Refining complexity analyses in planning by exploiting the exponential time hypothesis

The use of computational complexity in planning, and in AI in general, has always been a disputed topic. A major problem with ordinary worst-case analyses is that they do not provide any quantitative information: they do not tell us much about the running time of concrete algorithms, nor do they tell us much about the running time of optimal algorithms. We address problems like this by presenting results based on the exponential time hypothesis (ETH), which is a widely accepted hypothesis concerning the time complexity of 3-SAT. By using this approach, we provide, for instance, almost matching upper and lower bounds onthe time complexity of propositional planning.Funding Agencies|National Graduate School in Computer Science (CUGS), Sweden; Swedish Research Council (VR) [621-2014-4086]</p

New methods for 3-SAT decision and worst-case analysis

We prove the worst-case upper bound 1:5045 n for the time complexity of 3-SAT decision, where n is the number of variables in the input formula, introducing new methods for the analysis as well as new algorithmic techniques. We add new 2- and 3-clauses, called &quot;blocked clauses&quot;, generalizing the extension rule of &quot;Extended Resolution.&quot; Our methods for estimating the size of trees lead to a refined measure of formula complexity of 3-clause-sets and can be applied also to arbitrary trees. Keywords: 3-SAT, worst-case upper bounds, analysis of algorithms, Extended Resolution, blocked clauses, generalized autarkness. 1 Introduction In this paper we study the exponential part of time complexity for 3-SAT decision and prove the worst-case upper bound 1:5044:: n for n the number of variables in the input formula, using new algorithmic methods as well as new methods for the analysis. These methods also deepen the already existing approaches in a systematically manner. The following results..

The Fine-Grained Complexity of Problems Expressible by First-Order Logic and Its Extensions

This dissertation studies the fine-grained complexity of model checking problems for fixed logical formulas on sparse input structures. The Orthogonal Vectors problem is an important and well-studied problem in fine-grained complexity: its hardness is implied by the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis, and its hardness implies the hardness of many other interesting problems. We show that the Orthogonal Vectors problem is complete in the class of first-order model checking on sparse structures, under fine-grained reductions. In other words, the hardness of Orthogonal Vectors and the hardness of first-order model checking imply each other. This also gives us an improved algorithm for first-order model checking problems. Among all first-order logic formulas in prenex normal form, we have reasons to believe that quantifier structures $\exists \dots \exists \forall$ and $\forall \dots \forall \exists$ may be the hardest in computational complexity: If the Nondeterministic version of the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis is true, formulas of these forms are the only hard ones under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. We can add extensions to first-order logic to strengthen its expressive power. This work also studies the fine-grained complexity of first-order formulas with comparison on structures with total order, first-order formulas with transitive closure operations, first-order formulas of fixed quantifier rank, and first-order formulas of fixed variable complexity. We also introduce a technique that can be used to reduce from sequential problems on graphs to parallel problems on sets, which can be applied to extending the Least Weight Subsequence problems from linear structures to some special classes of graphs