1,746 research outputs found
On the proof-theoretic strength of monotone induction in explicit mathematics
AbstractWe characterize the proof-theoretic strength of systems of explicit mathematics with a general principle (MID) asserting the existence of least fixed points for monotone inductive definitions, in terms of certain systems of analysis and set theory. In the case of analysis, these are systems which contain the Σ12-axiom of choice and Π12-comprehension for formulas without set parameters. In the case of set theory, these are systems containing the Kripke-Platek axioms for a recursively inaccessible universe together with the existence of a stable ordinal. In all cases, the exact strength depends on what forms of induction are admitted in the respective systems
Derived rules for predicative set theory: an application of sheaves
We show how one may establish proof-theoretic results for constructive
Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, such as the compactness rule for Cantor space and
the Bar Induction rule for Baire space, by constructing sheaf models and using
their preservation properties
Constructive set theory and Brouwerian principles
The paper furnishes realizability models of constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, CZF, which also validate Brouwerian principles such as the axiom of continuous choice (CC), the fan theorem (FT), and monotone bar induction (BIM), and thereby determines the proof-theoretic strength of CZF augmented by these principles. The upshot is that CZF+CC+FT possesses the same strength as CZF, or more precisely, that CZF+CC+FTis conservative over CZF for 02 statements of arithmetic, whereas the addition of a restricted version of bar induction to CZF (called decidable bar induction, BID) leads to greater proof-theoretic strength in that CZF+BID proves the consistency of CZF
An applicative theory for FPH
In this paper we introduce an applicative theory which characterizes the
polynomial hierarchy of time.Comment: In Proceedings CL&C 2010, arXiv:1101.520
Proof-irrelevant model of CC with predicative induction and judgmental equality
We present a set-theoretic, proof-irrelevant model for Calculus of
Constructions (CC) with predicative induction and judgmental equality in
Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with an axiom for countably many inaccessible
cardinals. We use Aczel's trace encoding which is universally defined for any
function type, regardless of being impredicative. Direct and concrete
interpretations of simultaneous induction and mutually recursive functions are
also provided by extending Dybjer's interpretations on the basis of Aczel's
rule sets. Our model can be regarded as a higher-order generalization of the
truth-table methods. We provide a relatively simple consistency proof of type
theory, which can be used as the basis for a theorem prover
How unprovable is Rabin's decidability theorem?
We study the strength of set-theoretic axioms needed to prove Rabin's theorem
on the decidability of the MSO theory of the infinite binary tree. We first
show that the complementation theorem for tree automata, which forms the
technical core of typical proofs of Rabin's theorem, is equivalent over the
moderately strong second-order arithmetic theory to a
determinacy principle implied by the positional determinacy of all parity games
and implying the determinacy of all Gale-Stewart games given by boolean
combinations of sets. It follows that complementation for
tree automata is provable from - but not -comprehension.
We then use results due to MedSalem-Tanaka, M\"ollerfeld and
Heinatsch-M\"ollerfeld to prove that over -comprehension, the
complementation theorem for tree automata, decidability of the MSO theory of
the infinite binary tree, positional determinacy of parity games and
determinacy of Gale-Stewart games are all
equivalent. Moreover, these statements are equivalent to the
-reflection principle for -comprehension. It follows in
particular that Rabin's decidability theorem is not provable in
-comprehension.Comment: 21 page
On the Hierarchy of Natural Theories
It is a well-known empirical phenomenon that natural axiomatic theories are
pre-well-ordered by consistency strength. Without a precise mathematical
definition of "natural," it is unclear how to study this phenomenon
mathematically. We will discuss the significance of this problem and survey
some strategies that have recently been developed for addressing it. These
strategies emphasize the role of reflection principles and ordinal analysis and
draw on analogies with research in recursion theory. We will conclude with a
discussion of open problems and directions for future research
- …