Parameterized Approximation Algorithms for Bidirected Steiner Network Problems

The Directed Steiner Network (DSN) problem takes as input a directed edge-weighted graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $\mathcal{D}\subseteq V\times V$ of $k$ demand pairs. The aim is to compute the cheapest network $N\subseteq G$ for which there is an $s\to t$ path for each $(s,t)\in\mathcal{D}$. It is known that this problem is notoriously hard as there is no $k^{1/4-o(1)}$-approximation algorithm under Gap-ETH, even when parametrizing the runtime by $k$ [Dinur & Manurangsi, ITCS 2018]. In light of this, we systematically study several special cases of DSN and determine their parameterized approximability for the parameter $k$. For the bi-DSN$_\text{Planar}$ problem, the aim is to compute a planar optimum solution $N\subseteq G$ in a bidirected graph $G$, i.e., for every edge $uv$ of $G$ the reverse edge $vu$ exists and has the same weight. This problem is a generalization of several well-studied special cases. Our main result is that this problem admits a parameterized approximation scheme (PAS) for $k$. We also prove that our result is tight in the sense that (a) the runtime of our PAS cannot be significantly improved, and (b) it is unlikely that a PAS exists for any generalization of bi-DSN$_\text{Planar}$, unless FPT=W[1]. One important special case of DSN is the Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph (SCSS) problem, for which the solution network $N\subseteq G$ needs to strongly connect a given set of $k$ terminals. It has been observed before that for SCSS a parameterized $2$-approximation exists when parameterized by $k$ [Chitnis et al., IPEC 2013]. We give a tight inapproximability result by showing that for $k$ no parameterized $(2-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm exists under Gap-ETH. Additionally we show that when restricting the input of SCSS to bidirected graphs, the problem remains NP-hard but becomes FPT for $k$

Parameterized approximation algorithms for bidirected steiner network problems

The Directed Steiner Network (DSN) problem takes as input a directed edge-weighted graph G=(V,E) and a set {D}subseteq V x V of k demand pairs. The aim is to compute the cheapest network N subseteq G for which there is an s -> t path for each (s,t)in {D}. It is known that this problem is notoriously hard as there is no k^{1/4-o(1)}-approximation algorithm under Gap-ETH, even when parameterizing the runtime by k [Dinur & Manurangsi, ITCS 2018]. In light of this, we systematically study several special cases of DSN and determine their parameterized approximability for the parameter k. For the bi-DSN_Planar problem, the aim is to compute a planar optimum solution N subseteq G in a bidirected graph G, i.e. for every edge uv of G the reverse edge vu exists and has the same weight. This problem is a generalization of several well-studied special cases. Our main result is that this problem admits a parameterized approximation scheme (PAS) for k. We also prove that our result is tight in the sense that (a) the runtime of our PAS cannot be significantly improved, and (b) it is unlikely that a PAS exists for any generalization of bi-DSN_Planar, unless FPT=W[1]. Additionally we study several generalizations of bi-DSN_Planar and obtain upper and lower bounds on obtainable runtimes parameterized by k. One important special case of DSN is the Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph (SCSS) problem, for which the solution network N subseteq G needs to strongly connect a given set of k terminals. It has been observed before that for SCSS a parameterized 2-approximation exists when parameterized by k [Chitnis et al., IPEC 2013]. We show a tight inapproximability result: under Gap-ETH there is no (2-{epsilon})-approximation algorithm parameterized by k (for any epsilon>0). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a W[1]-hard problem admitting a non-trivial parameterized approximation factor which is also known to be tight! Additionally we show that when restricting the input of SCSS to bidirected graphs, the problem remains NP-hard but becomes FPT for k

Parameterized approximation algorithms for bidirected Steiner network problems

The Directed Steiner Network (DSN) problem takes as input a directed graph G=(V, E) with non-negative edge-weights and a set D⊆ V × V of k demand pairs. The aim is to compute the cheapest network N⊆ G for which there is an s\rightarrow t path for each (s, t)∈ D. It is known that this problem is notoriously hard, as there is no k1/4−o(1)-approximation algorithm under Gap-ETH, even when parametrizing the runtime by k [Dinur & Manurangsi, ITCS 2018]. In light of this, we systematically study several special cases of DSN and determine their parameterized approximability for the parameter k. For the bi-DSNPlanar problem, the aim is to compute a solution N⊆ G whose cost is at most that of an optimum planar solution in a bidirected graph G, i.e., for every edge uv of G the reverse edge vu exists and has the same weight. This problem is a generalization of several well-studied special cases. Our main result is that this problem admits a parameterized approximation scheme (PAS) for k. We also prove that our result is tight in the sense that (a) the runtime of our PAS cannot be significantly improved, and (b) no PAS exists for any generalization of bi-DSNPlanar, under standard complexity assumptions. The techniques we use also imply a polynomial-sized approximate kernelization scheme (PSAKS). Additionally, we study several generalizations of bi-DSNPlanar and obtain upper and lower bounds on obtainable runtimes parameterized by k. One important special case of DSN is the Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph (SCSS) problem, for which the solution network N⊆ G needs to strongly connect a given set of k terminals. It has been observed before that for SCSS a parameterized 2-approximation exists for parameter k [Chitnis et al., IPEC 2013]. We give a tight inapproximability result by showing that for k no parameterized (2 − ε)-approximation algorithm exists under Gap-ETH. Additionally, we show that when restricting the input of SCSS to bidirected graphs, the problem remains NP-hard but becomes FPT for k

Parameterized Approximation Schemes for Steiner Trees with Small Number of Steiner Vertices

We study the Steiner Tree problem, in which a set of terminal vertices needs to be connected in the cheapest possible way in an edge-weighted graph. This problem has been extensively studied from the viewpoint of approximation and also parametrization. In particular, on one hand Steiner Tree is known to be APX-hard, and W[2]-hard on the other, if parameterized by the number of non-terminals (Steiner vertices) in the optimum solution. In contrast to this we give an efficient parameterized approximation scheme (EPAS), which circumvents both hardness results. Moreover, our methods imply the existence of a polynomial size approximate kernelization scheme (PSAKS) for the considered parameter. We further study the parameterized approximability of other variants of Steiner Tree, such as Directed Steiner Tree and Steiner Forest. For neither of these an EPAS is likely to exist for the studied parameter: for Steiner Forest an easy observation shows that the problem is APX-hard, even if the input graph contains no Steiner vertices. For Directed Steiner Tree we prove that approximating within any function of the studied parameter is W[1]-hard. Nevertheless, we show that an EPAS exists for Unweighted Directed Steiner Tree, but a PSAKS does not. We also prove that there is an EPAS and a PSAKS for Steiner Forest if in addition to the number of Steiner vertices, the number of connected components of an optimal solution is considered to be a parameter.Comment: 23 pages, 6 figures An extended abstract appeared in proceedings of STACS 201

FPT Inapproximability of Directed Cut and Connectivity Problems

Cut problems and connectivity problems on digraphs are two well-studied classes of problems from the viewpoint of parameterized complexity. After a series of papers over the last decade, we now have (almost) tight bounds for the running time of several standard variants of these problems parameterized by two parameters: the number k of terminals and the size p of the solution. When there is evidence of FPT intractability, then the next natural alternative is to consider FPT approximations. In this paper, we show two types of results for directed cut and connectivity problems, building on existing results from the literature: first is to circumvent the hardness results for these problems by designing FPT approximation algorithms, or alternatively strengthen the existing hardness results by creating "gap-instances" under stronger hypotheses such as the (Gap-)Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Formally, we show the following results: Cutting paths between a set of terminal pairs, i.e., Directed Multicut: Pilipczuk and Wahlstrom [TOCT \u2718] showed that Directed Multicut is W[1]-hard when parameterized by p if k=4. We complement this by showing the following two results: - Directed Multicut has a k/2-approximation in 2^{O(p^2)}* n^{O(1)} time (i.e., a 2-approximation if k=4), - Under Gap-ETH, Directed Multicut does not admit an (59/58-epsilon)-approximation in f(p)* n^{O(1)} time, for any computable function f, even if k=4. Connecting a set of terminal pairs, i.e., Directed Steiner Network (DSN): The DSN problem on general graphs is known to be W[1]-hard parameterized by p+k due to Guo et al. [SIDMA \u2711]. Dinur and Manurangsi [ITCS \u2718] further showed that there is no FPT k^{1/4-o(1)}-approximation algorithm parameterized by k, under Gap-ETH. Chitnis et al. [SODA \u2714] considered the restriction to special graph classes, but unfortunately this does not lead to FPT algorithms either: DSN on planar graphs is W[1]-hard parameterized by k. In this paper we consider the DSN_Planar problem which is an intermediate version: the graph is general, but we want to find a solution whose cost is at most that of an optimal planar solution (if one exists). We show the following lower bounds for DSN_Planar: - DSN_Planar has no (2-epsilon)-approximation in FPT time parameterized by k, under Gap-ETH. This answers in the negative a question of Chitnis et al. [ESA \u2718]. - DSN_Planar is W[1]-hard parameterized by k+p. Moreover, under ETH, there is no (1+epsilon)-approximation for DSN_Planar in f(k,p,epsilon)* n^{o(k+sqrt{p+1/epsilon})} time for any computable function f. Pairwise connecting a set of terminals, i.e., Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph (SCSS): Guo et al. [SIDMA \u2711] showed that SCSS is W[1]-hard parameterized by p+k, while Chitnis et al. [SODA \u2714] showed that SCSS remains W[1]-hard parameterized by p, even if the input graph is planar. In this paper we consider the SCSS_Planar problem which is an intermediate version: the graph is general, but we want to find a solution whose cost is at most that of an optimal planar solution (if one exists). We show the following lower bounds for SCSS_Planar: - SCSS_Planar is W[1]-hard parameterized by k+p. Moreover, under ETH, there is no (1+epsilon)-approximation for SCSS_Planar in f(k,p,epsilon)* n^{o(sqrt{k+p+1/epsilon})} time for any computable function f. Previously, the only known FPT approximation results for SCSS applied to general graphs parameterized by k: a 2-approximation by Chitnis et al. [IPEC \u2713], and a matching (2-epsilon)-hardness under Gap-ETH by Chitnis et al. [ESA \u2718]

The Complexity Landscape of Fixed-Parameter Directed Steiner Network Problems

Given a directed graph G and a list (s_1, t_1), ..., (s_k, t_k) of terminal pairs, the Directed Steiner Network problem asks for a minimum-cost subgraph of G that contains a directed s_i -> t_i path for every 1 <= i <= k. The special case Directed Steiner Tree (when we ask for paths from a root r to terminals t_1, . . .t_k) is known to be fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the number of terminals, while the special case Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph (when we ask for a path from every t_i to every other t_j ) is known to be W[1]-hard parameterized by the number of terminals. We systematically explore the complexity landscape of directed Steiner problems to fully understand which other special cases are FPT or W[1]-hard. Formally, if H is a class of directed graphs, then we look at the special case of Directed Steiner Network where the list (s_1, t_1), ..., (s_k, t_k) of requests form a directed graph that is a member of H. Our main result is a complete characterization of the classes H resulting in fixed-parameter tractable special cases: we show that if every pattern in H has the combinatorial property of being "transitively equivalent to a bounded-length caterpillar with a bounded number of extra edges," then the problem is FPT, and it is W[1]-hard for every recursively enumerable H not having this property. This complete dichotomy unifies and generalizes the known results showing that Directed Steiner Tree is FPT [Dreyfus and Wagner, Networks 1971], Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph is W[1]-hard [Guo et al., SIAM J. Discrete Math. 2011], and Directed Steiner Network is solvable in polynomial-time for constant number of terminals [Feldman and Ruhl, SIAM J. Comput. 2006], and moreover reveals a large continent of tractable cases that were not known before

Tight bounds for planar strongly connected Steiner subgraph with fixed number of terminals (and extensions)

(see paper for full abstract) Given a vertex-weighted directed graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $T=\{t_1, t_2, \ldots t_k\}$ of $k$ terminals, the objective of the SCSS problem is to find a vertex set $H\subseteq V$ of minimum weight such that $G[H]$ contains a $t_{i}\rightarrow t_j$ path for each $i\neq j$. The problem is NP-hard, but Feldman and Ruhl [FOCS '99; SICOMP '06] gave a novel $n^{O(k)}$ algorithm for the SCSS problem, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph and $k$ is the number of terminals. We explore how much easier the problem becomes on planar directed graphs: - Our main algorithmic result is a $2^{O(k)}\cdot n^{O(\sqrt{k})}$ algorithm for planar SCSS, which is an improvement of a factor of $O(\sqrt{k})$ in the exponent over the algorithm of Feldman and Ruhl. - Our main hardness result is a matching lower bound for our algorithm: we show that planar SCSS does not have an $f(k)\cdot n^{o(\sqrt{k})}$ algorithm for any computable function $f$, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. The following additional results put our upper and lower bounds in context: - In general graphs, we cannot hope for such a dramatic improvement over the $n^{O(k)}$ algorithm of Feldman and Ruhl: assuming ETH, SCSS in general graphs does not have an $f(k)\cdot n^{o(k/\log k)}$ algorithm for any computable function $f$. - Feldman and Ruhl generalized their $n^{O(k)}$ algorithm to the more general Directed Steiner Network (DSN) problem; here the task is to find a subgraph of minimum weight such that for every source $s_i$ there is a path to the corresponding terminal $t_i$. We show that, assuming ETH, there is no $f(k)\cdot n^{o(k)}$ time algorithm for DSN on acyclic planar graphs.Comment: To appear in SICOMP. Extended abstract in SODA 2014. This version has a new author (Andreas Emil Feldmann), and the algorithm is faster and considerably simplified as compared to conference versio

Stochastic Network Design: Models and Scalable Algorithms

Many natural and social phenomena occur in networks. Examples include the spread of information, ideas, and opinions through a social network, the propagation of an infectious disease among people, and the spread of species within an interconnected habitat network. The ability to modify a phenomenon towards some desired outcomes has widely recognized benefits to our society and the economy. The outcome of a phenomenon is largely determined by the topology or properties of its underlying network. A decision maker can take management actions to modify a network and, therefore, change the outcome of the phenomenon. A management action is an activity that changes the topology or other properties of a network. For example, species that live in a small area may expand their population and gradually spread into an interconnected habitat network. However, human development of various structures such as highways and factories may destroy natural habitats or block paths connecting different habitat patches, which results in a population decline. To facilitate the dispersal of species and help the population recover, artificial corridors (e.g., a wildlife highway crossing) can be built to restore connectivity of isolated habitats, and conservation areas can be established to restore historical habitats of species, both of which are examples of management actions. The set of management actions that can be taken is restricted by a budget, so we must find cost-effective allocations of limited funding resources. In the thesis, the problem of finding the (nearly) optimal set of management actions is formulated as a discrete and stochastic optimization problem. Specifically, a general decision-making framework called stochastic network design is defined to model a broad range of similar real-world problems. The framework is defined upon a stochastic network, in which edges are either present or absent with certain probabilities. It defines several metrics to measure the outcome of the underlying phenomenon and a set of management actions that modify the network or its parameters in specific ways. The goal is to select a subset of management actions, subject to a budget constraint, to maximize a specified metric. The major contribution of the thesis is to develop scalable algorithms to find high- quality solutions for different problems within the framework. In general, these problems are NP-hard, and their objective functions are neither submodular nor super-modular. Existing algorithms, such as greedy algorithms and heuristic search algorithms, either lack theoretical guarantees or have limited scalability. In the thesis, fast approximate algorithms are developed under three different settings that are gradually more general. The most restricted setting is when a network is tree-structured. For this case, fully polynomial-time approximation schemes (FPTAS) are developed using dynamic programming algorithms and rounding techniques. A more general setting is when networks are general directed graphs. We use a sampling technique to convert the original stochastic optimization problem into a deterministic optimization problem and develop a primal-dual algorithm to solve it efficiently. In the previous two problem settings, the goal is to maximize connectivity of networks. In the most general setting, the goal is to maximize the number of nodes being connected and minimize the distance between these connected nodes. For example, we do not only want the species to reach a large number of habitat areas but also want them to be able to get there within a reasonable amount of time. The scalable algorithms for this setting combine a fast primal-dual algorithm and a sampling procedure. Three real-world problems from the areas of computational sustainability and emergency response are used to evaluate these algorithms. They are the barrier removal problem aimed to determine which instream barriers to remove to help fish access their historical habitats in a river network, the spatial conservation planning problem to determine which habitat units to set as conservation areas to encourage the dispersal of endangered species in a landscape, and the pre-disaster preparation problem aimed to minimize the disruption of emergency medical services by natural disasters. In these three problems, the developed algorithms are much more scalable than the existing state-of-the-arts and produce high-quality solutions