelling different engineering materials

    Symbolic Regression Approaches for the Direct Calculation of Pipe Diameter

    Get PDF
    This study provides novel and accurate symbolic regression-based solutions for the calculation of pipe diameter when flow rate and pressure drop (head loss) are known, together with the length of the pipe, absolute inner roughness of the pipe, and kinematic viscosity of the fluid. PySR and Eureqa, free and open-source symbolic regression tools, are used for discovering simple and accurate approximate formulas. Three approaches are used: (1) brute force of computing power, which provides results based on raw input data; (2) an improved method where input parameters are transformed through the Lambert W-function; (3) a method where the results are based on inputs and the Colebrook equation transformed through new suitable dimensionless groups. The discovered models were simplified by the WolframAlpha simplify tool and/or the equivalent Matlab Symbolic toolbox. Novel models make iterative calculus redundant; they are simple for computer coding while the relative error remains lower compared with the solution through nomograms. The symbolic-regression solutions discovered by brute force computing power discard the kinematic viscosity of the fluid as an input parameter, implying that it has the least influence

    Oil price forecasting using gene expression programming and artificial neural networks

    Get PDF
    This study aims to forecast oil prices using evolutionary techniques such as gene expression programming (GEP) and artificial neural network (NN) models to predict oil prices over the period from January 2, 1986 to June 12, 2012. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models are employed to benchmark evolutionary models. The results reveal that the GEP technique outperforms traditional statistical techniques in predicting oil prices. Further, the GEP model outperforms the NN and the ARIMA models in terms of the mean squared error, the root mean squared error and the mean absolute error. Finally, the GEP model also has the highest explanatory power as measured by the R-squared statistic. The results of this study have important implications for both theory and practice

    μ•”μ„μ˜ 기계꡴착 μ„±λŠ₯ μ˜ˆμΈ‘μ„ μœ„ν•œ μœ μ „μžλ°œν˜„ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž˜λ°κ³Ό μž…μžκ΅°μ§‘μ΅œμ ν™”μ— κΈ°μ΄ˆν•œ ν˜Όν•©ν˜• 진화 계산 μ•Œκ³ λ¦¬μ¦˜

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(박사) -- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅λŒ€ν•™μ› : κ³΅κ³ΌλŒ€ν•™ μ—λ„ˆμ§€μ‹œμŠ€ν…œκ³΅ν•™λΆ€, 2022. 8. Seokwon Jeon.μ•”λ°˜ 기계 κ΅΄μ°© 기술의 λ°œμ „μœΌλ‘œ 기쑴의 발파 곡법이 μ•„λ‹Œ 기계 ꡴착을 μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ§€ν•˜ 곡간을 κ±΄μ„€ν•˜λŠ” 사둀가 μ¦κ°€ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 기계식 암석 κ΅΄μ°© λΆ„μ•Όμ—λŠ” λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ λ³€μˆ˜ κ°„μ˜ 관계에 λŒ€ν•œ μƒλ‹Ήν•œ 수의 결정둠적 해법이 μžˆμ§€λ§Œ, λ§Žμ€ 경우 λ³€μˆ˜ κ°„μ˜ 결정적 관계λ₯Ό μ„€μ •ν•˜λŠ” 것은 극히 μ–΄λ ΅λ‹€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό λ§Žμ€ μ—°κ΅¬μžλ“€μ΄ νšŒκ·€ 뢄석을 μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 관계λ₯Ό μ„€λͺ…ν•˜λ €κ³  ν•œλ‹€. 암석 νŒŒμ‡„ ν˜„μƒμ˜ λ³΅μž‘ν•˜κ³  λΉ„μ„ ν˜•μ μΈ νŠΉμ„±μœΌλ‘œ 인해 기쑴의 ν•¨μˆ˜ ν”ΌνŒ… κΈ°λ²•μ—μ„œ μš”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” 톡계 데이터에 λΆ€ν•©ν•˜λŠ” λΉ„μ„ ν˜• ν•¨μˆ˜μ˜ ν˜•νƒœλ₯Ό ν•©λ¦¬μ μœΌλ‘œ κ²°μ •ν•˜κΈ°κ°€ 쉽지 μ•Šλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 기계 κ΅΄μ°© λΆ„μ•Όμ˜ λ¬Έμ œμ μ„ ν•΄κ²°ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ μœ μ „μž λ°œν˜„ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž˜λ°(GEP)κ³Ό μž…μž ꡰ집 μ΅œμ ν™” (PSO)의 쑰합을 데이터 뢄석에 μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. GEP 및 PSOλŠ” 진화적 계산 기술이며 GEP-PSO μ•Œκ³ λ¦¬μ¦˜μ„ 톡해 데이터 μ„ΈνŠΈμ— λ§žλŠ” λΉ„μ„ ν˜• ν•¨μˆ˜μ˜ ν˜•μ‹κ³Ό μƒμˆ˜λ₯Ό μžλ™μœΌλ‘œ 찾을 수 μžˆλ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” μž„νŒ©νŠΈ 해머에 λŒ€ν•œ μ„±λŠ₯ 예츑 λͺ¨λΈ, 픽컀터에 ν•„μš”ν•œ λΉ„μ—λ„ˆμ§€ 예츑 λͺ¨λΈ, 픽컀터에 μž‘μš©ν•˜λŠ” μ ˆμ‚­λ ₯, 수직λ ₯, 횑방ν–₯λ ₯ 예츑 λͺ¨λΈμ„ κ°œλ°œν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ μ•Œκ³ λ¦¬μ¦˜μ„ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λͺ¨λ“  κ²½μš°μ— GEP-PSO μ•Œκ³ λ¦¬μ¦˜μ„ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μƒμ„±λœ κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” 닀쀑 μ„ ν˜• νšŒκ·€μ— μ˜ν•΄ μƒμ„±λœ 결과와 λΉ„κ΅ν•˜μ—¬ μƒλ‹Ήνžˆ 높은 예츑 정확도λ₯Ό 생성함을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ°€λŠ₯ν•œ 경우 GEP-PSO μ•Œκ³ λ¦¬μ¦˜μ— μ˜ν•΄ μƒμ„±λœ 결과와 λ‹€λ₯Έ μ—°κ΅¬μžκ°€ κ°œλ°œν•œ 예츑 λͺ¨λΈμ„ λΉ„κ΅ν•˜μ—¬ ν˜„μž¬ 연ꡬ κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ 개발된 λͺ¨λΈμ˜ μž₯점을 보여 쀄 κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ 보인닀. 높은 μˆ˜μ€€μ˜ 정확도 외에도 GEP-PSO μ•Œκ³ λ¦¬μ¦˜μ„ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ 개발된 λͺ¨λΈμ€ κΈ°μ‘΄ 예츑 λͺ¨λΈμ˜ 단점을 상당 λΆ€λΆ„ 극볡할 수 μžˆλ‹€. 개발된 λͺ¨λΈμ€ μ–»κΈ° μ‰¬μš΄ μž…λ ₯ λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜λ₯Ό 거의 μš”κ΅¬ν•˜μ§€ μ•ŠμœΌλ©΄μ„œ 더 λ§Žμ€ μ‹ λ’°μ„± 및 정확도λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅ν•˜κ±°λ‚˜ κΈ°μ‘΄ 예츑 λͺ¨λΈμ—μ„œ λ¬΄μ‹œλ˜μ—ˆλ˜ μ€‘μš”ν•œ μž…λ ₯ λ§€κ°œλ³€μˆ˜λ₯Ό ν¬ν•¨ν•˜λ―€λ‘œ 더 μœ λ¦¬ν•˜λ‹€κ³  λ³Ό 수 μžˆλ‹€.With the advances in mechanical excavation technology, increasing number of underground spaces are built using mechanical excavation rather than the conventional drilling and blasting method. In the field of mechanical rock excavation, there are a fair number of deterministic solutions for the relations between different variables. However, in many cases, establishing such a relation is extremely difficult. As a result, many researchers try to explain those relations using regression analysis. Due to the complex and non-linear nature of rock cutting phenomenon, it is not easy to reasonably determine the form of the non-linear functions that fit to the statistical data as it is required by the conventional non-linear function fitting techniques. As a result, a combination of Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) was used for data analysis in this study in order to solve problems in the field of mechanical excavation. GEP and PSO are evolutionary computation techniques and the GEP-PSO algorithm is capable of automatically finding the form and constants of a non-linear function that fits on a data set. The algorithm was used in order to develop a performance prediction model for impact hammer, a prediction model for specific energy required by point attack picks, and models for prediction of cutting, normal, and side force acting on a point attack pick. In all cases, the results generated using the GEP-PSO algorithm produced significantly high prediction accuracy in comparison to those generated by multiple linear regression. When possible, comparisons were made between the results generated by the GEP-PSO algorithm and the prediction models developed by other researchers to show the advantages of the models developed over the course of the present study. In addition to high level of accuracy, the models developed using GEP-PSO algorithm could overcome shortcomings of the existing prediction models to a fair extent. The developed models are more advantageous as they provide more reliability/accuracy while requiring few easy-to-obtain input parameters, and/or they include the significant input parameters that have been neglected by the existing prediction models.1. Introduction 1 2. Literature Review 10 2.1 Impact hammer performance prediction 10 2.1.1 Existing performance prediction models 11 2.1.2 Performance prediction model 13 2.2 Specific energy prediction 14 2.2.1 Parameters with a significant impact on specific energy 16 2.2.2 Specific energy prediction model 22 2.3 Forces acting on a point attack pick 22 2.3.1 Existing force prediction models 23 2.3.2 Parameters with a significant impact on forces 29 2.3.3 Forces prediction models 30 3. Statistical Data 31 3.1 Impact hammer performance 31 3.1.1 Levent-Hisarustu tunnel 31 3.1.2 Uskudar-Cekmekoy tunnel 33 3.2 Specific energy required by point attack picks 37 3.3 Forces applied on point attack picks 41 4. Data Analysis Method 43 4.1 Gene Expression Programming (GEP) 45 4.1.1 Genetic Operators 47 4.1.2 The Basic Flowchart of GEP algorithm 55 4.2 Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) 56 4.3 GEP-PSO algorithm 58 5. Results and Discussion 64 5.1 The suggested impact hammer performance prediction model 65 5.2 The model suggested for prediction of specific energy required by point attack picks 75 5.3 The suggested models for prediction of forces acting on a point attack pick 88 6. Conclusions 97 6.1 Performance prediction model for impact hammer 97 6.2 Prediction model for specific energy required by point attack picks 99 6.3 Models for prediction of cutting, normal, and side force acting on a point attack pick 100 References 102 초 둝 116 Appendix A 118 Acknowledgment 138λ°•

    Modelling of geotechnical structures using multi-variate adaptive regression spline (MARS) and genetic programming (GP)

    Get PDF
    The soil is considered as a complex material produced by the weathering of solid rock. Due to its uncertain behavior, modeling the behavior of such materials is complex by using more traditional forms of mechanistic based engineering methods like analytical and finite element methods etc. Very often it is difficult to develop theoretical/statistical models due to the complex nature of the problem and uncertainty in soil parameters. These are situations where data driven approach has been found to more appropriate than model oriented approach. To take care of such problems in artificial intelligence (AI) techniques has been developed in the computational methods. Though AI techniques has proved to have the superior predictive ability than other traditional methods for modeling complex behavior of geotechnical engineering materials, still it is facing some criticism due to the lack of transparency, knowledge extraction and model uncertainty. To overcome this problem there are developments of improvised AI techniques. Different AI techniques as β€˜black box’ i.e artificial neural network (ANN), β€˜grey box’ i.e Genetic programming (GP) and β€˜white box’ i.e multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) depending upon its transparency and knowledge extraction. Here, in this study of GP and MARS β€˜grey box’ and β€˜white box’ AI techniques are applied to some geotechnical problems such as prediction of lateral load capacity of piles in clay, pull-out capacity of ground anchor, factor of safety of slope stability analysis and ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations.. Different statistical criteria are used to compare the developed GP and MARS models with other AI models like ANN and support vector machine (SVM) models. It was observed that for the problems considered in the present study, the MARS and GP model are found to be more efficient than ANN and SVM model and the model equations are also found to be more comprehensive
    • …
    corecore