I Can See Clearly Now: Clairvoyant Assertions for Deadlock Checking

Under embargo until: 2023-07-04Static analysers are traditionally used to check various correctness properties of software. In the face of refactorings that can have adverse effects on correctness, developers need to analyse the code after refactoring and possibly revert their changes. Here, we take a different approach: we capture the effect of the Hide Delegate refactoring on programs in the ABS modelling language in terms of the base program, which allows us to predict the correctness of the refactored program. In particular, we focus on deadlock-detection. The actual check is encoded with the help of an additional data structure and assertions. Developers can then attempt to discharge assertions as vacuous with the help of a theorem prover such as KeY. On the one hand, this means that we do not require a specific static analyser nor theorem prover, but rather profit from the strength and advances of modern tool support. On the other hand, developers can choose to rely on existing tests to confirm that no assertion is triggered before executing the actual refactoring. Finally, we argue the correctness of our over-approximation.acceptedVersio

Synthesising correct concurrent runtime monitors

This paper studies the correctness of automated synthesis for concurrent monitors. We adapt a subset of the Hennessy-Milner logic with recursion (a reformulation of the modal μ-calculus) to specify safety properties for Erlang programs. We also define an automated translation from formulas in this sub-logic to concurrent Erlang monitors that detect formula violations at runtime. Subsequently, we formalise a novel definition for monitor correctness that incorporates monitor behaviour when instrumented with the program being monitored. Finally, we devise a sound technique that allows us to prove monitor correctness in stages; this technique is used to prove the correctness of our automated monitor synthesis.peer-reviewe

Verifying a signature architecture: a comparative case study

We report on a case study in applying different formal methods to model and verify an architecture for administrating digital signatures. The architecture comprises several concurrently executing systems that authenticate users and generate and store digital signatures by passing security relevant data through a tightly controlled interface. The architecture is interesting from a formal-methods perspective as it involves complex operations on data as well as process coordination and hence is a candidate for both data-oriented and process-oriented formal methods. We have built and verified two models of the signature architecture using two representative formal methods. In the first, we specify a data model of the architecture in Z that we extend to a trace model and interactively verify by theorem proving. In the second, we model the architecture as a system of communicating processes that we verify by finite-state model checking. We provide a detailed comparison of these two different approaches to formalization (infinite state with rich data types versus finite state) and verification (theorem proving versus model checking). Contrary to common belief, our case study suggests that Z is well suited for temporal reasoning about process models with complex operations on data. Moreover, our comparison highlights the advantages of proving theorems about such models and provides evidence that, in the hands of an experienced user, theorem proving may be neither substantially more time-consuming nor more complex than model checkin

Combating state explosion in the detection of dynamic properties of distributed computations

In the context of asynchronous distributed systems, many important applications depend on the ability to check that all observations of the execution of a distributed program, or distributed computation, satisfy a desired (or undesired) temporal evolution of states, or dynamic property. Examples include the implementation of distributed algorithms, automated testing via oracles, debugging, and building fault-tolerant applications through exception detection and handling. When a distributed program exhibits a high degree of concurrency, the number of possible observations of an execution can grow exponentially, quickly leading to an explosion in the amount of space and time required to check a dynamic property. In the worst case, detection of such properties may be defeated. This is the run-time counterpart of the well-known state explosion problem studied in model checking. In this thesis, we study the problem of state explosion as it arises in the detection of dynamic properties. In particular, we consider the potential of applying well-known techniques for dealing with state explosion from model checking to the case of dynamic property detection. Significant semantic similarities between the two problems means that there is great potential for deriving techniques for dealing with state explosion in dynamic property detection based on existing model checking techniques. However, differences between the contexts in which model checking and dynamic property detection take place mean that not all approaches to dealing with state explosion in model checking may carryover to the run-time case. We investigate these similarities and differences and provide the development and analysis of two approaches for combating state explosion in dynamic property detection based on model checking methods: on-the-fly automata theoretic model checking, and partial order reduction.EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

Getting Past the Language Gap: Innovations in Machine Translation

In this chapter, we will be reviewing state of the art machine translation systems, and will discuss innovative methods for machine translation, highlighting the most promising techniques and applications. Machine translation (MT) has benefited from a revitalization in the last 10 years or so, after a period of relatively slow activity. In 2005 the field received a jumpstart when a powerful complete experimental package for building MT systems from scratch became freely available as a result of the unified efforts of the MOSES international consortium. Around the same time, hierarchical methods had been introduced by Chinese researchers, which allowed the introduction and use of syntactic information in translation modeling. Furthermore, the advances in the related field of computational linguistics, making off-the-shelf taggers and parsers readily available, helped give MT an additional boost. Yet there is still more progress to be made. For example, MT will be enhanced greatly when both syntax and semantics are on board: this still presents a major challenge though many advanced research groups are currently pursuing ways to meet this challenge head-on. The next generation of MT will consist of a collection of hybrid systems. It also augurs well for the mobile environment, as we look forward to more advanced and improved technologies that enable the working of Speech-To-Speech machine translation on hand-held devices, i.e. speech recognition and speech synthesis. We review all of these developments and point out in the final section some of the most promising research avenues for the future of MT

FOAL 2004 Proceedings: Foundations of Aspect-Oriented Languages Workshop at AOSD 2004

Aspect-oriented programming is a paradigm in software engineering and FOAL logos courtesy of Luca Cardelli programming languages that promises better support for separation of concerns. The third Foundations of Aspect-Oriented Languages (FOAL) workshop was held at the Third International Conference on Aspect-Oriented Software Development in Lancaster, UK, on March 23, 2004. This workshop was designed to be a forum for research in formal foundations of aspect-oriented programming languages. The call for papers announced the areas of interest for FOAL as including, but not limited to: semantics of aspect-oriented languages, specification and verification for such languages, type systems, static analysis, theory of testing, theory of aspect composition, and theory of aspect translation (compilation) and rewriting. The call for papers welcomed all theoretical and foundational studies of foundations of aspect-oriented languages. The goals of this FOAL workshop were to: � Make progress on the foundations of aspect-oriented programming languages. � Exchange ideas about semantics and formal methods for aspect-oriented programming languages. � Foster interest within the programming language theory and types communities in aspect-oriented programming languages. � Foster interest within the formal methods community in aspect-oriented programming and the problems of reasoning about aspect-oriented programs. The papers at the workshop, which are included in the proceedings, were selected frompapers submitted by researchers worldwide. Due to time limitations at the workshop, not all of the submitted papers were selected for presentation. FOAL also welcomed an invited talk by James Riely (DePaul University), the abstract of which is included below. The workshop was organized by Gary T. Leavens (Iowa State University), Ralf L?ammel (CWI and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam), and Curtis Clifton (Iowa State University). The program committee was chaired by L?ammel and included L?ammel, Leavens, Clifton, Lodewijk Bergmans (University of Twente), John Tang Boyland (University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee), William R. Cook (University of Texas at Austin), Tzilla Elrad (Illinois Institute of Technology), Kathleen Fisher (AT&T Labs�Research), Radha Jagadeesan (DePaul University), Shmuel Katz (Technion�Israel Institute of Technology), Shriram Krishnamurthi (Brown University), Mira Mezini (Darmstadt University of Technology), Todd Millstein (University of California, Los Angeles), Benjamin C. Pierce (University of Pennsylvania), Henny Sipma (Stanford University), Mario S?udholt ( ?Ecole des Mines de Nantes), and David Walker (Princeton University). We thank the organizers of AOSD 2004 for hosting the workshop

Semantic chunking

Long sentences pose a challenge for natural language processing (NLP) applications. They are associated with a complex information structure leading to increased requirements for processing resources. Although the issue is present in many areas of research, there is little uniformity in the solutions used by research communities dedicated to individual NLP applications. Different aspects of the problem are addressed by different tasks, such as sentence simplification or shallow chunking. The main contribution of this thesis is the introduction of the task of semantic chunking as a general approach to reducing the cost of processing long sentences. The goal of semantic chunking is to find semantically contained fragments of a sentence representation that can be processed independently and recombined without loss of information. We anchor its principles in established concepts of semantic theory, in particular event and situation semantics. Most of the experiments in this thesis focus on semantic chunking defined on complex semantic representations in Dependency Minimal Recursion Semantics (DMRS), but we also demonstrate that the task can be performed on sentence strings. We present three chunking models: a) rule-based proof-of-concept DMRS chunking system; b) a semi-supervised sequence labelling neural model for surface semantic chunking; c) a system capable of finding semantic chunk boundaries based on the inherent structure of DMRS graphs, generalisable in the form of descriptive templates. We show how semantic chunking can be applied within a divide-and-conquer processing paradigm, using as an example the task of realization from DMRS. The application of semantic chunking yields noticeable efficiency gains without decreasing the quality of results

IEEE/NASA Workshop on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification, and Validation

This volume contains the Preliminary Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE ISoLA Workshop on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification, and Validation, with a special track on the theme of Formal Methods in Human and Robotic Space Exploration. The workshop was held on 23-24 September 2005 at the Loyola College Graduate Center, Columbia, MD, USA. The idea behind the Workshop arose from the experience and feedback of ISoLA 2004, the 1st International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods held in Paphos (Cyprus) last October-November. ISoLA 2004 served the need of providing a forum for developers, users, and researchers to discuss issues related to the adoption and use of rigorous tools and methods for the specification, analysis, verification, certification, construction, test, and maintenance of systems from the point of view of their different application domains