Phase transitions related to the pigeonhole principle

Since Paris introduced them in the late seventies (Paris1978), densities turned out to be useful for studying independence results. Motivated by their simplicity and surprising strength we investigate the combinatorial complexity of two such densities which are strongly related to the pigeonhole principle. The aim is to miniaturise Ramsey's Theorem for $1$-tuples. The first principle uses an unlimited amount of colours, whereas the second has a fixed number of two colours. We show that these principles give rise to Ackermannian growth. After parameterising these statements with respect to a function f:N->N, we investigate for which functions f Ackermannian growth is still preserved

Unprovability and phase transitions in Ramsey theory

The first mathematically interesting, first-order arithmetical example of incompleteness was given in the late seventies and is know as the Paris-Harrington principle. It is a strengthened form of the finite Ramsey theorem which can not be proved, nor refuted in Peano Arithmetic. In this dissertation we investigate several other unprovable statements of Ramseyan nature and determine the threshold functions for the related phase transitions. Chapter 1 sketches out the historical development of unprovability and phase transitions, and offers a little information on Ramsey theory. In addition, it introduces the necessary mathematical background by giving definitions and some useful lemmas. Chapter 2 deals with the pigeonhole principle, presumably the most well-known, finite instance of the Ramsey theorem. Although straightforward in itself, the principle gives rise to unprovable statements. We investigate the related phase transitions and determine the threshold functions. Chapter 3 explores a phase transition related to the so-called infinite subsequence principle, which is another instance of Ramsey’s theorem. Chapter 4 considers the Ramsey theorem without restrictions on the dimensions and colours. First, generalisations of results on partitioning α-large sets are proved, as they are needed later. Second, we show that an iteration of a finite version of the Ramsey theorem leads to unprovability. Chapter 5 investigates the template “thin implies Ramsey”, of which one of the theorems of Nash-Williams is an example. After proving a more universal instance, we study the strength of the original Nash-Williams theorem. We conclude this chapter by presenting an unprovable statement related to Schreier families. Chapter 6 is intended as a vast introduction to the Atlas of prefixed polynomial equations. We begin with the necessary definitions, present some specific members of the Atlas, discuss several issues and give technical details

On Multiphase-Linear Ranking Functions

Multiphase ranking functions ($\mathit{M{\Phi}RFs}$) were proposed as a means to prove the termination of a loop in which the computation progresses through a number of "phases", and the progress of each phase is described by a different linear ranking function. Our work provides new insights regarding such functions for loops described by a conjunction of linear constraints (single-path loops). We provide a complete polynomial-time solution to the problem of existence and of synthesis of $\mathit{M{\Phi}RF}$ of bounded depth (number of phases), when variables range over rational or real numbers; a complete solution for the (harder) case that variables are integer, with a matching lower-bound proof, showing that the problem is coNP-complete; and a new theorem which bounds the number of iterations for loops with $\mathit{M{\Phi}RFs}$. Surprisingly, the bound is linear, even when the variables involved change in non-linear way. We also consider a type of lexicographic ranking functions, $\mathit{LLRFs}$, more expressive than types of lexicographic functions for which complete solutions have been given so far. We prove that for the above type of loops, lexicographic functions can be reduced to $\mathit{M{\Phi}RFs}$, and thus the questions of complexity of detection and synthesis, and of resulting iteration bounds, are also answered for this class.Comment: typos correcte

Verification of distributed algorithms with the Why3 tool

Dissertação de mestrado integrado em Informatics EngineeringNowadays, there currently exist many working program verification tools however, the developed tools are mostly limited to the verification of sequential code, or else of multi-threaded shared-memory programs. Due to the importance that distributed systems and protocols play in many systems, they have been targeted by the program verification community since the beginning of this area. In this sense, they recently tried to create tools capable of deductive verification in the distributed setting (deductive verification techniques offer the highest degree of assurance) and claim to have achieved impressive results. Thus, this dissertation will explore the use of the Why3 deductive verification tool for the verification of dis tributed algorithms. It will comprise the definition of a dedicated Why3library, together with a representative set of case studies. The goal is to provide evidence that Why3 is a privileged tool for such a task, standing at a sweet spot regarding expressive power and practicality.Nos dias de hoje, possuímos diversas ferramentas de verificação, ferramentas essas limitadas à verificação de código sequencial, ou então de programas multi-thread de memória partilhada. Devido à importância que os sistemas e protocolos distribuídos desempenham em muitos sistemas, estes foram alvos por parte da comunidade de verificação de programas desde o início desta área. Neste sentido, recentemente tentaram criar ferramentas capazes de realizar a verificação dedutiva no ambiente distribuído (técnicas de verificação dedutiva que oferecem o mais elevado grau de segurança) e afirmam ter alcançado resultados impressionantes. Assim, esta dissertação irá explorar o uso da ferramenta de verificação dedutiva Why3 com o propósito de verificar algoritmos distribuídos. Irão ser desenvolvidos modos e modelos da biblioteca Why3do, juntamente com um conjunto representativo de casos de estudos. O objetivo é fornecer evidências de que Why3 é uma ferramenta privilegiada para esta tarefa, estando no ponto ideal na relação poder expressivo e praticabilidade.This work is financed by the ERDF – European Regional Development Fund through the North Portugal Regional Operational Programme - NORTE2020 Programme and by National Funds through the Portuguese funding agency, FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia within project NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-028550- PTDC/EEI-COM/28550/2017

Connecting the provable with the unprovable: phase transitions for unprovability

Why are some theorems not provable in certain theories of mathematics? Why are most theorems from existing mathematics provable in very weak systems? Unprovability theory seeks answers for those questions. Logicians have obtained unprovable statements which resemble provable statements. These statements often contain some condition which seems to cause unprovability, as this condition can be modified, using a function parameter, in such a manner as to make the theorem provable. It turns out that in many cases there is a phase transition: By modifying the parameter slightly one changes the theorem from provable to unprovable. We study these transitions with the goal of gaining more insights into unprovability