11,657 research outputs found

    Edge Dominating Sets and Vertex Covers

    Get PDF
    Bipartite graphs with equal edge domination number and maximum matching cardinality are characterized. These two parameters are used to develop bounds on the vertex cover and total vertex cover numbers of graphs and a resulting chain of vertex covering, edge domination, and matching parameters is explored. In addition, the total vertex cover number is compared to the total domination number of trees and grid graphs

    Total domination in inflated graphs

    Get PDF
    AbstractThe inflation GI of a graph G is obtained from G by replacing every vertex x of degree d(x) by a clique X=Kd(x) and each edge xy by an edge between two vertices of the corresponding cliques X and Y of GI in such a way that the edges of GI which come from the edges of G form a matching of GI. A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set, abbreviated TDS, of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to a vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a TDS of G is the total domination number γt(G) of G. In this paper, we investigate total domination in inflated graphs. We provide an upper bound on the total domination number of an inflated graph in terms of its order and matching number. We show that if G is a connected graph of order n≥2, then γt(GI)≥2n/3, and we characterize the graphs achieving equality in this bound. Further, if we restrict the minimum degree of G to be at least 2, then we show that γt(GI)≥n, with equality if and only if G has a perfect matching. If we increase the minimum degree requirement of G to be at least 3, then we show γt(GI)≥n, with equality if and only if every minimum TDS of GI is a perfect total dominating set of GI, where a perfect total dominating set is a TDS with the property that every vertex is adjacent to precisely one vertex of the set

    On the algorithmic complexity of twelve covering and independence parameters of graphs

    Get PDF
    The definitions of four previously studied parameters related to total coverings and total matchings of graphs can be restricted, thereby obtaining eight parameters related to covering and independence, each of which has been studied previously in some form. Here we survey briefly results concerning total coverings and total matchings of graphs, and consider the aforementioned 12 covering and independence parameters with regard to algorithmic complexity. We survey briefly known results for several graph classes, and obtain new NP-completeness results for the minimum total cover and maximum minimal total cover problems in planar graphs, the minimum maximal total matching problem in bipartite and chordal graphs, and the minimum independent dominating set problem in planar cubic graphs

    k-Tuple_Total_Domination_in_Inflated_Graphs

    Full text link
    The inflated graph GIG_{I} of a graph GG with n(G)n(G) vertices is obtained from GG by replacing every vertex of degree dd of GG by a clique, which is isomorph to the complete graph KdK_{d}, and each edge (xi,xj)(x_{i},x_{j}) of GG is replaced by an edge (u,v)(u,v) in such a way that u∈Xiu\in X_{i}, v∈Xjv\in X_{j}, and two different edges of GG are replaced by non-adjacent edges of GIG_{I}. For integer k≥1k\geq 1, the kk-tuple total domination number γ×k,t(G)\gamma_{\times k,t}(G) of GG is the minimum cardinality of a kk-tuple total dominating set of GG, which is a set of vertices in GG such that every vertex of GG is adjacent to at least kk vertices in it. For existing this number, must the minimum degree of GG is at least kk. Here, we study the kk-tuple total domination number in inflated graphs when k≥2k\geq 2. First we prove that n(G)k≤γ×k,t(GI)≤n(G)(k+1)−1n(G)k\leq \gamma_{\times k,t}(G_{I})\leq n(G)(k+1)-1, and then we characterize graphs GG that the kk-tuple total domination number number of GIG_I is n(G)kn(G)k or n(G)k+1n(G)k+1. Then we find bounds for this number in the inflated graph GIG_I, when GG has a cut-edge ee or cut-vertex vv, in terms on the kk-tuple total domination number of the inflated graphs of the components of G−eG-e or vv-components of G−vG-v, respectively. Finally, we calculate this number in the inflated graphs that have obtained by some of the known graphs

    The Disjoint Domination Game

    Full text link
    We introduce and study a Maker-Breaker type game in which the issue is to create or avoid two disjoint dominating sets in graphs without isolated vertices. We prove that the maker has a winning strategy on all connected graphs if the game is started by the breaker. This implies the same in the (2:1)(2:1) biased game also in the maker-start game. It remains open to characterize the maker-win graphs in the maker-start non-biased game, and to analyze the (a:b)(a:b) biased game for (a:b)≠(2:1)(a:b)\neq (2:1). For a more restricted variant of the non-biased game we prove that the maker can win on every graph without isolated vertices.Comment: 18 page
    • …
    corecore